29/06/2025
🚨 Political Drama in the Red House: Pension Law Could Erase PM’s Retirement in Stunning Move
— Suspense, Strategy, and a Nation Watching Closely —
---
⚔️ A Prime Minister’s Pension... Snatched?
In a twist straight out of a political thriller, Parliament passed a bill yesterday that could strip former prime minister Stuart Young of his pension—after serving just a few days in the top job.
The Prime Minister’s Pension (Amendment) Bill, 2025 rewrites the rules of what it means to “earn” a pension as PM—and may retroactively deny that benefit to the country’s most recent leader.
But was this long-overdue reform?
Or a calculated political maneuver?
---
♟️ Power Plays & Political Strategy
The bill, brought by Finance Minister Dave Tancoo, passed with 27 votes—just enough to clear the three-fifths majority needed.
Voting “Yes”:
All 25 UNC MPs and 2 from the Tobago People’s Party (TPP).
Voting “No”?
None.
The People’s National Movement (PNM) abstained—a move that said more than a speech ever could.
Stuart Young, the man directly affected? He was absent in protest.
Meanwhile, Parliament echoed with desk-thumping applause as the bill cleared the floor just before 6 PM.
---
🧾 The Law: Four Tiers, One Target?
The bill introduces a tiered pension system for prime ministers:
1–2 years: ¼ pension
2–3 years: ½ pension
3–4 years: ¾ pension
4–5 years: full pension
But it also requires a minimum of one full year in office to qualify for any payout at all.
Here's where the controversy explodes:
Stuart Young was appointed PM on March 17, 2025.
The bill’s cutoff? March 10, 2025.
One week earlier.
Opposition MPs cried foul, calling the retroactive clause a direct hit on Young’s brief term.
PNM MP Keith Scotland tried to strike it out—but the request was denied due to a technicality: it wasn’t submitted in writing.
---
🧠 A Nation Asks: Reform or Retaliation?
Minister Tancoo defended the bill, saying it brings the law in line with “regional best practice” and similar pension rules for judges, MPs, and police officers.
But he didn’t shy away from criticizing how Young rose to power—calling it “undemocratic” and arguing that the appointment may have gone against Section 76(1)(a) of the Constitution.
> “We saw actions that were not in keeping with the spirit of democracy... leading to a prime minister that no one voted for.”
He said the new system ensures pensions are based on merit, service, and accountability—not brief political moments.
The Opposition sees it differently.
Is this a fix for a broken system—or political payback written into law?
---
🕵️♂️ What’s Really at Stake
For former PM Stuart Young, the consequences are personal:
He could lose hundreds of thousands of dollars in retirement benefits.
For the government, it’s about setting a new standard for leadership accountability.
For the PNM, it raises serious concerns about constitutional overreach and targeted legislation.
For the country?
It’s about trust in democracy—and whether political decisions are driven by principles or power plays.
---
📜 What’s Next: All Eyes on the Senate
The bill still has one more hurdle—a debate in the Senate.
There, the drama could deepen:
Will Opposition Senators mount a challenge?
Will the retroactive clause be revisited?
Could this be taken to court?
And bigger still:
Could this set a dangerous precedent for using legislation to shape—or erase—the legacy of political figures?
---
⏳ A Cliffhanger in Motion
What began as a routine pension reform has exploded into a test of democratic values, strategic silence, and who really holds the power in Trinidad and Tobago.
This isn’t just a battle over benefits.
It’s a political chess match, and the next move is anyone’s guess.
Stay tuned to Trinidad HoTT Topics 🔥 for more.
