I will share my world to you๐โ๏ธ๐
25/11/2024
Legislation or Political Subversion?
Lawmakers, Not Judges A Calculated Power Grab
Argument: The House of Representatives Acting as Prosecutor Violates Constitutional Rights
1. Separation of Powers
โข The Constitution delineates the roles of the three branches of government: the legislative creates laws, the executive enforces them, and the judiciary interprets and applies them. When the House of Representatives assumes the role of prosecutor, it encroaches on the judiciary's authority, undermining the principle of separation of powers.
2. Due Process Concerns
โข Prosecuting individuals requires impartiality and adherence to due process, which are fundamental constitutional rights. The House, as a political body, may not ensure fair and unbiased proceedings, leading to violations of the accused's rights.
3. Risk of Abuse
โข The House acting as a prosecuting authority risks politicizing the justice system. Investigations or prosecutions may be driven by political vendettas or agendas, rather than genuine legal grounds, eroding public trust in democratic institutions.
4. Legislative Focus
โข The primary role of the House of
Representatives are to legislate, not to prosecute.
Overstepping into judicial functions distracts from its mandate and undermines its effectiveness as a lawmaking body.
Counterpoint and Rebuttal
โข Counterpoint: Some argue that the House's investigative powers are essential for accountability.
Rebuttal: While the House can investigate to craft laws or hold officials accountable, actual prosecution should remain the responsibility of judicial bodies like the Ombudsman or courts to preserve fairness and constitutionality.
