Ng Wei Aik 黄伟益

18/01/2025

Why I said that the JMB/MC cannot issue a fine against anyone for obstructing the passageways or stairways?

(1) The paragraph 20(2) of the by-laws as provided under the Strata Management (Maintenance and Management) Regulations 2015 has laid out a mechanism to deal with such a matter whereby the JMB/MC can remove these obstruction with or without notice, and then allow the parcel owners to redeem their confiscated property within 14 days from the date of the notice being given and also to pay the charges of not more than RM200.00 for this purpose;

(2) The by-laws do not provide that a fine could be imposed under this situation. The imposition of the fines are not automatically allowed unless with the power given to the JMB/MC under a resolution which is passed in an AGM/EGM pursuant to Paragraph 7(1) of the by-laws;

(3) If you try to impose a fine by way of passing a resolution (with simple majority to approve) or by making additional by-laws (with 75% of valid votes being cast) in the AGM/EGM, the parcel owners would be at risk of being imposed a fine on top of the charges payable to the JMB/MC. This is prohibited under the principle of double jeopardy as no law would allow a person to be meted out penalties for twice on the same breach of the by-laws;

(4) As the fine is criminal in nature, no fine shall be imposed against a parcel owner just because the obstruction was found on the passageways or stairways. There is possibly that certain items are not belong to the parcel owner himself. Just simply issuing a fine without concrete proof may land the JMB/MC in the hot soup which would usually ended up in the court or the Strata Management Tribunal. It would be safer to put up a notice for the parcel owners to come forward and claim back their confiscated property; and

(5) Following the principle of double jeopardy, once a parcel owner is slapped with a fine for obstructing the passageways and if he/she is willing (or not willing) to pay a fine without removing the obstruction, then the JMB/MC cannot continue to take further action by slapping another fine or even to remove these obstruction including to impose the charges for removal purpose. By allowing the JMB/MC to remove these obstruction and then to impose the charges against the parcel owners, it would be deemed as double jeopardy which is also against natural justice.

Hope that my explanation would be helpful.

17/01/2025

The JMB/MC cannot impose a fine against the parcel owners for obstructing the passageways since the by-laws has laid down a clear mechanism to deal with such a matter.

Following the by-laws as provided under the Third Schedule of the Strata Management (Maintenance and Management) Regulations 2015,

20. Prohibition of obstruction

(2) The management corporation may without prior notice, remove or confiscate any property of a proprietor, including but not limited to, bicycles, potted plants, vases, furniture, trolleys, boxes, goods or objects of any kind whatsoever. The management corporation may put up a notice of any removed or confiscated property which may be claimed by the proprietor within fourteen days from date of the notice subject to payment to the management corporation of a charge not exceeding two hundred ringgit. If a removed or confiscated property is not claimed at the expiry of the period of fourteen days, the management corporation may discard or dispose of such property as it deems fit without any liability to the proprietor.

If a fine is imposed and the obstruction is not removed, the JMB/MC may not be allowed to take further action against the parcel owners as it will be a double jeopardy against the parcel owners for meting out penalty twice on the same breach of the by-laws.

Even though you may try to impose a fine by way of making additional by-laws and/or passing a motion in the AGM/EGM for that effect, it will still not helping to do away with the issue of double jeopardy and the JMB/MC may be further challenged due to this issue.

17/01/2025

我刚刚用AI做了这首歌，你还不快点来买TOTO?

就以此歌送给大家，祝大家新年中大奖！

[Verse]
天上光芒闪耀每天都是宴会
亿万梦想等待着按下那一回
金色霓虹在招手好运多到装不满
你还等什么呢快来打扮

[Verse 2]
主角从此改写命运就在今晚
快把希望下注生活不会孤单
狂热梦想一起分享精彩剧本快演绎
你还犹豫什么赶紧购买

[Chorus]
TOTO奖池破亿快来抢一票
与好运拥抱幸福就快来到
命运掌握在手别再等待少
TOTO大奖等你实现美好

[Verse 3]
车轮是否转动决定在望眼前
未来从不遥远只要心怀期盼
星光闪耀之道就在这里刻画
你还等什么赶紧来尝

[Bridge]
梦想在指尖筹码全拿上
命运不再戏言好运为你唱
每个烟火瞬间都值得珍藏
快来加入这场亿万大狂欢

[Chorus]
TOTO奖池破亿快来抢一票
与好运拥抱幸福就快来到
命运掌握在手别再等待少
TOTO大奖等你实现美好

励志，亢奋，电子流行 song. Listen and make your own with Suno.

