Georgia Law Review

Georgia Law Review Georgia Law Review is the flagship publication of the University of Georgia School of Law. Georgia Law Review’s mission addresses two principal goals.
(7)

Established in 1966, Georgia Law Review is the flagship publication of the University of Georgia School of Law. Staffed entirely by second- and third-year law students, the Law Review is Georgia Law’s only general subject-matter publication. Law Review publishes one volume–comprised of four quarterly issues–annually, and it has recently launched a Symposium issue. Dedicated to publishing quality a

nd timely legal scholarship for over forty-five years, Georgia Law Review publishes the work of renowned law professors, judges, and legal practitioners in addition to selected notes written by Georgia Law Review members. First, the Review provides the finest legal education and training. Law Review editors select, edit, and publish the works that appear within the pages of Georgia Law Review’s volumes. Through this process, Law Review editors develop and hone their research, writing, editorial, and leadership skills. More importantly, however, the Review strives to provide a forum for legal reform. In the inaugural issue of the Georgia Law Review, Dean Lindsey Cowen articulates the Review’s purpose “in seeking out the weak points in our law, in developing appropriate recommendations for change, and in advocating them persuasively in its pages.” The editors of Georgia Law Review continually seek to fulfill this mission in helping the Review serve as a platform of legal reform. Georgia Law Review is staffed by Georgia Law students and operates independently of the University of Georgia Law faculty or administration.

In his Note, Alexander F. Krupp, Georgia Law '23, advocates for robust privacy legislation that takes full advantage of ...
04/26/2023

In his Note, Alexander F. Krupp, Georgia Law '23, advocates for robust privacy legislation that takes full advantage of the expressive function of the law to meaningfully protect individual data privacy rights from corporate deregulators.

By Alexander F. Krupp. This Note advocates for robust privacy legislation that takes full advantage of the expressive function of the law to meaningfully protect individual data privacy rights from corporate deregulators.

In his Note, Vol. 57 Executive Articles Editor Nicholas R. Lewis argues that qui tam legislation should be used to limit...
04/25/2023

In his Note, Vol. 57 Executive Articles Editor Nicholas R. Lewis argues that qui tam legislation should be used to limit expansive executive war power, and offers a framework to do so through existing laws or new legislation.

By Nicholas R. Lewis. This Note argues that qui tam legislation should be used to limit expansive executive war power, and offers a framework to do so through existing laws or new legislation.

In his Note, Hunter Davis, Georgia Law '23, examines the Tax Court's recent consumer loyalty rewards case—Anikeev v. Com...
04/24/2023

In his Note, Hunter Davis, Georgia Law '23, examines the Tax Court's recent consumer loyalty rewards case—Anikeev v. Commissioner—and the question of which governmental entity should address the taxability of credit card rewards.

By Hunter Davis. This Note examines the Tax Court's recent consumer loyalty rewards case—Anikeev v. Commissioner—and the question of which governmental entity should address the taxability of credit card rewards.

In his Note, Kasey Clark, Georgia Law '23, explains issues with the "three strikes rule" in the Prison Litigation Reform...
04/19/2023

In his Note, Kasey Clark, Georgia Law '23, explains issues with the "three strikes rule" in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and advocates for courts to dismantle the rule after years of legislative inaction.

By Kasey Clark. This Note explains issues with the "three strikes rule" in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and advocates for courts to dismantle the rule after years of legislative inaction.

In his Note, Vol. 57 Senior Managing Editor Logan Purvis reviews the history of Georgia's law for determining intellectu...
04/18/2023

In his Note, Vol. 57 Senior Managing Editor Logan Purvis reviews the history of Georgia's law for determining intellectual disability, the Supreme Court's rulings and guidance on the issue, and proposes changes to the law to remedy prejudice.

By Logan Purvis. This Note reviews the history of Georgia's law for determining intellectual disability, the Supreme Court's rulings and guidance on the issue, and proposes changes to the law to remedy prejudice.

