23/05/2025
J&K High Court Overturns Controversial Seniority Clause for Rehbar-e-Taleem Teachers, Upholds Merit-Based Recruitment
Analysis by Mushkil Rasta ا Srinagar | May 23, 2025
In a watershed judgment that underscores the sanctity of statutory service rules and meritocracy in public employment, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar has struck down a controversial provision of the 2014 Government Order that allowed Rehbar-e-Taleem (ReT) teachers to count their five-year contractual service for seniority after regularization. The decision restores the rightful seniority of merit-based recruits and redefines the boundaries of state policy-making in public service.
---
The Case: Merit Versus Policy
The case involved appeals filed by ten General Line Teachers (GLTs)—formally selected through the J&K Services Selection Board (JKSSB)—who challenged the validity of Government Order No. 469-Edu of 2014, which gave retrospective seniority and pension benefits to ReT teachers from the date of their initial engagement, not their regularization.
The GLTs contended that the order violated Rule 24(1) of the J&K Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 and Rules of 1979, which mandate that seniority begins only upon formal appointment to a service. ReTs, they argued, were not part of the permanent establishment during their initial years and thus could not be granted seniority over teachers who entered through open, competitive recruitment.
The ReT Scheme: A Welfare Initiative Misapplied?
Launched in 2000, the ReT Scheme was designed as a decentralized, community-driven solution to staffing shortages in primary and middle schools. Teachers were locally appointed on honorarium for five years, after which they could be regularized based on performance and assessment.
However, the 2014 Cabinet decision extended their pre-regularization service for seniority and pension purposes—triggering legal friction. It also included a new transfer policy, making ReTs transferrable within the district post-regularization—raising further questions about integration into the formal service cadre.
Court’s Analysis: Beyond Surface Parity
The Division Bench of Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Parihar delivered a detailed, hard-hitting judgment that cut through surface-level comparisons.
“Merely because ReTs were granted welfare benefits such as maternity leave or their service was counted for pension does not elevate them to the status of formal government employees,” the Bench observed.
The Court held that:
The selection process of ReTs (via Village Level Committees) lacked the rigour, transparency, and district-wide competition mandated for GLTs recruited by JKSSB.
ReTs became government servants only after regularization—not during their honorarium-based service period.
The impugned proviso in the 2014 Order violated Rule 24(1), which states that seniority accrues only from the date of formal appointment.
The government failed to consider the grave injustice caused to JKSSB-recruited teachers, who were pushed down in seniority unfairly.
---
Transfer Policy and Its Silent Fallout
While the judgment focused primarily on seniority, the transferability clause added in 2014 was also scrutinized. Earlier, ReTs were village-specific, reflecting the Scheme’s community-based ethos. However, once regularized, the new clause allowed intra-district transfers, subtly morphing ReTs into district-level employees—raising equity and governance concerns.
The Court did not directly invalidate this part but hinted at the broader implications of such administrative flexibility being granted without legislative or recruitment rule alignment.
---
Setting the Record Straight: Previous Judgments Misinterpreted
Importantly, the Bench declared that the earlier Single Bench judgment of 2014, which upheld the ReT seniority clause, suffered from serious legal and factual errors. It also rejected reliance on previous judgments like Amit Padha v. State of J&K, terming them per incuriam (rendered without full knowledge of the relevant law).
---
The Final Verdict
> “We find merit in these appeals… The impugned proviso that the five years service rendered by Rehbar-e-Taleem teachers before regularization shall count for fixing their seniority is set aside,” the Court ruled.
---
Why This Judgment Matters
This decision resonates far beyond the courtroom:
Reinstates Rule of Law: It upholds that executive policies must align with statutory service rules, not override them.
Protects Competitive Merit: JKSSB-selected candidates—many of whom had ranked high in open competition—are now safeguarded from being unfairly overtaken in seniority.
Limits Populist Policy Tweaks: The ruling acts as a check on governments that attempt to extend benefits retroactively to appease contractual or scheme-based workers.
Guides Future HR Policy: By clarifying that temporary or scheme-based staff cannot claim equal footing with regular appointees, it guides HR reforms across Indian states facing similar tensions.
---
The Road Ahead: A Governance Test
This verdict forces the government to recalibrate the seniority lists of thousands of teachers and potentially revise transfer orders already executed under the 2014 policy. It also leaves the door open for similar litigation in other sectors (like healthcare or rural employment), where contractual staff were later absorbed into formal roles.
Conclusion:
The J&K High Court’s decision is a reminder that while welfare schemes like ReT may fill critical service gaps, their administrative integration must follow due process. In a nation striving for rule-bound governance, the court has once again made it clear: fairness to one group cannot mean injustice to another.
