Question Antiquity

Question Antiquity Theoretical Historian & Author ⚡️
Personal: Danny Silletti⚡️
New Jersey Native ⚡️

President John F. Kennedy maintained a complex relationship with Israel and its leaders, especially David Ben‑Gurion. He...
10/08/2025

President John F. Kennedy maintained a complex relationship with Israel and its leaders, especially David Ben‑Gurion. He supported Israel as a strategic ally but was deeply concerned about nuclear proliferation. Kennedy pressed Israel to allow inspections of the Dimona nuclear facility and sought assurances it would not produce weapons, while Ben‑Gurion saw nuclear capability as essential for Israel’s security. Their 1963 correspondence reflects a negotiation between Israel’s needs and Kennedy’s insistence on transparency and U.S. nonproliferation goals. After Kennedy’s assassination, these tensions — inspections, nuclear restrictions, and scrutiny over Israel’s ambitions — largely vanished, allowing Israel to advance its goals with far less pressure.

Kennedy’s administration also scrutinized the American Zionist Council (AZC), predecessor to AIPAC. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy ordered the AZC to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) due to funding and coordination with the Jewish Agency in Israel, aiming to provide transparency and oversight. The AZC resisted, refusing to comply with U.S. law, highlighting tensions between Washington’s legal requirements and pro-Israel lobbying. While Kennedy supported strong U.S.-Israel relations, he insisted lobbying groups with foreign connections operate under clear legal frameworks. After his death, these pressures were dropped, and the AZC’s influence grew in subsequent years.

Kennedy also distrusted the CIA, shaping his approach to Israel and broader foreign policy. Early missteps like the Bay of Pigs invasion showed the agency could act independently of presidential oversight. Intelligence reports suggested Israel might be developing nuclear weapons, reinforcing Kennedy’s insistence on inspections and cautioning against unchecked operations. He sought to engage Israel constructively but demanded transparency while remaining skeptical of intelligence sources. Conveniently, after his assassination, these pressures largely disappeared, allowing Israel’s strategic ambitions and certain intelligence dynamics — including the unresolved FARA compliance issue — to continue with far less scrutiny.

Follow Question Antiquity for more❕

In the days leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination, leaked messages surfaced, allegedly showing Kirk expressing frus...
10/08/2025

In the days leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination, leaked messages surfaced, allegedly showing Kirk expressing frustration over losing a significant donor due to his refusal to disinvite Tucker Carlson from a Turning Point USA event. These messages, confirmed as authentic by Turning Point USA, suggest that Kirk was under pressure from influential donors to align with their pro-Israel stance. Believers in the Mossad involvement theory interpret these communications as evidence of Kirk’s resistance to external political influence, which they argue could have made him a target for those seeking to maintain control over political narratives.

Further fueling these suspicions, reports emerged of a meeting involving billionaire investor Bill Ackman, who is known for his strong pro-Israel views. Candace Owens alleged that this meeting was an “intervention” aimed at pressuring Kirk to reaffirm his support for Israel. While Ackman denied these allegations, the timing and nature of the meeting, coupled with Kirk’s subsequent assassination, have led some to speculate about the involvement of intelligence agencies in orchestrating the event.

The official narrative attributes Kirk’s death to a lone gunman, Tyler Robinson, who has been arrested and charged with aggravated murder. However, believers in the Mossad theory argue that the precision of the assassination and the political context suggest a more complex orchestration. They point to the sniper-style shooting and the rapid suppression of certain information as indicative of a covert operation, possibly linked to foreign intelligence agencies aiming to eliminate a dissenting voice within the pro-Israel community.

In November 1910, seven powerful bankers and policymakers secretly traveled by private railcar to Jekyll Island, a seclu...
10/07/2025

In November 1910, seven powerful bankers and policymakers secretly traveled by private railcar to Jekyll Island, a secluded Georgia resort owned by J.P. Morgan’s associates. The meeting was organized by Senator Nelson Aldrich, head of the National Monetary Commission, and A. Piatt Andrew, the Commission’s staff director. Participants included Paul Warburg (Kuhn, Loeb & Co.), Frank Vanderlip (National City Bank), Henry P. Davison and Charles Norton (representing J.P. Morgan), and Benjamin Strong (Bankers Trust). They traveled under first names only, avoided the press, and kept their purpose secret because central banking was politically controversial.

Over several days, the group drafted the “Aldrich Plan,” proposing a privately controlled reserve system with regional banks and a central board to act as lender of last resort and stabilize the currency. The plan outlined rediscounting commercial paper and pooling reserves to prevent panics. While Congress did not adopt it wholesale, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 reflected much of their blueprint, establishing 12 regional Reserve Banks under a central Board—a compromise between the Aldrich Plan and congressional demands.