16/01/2025

AI is always smarter than Dr Ham!

连AI都懂Hamburger是牛肉做成的。只有Dr Ham不懂……

16/01/2025

不看啦！不敢看啦！

16/01/2025

查什么牛精字典？问问AI就可以了……

做人请不要像阿克玛这样蠢！

AI is even smarter than a Doctor!!!

15/01/2025

昨天的消费人仲裁庭第一次聆审，我一直找不到庄若，也找不到熊祥光！我同样找不到John Rock！

这个老文青（有人说他是老文伯）怎么不敢出来当庭对质呢？为了RM80，典当了老文青个人最后的尊严，出卖了《椰子屋》，玷污了整个艺文界……

针对此事，我早前入禀消费人索偿仲裁庭，起诉《椰子屋》庄若（熊祥光）拿了钱没有出版《椰子屋》纪念号，也不愿意退款，甚至为了区区RM80拉黑了我！

老文青怎么变成了老万？有人问我，我这么在乎RM80吗？当然不是。当老文青坑钱的消息爆出来时，我也接到其他人来电，告诉我其他类似的消息。

我敢相信，我不是第一个受害者，也不是最后一个受害者。我入禀消费人仲裁庭，是希望起着带动作用，让其他受害者也挺身而出。

我相信江湖上还有许多面对同样遭遇的人，让我们替天行道，大家一起把这个老万楸出来吧！江湖事江湖了，这是万古不变的道理！

14/01/2025

猜猜我在哪里？

14/01/2025

Happy Pongal to all our Indian friends…

14/01/2025

Open tender for security guard service - Sri Pandan @ Ampang

12/01/2025

It is clear that pursuant to Section 21(3) of the Strata Management Act 2013 [Act 757], no JMB can enter into a contract in relation to the maintenance and management of a building for more than 12 months:

21. Duties and powers of joint management body

(3) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Act, the joint management body shall not enter into any contract relating to the maintenance and management of any building or land intended for subdivision into parcels and the common property in the development area for any period exceeding twelve months.

However, there is no such a clause provided for the MC under the SMA 2013. In other words, the MC is at liberty to enter into a contract for more than 12 months.

Even though the JMB is not allowed to enter into any contract for more than 12 months, but if there is any contract being entered by the JMB for more than 12 months, what would be the legal remedy available for challenging that contract?

Always remember, you may argue that the contract being entered by the JMB for more than 12 months would be voidable, but it will not be automatically void pursuant to the SMA 2013, as the Court may also tend to look into the contract from the eyes of the Contracts Act 1950 [Act 136].

If by the judgment of the Court that the contract is valid and existing and also enforceable and binding on all parties, then the JMB would be compelled to honour all its obligations being outlined under the said contract.

09/01/2025

In Johor Bahru for the UTM Real Estate Career Fair 2025…

We as the Property Managers are invited to tab on the talent pool which would be graduated very soon…

今天在新山马来西亚工艺大学参与为产业相关科系即将毕业学生举办的就业展，而我们则受邀来给这些国家未来的主人翁打开他们的就业之门！

08/01/2025

这个家伙完全不知道槟州人民要的是什么？难怪民政党会输到一败涂地！

08/01/2025

联邦宪法第42条文规定，联邦直辖区特赦局主席是最高元首，而特赦局会议必须在最高元首在场的情况下召开。

既然特赦局是由最高元首主持会议，如果特赦局要给纳吉居家服刑，那么最高元首绝对有权在会议中提出，并寻求会议通过。

除非这个居家服刑的建议，不符合我国现有法律的规定，所以最高元首就尝试以附录，为日后尝试推动居家服刑留下一道伏笔。

请记住联邦宪法第42(9)条提到，特赦局在作出任何建议之前，必须考虑到律政司针对某事项所可能提出的书面看法。

最高元首的特赦权力是否有所限制？根据联邦宪法第42(4)(a)条提到，最高元首的特赦权力必须符合联邦宪法第40(3)条之规定，即最高元首在这方面，除非特赦局有提出之建议，否则最高元首没有自行决定要如何特赦之权力。

永远记住，马来西亚是君主立宪之国家，最高元首永远要根据联邦宪法行事，不得超越法律自行给纳吉居家服刑的特权！

请不要人云亦云！一个不在特赦局会议通过之附录，即使有彭亨州皇室证实其存在，即使时任最高元首要给纳吉居家服刑，但不可行就是不可行！法外立法更加行不通！

联邦宪法永远是我们最后的依据……

PERLEMBAGAAN PERSEKUTUAN

BAHAGIAN IV - PERSEKUTUAN
Bab 3 - Badan Eksekutif

Perkara 42. Kuasa pengampunan, dsb.

