22/03/2024
AGREED RETRENCHMENT PACKAGE
Below are my reflections on the meaning of an ‘Agreed Retrenchment Package’ as provided in the new Section 12C which repealed section 12(4a) of the principal Act.
Section 12C (3) provides that:
“An employer who intends to retrench any one or more employees or has negotiated with his or her employees a retrenchment package better than the minimum retrenchment package (hereafter called the “agreed retrenchment package”) shall…”
The wording of this section envisages two situations for an employer:
a situation where an employer intends to retrench any one or more employees; or
a situation where an employer has negotiated with his or her employees a retrenchment package better than a minimum retrenchment package [the ‘agreed retrenchment package’], presumably without the employer having or being required to give notice of intention of his intention to retrench.
How is the ‘Agreed Retrenchment Package’ arrived at?
According to this subsection an ‘agreed retrenchment package’ is a package above the ‘minimum retrenchment package’ but the section does not explain how the ‘agreed retrenchment package’ is arrived at, which is quite unhelpful.
Generally, a retrenchment agreement is secured by a process of negotiation/consultation between representatives of the employer and the employees to be retrenched or their representatives on the proposed retrenchments. See for example case of Mugabe and Others v Zvimba Rural District Council-SC 29/06
The agreement will be on the need for the retrenchment, as described in the annexure detailing the reasons for retrenching the listed employees and the terms and conditions of the retrenchment which cover the size of package and payment terms etc.
Each party must be able to tender documentary evidence as proof of agreement having been reached on the need to retrench and the terms and conditions of the retrenchment which include size of package and its payment.
Existence of a signed document detailing among other things, the size of package and date of retrenchment is prima facie evidence of the existence of an agreement on the retrenchment package between the parties, as contemplated under section 12C(3) of the Act.
While the drafters refer to a retrenchment package that is better than the ‘minimum retrenchment’ as an ‘agreed retrenchment package’ it is my humble view that, notwithstanding its size, every retrenchment package is a result of negotiation and agreement including the undefined and so-called ‘minimum retrenchment package’ between the employer and the employees concerned or their representatives.
An employer cannot impose on the employees a retrenchment package.
It is my humble submission that even a ‘minimum retrenchment package’ [which is not specified in the amendment Act], must also be negotiated and agreed between the employer and the employee(s) to be retrenched or their representatives, and employees concerned may reject the offer to be paid the ’minimum retrenchment package’, even if it was defined/specified, if they believe that the employer has capacity to pay more.
Important: What is referred to as ‘agreed retrenchment package’ is section 12C (3) is referred in other subsections as ‘enhanced retrenchment package’. See definition of ‘Capacity to pay’ under section 12C(1).
Key Takeaways
Every retrenchment must be predicated on the employer terminating employment on any one or more of the retrenchment grounds specified in the Act (Interpretation section 2) as read together with section 12C (1), and an employer cannot negotiate and agree on a retrenchment package with the affected employees or their representatives without making his intention to retrench known, and his intention can only be known by issuing a notice to retrench as provided under section 12C (3)(a).
Any other agreement between an employer and employee(s) to terminate employment and to pay a package/terminal benefits can only be appropriately pigeonholed and rightfully be described as mutual termination and not a retrenchment.
A retrenchment agreement is between the employer and the affected employees or their representatives and no one else.
Please note that while a retrenchment agreement is between an employer and the affected employees or their representatives, an employer who has negotiated and agreed on a retrenchment package with the employees concerned or their representatives must notify the Retrenchment Board and the Board shall issue to the employer a certificate (hereinafter called a “notification certificate”) if it is satisfied that the agreed retrenchment package is indeed better than the minimum retrenchment package. It stands to reason that the Retrenchment Board will not issue the ‘notification certificate’ if it is not satisfied that the agreed retrenchment package is indeed better than the ‘minimum retrenchment package’.
Having made these reflections it is suggested that there is urgent need for further refinement, by way of legislative amendment to the wording and formulation of the current section 12C to address these glaring omissions and shortcomings noted in this piece and elsewhere in section 12C and not discussed in this piece in order to make it more user-friendly.
Until next time
I Machingambi
For more on this subscribe to our Labour and Employment Law for Practitioners Handbook 2023 by visiting our online shop at www.elr.co.zw
If you are still unsure Elegant Legal Resources will be your knowledge partner helping you manage retrenchments and other workplace changes correctly and you can contact the author on WhatsApp number 0772 979 612.
Coming soon is a simple, plain-English and free Tax Law Bulletin weekly e-letter. The purpose is to keep our valued readers completely up to date with developments in the fast-changing world of tax law, and offer you practical and actionable tips on the law.