Palestine/Israel Review

01/24/2025

PIR's Book Review Editor, Ian Lustick, just published a new article in IJMES. Read it here:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-middle-east-studies/article/israel-annexation-and-sovereignty-within-the-green-line-and-across-it/67CA56433697F023BE3307E41F4AF74E?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=bookmark

01/24/2025

We are now on the other social media app, where the sky is blue.
Follow us:

Palestine/Israel Review is an open-access journal that provides a platform for exchanging knowledge, scholarship, and ideas among scholars who share the relational, integrative, and holistic approach to the study of Palestine/Israel.

01/16/2025

Call for Submissions for a special issue, “From Nakba to Genocide,” in Palestine/Israel Review, edited by the two prominent guest editors Dr. Maha Nassar and Dr. Raz Segal

With news of a ceasefire agreement, Israel’s 15-month-long genocide in Gaza warrants greater scrutiny. Official UN figures put the number of Palestinians that Israel has killed so far above 46,000. The actual number is likely far higher—a recent article in The Lancet argues that Israel had killed over 64,000 Palestinians by the end of June 2024, and 99 doctors and other healthcare workers who have worked in Gaza since October 2023 wrote in a letter to US President Biden in October 2024 that Israel may have killed over 120,000 Palestinians. Israeli attacks have also injured more than 110,000 people and have forcibly displaced multiple times nearly all 2.3 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Even if the ceasefire leads to the end of Israel’s genocide, Palestinians in Gaza will continue to die as a result of the atrocious conditions that Israel has intentionally created, including starvation policies, and the unprecedented destruction means that it will take decades to remove the rubble and rebuild.
Israel has crossed all red lines in its genocidal assault on Gaza: it has killed over 16,000 children; destroyed most of the hospitals; demolished all the universities and most of the schools. More journalists, aid workers, and health care personnel have been killed than in any other war or state violence in the 21st century. All this is supported by explicit Israeli political, media, and social discourses that celebrate genocide, as evidenced by the thousands of mass atrocity videos that Israeli soldiers and officers in Gaza have proudly uploaded to social media.

This livestreamed genocide has not led most Western states, primarily the US, to reconsider their unconditional military and diplomatic support for Israel. Yet people around the world have responded to this Israeli-Western genocide through mass demonstrations, hundreds of pro-Palestine campus encampments, and a significant increase in BDS initiatives. It is no accident that a Global South state, South Africa, brought the charge of genocide against Israel in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in December 2023, and the International Criminal Court (ICC) finally issued arrest warrants in November 2024 against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

The Palestine/Israel Review’s special issue, “From Nakba to Genocide,” planned for late 2025 or early 2026, will include research articles (6,000-7,000 words), shorter reflection pieces (approx. 3,000 words, which may include discussions of visual art or other creative works), and poetry. It will address the incessantly accumulating evidence for Israel’s “genocide as colonial erasure,” situating it within the broader history of the 1948 Nakba and the 76-year-old ongoing Nakba of Israeli settler-colonial violence against Palestinians. This includes Israel’s military regime over Palestinian citizens until 1966; the Israeli military occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip after 1967; the systematic “unchilding” of Palestinian children; the mass imprisonment and torture of Palestinians; the system of apartheid; and the 17-year-long siege on the Gaza Strip—the longest in modern history.

We seek articles that engage with international law, the legal struggle to stop Israel’s genocide in Gaza, and the urgency of genocide prevention in relation to the escalating Israeli settler-colonial violence in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and against Palestinian citizens of Israel. Other topics we seek to address include: Nakba and genocide denial; firsthand accounts by Palestinians;
resistance against Israeli settler colonialism (including through international solidarity efforts); and sumud, including the persistence of Palestinian artistic expression and education in Palestine and beyond in the face of unprecedented cultural destruction and scholasticide. We are particularly interested in articles and poems that center the voices, knowledge, and perspectives of Palestinians. Inspired by Palestinian physician and poet Fady Joudah’s argument that “Palestine will be liberated in Arabic,” the co-editors of the volume will publish some of the articles and poems in both English and Arabic.

