🇺🇸 NEW ANALYSIS: The Fiscal Impact of the Harris and Trump Campaign Plans🇺🇸
Our comprehensive analysis breaks down the presidential candidates' tax and spending plans and what they would mean for the national debt.
Read the full analysis here: https://crfb.org/papers/fiscal-impact-harris-and-trump-campaign-plans
Under our central estimate, we find:
➡️ Vice President Harris would add $3.50 trillion to the projected debt through FY 2035
➡️ President Trump would add $7.50 trillion to the projected debt through FY 2035
As in past election years, this analysis presents high- and low-cost estimates for each proposal along with our central estimates.
Under our low-cost estimate, we find the Harris plan would be roughly deficit neutral, while the Trump plan would increase the debt by $1.45 trillion.
Under our high-cost estimate, we find the Harris plan would increase debt by $8.10 trillion, while the Trump plan would increase debt by $15.15 trillion.
***This report is a product of our US Budget Watch 2024 project designed to educate the public on the fiscal impact of presidential candidates' proposals and platforms. We do not support or oppose any candidate for public office.***
🇺🇸 Trump and Biden: The National Debt 🇺🇸
The national debt is on course to reach a record share of the economy under the next presidential administration, due in part to policies approved by Presidents Trump and Biden during their time in office.
In new analysis from our US Budget Watch project, we find:
➡️ President Trump approved $8.4 trillion of new ten-year borrowing during his full term in office, or $4.8 trillion excluding the CARES Act and other COVID relief.
➡️ President Biden, in his first three years and five months in office, approved $4.3 trillion of new ten-year borrowing, or $2.2 trillion excluding the American Rescue Plan.
Read the full analysis, including breakdowns for both President Trump and President Biden along with our methodology, on our website at https://www.crfb.org/papers/trump-and-biden-national-debt
➡️ Addressing the national debt will take tough choices. What choices would you make?
Our interactive Debt Fixer tool allows you to choose your budgeting priorities and see how they affect our debt trajectory.
➡️ Give it a try + share your results: https://crfb.org/debtfixer
What’s New in the 2022 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports?
The Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds face insolvency in the next decade-and-a-half. Please join us for a virtual event to discuss the trust funds’ status. We will also hear from a panel of policy experts who will discuss the trust funds and some potential solvency-improving policy reforms. The panelists will take audience questions as well.
Is it Worth It?
💵📈At a scale of billions, it becomes hard to visualize the cost of government policies. But what about the cost per person? Per taxpayer? Per household?
Look at the numbers and decide for yourself: Is It Worth It? http://fixthedebtnow.org/is-it-worth-it/.
Fiscal Policy and Climate Change
The United States faces a number of generational challenges, including high and rising national debt and the increasing effects of climate change. The Build Back Better agenda reflects one approach to address climate change through new spending and tax breaks. In addition to or in place of this approach, policymakers could consider carbon pricing as a means to reduce carbon emissions.
Fiscal Solutions to Climate Change, is a virtual event that will include a panel of experts and discussion with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI). The event will examine what role fiscal policy can play in mitigating climate change and what it would mean for the economy and the budget.
A carbon tax is an Earth Day win-win.
💡On this Earth Day, we ask ourselves: how can we help save the planet🌎 and save our budget💰 at the same time? The solution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and paying for new climate investments (+more!) might just be a carbon tax.
Learn more: https://crfb.org/papers/can-carbon-tax-fund-climate-investments.
Fiscal Considerations for the Future of Telehealth
🚨🥼NEW PAPER📞🚨 With the growth of telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, we carefully look at the costs and potential risks of expanded usage – and urge Congress to do the same when designing any new policies.
➡️ Read our new analysis: https://crfb.org/papers/fiscal-considerations-future-telehealth.
➡️ Both the Congressional Budget Office and the Government Accountability Office have projected that the increased use of telehealth services will add to overall health care costs; permanent expansion could cost Medicare $𝟮𝟱 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 over ten years, with the potential for even greater costs in the federal and private sectors.
🩺💵 While telehealth can increase access to care, it is also likely to drive up health care costs.
We suggest attention to the following challenges related to the federal budget, and to national health expenditures: ⤵️
1️⃣ The expansion of telehealth services runs the risk of over-utilization;
2️⃣ Payment incentives, especially with reimbursement at parity with in-person care, might lead to more costly care;
3️⃣ Guardrails must be put in place to discover and prevent sources of fraud and abuse.
➡️ Telehealth has become an essential tool for the delivery of health care to millions, but the cost for the federal government must be taken seriously.
Congress should take the time to develop comprehensive + sound legislation improving accessibility while providing safeguards.
FSOTN – not just a Washington conversation.
The U.S. is $30 trillion in debt. The budget has not been anywhere near balanced in 20 years. CRFB is partnering with 14 local and national organizations calling for an annual public audit of the nation's fiscal health, the Fiscal State of the Nation Coalition.
Learn more about our effort and urge Congress to take action by visiting https://crfb.org/press-releases/coalition-calls-attention-lack-fiscal-responsibility.