27/07/2023
I’ve been following a case recently, my interest started due to the online abuse the accused received. I wanted to know, did they deserve to be spat at, assaulted, receive death threats and abuse from online trolls?
I don’t condone or defend anyone who purposely commits a crime.
So I decided to meet the accused and they gave me access to the evidence etc, they gave permission to use personal medical details, so I do have an insight which others may not.
The case in question is a breach of trust involving use of an ATM, but it raises many concerns not just the £5k difference between, the media report based on an already dismissed fraud charge and the actual amount. Presumably figures added for s***t value.
Theft of over £5k from a vulnerable person would mean a minimum of 5 years in prison, so that fact alone in itself proves my point to those who genuinely want to listen. My main replies to those who are FB experts are -
1. At the time of the offence, the accused was under the MH crisis team, had numerous police welfare visits and had 3 su***de attempts leading up to the offence, none of which were announced or a cry for help, they were intentional su***de attempts, they had suffered 3 TIA’s in 18 months, the last in June 22, they have a historic brain injury and severe mental health issues. Lost their home, marriage and business.
All these issues were just days and weeks prior to the offence, not a case of being caught then deciding to say they were ill. Medical reports clearly state cognitive issues, decision making, memory issues and drifting from hour to hour whilst keeping a business going.
2. The accused was cleared of fraud, they didn’t go on a shopping spree as media reported, but evidence has shown they didn’t have a key, numerous others had used the card and pin and both the accused card and claimants cards had transactions on them. The accused accepted responsibility for all issues due to memory issues at the time and had presumed they had somehow done this, then after reviewing the evidence that was added at the hearing they raised concerns of island based transactions & cashback whilst they were proven to be In the UK.
The offence ? The accused used a clients card to withdraw cash instead of his own during a 3 week period where the claimant admitted and confirmed there had been a genuine mix up of cards, both cards were green IOM bank and the pins were the same after an agreement to change the pin for ease of use, the situation had been exasperated by the accused being in an unfit state and all medical expert involvement stated the accused would have had no cognitive or decision making capacity at the time of the offence and state 100% the accused wouldn’t have known.
As soon as it became clear the accused approached the claimant and explained in full prior to Police involvement.
At the time they were medically and mentally unfit to operate and maintain a care company and the staff knew that.
Not exactly the sensationalised story’s being gossiped about or out in the other Manx media. They didn’t mug anyone, murder someone or burgle houses, they tried to keep there address out of the press to protect their family not themselves because of the constant abuse and threats, mostly from people who should know better.