FEAR

13/02/2025

Wow! So, there it is—Anthony Fauci, the former chief medical advisor to the president, has been pardoned. One must ask: why does someone need a pardon for simply giving medical advice during the ‘pandemic’?

Was it because:
– Dr. Fauci claimed the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) was 3.4%, based on models, rather than the real-world data of 0.15% (comparable to a bad flu season)? (1)
– Dr. Fauci admitted in September 2023 that there was no evidence showing mask mandates stopped the spread of the pandemic, despite mandating masks (including double-masking)? (2)
– Dr. Fauci said in January 2024 that the 6-foot social distancing rule “sort of just appeared,” even though it led to school and business shutdowns? (3)
– Dr. Fauci pushed the ‘vaccine’ on American citizens, despite early trial data showing it was neither safe nor effective? (4)

So much for ‘The Science.’ What else, Dr. Fauci? What else have you not told us?

Fauci clearly made a series of errors—some would even call them lies—so why should he escape accountability? This pardon looks like an admission of guilt. Let’s hope this pardon can be revoked, and that Fauci is held accountable for the unnecessary and inhumane mandates. The truth will prevail.

FEAR. Don’t buy it.⁣
⁣


- - -
Sources:
1) swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality
2) dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12475613/fauci-covid-mask-mandate-evidence.html
nypost.com/2023/09/02/fauci-admits-lack-of-covid-mask-evidence-but-still-wants-us-to-wear-them
3) telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/01/12/anthony-fauci-covid-6ft-distancing-not-backed-data-usa
4) amazon.com/Pfizer-Papers-Pfizers-Against-Humanity/dp/1648210376

31/10/2024

Last month, Prof. Sir Chris Whitty testified before the ongoing so-called ‘Covid Inquiry’, expressing concern that the government “overdid it” in warning the public about the dangers of Covid at the start of the pandemic. No kidding, Sir Chris. As England’s Chief Medical Officer, Witty knew that authorities overstated the virus’s risks based on the facts available at the time.

But thank you anyway, Sir Chris, for finally acknowledging the lies. Let’s hope there will be accountability for the unnecessary suffering and deaths caused by the lockdown measures. The truth will prevail.
⁣
FEAR. Don’t buy it.⁣
⁣


- - -
Sources:
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/09/26/chris-whitty-covid-inquiry-live/
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13895329/Chris-Whitty-admits-government-overstated-danger-Covid-start-pandemic.html
www.youtube.com/live/qJ8SzqpNNUM?t=13054s

29/08/2024

Earlier this week, the social media giant Meta admitted that it regularly “censored” content on Facebook and Instagram during the so-called pandemic.

As recounted many times on this page, numerous eminent doctors and scientists were either shadow-banned or completely deplatformed. It is now clear that Meta also removed posts that contradicted the government’s fear-mongering narrative. For example, any posts critical of lockdowns, or those explaining that children were at virtually no risk from Covid-19, or those questioning the effectiveness of the ‘vaccines’ were deleted. As a result, the public was deprived of the truth, leading to widespread acceptance of the draconian lockdowns and coercion into taking a vaccine that was neither safe nor particularly effective.

Thank you, Mark Zuckerberg, for finally admitting to the widespread censorship. Let’s hope there will be accountability for the violation of the First Amendment and for the unnecessary suffering and death caused by the fear-mongering propaganda propagated by governments and enabled by companies like Meta. The truth will prevail.
⁣
FEAR. Don’t buy it.⁣
⁣


- - -
Sources:
www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/08/27/covid-censorship-was-wrong-i-wish-id-fought-it-zuckerberg/
www.bbc.com/news/articles/czxlpjlgdzjo

03/06/2024

Since March 2020, we’ve been called a lot of things: noncompliant, dangerous, crackpots, insane, anti-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists, tin-foil hats, wappies, granny killers, and even far-right extremists.

