Thinkafrica.net, London (2025)

13/01/2025

How MJ did the lean

13/01/2025

History teaches us that whatever you did 2,400 years ago doesn’t always help you today. All countries have to continue working hard, or suffer the consequences.

13/01/2025

Wa’at: The Land of the Reed 🌾🌊
Before “Thebes” became a Greek place name, the Egyptians called it Wa’at, meaning “Land of the Reed.” This African term links the region to the reeds of the Nile, integral to Egyptian life for food, tools, and papyrus production. 🌍✨ The original names carry deep connections to the land, proving that Egypt’s identity was rooted in African geography and ecology.

13/01/2025

At 12 years old, Nigerian-American student Eniola Shokunbi developed an affordable air filter to reduce airborne diseases in classrooms. Her design, costing about $60, uses a box fan, furnace filters, duct tape, and cardboard, and effectively removes over 99% of airborne viruses. The Connecticut State Bond Commission recognized its potential and approved $11.5 million in funding to implement these filters in schools statewide. Eniola’s initiative aims to enhance indoor air quality and promote health in educational environments.

12/01/2025

The Myth of “Darker men, lighter women” in Egyptian art

The image of Tutankhamun and his wife Ankhesenamun, depicted in regal Egyptian outfits and unmistakably painted in equally rich brown tones, serves as a stunning rebuke to the overused trope that ancient Egyptians depicted men darker than women because men worked outdoors while women remained indoors. Let’s dismantle this flawed assumption and examine how this intricately crafted artifact, featuring one of Egypt’s most iconic royal couples, obliterates stereotypes with its sheer artistry and cultural significance.

Mocking the “Indoor Woman, Outdoor Man” Claim

To suggest that men were painted darker due to their outdoor labor while women were lighter because of their supposed indoor existence is to apply Greek art conventions to a civilization that predates Greek frescoes by millennia. The Greeks, whose art heavily relied on stylized dichotomies, produced their frescoes more than 3,000 years after Egypt had already established its artistic traditions. Why impose unrelated European standards on a society that had its own sophisticated and consistent artistic language long before the first brush touched a wall in the Aegean?

The Egyptians were deliberate, not arbitrary, in their use of color. Skin tone was symbolic rather than mimetic. Men and women in Egyptian art were often painted differently for spiritual or aesthetic reasons, such as distinguishing divine qualities, not due to unsubstantiated notions of gender-based labor divisions. In this depiction, the equal brown tones of Tutankhamun and Ankhesenamun destroy this baseless claim. Both are portrayed as regal figures, in complementary, unified tones—a testament to their shared status, Africanity, and humanity.

Why the Tutankhamun Throne Scene Matters

This artwork is no casual depiction of random commoners; it represents the apex of Egyptian society, created with painstaking precision for none other than a pharaoh. Tutankhamun’s throne chair is more than just furniture—it is a statement of power, unity, and divine connection. Every detail is intentional, carrying symbolic weight.

The fact that both Tutankhamun and Ankhesenamun are painted in identical black African brown tones is especially significant because it reflects their shared status as divinely chosen rulers of Kemet, the “Black Land.” The intricate golden throne places the couple in a scene of intimacy and unity, with Ankhesenamun lovingly anointing her husband. The color choice is deliberate, emphasizing not gender-based stereotypes but rather the African identity of Egypt’s rulers.

The Slippers of Love: A Detail of Tenderness

One of the most overlooked yet enchanting details is the depiction of Tutankhamun and Ankhesenamun sharing one pair of slippers—a literal and symbolic act of affection and unity. Each wears one slipper from the same pair, a gesture that transcends mere aesthetics and speaks to their bond as partners in life and rule. Such a tender portrayal is a rarity in ancient art and reflects Egyptian values of mutual respect and harmony within a royal marriage.

This level of intimacy in the portrayal directly contradicts the stereotype of ancient depictions being cold, rigid, and formulaic. Here, we see a royal couple portrayed with warmth, affection, and equality—both in symbolism and skin tone.