Please send abstracts (approx. 350 words) and short bios (approx. 200 words) for research articles and reflections pieces or drafts of poems in Arabic, English, or other languages (including translated pieces) to the co-editors of the special issue: Dr. Maha Nassar ([email protected]) and Dr. Raz Segal ([email protected]).

Abstracts are due in Feb 15, and final submissions on May 15.

12/22/2024

The Abbasi Program in Islamic Studies and the Middle Eastern Studies Forum at Stanford Global Studies invite qualified candidates to apply for the inaugural Palestinian Studies Postdoctoral Fellowship.

This fellowship is for a two-year term, beginning in Fall 2025, with the possibility of a third-year extension. The inaugural Palestinian Studies Fellow will be hosted by one of the following units of Stanford University: the Department of Anthropology, the Department of History, the Division of Literatures, Cultures, and Languages (DLCL), or the Department of Political Science. We welcome applications from scholars in the disciplines represented by these units, and whose work promises to make significant contributions to Palestinian studies.
Applicants must have been awarded their PhD by August 31, 2025 and may not be more than three years beyond receipt of their doctoral degree at the start of the fellowship.

The postdoctoral scholar will teach one course each year in their host department: an undergraduate-level course in the first year, a graduate-level course in the second year, and a course of their choice in the third year (if extended). Fellows are required to reside in the Stanford area during the appointment period and expected to contribute to the intellectual community and academic programming of their host department, the Abbasi Program, and other relevant units.

The fellowship includes a funding package with an annual amount ranging from $85,000 to $95,000 for 2025–2026, eligibility for employee benefits, a research account of $6,000 per year, and a one-time funding of $9,000 to offset moving expenses and new equipment purchases. The pay offered to the selected candidate will be determined based on factors including (but not limited to) the qualifications of the selected candidate, budget availability, and internal equity.

Application Process: The application deadline for the 2025-2026 academic year is Friday, January 31, 2025, 11:59 p.m. PST.
To apply, candidates must create an account on Slideroom, the application platform used by the Abbasi Program in Islamic Studies, and upload the following materials in PDF format:
1. Cover letter
2. Curriculum Vitae (CV)
3. Research statement (up to two single-spaced pages)
4. Writing sample (dissertation chapter or other paper, up to 30 double-spaced pages)
5. Proposed undergraduate syllabus
6. Two letters of recommendation, which must be uploaded directly by recommenders to Slideroom.

https://islamicstudies.stanford.edu/opportunities/palestinian-studies-postdoctoral-fellowship

11/01/2024

Ian Lustick, a PIR Editorial Board member, did an interview recently with the Andrea Mitchell Center at the University of Pennsylvania. It focuses on the reinforcing afflictions of McCarthyist vigilantism by so-called pro-Israel advocates and rising anti-Semitism. He also discusses tensions within the Biden administration over its disastrous and cowardly policies toward the forever war in Gaza.

Check it out in this link:
https://mitchellcenter.libsyn.com/episode-65-ian-lustick-on-israel-gaza-and-the-united-states

10/13/2024

Tomorrow!

The Department of History and Palestine/Israel Review invite the public to Prof. Rashid Khalidi's presentation on October 14 at 5:30 pm. The event is in person and will not be recorded.