Critics then and since have noted that the secretive meeting and heavy banker influence gave Wall Street significant sway over the nation’s money supply. Supporters argue that the expertise of these men was crucial to ending the cycle of panics that plagued the U.S. economy in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Regardless, Jekyll Island marked a pivotal moment in American financial history: a confidential drafting that directly shaped the creation of the modern Federal Reserve.

10/06/2025

The night of October 1, 2017, at the Route 91 Harvest Festival was described by witnesses not as a lone-gunman event but as a coordinated military-style assault across the Las Vegas Strip. 911 calls from the Bellagio, Luxor, Aria, Tropicana, and Caesars Palace reported simultaneous active shooters on rooftops, in hallways, and on the ground near the concert—all within the same half hour. These reports, paired with recordings capturing overlapping bursts and different acoustic signatures, are cited as proof that several teams were firing in unison, not one man in a suite.

Helicopter flight data shows multiple aircraft circling above the concert, believed to be equipped with belt-fed machine guns—possibly M240 SAWs—producing the continuous automatic fire that couldn’t have come from semi-automatic rifles. Shooters inside and around Mandalay Bay may have been diversions, while the real assault came from above and coordinated ground teams near the stage. Witnesses also reported muzzle flashes and men in tactical gear moving between barricades. Many believe the chaos masked a failed high-level arms deal intended to assassinate a Saudi royal allegedly occupying the top five floors of Mandalay Bay, with the massacre serving as cover for the botched operation.

Further suspicion arose when police body-cam footage from Paddock’s suite appeared to show no broken windows—contradicting reports that two were shattered and used for firing—casting doubt on whether shots came from his room at all. Combined with the alleged Saudi link and multiple-shooter accounts, the event is viewed by many as a complex, coordinated operation. The same sheriff who led the Las Vegas investigation later oversaw the Lahaina fire response, which many see as evidence of a recurring pattern—authorities managing narratives, sealing reports, and suppressing footage to conceal the truth.

Donald Trump, the silver-tongued charlatan, became the perfect Trojan Horse for plunging America into authoritarian deca...
10/05/2025

Donald Trump, the silver-tongued charlatan, became the perfect Trojan Horse for plunging America into authoritarian decay—his bombast concealing the agendas of globalist puppeteers working in the shadows. With unwavering loyalty to foreign powers, especially those wrapped in Israeli nationalism, he rallied millions under false patriotism while steering the nation into costly entanglements abroad. His most devoted followers, blinded by empty slogans of “making America great again,” will awaken too late to find their freedoms eroded, their economy manipulated, and their nation divided—victims of their own misplaced faith.

Trump’s betrayal is clearest in his brazen commercialization of his cult of personality. Campaign outlets sold merchandise with Yiddish slogans and “Jewish Voices for Trump” branding, twisting MAGA into a grotesque “MIGA” parody that revealed the ethnic favoritism and backroom deals rotting within. These hats and mugs weren’t souvenirs but symbols of how Trump and his enablers—billionaires, donors, and operatives—auctioned off American sovereignty for foreign influence and lobbyist cash. What looked like nationalism was a cynical power grab, selling out the working class while mocking his base and pocketing the profits.

Even dystopian fears of vaccines, microchips, digital currencies, and AI overlords—once used to attack globalists like Klaus Schwab—were flipped as Trump cozied up to tech giants like Elon Musk, endorsing the very systems that crush privacy and autonomy. Memes once mocking “deep state” plots now read like prophecy: the self-styled 5D chess master, smiling behind the wheel in 2025, is the delayed awakening of supporters who thought they’d beaten the system—only to realize they’d become its pawns. Trump, the ultimate deceiver, turned their paranoia into obedience while welcoming the true wolves—surveillance capitalists and foreign influencers—through America’s open gates.

Many researchers and financial historians point to the role of powerful banking interests in the early 20th century—espe...
10/05/2025

Many researchers and financial historians point to the role of powerful banking interests in the early 20th century—especially figures like J.P. Morgan—as central to forming the Federal Reserve System. Morgan and his associates saw that the U.S. financial system of the late 1800s and early 1900s was unstable and prone to bank runs. They believed a centralized structure would stabilize markets, protect their empires, and give them more control over monetary policy. Critics argue these bankers weren’t just reformers but beneficiaries of a system that favored large institutions and financiers over smaller banks and the public.