Equally and Unmistakably Brown

Look closely: Tutankhamun and Ankhesenamun are both depicted with rich brown skin tones, unmistakably black African in appearance. This is no accident. Egyptian artists worked within a precise framework, adhering to religious and cultural ideals. These tones reflect their place as rulers of an African kingdom, deeply connected to the land and its people.

To suggest that these tones represent artistic shortcuts or labor-based stereotypes is laughable. Are we really to believe that artisans of such skill, capable of creating masterpieces like this throne, simply slapped on some paint to depict outdoor tanning? The absurdity of the argument collapses under the weight of evidence: the tones are deliberate and consistent across royal iconography, symbolizing the inherent African identity of Egypt’s rulers.

Ridiculous Modern Stereotypes

This depiction debunks modern misconceptions about ancient Egypt on multiple fronts:

1. “Egyptians weren’t Black”: Here is tangible, irrefutable evidence of an African identity expressed through the deliberate, consistent portrayal of brown skin tones.

2. “Men were darker than women”: Both Tutankhamun and Ankhesenamun are painted in identical tones, demonstrating that gender-based assumptions about color usage do not apply here.

3. “Egyptian art is static and emotionless”: The shared slipper detail and affectionate gestures reveal a deep emotional connection between the royal couple, breaking stereotypes about stiff or impersonal ancient art.

Let’s Apply Basic Logic Against These Claims
For a Second

• Why would Egyptian artists depict their god-king and queen inaccurately? Tutankhamun, a pharaoh tied to divine authority, is portrayed in the most idealized manner. The identical tones confirm that this was an intentional representation of reality and status, not an arbitrary artistic choice.

• Why impose Greek conventions on a civilization 3,000 years older? Egyptian art existed independently and flourished before the Aegean frescoes. The two civilizations had entirely different cultural priorities, and conflating them is intellectually dishonest.

• Why assume labor stereotypes for royalty? Pharaohs and queens didn’t farm or toil outdoors, yet their depictions consistently feature dark tones. This disproves any notion of pigmentation tied to manual labor.

Conclusion: Let the Throne Speak for Itself

This depiction of Tutankhamun and Ankhesenamun is a masterclass in artistry, symbolism, and African heritage. It demolishes tired stereotypes and forces us to confront the historical truth: ancient Egypt was a Black African civilization, and its rulers embraced this identity in their art. Instead of clinging to outdated, Eurocentric narratives, let’s marvel at the skill and cultural depth that created this iconic scene—a golden legacy of love, equality, and unapologetic African identity.

12/01/2025

12,000 structures, and 10,000 homes have been destroyed by fire in California. This is a tragedy, and demonstrates the importance of any country investing in disaster response services. Without accountable governance and paying taxes in your country, when these unfortunate circumstances occur, it is difficult to have the necessary people and equipment in place. Let us hope that African governments and populations reform, so that governments are able to respond to the needs of their people.

12/01/2025

The ancient Egyptians often depicted themselves in brown to dark brown. This fact makes a lot of Eurocentrics uncomfortable, even though Egypt is not in Europe. 😂It’s why they stick the label “Western Eurasia” on African DNA results. The claim that ancient Egyptian brown skin tones were merely the result of tanning is easily debunked when the historical, cultural, and artistic evidence is properly examined. Ancient Egyptian art consistently depicts figures with a range of rich brown tones, symbolic of their African identity, not temporary environmental effects. The frescoes in the Tomb of Nebamun, for instance, show men and women with similar brown tones, which debunks the theory that men’s darker skin was due to outdoor labor while women stayed indoors. This level of consistency was deliberate, representing the diverse natural pigmentation of Egypt’s population, rooted in their African heritage.

Women at funeral of Nebamun.

11/01/2025

This Greek guy 🇬🇷 claims Greeks like Minos founded Egypt

Response:

Egypt Founded by Greeks? Sure, and Pyramids are a Pack of 52 cards 🃏😂

Let’s get something straight: the idea that the Greeks founded Egypt is as ridiculous as claiming Greeks invented invented art. The ancient Egyptians were building pyramids and documenting the stars while the ancestors of the Greeks were still figuring out how to live without cave drafts. It’s a bold claim, but one that crumbles faster than a poorly-made papyrus scroll under the weight of evidence. So, let’s set the record straight—point by point—and dismantle this myth for good.