10/10/2024

NEW ARTICLE ALERT: Eli Osheroff, "Settling a State—Settling for a State: Reinterpreting One Hundred Years of Zionist–Arab Relations"

In recent years, a more coherent, widespread critique of Zionism as a form of settler colonialism has developed in Western academia. Despite its critical assumptions regarding Zionism, this conversation has yet to influence one of the core images of the Zionist-Arab encounter, mainly that of Palestinian intransigence versus Zionist political flexibility. According to this stereotypical image, these contrasting political characteristics played a central role in allowing a Jewish state to be established in a large part of historical Palestine, while an Arab one did not materialize. By examining political encounters between Zionists and Palestinians over the course of more than a hundred years, this article shows that, in fact, Palestinian leadership and Palestinians generally were willing to settle for an internationally recognized Arab-Palestinian state at key points. By contrast, Zionists usually exhibited greater ambivalence toward the idea of a recognized state, preferring to settle for something else, mainly expansionism. By adopting a counterintuitive approach, this article seeks to contrast the colonial dimension of Zionism with the more flexible and ultimately more state-and norm-oriented quality of Palestinian nationalism.

Read the full article here: https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/pir/article/doi/10.5325/pir.1.2.0005/390093/Settling-a-State-Settling-for-a-State

10/08/2024

Just published: "Who Gets to Talk When “WE” Talk about Israel: An Intersectional Meditation on Inclusivity."

Occasioned by a recent article by Jill Jacobs criticizing the underrepresentation of women in American Jewish debate about Israel and by a recently implemented policy by the Association for Jewish Studies (AJS) requiring gender diversity on panels at the association’s annual conference, this article explores the space where knowledge production, rhetorics of inclusivity, and disciplinary organization intersect: Despite its policies of inclusion, is the AJS able to avoid exercising a Jewish supremacy in its Israel/Palestine-oriented knowledge practices?

Read the full article here: https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/pir/article/doi/10.5325/pir.2.2.0001/391388/Who-Gets-to-Talk-When-WE-Talk-about-Israel-An

10/07/2024

The second article from the special issue on Haifa: Maayan Hilel's "Screening Identity: Palestinian National Culture and Intercommunal Dynamics in Haifa's Cinematic Landscape."

Focusing on the vibrant cinema scene in Haifa during the Mandate period, this article looks into the city’s Palestinian cultural history and the dialectic intercommunal relations between Jews and Arabs. It analyzes the persistent struggle of Haifa’s Palestinian community to establish a new Arab-owned cinema as part of a broader effort to develop a Palestinian national culture. The article demonstrates how Palestinian entrepreneurs sought to use cinema as an essential means in the formation of a distinct national culture and identity in the context of the escalating national conflict. At the same time, it highlights how cinemas effectively functioned as a shared space of daily intercommunal encounters and cultural collaboration between ordinary Arabs and Jews in Haifa.

Read the full article:
https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/pir/article/doi/10.5325/pir.2.1.0002/391393/Screening-Identity-Palestinian-National-Culture

10/06/2024

The Department of History and Palestine/Israel Review invite the public to Prof. Rashid Khalidi's presentation on October 14 at 5:30 pm. The event is in person and will not be recorded.

10/06/2024

Just out with Palestine/Israel Review and a part of a forthcoming issue about Haifa:

In this article, Amal Jamal explores the extent to which describing Haifa as an oasis of coexistence is truth or myth. The discourse of the city’s municipal officials and public figures is analyzed to verify their experiences and perceptions of the city’s identity, especially the rising Palestinian urbanism, the allocation of municipal resources to permit equality in individual and communal life, and the institutional division of labor to allow for just representation and participation. This study is framed within theoretical models of tolerance, arguing that Haifa is characterized by an asymmetric tolerance formula, which is enabled by the unequal political strength of the Jewish and Arab elites of the city. To illustrate this argument, a thematic analysis of twenty-five in-depth interviews with leading city figures is introduced. The themes emerging from the interviews not only describe how tolerance is manifested but also explore its positive normative potentials, translated into the ability to challenge the marginalization that individuals or groups experience and support their political struggle for equality, on the one hand, and fostering and managing inequalities, regulating prejudice and subordination, and masking domination and exclusion, on the other.
Read the full article here:
https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/pir/article/doi/10.5325/pir.2.1.0001/391392/The-Cunning-Reason-of-Liberal-In-Tolerance

06/27/2024

The English version of Hillel Cohen's book "Enemies, a Love Story: On Mizrahi Jews, Palestinian Arabs, and Ashkenazi Jews from the Rise of Zionism to the Present" will be published by Penn State University Press. Meanwhile, I recommend reading Smadar Lavie's review essay about this book, published in issue 1.2 of Palestine/Israel Review. In this essay, Smadar uses Cohen's book as a point of departure for examining Mizrahi-Palestinian relationships through the optics of decolonial feminist theory (link in the first comment).

