New Political Review

New Political Review A page about political issues. Global and specific. Pragmatic and Academic. Promoter of good Public Policy It will also promote good Public Policy issues.

This page is meant to inform on issues concerning Politics.

03/01/2025

Good reads! 👍

Here’s an introduction to Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know by Adam Grant. I recently finished reading the PDF version of this excellent book and would love to share some of its key insights. I hope it sparks your interest in exploring it further!

Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’t Know by Adam Grant is a compelling exploration of the value of rethinking and unlearning in a world where certainty often dominates our thinking. Grant, an organizational psychologist, argues that true wisdom comes not from knowing what to think, but from learning how to think and rethinking what we believe. He challenges readers to embrace doubt, question their assumptions, and become more intellectually flexible in a rapidly changing world.

Key Themes and Concepts:
1. The Importance of Rethinking
At the heart of Think Again is the idea that we often cling to outdated beliefs and assumptions, even when the evidence contradicts them. Grant emphasizes that mental flexibility and the ability to rethink are crucial for personal growth and success. Just as we upgrade our technology and skills, we should also upgrade our thinking. People tend to get stuck in “cognitive entrenchment,” where they rely on familiar patterns of thought, even when they’re no longer effective.

Grant contrasts the “preacher,” “prosecutor,” and “politician” modes of thinking with that of the “scientist.” The preacher defends beliefs, the prosecutor attacks opposing views, and the politician seeks approval. However, the scientist mindset—curious, open to new evidence, and willing to test and revise hypotheses—allows us to rethink our beliefs and adapt to new situations.

2. The Psychology of Overconfidence
One of the major obstacles to rethinking is overconfidence. Grant explores how humans have a tendency to overestimate the accuracy of their knowledge and the certainty of their beliefs, which leads to poor decision-making and resistance to change. The “armchair quarterback syndrome” occurs when people feel they have enough expertise to offer solutions without engaging deeply with the complexities of the issue.

Grant introduces the concept of “confident humility,” where one recognizes the limits of their knowledge while maintaining the confidence to explore and revise their beliefs. This balance of humility and confidence allows for better learning, problem-solving, and collaboration. He encourages people to be “actively open-minded” and seek out information that challenges their viewpoints, rather than simply reinforcing existing beliefs.

3. Unlearning: Letting Go of Old Knowledge
Grant highlights the importance of unlearning, which he defines as the process of discarding old knowledge and practices that no longer serve us. In an ever-changing world, holding on to outdated ideas can be harmful to personal and professional growth. To stay relevant, we need to be willing to let go of the past and make room for new ways of thinking.

He gives examples from various fields, including business, education, and personal relationships, to show how successful individuals and organizations have thrived by unlearning outdated practices. For example, NASA engineers were able to solve a major challenge in space exploration by letting go of traditional engineering methods and embracing new ideas.

4. The Power of Doubt and Intellectual Curiosity
Grant emphasizes that doubt is not a sign of weakness, but rather a pathway to greater understanding. By embracing doubt, we open ourselves up to new possibilities and prevent the dangers of rigid thinking. Intellectual curiosity drives rethinking, allowing us to explore new ideas and perspectives. People who are naturally curious and willing to question their assumptions tend to be more innovative and successful in navigating complex problems.

In the book, Grant offers practical tools for cultivating intellectual curiosity, including seeking out conversations with people who hold opposing views, asking questions, and being comfortable with the discomfort that comes from uncertainty.

5. Rethinking in Organizations
Grant devotes a significant portion of the book to how rethinking can be applied in organizations. He argues that the most successful companies foster a culture of psychological safety, where employees feel comfortable voicing dissent and questioning the status quo. Companies that encourage rethinking are more adaptable and resilient in the face of change.

One example Grant provides is BlackBerry, which dominated the smartphone market for years but failed to rethink its product strategy in the face of competition from Apple’s iPhone. In contrast, companies like Pixar and Bridgewater Associates thrive by promoting a culture of continuous learning, feedback, and rethinking.

6. Rethinking Relationships
Grant also discusses how rethinking can improve personal relationships. He introduces the idea of “argue like you’re right but listen like you’re wrong.” This approach allows for healthy debates and discussions, where the goal is not to win the argument but to learn from the exchange.

He points out that relationships—whether personal or professional—benefit when individuals are willing to rethink their positions and listen with an open mind. Grant advocates for “thinking like a scientist” in relationships by testing our assumptions, being open to changing our views, and focusing on mutual understanding.

