20/04/2024
In this post, I attribute to the AU the argument that consensus decision-making acts as a veil shielding member states from accountability. It functions as a de facto veto without consequences and a tool used by domestic audiences to justify complacency in unpopular decisions. I contend that because the AU predominantly avoids voting mechanisms, it should adopt a weighted voting system. This system would not only enhance transparency and accountability but also incentivize funding for the AU. If you have additional insights or a differing viewpoint, please feel free to share.
1. Introduction Countries create international organisations (IOs) to address complex issues that transcend national boundaries and require collective action to achieve results that individual states cannot achieve alone. IOs offer a structured forum where states can pool their resources, expertise,...
