21/09/2025
๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐ | ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ธ๐ท: ๐๐๐ ๐ป๐น๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ป๐๐
September 21, 1972, remains one of the most pivotal dates in Philippine history. On this day, then-President Ferdinand Marcos, Sr. signed Proclamation No. 1081, placing the entire country under Martial Law. For some, this date signifies order, discipline, and the promise of a โnew society.โ For others, it stands as a stark reminder of repression, curtailed freedoms, and human rights violations. As we mark the 53rd anniversary of the declaration of Martial Law, it is worth reflecting on what this chapter means for us today, as citizens and as custodians of democratic values.
Martial Law was justified at the time as a response to rising lawlessness, communist insurgency, and secessionist movements. The 1935 Constitution granted the President the power to declare Martial Law โin case of invasion, insurrection, or rebellion, or imminent danger thereof.โ Marcosโ proclamation suspended civil liberties, closed Congress, and empowered the Executive to rule by decree.
Yet, beyond the legal justifications, the lived experience of Martial Law cannot be ignored. Thousands of Filipinos were detained without warrant, censorship of the press became widespread, and dissent was silenced. Reports from human rights watchdogs documented instances of torture, extrajudicial killings, and enforced disappearances. Indeed, the promise of a revitalized nation came at the cost of democratic space and individual freedoms.
The end of Martial Law in 1981 and the eventual ouster of Marcos through the 1986 People Power Revolution restored constitutional democracy. The framers of the 1987 Constitution took deliberate steps to ensure that the excesses of the period would not be repeated: they tightened the conditions for declaring Martial Law, limited its duration to sixty days, required congressional concurrence, and mandated judicial review โ a safeguard that was notably absent during Marcosโ regime.
Fifty-three years later, the memory of Martial Law is still contested. Some argue that the period was one of infrastructure growth, discipline, and economic reform. Others caution against historical revisionism, emphasizing the human cost and the danger of unchecked executive power. As such, we are called to approach this debate with critical minds โ to balance legal theory with historical truth, and to champion constitutionalism even when doing so is inconvenient.
Commemorating the Martial Lawโs anniversary is not about reliving the past for its own sake. It is about vigilance โ reminding ourselves that democracy is fragile and that the rule of law must always prevail over rule by force. It has been often said that โ๐๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ฒ.โ As we commemorate the 53rd anniversary of the declaration of Martial Law, let us reaffirm that promise: never again.