Four years on, we don’t take any pleasure in saying that on almost everything we questioned, we have been proved right. Vindicated. So far, right.

We always questioned the fear-mongering propaganda – the relentless media coverage that sold the lie that Covid-19 was like the Black Death. Four years on, the IFR of Covid-19 is comparable to that of a bad flu season.

We always questioned the lockdown policies. Four years on, it is widely acknowledged that lockdowns had little impact on Covid-19 mortality and caused more harm than benefit, with substantial collateral damage that will be felt for years to come. This includes millions of non-Covid excess deaths, a devastated economy, impeded education, and harm to children’s development.

We always questioned the effectiveness of the so-called vaccines. Today, it is widely accepted that these jabs do not confer immunity or prevent the transmission of Covid-19. We also questioned the safety of these experimental mRNA vaccines, and sadly, one only has to look at the massive spike in excess deaths or the rise in strokes, myocarditis, blood clots, allergic reactions, skin conditions, Bell’s Palsy, menstrual irregularities, turbo cancers, and more to make the tragic link.

So far, right.

Source:
– off-guardian.org/2023/03/24/40-facts-you-need-to-know-the-real-story-of-covid/
– swprs.org/covid19-facts/

20/05/2024

In the previous post, we highlighted how seasonal influenza (flu) had virtually disappeared in 2020/21 and questioned whether the flu had simply been rebranded as Covid-19.⁣
⁣
Here in the Netherlands, the official data from the RIVM (the Dutch Public Health research institute) on seasonal influenza mortality is clear. See the black bars on the graph.⁣
⁣
Remarkably, the RIVM reported that “there was no flu epidemic” in 2020/21 and published the figure of 600 deaths associated with the flu. From 2020 to 2023, the RIVM registered no deaths associated with influenza in the Netherlands. You read that correctly: zero deaths.⁣
⁣
Meanwhile, when one looks at the official data from the RIVM for deaths associated with Covid-19, it’s fairly obvious what happened to the flu.⁣
⁣
Just do the math – or “follow the science.”⁣
⁣
FEAR. Don’t buy it.⁣
⁣
⁣⁣
⁣
Source:⁣
(1) www.rivm.nl/griep-griepprik/feiten-en-cijfers⁣
(2) www.rivm.nl/publicaties/annual-report-surveillance-of-covid-19-influenza-and-other-respiratory-infections-in-0

18/05/2024

While the world was riveted by the ‘novel’ coronavirus in 2020/21, the time-honoured seasonal virus known as ‘the flu’ dropped to historic lows and virtually disappeared. Was this a coincidence, or was the flu simply rebranded as the more terrifying Covid-19?⁣
⁣
Three years on, it’s clear from the official data that Covid-19, with a median IFR of less than 0.15%, is comparable to a bad flu season. The data does not lie and shows that Covid-19 disproportionately affected the elderly and those with underlying health conditions — just like the flu...⁣
⁣
In fact, back in 2020, many eminent scientists with no conflicts of interest (i.e. not funded by Big Pharma) were already stating that Covid-19 was not a death sentence and that there were many cheap, safe, and effective treatments. Instead, these scientists were demonised and censored. Shamefully, the legacy media and governments continued to roll out a campaign of fear, terrifying the public into believing that Covid-19 was akin to the Black Death. This 24/7 fearmongering clouded people’s judgments and nudged the public into accepting the draconian lockdowns and the ‘miracle vaccine’.⁣
⁣
Today, public health advice is to treat symptoms of Covid-19 similarly to those of the seasonal flu…⁣
⁣
So again, was the flu simply rebranded as Covid-19?⁣
⁣
FEAR. Don’t buy it.⁣
⁣
⁣

31/01/2024

Last week during the UK Covid Inquiry, it was revealed that the BBC “misrepresented” the risk posed by Covid-19 in order to boost public support for lockdown.

