12/11/2024
In 2018, after the Woolsey Fire, the Graphic reported on the origins of Pepperdine’s Stay-in-Place (shelter-in-place) policy and why the university house students instead of evacuating them:
The Woolsey Fire burned 96,949 acres, destroyed approximately 1500 structures, and became one of the most destructive and costliest fires in Southern California. However, as many communities were evacuated, students at Pepperdine University sheltered-in-place on campus, an action that drew a lot of criticism to the university’s fire response.
The entire city of Malibu was under mandatory evacuation beginning in the early morning of Friday Nov. 9th. When residents were allowed to return to their homes many found nothing left. In accordance with a 33 year-long shelter-in-place policy, students and faculty sought refuge at Pepperdine that same night, as flames advanced on and eventually breached campus borders. In the end, no lives were lost or structural damage done to the Malibu campus. However, as the fire surrounded campus and flames came closer to students, controversy over Pepperdine’s shelter in-place policy ignited and caused many to question the validity and motives behind the policy.
“We first used shelter in-place in the 1993 fire,” then-President Andrew K. Benton said. “And fortunately, prior to that fire, we had worked our plans with the county fire department and they approved those plans. And so we never deviated from it. And over all the … five fires that we sheltered in-place, we’ve never had anyone hurt.”
https://pepperdine-graphic.com/pepperdine-shelter-in-place-policy-raises-questions/