7. Teaching People to Rethink
In education, Grant stresses the importance of teaching students not just what to think, but how to think critically and re-evaluate their knowledge. He advocates for teaching methods that encourage questioning, curiosity, and exploration, rather than rote memorization. Schools and educators should create environments where students are rewarded for thinking creatively and rethinking established norms.

Grant shares examples of teachers who successfully fostered a culture of rethinking in the classroom. By encouraging students to challenge their own thinking and embrace intellectual humility, educators can prepare them to succeed in a rapidly evolving world.

Practical Strategies for Rethinking:
Grant provides several practical strategies throughout the book to help readers cultivate the skill of rethinking:

Detach Your Identity from Your Beliefs: Instead of defining yourself by your beliefs, embrace the idea that beliefs can change. This allows you to evolve and adapt without feeling personally attacked when your ideas are challenged.

Be Willing to Admit When You Don’t Know: Embracing the phrase “I don’t know” opens up opportunities for learning and growth. It’s better to acknowledge gaps in knowledge than to pretend to have all the answers.

Engage in “Disagreeable Conversations”: Seek out conversations with people who hold different views from your own. These discussions help expose blind spots and challenge your assumptions.

Use Motivational Interviewing: When discussing beliefs with others, ask open-ended questions to encourage them to reflect on their own views rather than imposing your ideas on them.

Practice a Growth Mindset: Focus on learning and improvement, rather than defending your current position. A growth mindset helps you stay open to new possibilities and change.

Seek Disconfirming Evidence: Actively look for information that challenges your current beliefs. This helps you avoid confirmation bias and encourages more balanced thinking.

Conclusion: The Power of Rethinking
Think Again is a call to embrace intellectual humility, curiosity, and the power of doubt. Grant argues that our ability to rethink and unlearn is essential in a world where change is constant and new challenges arise regularly. By adopting a mindset of rethinking, individuals can become more adaptable, innovative, and open to learning.

The book highlights that intellectual growth comes not from clinging to old certainties but from being willing to question our beliefs, explore new ideas, and adjust our thinking in the face of new evidence. Whether in personal relationships, professional environments, or broader societal debates, the ability to think again is a powerful tool for success and resilience.

By applying the strategies outlined in Think Again, readers can develop the mental flexibility needed to navigate the complexities of the modern world and continuously grow, learn, and improve.

https://www.facebook.com/share/15NtEuity1/

Economics: The Austrian School vs. The Chicago School
01/01/2025

Economics: The Austrian School vs. The Chicago School

I look introduce these two schools of economic thought and analyse their similarities and differences.Recommended further reading:On differences between the ...

Recently I've listened to some Podcasts about the French historical figure Napoleon Bonaparte. He gives us a good exampl...
01/01/2025

Recently I've listened to some Podcasts about the French historical figure Napoleon Bonaparte. He gives us a good example of a resolute mind to the extreme. It is quite fascinating to learn more about Napoleon's mind. The Podcasts are also interesting for the analogies we can make for today's business contexts, in particular running Startups or venture capital investing.

#302 Napoleon (The Mind of Napoleon)

What I learned from reading "The Mind of Napoleon: A Selection of His Written and Spoken Words" (https://a.co/d/5Gy8voV) edited by J. Christopher Herold. htt...

01/01/2025

Thought. It is true that resolute persons are generally happier. They are happier because they are quicker in finding their meaning and significance in Life. Sometimes I read that in order to be resolute we have to be a bit 'radical' in our psychology, to be innately capable of being in a 'virtuous' 'out of equilibrium' (a power law type of outlier) in relation to the normal human condition... There might be some truth in this. But I am more of the opinion that some people develop those traits given particular circumstances.

Anyone can develop a resolute and decisive psychology, but some might take longer or the right circumstances. People do not 'have' to be 'radical' in their psychologies in order to be resolute, decisive and closer to happiness in their lives. 'Out of equilibrium' psychologies may lead persons to end up making lots of mistakes in order to achieve their goals.

01/01/2025

Sisyphus is forced to push a heavy boulder up a hill, only for it to roll back down; for all eternity. Camus famously compared Sisyphus’ condition to the human condition.

Are we fated to complete mundane, meaningless tasks? To chase desires and achieve goals only for them to be replaced with new ones?

Professor Ronald Aronson believes otherwise, “Sisyphus reminds us that we cannot help seeking to understand the reality that transcends our intelligence, striving to grasp more than our limited and practical scientific understanding allows, wishing to live without dying.”