1. Afroasiatic Roots: Africa, Not Athens

The Egyptian language, part of the Afroasiatic family, traces its roots to Africa. Linguists like Christopher Ehret and over 10 other independent teams have pinpointed its origin to regions around the Horn of Africa and the Sahara. This linguistic family includes Berber, Cush*tic, Omotic, and Chadic languages—all distinctly African. Sorry, Greece, but Egyptian didn’t get its grammar lessons from Socrates.

2. Pomponius Mela Says Otherwise

Roman geographer Pomponius Mela, writing in the 1st century CE, documented the Egyptians’ own claims of being the oldest civilization, with a lineage spanning over 13,000 years and 330 kings before Amasis. No mention of Greece swooping in to “found” anything here. If anything, the Egyptians considered themselves self-made—and rightly so.

3. African Dynastic Traditions Came First

By the time the Greeks knew which way was up, Egypt had already gone through thousands of years of dynastic rule. The Narmer Palette, from around 3100 BCE, celebrates the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt under an African king. Artifacts like the Qustul incense burner from Nubia show that the symbols of kingship were already African inventions—long before Greece was more than a blip on the Mediterranean map.

4. Genetics Prove the Point

Genetic studies consistently confirm that ancient Egyptians were closely related to Northeast Africans. Haplogroups like E-M35 and maternal lineages such as L3, both African in origin, are found in abundance among ancient Egyptian remains. This isn’t speculation—it’s cold, hard DNA science. No Greek migration swooped in to replace or “civilize” the population.

5. Greeks Borrowed, Not the Other Way Around

Herodotus, the so-called “Father of History,” openly admitted that the Greeks learned much of their wisdom from the Egyptians. Greek philosophers like Pythagoras and Plato didn’t “found” anything in Egypt—they studied there. Egypt was the teacher; Greece was the eager student. The cultural borrowing only flowed in one direction, and it wasn’t north to south.

Aristotle, another important Greek philosopher, writes: “Egypt witnesses to the antiquity of all these things, for the Egyptians appear to be of all people the most ancient; and they have laws and a regular constitution existing from time immemorial. We should therefore make the best use of what has been already discovered, and try to supply defects.” In Politics Book VII Chapter X

6. African Innovations in Astronomy and Religion

Centuries before the Greeks learned to build columns, Africans at Nabta Playa (7500–5500 BCE) were aligning massive stone structures to celestial bodies. These early astronomical practices fed directly into Egypt’s religious systems and architectural alignments. Greece had no part in these innovations—they were rooted in Africa, plain and simple.

7. Egyptians Didn’t See Greeks as Indigenous

The Egyptians referred to their land as “Kemet” (Black Land), a term rooted in their African identity. Greeks, when they arrived much later, were seen as outsiders and foreigners, not as co-founders. Even the Ptolemies, who ruled during the Hellenistic period, adopted Egyptian customs to gain legitimacy—they weren’t considered native Egyptians by anyone except themselves.

8. Geography Anchors Egypt to Africa

Egypt wasn’t just located in Africa; it was shaped by its geography and ecology. The annual Nile floods were the lifeblood of the civilization, a phenomenon tied to African ecosystems. Agriculture, pastoralism, and trade routes from the Sahara and Nubia all contributed to Egypt’s rise. No Greek soil, no Greek water, no Greek founding—just African ingenuity.