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Zachary S. Price documents the variation in prosecutorial authority nationwide and argues that these...
04/04/2023

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Zachary S. Price documents the variation in prosecutorial authority nationwide and argues that these varied positive laws should govern whether categorical nonenforcement violates a duty of faithful ex*****on.

By Zachary S. Price. This Article documents the variation in prosecutorial authority nationwide and argues that these varied positive laws should govern whether categorical nonenforcement violates a duty of faithful ex*****on.

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Samuel D. Brunson discusses the explosion of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), their gr...
04/03/2023

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Samuel D. Brunson discusses the explosion of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), their growth and development in relation to LLCs, and the obligations that come with their tax entity status.

By Samuel D. Brunson. This Article discusses the explosion of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), their growth and development in relation to LLCs, and the obligations that come with their tax entity status.

In his Article, Dan T. Coenen studies founding-era history and Constitutional text to evaluate the independent-state-leg...
03/31/2023

In his Article, Dan T. Coenen studies founding-era history and Constitutional text to evaluate the independent-state-legislature theory, concluding that it does not comport with a proper reading of the Constitution.

By Dan T. Coenen. This Article studies founding-era history and Constitutional text to evaluate the independent-state-legislature theory, concluding that it does not comport with a proper reading of the Constitution.

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Maytal Gilboa argues that "biased-but-reasonable" medical treatment evades liability under negligenc...
03/27/2023

In Vol. 57 Issue 2, Maytal Gilboa argues that "biased-but-reasonable" medical treatment evades liability under negligence law and proposes using the loss of chance doctrine to eliminate evidentiary hurdles and incentivize the elimination of bias.

By Maytal Gilboa. This Article argues that "biased-but-reasonable" medical treatment evades liability under negligence law and proposes using the loss of chance doctrine to eliminate evidentiary hurdles and incentivize the elimination of bias.

Thank you to Dr. Amanda Reid, Dan Burke, Sharon Cop, Asaf Lubin, Gregory Dickinson, Rebecca Hamilton, Monika Ehrman, Roy...
03/24/2023

Thank you to Dr. Amanda Reid, Dan Burke, Sharon Cop, Asaf Lubin, Gregory Dickinson, Rebecca Hamilton, Monika Ehrman, Roy Hadley, and Matthew Grocoff, who spoke at today's symposium.
An additional thank you to all who attended as well as our Executive Symposium Editors, Savannah Grant and Tripp Keeffe.

In her Note, Cara Beth Musciano, Georgia Law '23, argues that regulators should develop a mandatory ESG disclosure frame...
03/22/2023

In her Note, Cara Beth Musciano, Georgia Law '23, argues that regulators should develop a mandatory ESG disclosure framework to create accurate, reliable data and to prevent capital from being misallocated against investors' genuine sustainable efforts.

By Cara Beth Musciano. This Note argues that regulators should develop a mandatory ESG disclosure framework to create accurate, reliable data and to prevent capital from being misallocated against investors' genuine sustainable efforts.

This week on the Blog, Copelenn McMahon, Georgia Law '23, explains the Survivors First Act, its flaws, and argues for th...
03/20/2023

This week on the Blog, Copelenn McMahon, Georgia Law '23, explains the Survivors First Act, its flaws, and argues for the addition of an affirmative defense for victims of s*x trafficking in Georgia.

Copelenn McMahon, UGA '23, explains the Survivors First Act, its flaws, and argues for the addition of an affirmative defense for victims of s*x trafficking in Georgia.

In her Note, Executive Managing Editor Destiny B. Barnett explores how laws favor traditional biological parents over th...
03/16/2023

In her Note, Executive Managing Editor Destiny B. Barnett explores how laws favor traditional biological parents over the kinship caregiver role played by African American women and proposes changes to Georgia’s guardianship laws to remedy these inequalities.