06/27/2024

Soon in issue 1.2

04/25/2024

While more countries recognize the State of Palestine, PIR editor, Sonia Boulos, co-authored an article with Xavier Abu Eid, in which they analyze the importance of this development and explain the conditions under which this could lead to positive outcomes (link in first comment).

04/08/2024

New in Palestine/Israel Review: Walid Habbas explores the Palestinian economic agency in overcoming the post-2005 spatial restrictions imposed by the illegal Israeli occupation in the West Bank with the aim of controlling Palestinians and facilitating settler expansion. As a result, the routing of Palestinian commercial freight through the segregation wall has escalated logistics costs, while settlement expansion in Area C has further impeded mobility between Palestinian self-rule areas. Using data from observations, interviews, and documentary sources, the study focuses on Palestinian furniture exports to Israel. It examines how Palestinians have leveraged colonial spatial variations to their advantage by forming partnerships with Israelis to export products (link in first comment).

04/07/2024

Call for papers for a Palestine/Israel Review special issue on "Imagining Palestine-Israel."

Guest Editors: Maurice Ebileeni and Shachar Pinsker.
In thinking about Palestine-Israel, to imagine is both problematic and crucial insofar as imagination might offer different and new horizons and futures, or further preserve the political impasse as well as diverge from the atrocities of the present into even more dangerous territories (as recent events are rendering disturbingly visible). The land continues to be the locus for religious imagination for the various monotheistic religions while also presenting the stage for competing utopic/dystopic visions, bringing into collision the Zionist myth of “a land without a people” and the call for “the greater Israel” with the Palestinian call for a liberated nation “from the river to the sea.” Moreover, today’s increasingly polarizing effects of social media are fundamentally changing our capacity for imagination, significantly amplifying the violent nature of the Palestinian-Israeli deadlock over diligent attempts at critical and creative imagination.

This co-edited special issue of the open-access journal Palestine/Israel Review aims to identify and analyze different efforts at imagining Palestine-Israel in cultural texts across languages, borders, and genres. We invite scholars to contribute original articles that engage with different forms of texts and sources, from literary texts (poems, stories, novels, plays) to media (journalism, films, digital media, artworks etc.) by scholars from a variety of disciplines. Articles can be on topics such as diasporic and exilic imagination of territory, deterritorialization and time, utopian/dystopian/futuristic imaginings of homeland or alternative variations of homelands and homes, as well as of specific spaces and the role of memory and forgetfulness in Palestine-Israel. The scope of this special issue is global and encourages contributions that examine a range of literary and cultural products from the nineteenth to the twenty-first centuries in Hebrew and Arabic, as well as in a variety of other languages.

Please send a title, a 500 words abstract, and a short bio to Maurice Ebileeni ([email protected]) and Shachar Pinsker ([email protected]) by April 30, 2024.

More details: https://psupress.org/journals/jnls_PIR.html

03/30/2024

On March 30, Palestinians commemorate Land Day, a day that has become a symbol of the struggle of Palestinians against land dispossession and injustice. In his biography of Tawfiq Zayyad, Tamir Sorek, PIR's co-editor, talks about the role of Zayyad in the adoption of the historic decision of 1976 on the part of the Palestinian political leadership in Israel to organize a general strike against the government's plan to expropriate thousands of dunams of Palestinian lands. The marches that were organized in Arab towns were met by the violent response of the security forces, leading to the killing of six unarmed Palestinian citizens of Israel, the injury of tens of protestors, and the arrest of hundreds. Link in the comments