Prof. Mark Woolhouse, a prominent epidemiologist and government adviser, slammed the broadcaster for having “repeatedly reported rare deaths or illnesses among healthy adults as if they were the norm”. He stated that this created a “misleading impression” among viewers at the start of the pandemic, suggesting that “we are all at risk” and “the virus does not discriminate”. In reality, he pointed out that at the time, it was known that the risk of dying from Covid-19 was 10,000 times higher in the over-75s than in the under-15s!

In 2021, we discovered that the UK government was employing teams of behavioural scientists to terrify the public and ensure compliance with regulations. It is now abundantly clear that the BBC conspired in this campaign of mass FEAR against the British public.

The BBC’s messaging, or brainwashing, was designed to instil the highest levels of anxiety about Covid-19. This fear ruthlessly stripped away rational thinking and the coping mechanisms of those with existing mental health conditions or those vulnerable to developing them. Consequently, we now have a generation of children and adolescents who grew up isolated and are still suffering from anxiety, grappling with eating disorders, or contending with thoughts of self-harm. We also have parents battling depression, often stemming from the debts incurred when their businesses were forced to close. Moreover, many elderly people still live in fear, reluctant to leave their homes or bin their face masks.

The BBC ought to be held accountable for disseminating misleading and harmful news – or ‘misinformation’, as it’s known these days. It is clear that the corporation is in violation of its own Royal Charter, which states that it “is to act in the public interest.” It went from being a public service news outlet to what the BBC notably has always insisted it is not: a state broadcaster. From Strictly Dancing to Pravda in a single move.

It is simply not ethical to create a level of fear that pushed many people to the very edge, and some over it. The BBC should be held accountable for the 360-degree campaign of FEAR that has left many of our fellow citizens debilitated with anxiety, fear, and worse, for years to come.

FEAR, don’t buy it.


•
•
•
•
Sources:
–
UK Covid-19 Inquiry:
https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/documents/inq000369765-witness-statement-of-professor-mark-woolhouse-professor-of-infectious-disease-epidemiology-at-the-university-of-edinburgh-dated-14-12-2023/
–
The Telegraph (25 January 2024):
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/25/covid-inquiry-bbc-misrepresented-risk-pandemic/

13/03/2023

The Telegraph’s ‘Lockdown Files’ confirm how the UK government weaponised fear during the so-called pandemic. At first, the strategy to “frighten the pants off everyone” encouraged maximum compliance with the restrictions. By 2021, the campaign of fear created maximum desire for the so-called vaccine and regular boosters.
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/lockdown-files/

This is the biggest scandal of our lifetime.

⁣
⁣
⁣

11/03/2023

The Telegraph’s ‘Lockdown Files’ confirm how the UK government weaponised fear during the so-called pandemic. At first, the strategy to “frighten the pants off everyone” encouraged maximum compliance with the restrictions. By 2021, the campaign of fear created maximum desire for the so-called vaccine and regular boosters.
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/lockdown-files

This is the biggest scandal of our lifetime.

⁣
⁣
⁣

10/03/2023

The Telegraph’s ‘Lockdown Files’ confirm how the UK government weaponised fear during the so-called pandemic. At first, the strategy to “frighten the pants off everyone” encouraged maximum compliance with the restrictions. By 2021, the campaign of fear created maximum desire for the so-called vaccine and regular boosters.

This is the biggest scandal of our lifetime.

⁣
⁣
⁣

08/03/2023

05/03/2023

The Telegraph’s ‘Lockdown Files’ confirm, amongst other things, how the UK government weaponised fear during the so-called pandemic.

This exchange between Matt Hancock (Health Secretary) and his media advisor Damon Poole shows how new variants of Covid-19 propelled the campaign of fear. At first, “frighten(ing) the pants of everyone” was about maximum compliance with the restrictions. By 2021, the excessive use of fear was used to create maximum desire for the so-called vaccine and regular boosters.

This is the biggest scandal of our lifetime.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/lockdown-files