Tap the link to read more about Aronson’s argument that it is our awareness, our human self-consciousness, of this condition that makes us superior to it: https://iai.tv/articles/lifes-absurdity-is-a-cause-for-happiness-auid-2885

01/01/2025
Creative ways to think ethically about Artificial Superintelligence- a short film featuring a screenwriting 'brainstorm'...
30/12/2024

Creative ways to think ethically about Artificial Superintelligence- a short film featuring a screenwriting 'brainstorm' session about it. All very human indeed. Sometimes really funny 🤣

Writing Doom – Award-Winning Short Film on Superintelligence (2024)

Writing Doom is a fiction short film about the dangers of artificial intelligence (AI).Grand Prize Winner - Future of Life Institute's Superintelligence Imag...

Worth listening to this Podcast episode from   about the current serious economic problems of the leading European econo...
29/12/2024

Worth listening to this Podcast episode from about the current serious economic problems of the leading European economy: Germany. Profound changes of its model of economic development are needed if Germany is to return to be an important global economic player. There are concerns of prolonged stagnation, which Germans and all Europeans must avoid.

The End of the German Economic Miracle | Wolfgang Münchau.

In Episode 391 of Hidden Forces, Demetri Kofinas speaks with Wolfgang Münchau, the director and co-founder of Eurointelligence and the author of a phenomenal...

29/12/2024

A good business quote from the usual Sunday morning Farnam Street newsletter. I agree. I would go even further and note that a tacit positive stance about trust in people and making this an advantage to be an important 'secret sauce' for corporate success in America and explains a lot of European business ecosystems lagging behind. In Europe the tacit psychology is the opposite: mistrust first and then verify... A terrible business attitude.

"Smart people know an unsettling truth: loyalty must be given before it's earned.

The best leaders I know extend trust and loyalty long before receiving it - they treat people as if they've already proven trustworthy. This seems naive until you realize it's a forcing function: by acting as if people have already earned your trust, you create the conditions that make it almost inevitable that they will.

Instead of searching for win-win deals, create an environment where nothing else can exist. "

Elon Musk is a controversial figure of our day. Recently has become a somewhat hard to understand supporter of extreme r...
26/12/2024

Elon Musk is a controversial figure of our day. Recently has become a somewhat hard to understand supporter of extreme right-wing politicians, something that indeed dims his brightness.

But make no mistakes, his business brightness, smarts and knowledge is what best defines Musk. Marc Andreessen, of Venture Capital firm , who may know Musk well, gives here his own insights about why Musk's CEO 'modus operandi'offers lessons for all CEOs, in particular ones in high-end cutting-edge technological or businesses.

Going right to the bottlenecks of each business problem every week, joining the engineering teams on the ground and solving problems in a focused unrelentingly manner is a practice to be inspired by (it might be useful in other contexts, not necessarily the same involving Musk). It engages everyone and creates a 'team spirit' that makes a big difference if you want to retain top talent. Without sacrificing excellence...

Recent Political positions from Musk may be something of a 'small passage' through time without much meaning. Or so we wish, that do not share it, but still admire his business accomplishments.

Elon Musk solves Tesla's and SpaceX's biggest problems in a week and repeats that 52 times a year, Marc Andreessen says

Elon Musk focuses on fixing the biggest issues at his companies every week, often by working directly with engineers and coders, Marc Andreessen said.

23/12/2024

Thought. An important paradox in free Societies and with the possibility of, through confrontation and denunciation, being able to alert to possible injustices or bad practices, is that this same argumentation and publicity can sometimes have the effect of extreme positions and the result being the opposite of what the protest aims to avoid or interrupt.

Even so, it is much better to have this Freedom. Because this opened a new 'line of argument' on the subject in question. And so the probability of reaching the best solutions, the best ideas and policies was greatly increased.

In balanced democracies, users of sovereign decision-making power also do so in this understanding, and for this same reason, they have a greater tendency to make reasonable and better quality decisions and executions (in the knowledge of saving resources on excessive argumentation). The problem is that Democracies are not always really balanced...

23/12/2024

Pensamento. Um importante paradoxo em Sociedades livres e com a possibilidade de, pelo confronto e denuncia, se poder alertar para possíveis injustiças ou más práticas, é o de que essa mesma argumentação e publicidlade por vezes ter o efeito de extremar posições e de o resultado ser o oposto do que o protesto pretende evitar ou interromper.