The secretive meeting at Jekyll Island in November 1910 is often viewed as the key turning point. A handful of top bankers—many linked to Morgan’s network—reportedly traveled under false names to the Georgia resort to draft what became the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Participants claimed secrecy was needed to avoid public outrage over private bankers shaping national finance. Supporters of this theory say the Jekyll Island meeting shows how America’s central bank was designed by elites who stood to gain most. Some versions also connect Morgan to the Olympic switch theory, suggesting the Titanic’s nearly identical sister ship, the RMS Olympic, was secretly swapped before the voyage as part of an insurance scheme to offset financial losses from the damaged Olympic.

A further link in this story is the Titanic itself. In 1898, fourteen years before the ship sank, author Morgan Robertson wrote Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan, about an “unsinkable” ocean liner striking an iceberg and sinking in the North Atlantic. Researchers note that several wealthy American opponents of the Federal Reserve—Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidor Straus, and John Jacob Astor—died aboard the Titanic in 1912, while J.P. Morgan, who owned controlling interest in the White Star Line, canceled his voyage at the last minute. In this view, Robertson’s prophetic novel, the Olympic switch theory, and the real-life tragedy all intertwine with the broader story of how financial elites may have influenced events leading to the creation of the Federal Reserve.

In April 1995, the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was destroyed by a massive truck bomb, officially ...
10/05/2025

In April 1995, the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was destroyed by a massive truck bomb, officially blamed on Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. Alternative accounts claim the attack had a deeper motive — to destroy sensitive files tied to the Whitewater investigation involving Bill and Hillary Clinton. Those records were reportedly stored inside the Murrah Building, and the blast came just days before Hillary Clinton was rumored to face indictment. When the building and its contents were obliterated, so was much of the evidence against her, effectively shielding powerful political figures.

Witnesses at the truck rental lot described McVeigh arriving with another man later dubbed John Doe No. 2, and some even mentioned a John Doe No. 3. The second man was said to be medium-built with dark hair and a tattoo, and several eyewitnesses insisted McVeigh wasn’t alone in the days leading up to the bombing. This figure has often been connected to Michael Brescia, a member of the A***n Republican Army, and to extremist circles at Elohim City, where McVeigh reportedly visited weeks before the attack. Early FBI sketches of John Doe 2 were released to the media, but the Bureau later withdrew them and insisted McVeigh acted alone.

Proponents of this version note several unusual details: the sudden disappearance of John Doe 2 from official reports, the mysterious death of Kenneth Trentadue (who resembled the sketch), and the existence of missing or unreleased security footage allegedly showing multiple people near the truck. Some researchers have even compared McVeigh’s appearance to FBI agent Larry Wysopal, noting uncanny similarities that fueled claims of deeper federal involvement. Together, these elements form a picture of an operation far more complex than two rogue bombers — one that may have served political purposes while erasing critical evidence.

For decades, the U.S. has poured massive financial, military, and diplomatic support into Israel, more than to almost an...
10/04/2025

For decades, the U.S. has poured massive financial, military, and diplomatic support into Israel, more than to almost any other nation. Total U.S. aid since 1948 amounts to hundreds of billions, making Israel the largest cumulative recipient of American foreign aid. Annual agreements and treaties guarantee billions in military assistance, missile defense, and technology. Critics argue this goes forward even when it contradicts American interests or values, raising the question of whether U.S. foreign policy is driven more by Israeli priorities than U.S. ones.

Claims that highlight this imbalance often cite events like the “Dancing Israelis” of 9/11, where several Israelis were arrested after being seen celebrating and allegedly saying they were there to “document the event.” While official investigations were inconclusive, critics argue this fits a larger pattern of Israeli intelligence using U.S. wars and tragedies to its benefit. These suspicions overlap with concerns about lobbying power and intelligence ties that allow Israel to steer U.S. resources—military, financial, and diplomatic—without real reciprocity.

Figures like George Lincoln Rockwell, founder of the American N**i Party, are extreme, but his rhetoric about “foreign powers” using America resonates today in more mainstream populist critiques. While his racist ideology is rejected, the structure of his argument—wars fought for hidden interests, elites steering policy away from the people—still surfaces in modern distrust of foreign entanglements. Even celebrity deaths like Prince’s, ruled an accidental overdose, are seen by some as connected to intelligence groups like Mossad, feeding the broader narrative that secrecy and manipulation play a role in shaping events. Combined with inflammatory statements from leaders like Netanyahu about America’s usefulness in war, this fuels the view that U.S. representatives are too easily controlled by Israel.

