02/09/2024
THE HOBBIT [Photo] Book & Record 7” (1977)
Disneyland Records #368
THE HOBBIT [Photo] Book & Record 12” (1977)
Disneyland Records #3819
At a particularly young age, I was already a fan of the output of Rankin & Bass: Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (1964) Mad Monster Party (1967), and Santa Claus Is Coming to Town (1970) being my three favorites, then and now. But on November 20th, 1977, I caught the television premiere of The Hobbit, their animated adaptation J.R.R. Tolkien's classic. In addition to horror/monster fare, I was almost just as enamored with fantasy and science fiction, so it's not surprising that this feature-length cartoon caught my immediate fancy. For my birthday, I was gifted copies of both the 7” and 12” book and record sets published by Disneyland Records, being compact adaptations of an already compact adaptation.
Of course, I soon found out these were based on a book which was also a prequel to a fairly extensive trilogy, known as The Lord of the Rings. So, for Christmas that same year, Santa brought me a cornucopia of printed Tolkien, including the original novel of The Hobbit, a box set containing the aforementioned trilogy, and a one-off parody from National Lampoon, namely Bored of the Rings. (Being the prudish child I was, after reading the first few pages of the latter, I alerted my mother to the book's questionable content, who returned it to the bookstore for a full refund the following week.)
It took me a the better part of a month to plow through all of them. (Even though my reading level was far above that of many of my peers, I was still only nine at the time.) Suffice it to say, I was hooked. Over the next few months, I attempted to consume everything and anything related to LOTR, including The Silmarillion (a tough read at the time), as well as Robert Foster's A Guide to Middle-Earth. (The latter I found on my uncle's bookshelf during a family get-together—he was a fan as well—and after I spent most of my family's visit glued to this particular book, he gifted it to me.)
At this time, the most exhaustive fantasy series I had read were the seven books in The Chronicles of Narnia. (Although Tolkien's efforts were far more challenging than C.S. Lewis' fare, I found them far more fulfilling and thought-provoking.) I was still immersed in the mythos when Ralph Bashki's big-screen adaptation of The Lord of the Rings premiered theatrically in November of 1978; although it only covered material from the first and second books in the series, it was enough to prompt me to go back and revisit the literary source once again in its entirety.
During this time, I scoured all media fantasy/sword and sorcery-related, but the only other franchise that caught my fancy to any real degree were exploits of Robert E. Howard's Conan, be it novels, short stories, comic books, and the like. (By the time Rankin & Bass released their long-awaited follow-up in May of 1980, an adaptation of The Return of the King—another full-length made-for-television feature—I had already moved on from LOTR and Conan, having since discovered the likes of Fritz Leiber's Fafhrd & the Grey Mouser and Michael Moorcock's Elric of Melnibone sagas. Soon thereafter, I was turned on to Frank Herbert's Dune, and my interest in sword & sorcery shifted to literary science fiction almost overnight.)
Suffice it to say, I was ecstatic when Peter Jackson finally started releasing his cinematic version of Tolkien's vision in 2001. Like many fans, I felt that it was the first time that the genre had received proper cinematic justice, despite any and all flaws. (A few of its ground-breaking predecessors still hold up amazingly well—Jason and the Argonauts (1963) and Dragonslayer (1981) being my favorites among them—but neither of them were nearly as ambitious or epic as Jackson's first three installments in the series. Those later entries devoted to The Hobbit, not so much.)
(Of course, most of the above photos were culled from the Internet, since my personal copies have been buried deep in stacked boxes over the last few decades.) Although my interest in the genre is nowhere near as great as it was some forty years ago, I still have a particular soft spot for Tolkien's influential catalog of fanciful tales.