Mesmo assim é muito melhor ter essa Liberdade. Porque assim abriu-se uma nova 'linha de argumentação' acerca do assunto em questão. E assim aumentou-se muito a probabilidade de se chegar às melhores soluções, às melhores ideas e políticas.

Em Democracias equilibradas, os utentes da soberania do poder de decisão fazem-no também neste entendimento, e por essa mesma razão, têm maior tendência para decisões e execuções razoáveis e de melhor qualidade (no conhecimento de poupar recursos em argumentação excessiva). O problema é as Democracias nem sempre serem realmente equilibradas...

A good long read from   and one in large parts to agree on. But also in other parts to strongly disagree with. I often t...
21/12/2024

A good long read from and one in large parts to agree on. But also in other parts to strongly disagree with. I often tend to think that when we try to make a strong ideological case against another ideology, it is we the ones most biased in that regard. For ideology almost always trend to diminished forms of imagination. Imagination is often an effort to get rid of the riddles of ideology.

I agree obviously with the idea that we must not allow AI, or "super human" machines to reduce our sense of Humanity and our most cherished values. That is consensual. Then what I see or interpret in arguments about super intelligence is perhaps not about Humanity, but about the use of new forms of intelligence when mixed with Human Intelligence. For the better and the worst. In these matters we risk "throwing the baby with the bath water"... And we should also be quite realist about human intentions, or be realist about our capacity to improve our own condition. Getting to new forms of artificially/mechanically help us improve many of our shortcomings should not be demonized. It must be carefully regulated.

Enhanced economic outputs and outcomes tend to be demonized and put in an unjust negative bias in some parts of our Societies. I think that is also wrong. Most of our cherished human attributes are only possible in viable environments or ecosystems. Economies are like 'infrastructures for ecosystems'. If we do not care to have robust, yes growing and thriving Economies, we then would be unable to exercise our most cherished of human agencies. And AI, artificial intelligence and even maybe enhanced such technologies will, with all probability, be part of our future Economies. We might do well to treat them right also. Along with all Humans....

The Danger Of Superhuman AI Is Not What You Think.

The rhetoric over “superhuman” AI implicitly erases what’s most important about being human.

For all Men and Women happy to be truly free in their thoughts. Never be concerned about your thoughts and intellectual ...
16/12/2024

For all Men and Women happy to be truly free in their thoughts. Never be concerned about your thoughts and intellectual attainments. These are within the most valuable of human pursuits, and we should never be in doubt of disclosing our thoughts, when they are authentic, peaceful and neutral about human often turbulent, inconsistent or even dangerous emotions.

© - @ The Philosophy Library

14/12/2024

Thoughts about Democracy. I hear and read countless times that Democracy is the political regime of mediated confrontation to arrive at laws and public policies. It is believed that this confrontation is a type of 'brainstorming' that better identifies the best ideas and Public Policies. But will it always be like this?! Let's face it, much of the media coverage in Democracies leads to excessive unproductive confrontation in the media, because this results in media gains. Behind the scenes, the real production of ideas and policies takes place. But I feel like, for this very reason, classifying this mediaism as an irresponsible way of 'making a living'.

If Democracies, by believing in and implementing well a productive confrontation of ideas to arrive at the best ideas and public policies, then this system should not be reformed or 'changed'. If, on the other hand, the opposite happens and what happens is a chronic inability to reform, to arrive at the best ideas and policies, this type of confrontation must be reformulated. Multiple data, intuition and realities have shown us that the economies of Democracies sometimes suffer from immobility, stagnation or bad ideas in more recent times. The examples are many. So the non-democrats unfortunately rejoice and are filled with hope.

Good ideas don't just have to come from confrontation and brainstorming. Good ideas can come from any context and happen in diverse and ordered plural contexts. Perhaps in the future, Democracies will find systems, regimes and processes where one is emphasized more than the other and vice versa. But both must always be available. My intuition is that ordered pluralism will often be more useful than confrontation in arriving at the best ideas and policies.

Endereço

Torres Vedras
2560-042

Notificações

Seja o primeiro a receber as novidades e deixe-nos enviar-lhe um email quando New Political Review publica notícias e promoções. O seu endereço de email não será utilizado para qualquer outro propósito, e pode cancelar a subscrição a qualquer momento.

Entre Em Contato Com O Negócio

Envie uma mensagem para New Political Review:

Compartilhar