In October 2025, Sean “Diddy” Combs was sentenced to 50 months (4 years and 2 months) in federal prison after being conv...
10/03/2025

In October 2025, Sean “Diddy” Combs was sentenced to 50 months (4 years and 2 months) in federal prison after being convicted on two counts of transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution — violations of the Mann Act. The sentence was reduced by credit for approximately 13 months he had already spent in custody, leaving him to serve about three more years behind bars, followed by five years of supervised release and a $500,000 fine. Importantly, he was acquitted of the most serious charges — including racketeering conspiracy and s*x trafficking — which could have carried a life sentence.

Many observers noted that the final sentence was far lighter than the more than 11 years prosecutors had sought, suggesting that Combs benefited from legal skill, negotiated mitigation, and the fact that the jury declined to convict on the gravest counts. Some commentators viewed the outcome as indicative of how wealth, influence, and access to strong legal resources can result in outcomes that appear more lenient than expected.

In the weeks leading up to sentencing, there was widespread reporting that former President Donald Trump was “seriously considering” granting Combs a full pardon, a possibility that would have trumped any prison sentence. Combs’ legal team publicly acknowledged some engagement with the idea of clemency, though they stopped short of confirming negotiations. Trump himself stated he would “look at the facts” before making a decision and had earlier described his relationship with Combs as once friendly — comments that fueled speculation about a pardon regardless of the judicial outcome.

Over the past year, the U.S. government has allocated significantly more funding to Israel than to disaster recovery at ...
10/02/2025

Over the past year, the U.S. government has allocated significantly more funding to Israel than to disaster recovery at home, with estimates showing roughly $20 billion more directed abroad than to North Carolina after Hurricane Helene. This disparity highlights a sharp imbalance in national priorities, where foreign aid and military assistance continue to outweigh the urgent needs of American citizens who are struggling to rebuild their homes and communities. For critics, this is not simply about budgets—it reflects a deeper choice to prioritize geopolitical alliances over the immediate suffering of citizens at home.

Hurricane Helene devastated North Carolina in 2024, with damage estimates near $60 billion. Yet, more than a year later, survivors are still waiting for sufficient relief. State officials have pleaded with Congress for an additional $13.5 billion to fund housing, infrastructure, and local recovery, but much of the promised assistance has stalled in bureaucracy. Entire neighborhoods remain in disrepair, small businesses are shuttered, and residents face prolonged displacement as federal relief fails to meet the scale of destruction. The shortfall underscores how domestic recovery is consistently underfunded, despite the scale of human suffering it involves.

The imbalance is further sharpened by the fact that U.S. aid to Israel is not only larger but far more consistent, flowing in reliable yearly tranches. By contrast, disaster relief for American citizens comes piecemeal, delayed, and riddled with red tape. From a critical standpoint, this pattern reflects a betrayal of priorities: while billions are used to sustain a foreign government accused of systemic violence against Palestinians, Americans in devastated towns are left waiting for the most basic forms of assistance. The outcome is a portrait of misplaced loyalties, where the needs of people at home are left behind in favor of sustaining policies abroad.

These are just some photographs from a release in September 2025, where the House Oversight Committee publicly released ...
10/01/2025

These are just some photographs from a release in September 2025, where the House Oversight Committee publicly released records obtained from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, following a subpoena issued by Committee Chairman James Comer. Comer’s statement accompanying the release accused Democrats of “cherry-picking documents” and insisted that Oversight Republicans were pursuing a full, transparent investigation to serve survivors of Epstein’s crimes and the American public. The materials turned over include unredacted calendars, call logs, cash ledgers, flight logs and manifests, Epstein’s will, and other contemporaneous documents. 

Among the materials is a leather-bound “birthday book” compiled for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003, assembled by Ghislaine Maxwell. That book contains a mix of content: letters, photos (some of women in bikinis), crude drawings, mathematical equations, and manuscript pages.  One letter in the collection is allegedly signed “Donald” and placed within the outline of a female form, concluding: “Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret. Donald J. Trump.”  Other pages include references to crude humor, a “joke” photo of a check signed “DJ TRUMP,” and messages to Epstein from other notable figures, among other personal or symbolic notes. 

In the aftermath, public debate has focused on how to interpret these artifacts and whether they point to deeper associations or wrongdoing. The committee’s documents now span thousands of pages, with further analysis ongoing.  Some contend the newly released content raises serious questions about Epstein’s social network and communications, while others caution that signatures, drawings, and cryptic messages require careful forensic scrutiny before ascribing authorship or meaning.

Address

Lyndhurst, NJ

Website

https://www.givesendgo.com/QuestionAntiquity

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Question Antiquity posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Question Antiquity:

Shortcuts

Share

Category