Thucydides on Greek Development: A Sobering Contrast to Egypt’s Sophistication

Even Thucydides, the great chronicler of Greek history, didn’t sugarcoat Greece’s primitive beginnings. In History of the Peloponnesian War, he describes the early Greeks as nomadic tribes who subsisted on piracy and raiding, their lands devoid of walls, surplus wealth, or stable settlements. Greek identity itself was a late development; before Hellen and his descendants unified them under the name “Hellenes,” they lived as fragmented communities, barely distinguishable from “barbarians.” In stark contrast, by the time the Greeks were looting unprotected villages, Egypt and Nubia had already developed complex ethical systems like Ma’at, established thriving cities, and built monumental structures that continue to baffle engineers. While the Egyptians were recording astronomical observations and perfecting agricultural techniques, early Greeks were asking passing ships if they were pirates—not as an accusation but as a friendly conversation starter. Thucydides’ unvarnished account of his ancestors highlights the absurdity of claiming that these nascent societies somehow “founded” Egypt. The evidence makes it clear: Greece was struggling to organize itself into a coherent civilization while Egypt was already a beacon of sophistication.

The Bottom Line
The claim that Greece “founded” Egypt ignores mountains of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, and historical evidence. Egypt’s roots are African, its culture was shaped by Africans, and its story is one of indigenous innovation and brilliance. The Greeks may have admired Egypt, but they didn’t build it—no matter how much anyone wishes otherwise.

11/01/2025

Coming to Terms with Facts You Didn’t Know: A Guide to Staying Cool

Let’s face it: being confronted with new facts—especially ones that challenge what you thought you knew—can feel like stepping into quicksand. Your mind races, you feel defensive, and before you know it, you’re saying, “That can’t be right!” rather than pausing to reflect. The good news? Overreacting isn’t inevitable. The trick lies in understanding why it happens and learning how to respond with curiosity instead of combativeness. Let’s unpack the science behind it.

Bounded Rationality: Why We Can’t Know Everything

Let’s start with a reality check: no one, not even the smartest person on Earth, knows everything. This is what Nobel laureate Herbert Simon referred to as bounded rationality—our decision-making is limited by three factors:

1. The information we have.
2. The time we have to process it.
3. The cognitive limits of our brains.

Think of it like this: if your brain were a smartphone, it would have great apps but limited storage. We specialize in what we need most—our careers, our social relationships, hobbies, or cultural contexts—but that leaves gaps. This isn’t a failure; it’s human nature. But problems arise when we assume our limited knowledge represents the full picture.

For instance, someone who has always seen Egypt discussed separately from Africa might struggle to process evidence of its African roots. It’s not stubbornness—it’s bounded reality meeting an unfamiliar fact.

The Dunning-Kruger Effect: When Confidence Outpaces Competence

Now, let’s talk about why some people overreact to facts they don’t understand: the Dunning-Kruger effect. This cognitive bias explains that people with low knowledge in a subject often overestimate their expertise. Why? Because knowing a little can trick us into thinking we know a lot.

Picture this: you’ve read a few articles about African history, and you confidently proclaim that the pyramids were built by aliens. Then someone calmly explains that there’s zero evidence for extraterrestrial architects, and the engineering feats align with the skill of ancient Egyptians. Instead of thanking them for the clarification, you double down. Why? Because admitting you’re wrong feels like losing face.

The Dunning-Kruger effect is not about intelligence; it’s about familiarity. The more you learn, the more you realize how much you don’t know—and that’s humbling. But when you don’t know enough to realize what you don’t know, defensiveness kicks in.

Cognitive Biases: The Mind’s Shortcut Factory

Our brains are constantly trying to save energy, which is why we rely on cognitive biases—mental shortcuts that simplify decision-making. While these shortcuts are useful, they can distort how we process new information. Here are a few common biases and how they show up when facts challenge us:

1. Confirmation Bias: We prefer information that supports what we already believe. If someone insists Egypt was founded by non-Africans, they may reject evidence of African DNA in ancient Egyptians because it doesn’t align with their narrative.

2. The Backfire Effect: When confronted with contradictory evidence, some people don’t just resist—they dig their heels in deeper. This is why correcting historical misconceptions can feel like a losing battle.

3. Anchoring: This is when the first piece of information we receive acts as a “mental anchor,” influencing how we interpret new data. For example, if someone’s anchor is the outdated idea that Africa contributed little to global civilization, they might dismiss discoveries like African ironworking or Nubian astronomy.

