
02/17/2025
Occam's Flaws) simple conclusions are dependent on easy-to-see info = we're never able to see all the info = Is simple correct? Or better said, is simple correct correct? As in, answers can be both simple and correct if you leave out all the complex and channeling variables.
No equation ever used in all of physics, in all of history, included an accurate measure for things we don't know. Kicker: we know that we don't know (it all) = what do we actually accurately know?
Spoiler: I'm tip-toeing around a deep rabbit hole. This rabbit hole (42) is a personal journey my readers will need to take on their own if they want to go.
Starting point: Every year we learn stuff we didn't know the year before. What conclusions of today are accurate tomorrow and then work backward from that future state, back to the present state = why are so many people confident?
Science today and all of human history yesterday suggest they shouldn't be.