04/03/2025
*The Struggle for Survival: Beitbridge’s Informal Concrete Miners and Landowners at Odds*
By Mmeli Mbedzi
In the rapidly developing town of Beitbridge, Zimbabwe, an informal yet critical industry thrives on the margins of legality and survival. Manual stone miners—armed with hammers and sheer determination—extract concrete material for construction, a backbreaking task that sustains their livelihoods. However, these activities are not without controversy. Conflicts frequently arise between the miners and landowners who claim the right to the land from which the stones are sourced. This article critically examines the socio-economic factors driving this informal mining, the legal and ethical dilemmas involved, and possible solutions to mitigate the growing tensions.
For many in Beitbridge, formal employment opportunities remain scarce, pushing individuals to seek alternative means of survival. Mining concrete manually is one such means, requiring little more than physical effort and rudimentary tools. These miners, often from vulnerable backgrounds, see the extraction of stones as a lifeline, enabling them to provide for their families in an otherwise unforgiving economic environment.
However, this work is grueling and hazardous. Miners expose themselves to injuries from flying rock shards, the risk of collapsing earth, and prolonged exposure to dust, which can cause respiratory issues. Despite these dangers, the financial necessity outweighs the risks, as demand for construction materials remains high in Beitbridge’s developing areas.
The main point of contention is land ownership and resource control. Many of the areas where these miners extract stones belong to individuals who have purchased stands for future development. When miners locate desirable stone deposits on these properties, they often begin extraction without the landowner’s consent. This intrusion is seen as trespassing, leading to confrontations between miners and stand owners.
For landowners, the unauthorized removal of stones is more than just theft—it disrupts construction plans and can devalue the property. Some landowners argue that the uncontrolled extraction creates unstable land conditions, increasing risks of erosion or foundation instability when they eventually build structures.
On the other hand, miners often claim that the stones are a natural resource that should be accessible to anyone willing to extract them. Some assert that they are simply trying to earn a living in an economy that offers them few alternatives.
The legal landscape surrounding informal mining in Beitbridge remains murky. While property rights are protected under Zimbabwean law, enforcement is often inconsistent, especially in rural and peri-urban areas. Law enforcement agencies struggle to regulate these mining activities, leading to a scenario where disputes are resolved through informal negotiations—or, at times, violent confrontations.
Ethically, the situation presents a dilemma: should economic desperation justify the exploitation of another person’s property? Or should landowners, who may not immediately develop their stands, accommodate those struggling to make a living? These questions remain central to the debate and demand nuanced, sustainable solutions.
To address these conflicts, stakeholders—including local authorities, landowners, and miners—must seek a balanced approach that considers both economic survival and property rights. Some possible solutions include:
1. Formalizing Small-Scale Mining
Local authorities could introduce a licensing system for manual miners, ensuring that their activities are regulated and conducted in designated areas. This would reduce land disputes while offering miners a legal means of earning a livelihood.
2. Community Resource Sharing Agreements
Landowners and miners could enter negotiated agreements where stone extraction is permitted under certain conditions. This could include designated time frames, extraction limits, and rehabilitation plans for the land post-mining.
3. Alternative Employment Opportunities
The government and private sector should explore alternative job opportunities for those engaged in manual mining. Investing in vocational training programs could equip miners with skills in construction, carpentry, or brick-making, reducing their dependence on stone extraction.
4. Law Enforcement and Mediation Mechanisms
Strengthening law enforcement while simultaneously promoting mediation mechanisms would help prevent conflicts from escalating. Establishing a local dispute resolution committee could provide a platform for miners and landowners to address grievances amicably.
The conflict between informal concrete miners and landowners in Beitbridge is a reflection of broader economic hardships and unregulated urban development. While landowners have the legal right to their property, the struggles of informal miners cannot be ignored. A balanced approach—rooted in legal reforms, community cooperation, and economic diversification—is essential to prevent further disputes while ensuring that Beitbridge’s growth benefits all its residents.
Photo Credit:
Empire, the state of mind.