(1) Yang di-Pertuan Agong berkuasa memberi ampun, tunda hukum dan lega hukum berkenaan dengan segala kesalahan yang telah dibicarakan oleh mahkamah tentera dan segala kesalahan yang dilakukan di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Labuan dan Putrajaya; dan Raja atau Yang di-Pertua Negeri sesuatu Negeri berkuasa memberi ampun, tunda hukum dan lega hukum berkenaan dengan segala kesalahan lain yang dilakukan di dalam Negerinya.

(4) Kuasa yang disebut dalam Perkara ini--

(a) adalah, setakat yang kuasa itu boleh dijalankan oleh Yang di-Pertuan Agong, antara fungsi yang peruntukan berkenaan dengannya boleh dibuat oleh undang-undang persekutuan di bawah Fasal (3) Perkara 40;

(5) Lembaga Pengampunan yang ditubuhkan bagi setiap Negeri hendaklah terdiri daripada Peguam Negara Persekutuan, Ketua Menteri Negeri itu dan tidak lebih daripada tiga orang anggota lain yang hendaklah dilantik olrh Raja atau Yang di-Pertua Negeri; tetapi Peguam Negara boleh dari semasa ke semasa melalui surat cara secara bertulis mewakilkan fungsinya sebagai anggota Lembaga itu kepada mana-mana orang lain, dan Raja atau Yang di-Pertua Negeri boleh melantik mana-mana orang untuk menjalankan buat sementara fungsi mana-mana anggota Lembaga yang dilantik olehnya yang tidak hadir atau tidak dapat menjalankan fungsinya.

(8) Lembaga Pengampunan hendaklah bermesyuarat dengan kehadiran Raja atau Yang di-Pertua Negeri dan Raja atau Yang di-Pertua Negeri itu hendaklah mempengerusikan mesyuarat itu.

(9) Sebelum memberikan nasihatnya mengenai apa-apa perkara, Lembaga Pengampunan hendaklah menimbangkan apa-apa pendapat bertulis yang mungkin telah dikemukakan oleh Peguam Negara mengenai perkara itu.

(11) Bagi maksud Perkara ini, maka hendaklah ditubuhkan Lembaga Pengampunan tunggal bagi Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Labuan dan Putrajaya dan peruntukan Fasal (5), (6), (7), (8) dan (9) hendaklah terpakai mutatis mutandis bagi Lembaga Pengampunan di bawah Fasal ini kecuali bahawa sebutan mengenai "Raja atau Yang di-Pertua Negeri" hendaklah ditafsirkan sebagai sebutan mengenai Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan sebutan mengenai "Ketua Menteri Negeri itu" hendaklah ditafsirkan sebagai sebutan mengenai Menteri yang bertanggungjawab bagi Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Labuan dan Putrajaya.

07/01/2025

早就应该执法啦！还要等什么时候？

禁用塑料吸管是因其难以回收，塑料微粒积累在土壤中会对环境造成破坏。

#东方日报 #东方北马 #槟城

05/01/2025

Thanks to Ch’ng Ewe Lee for delivering a seminar topic on “How e-Invoicing impacts the JMBs/MCs?”

Strata Management Seminar in Penang - 4/1/2025 (with CPD approved by BOVEAP, RISM and Bar Council)

TO PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY VALUE – WHAT OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR US?

Organised by The Light Academy Sdn Bhd

05/01/2025

Thanks to Willie Ong for delivering a seminar topic on “How to Enforce the Tribunal Awards & Make A Claim on Building Defects?”

Strata Management Seminar in Penang - 4/1/2025 (with CPD approved by BOVEAP, RISM and Bar Council)

TO PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY VALUE – WHAT OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR US?

Organised by The Light Academy Sdn Bhd

05/01/2025

Thanks to Sr Jessyca Yong for delivering a seminar topic on “How to Maintain Your Building in Good Shape?”

Strata Management Seminar in Penang - 4/1/2025 (with CPD approved by BOVEAP, RISM and Bar Council)

TO PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY VALUE – WHAT OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR US?

Organised by The Light Academy Sdn Bhd