By Destiny B. Barnett. This Note explores how laws favor traditional biological parents over the kinship caregiver role played by African American women and proposes changes to Georgia’s guardianship laws to remedy these inequalities.

In her Note, Executive Online Editor Devin C. Berrigan argues that the frustration of purpose doctrine in contracts is i...
03/15/2023

In her Note, Executive Online Editor Devin C. Berrigan argues that the frustration of purpose doctrine in contracts is ineffective and proposes alterations that would ease the burden on lessees by making lessors responsible more often.

By Devin C. Berrigan. This Note argues that the frustration of purpose doctrine in contracts is ineffective and proposes alterations that would ease the burden on lessees by making lessors responsible more often.

Next Friday, The 57th Volume of the Georgia Law Review presents a symposium on The Intersection of Law and Technology. W...
03/14/2023

Next Friday, The 57th Volume of the Georgia Law Review presents a symposium on The Intersection of Law and Technology.

We welcome you as we are joined by phenomenal panelists such as Dr. Amanda Reid, Dan Burke, Sharon Cop, Asaf Lubin, Gregory Dickinson, Rebecca Hamilton, and Monika Ehrman, with keynote speakers Roy Hadley and Matthew Grocoff.

Rounding out Volume 57 Issue 1, Executive Notes Editor G. Max Miseyko highlights how the SPARC promises to reintegrate t...
03/13/2023

Rounding out Volume 57 Issue 1, Executive Notes Editor G. Max Miseyko highlights how the SPARC promises to reintegrate the reputational component that the S**C lacks and calls for the SEC to scrap most of its proposed S**C rules.

By G. Max Miseyko. This Note highlights how the SPARC promises to reintegrate the reputational component that the S**C lacks and calls for the SEC to scrap most of its proposed S**C rules.

Issue 2 of Volume 57 is now available at https://georgialawreview.org/issue/7086This issue features articles written by ...
03/13/2023

Issue 2 of Volume 57 is now available at https://georgialawreview.org/issue/7086

This issue features articles written by Samuel D. Brunson, Dan T. Coenen, Maytal Gilboa, and Zachary S. Price. Notes written by Kasey Clark and Logan Purvis.

Volume 57, Issue 2, by the Georgia Law Review

This week on the blog, managing board editor Brianna Yates explains the school book ban signed by Governor Kemp, its imp...
03/03/2023

This week on the blog, managing board editor Brianna Yates explains the school book ban signed by Governor Kemp, its implications, and emphasizes the importance of continuing to assess the law's efficacy moving forward.

Brianna Yates, UGA '23, explains the school book ban signed by Gov. Kemp, its implications, and emphasizes the importance of continuing to assess the law's efficacy moving forward.

The Georgia Law Review is proud to announce the Executive Board and the Managing Board for our 58th Volume.
02/27/2023

The Georgia Law Review is proud to announce the Executive Board and the Managing Board for our 58th Volume.

In Vol. 56 Issue 3, current Editor-in-Chief of the Georgia Law Review, Millie Price, evaluates the snap removal loophole...
02/20/2023

In Vol. 56 Issue 3, current Editor-in-Chief of the Georgia Law Review, Millie Price, evaluates the snap removal loophole in 28 U.S.C. § 1441, its relationship with MDLs, and proposes solutions to prevent plaintiffs' motions from sitting undecided for years in MDLs.

By Millie Price. This Note evaluates the snap removal loophole in 28 U.S.C. § 1441, its relationship with MDLs, and proposes solutions to prevent plaintiffs' motions from sitting undecided for years in MDLs.

In the first Issue of Volume 57, Sadie Blanchard argues, using a case study of the reinsurance industry, that heterogeno...
02/17/2023

In the first Issue of Volume 57, Sadie Blanchard argues, using a case study of the reinsurance industry, that heterogenous business networks are capable of sustaining high-stakes trade, contrary to the belief of some leading legal scholars.

By Sadie Blanchard. This Article argues, using a case study of the reinsurance industry, that heterogenous business networks are capable of sustaining high-stakes trade, contrary to the belief of some leading legal scholars.

In his note, Volume 57 Executive Notes Editor K. L. Renner proposes that courts presented with reality television footag...
02/15/2023

In his note, Volume 57 Executive Notes Editor K. L. Renner proposes that courts presented with reality television footage should be wary to admit it as character evidence lest the risk of prejudice steal the show.

By K. L. Renner. This Note proposes that courts presented with reality television footage should be wary to admit it as character evidence lest the risk of prejudice steal the show.

In the first issue of Volume 57, Stephen Gillers analyzes provisions in the ABA's Model Rules and the D.C. Court of Appe...
02/13/2023

In the first issue of Volume 57, Stephen Gillers analyzes provisions in the ABA's Model Rules and the D.C. Court of Appeals' professional conduct rules and explains how each rule may be a check on executive power.

By Stephen Gillers. This Article analyzes provisions in the ABA's Model Rules and the D.C. Court of Appeals' professional conduct rules and explains how each rule may be a check on executive power.

In their new article in Vol. 57 Issue 1 of the Georgia Law Review, Richard L. Jolly, Valerie P. Hans, & Robert S. Peck o...
02/10/2023

In their new article in Vol. 57 Issue 1 of the Georgia Law Review, Richard L. Jolly, Valerie P. Hans, & Robert S. Peck offer six recommendations to help reintroduce democracy into the civil justice system, and in doing so, direct America back toward the nation's democratic aspirations.

By Richard L. Jolly, Valerie P. Hans & 1 more. This Article offers six recommendations to help reintroduce democracy into the civil justice system, and in doing so, direct America back toward the nation's democratic aspirations.

Georgia Law Review is proud to announce the student notes that have been selected for publication in our 58th Volume.
02/09/2023

Georgia Law Review is proud to announce the student notes that have been selected for publication in our 58th Volume.

Please join us Friday, March 24th for The Georgia Law Review's Vol. 57 Symposium: The Intersection of Law and Technology...
02/08/2023

Please join us Friday, March 24th for The Georgia Law Review's Vol. 57 Symposium: The Intersection of Law and Technology.

We will be joined by phenomenal panelists such as Dr. Amanda Reid, Dan Burke, Sharon Cop, Asaf Lubin, Gregory Dickinson, Rebecca Hamilton, and Monika Ehrman, with keynote speakers Roy Hadley and Matthew Grocoff.

In the 1st Issue of our 57th Volume, John T. Holden, Marc Edelman, & Michael A. McCann provide an overview of the right ...
02/06/2023

In the 1st Issue of our 57th Volume, John T. Holden, Marc Edelman, & Michael A. McCann provide an overview of the right of publicity and discuss the legal risks facing the NCAA, collegiate conferences, schools, and athletes in this new world of college sports.

By John T. Holden, Marc Edelman & 1 more. This Article provides an overview of the right of publicity and discusses legal risks facing the NCAA, collegiate conferences, schools, and athletes in this new world of college sports.

In a new blog post, Taylor Pittman, Georgia Law Class of 2023, argues that Georgia legislators should incentivize crypto...
01/20/2023

In a new blog post, Taylor Pittman, Georgia Law Class of 2023, argues that Georgia legislators should incentivize cryptocurrencies that require less energy in order to attract business but protect Georgians from cryptocurrencies' negative effects.

Taylor Pittman, UGA '23, argues that Georgia legislators should evaluate different cryptocurrencies to incentivize ones requiring less energy in order to attract business but protect Georgians from cryptocurrencies' negative effects.

Address

Athens, GA
30602

Telephone

+17065427286

Website

https://georgia-law-review.scholasticahq.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Georgia Law Review posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Georgia Law Review:

Share

Category