4. Framing: The way information is presented can skew perception. For instance, framing African history as a series of “tribal conflicts” rather than complex kingdoms and empires diminishes its significance, even if the facts remain the same.

How Anchoring and Framing Skew African History

Let’s say someone learns about Africa primarily through colonial narratives. Their “anchor” might be the idea that Africa was a continent of chaos before European intervention. Even when presented with evidence of sophisticated societies like Mali or Nubia, they unconsciously measure it against this flawed anchor, dismissing anything that doesn’t align.

Framing is equally deceptive. Take the story of the pyramids: framed as the work of “mysterious builders,” it sounds mystical, almost otherworldly. But framed as the product of African ingenuity, it’s a story of innovation rooted in a rich cultural context. The facts don’t change, but how we interpret them does.

Tools for Discovering and Evaluating New Information

So, how do you embrace new facts without overreacting? Here are some practical tools:

1. Adopt a Learner’s Mindset: Approach every conversation as an opportunity to learn. Instead of thinking, “This contradicts what I know,” try, “What can this teach me?”

2. Pause and Reflect: If new information feels shocking, give yourself time to process it before reacting. Ask yourself, “Is my reaction emotional or logical?”

3. Fact-Check Strategically: Instead of dismissing evidence, investigate it. Use credible sources and compare multiple perspectives to form a balanced view.

4. Challenge Your Biases: Actively question your assumptions. If a fact feels wrong, ask yourself, “Am I clinging to an outdated anchor?”

5. Ask Better Questions: Instead of debating, inquire. For instance, “What evidence supports that claim?” fosters dialogue rather than conflict.

6. Cultivate Intellectual Humility: It’s okay to say, “I didn’t know that.” Admitting gaps in your knowledge shows strength, not weakness.

The Takeaway

Coming to terms with new facts isn’t about proving others wrong or being the smartest in the room. It’s about curiosity, humility, and growth. As adults, we can’t know everything, and that’s okay. But when we anchor ourselves in open-mindedness and frame our reactions with curiosity, we unlock the beauty of lifelong learning.

So next time you hear something unexpected—whether it’s about African history, astronomy, or pyramids—don’t panic. Take a breath, grab a metaphorical shovel, and start digging for the truth. You might just discover something incredible.

11/01/2025

Earliest archaeological sites of human presence in Africa

Let’s embark on a tour through time and space, unraveling evidence of humans in Africa from hundreds of thousands of years ago. From Morocco’s deserts to South Africa’s caves, Africa wasn’t just humanity’s starting line—it was our laboratory of survival and innovation. And guess what? Every piece of evidence comes with its own timestamp, etched in stone, soil, or bone.

North Africa: The Dawn of Modern Humans
• Morocco 🇲🇦 - Jebel Irhoud (300,000 years ago)
Jebel Irhoud blew the archaeological community’s socks off when fossilized skulls and tools revealed early Homo sapiens were hanging out in Morocco 300,000 years ago. Using advanced dating methods like thermoluminescence, scientists determined how long ago the tools’ minerals were last heated. Spoiler: It was long before Instagram.
• Libya 🇱🇾 - Haua Fteah (80,000 years ago)
Fast-forward to 80,000 years ago. In the caves of Haua Fteah, early humans left behind hearths and artifacts, proving they had mastered fire. Carbon dating of charred remains tied their timeline to a period when Northern Africa oscillated between lush savannas and arid deserts.

West Africa: The Latecomer in the Story
• Nigeria 🇳🇬 - Iwo Eleru (12,000 years ago)
West Africa has fewer ancient sites, but don’t sleep on it! Iwo Eleru’s skeleton—discovered in Nigeria—shows Late Homo sapiens were still roaming here 12,000 years ago. The bones exhibit features linking them to earlier populations, suggesting an intriguing mix of ancient and modern traits. Cue debates among anthropologists.
• Niger 🇳🇪 - Kiffian Culture (8,000 years ago)
In the ancient wetlands of what is now Niger, Kiffian Culture thrived, leaving behind burials and tools. Radiocarbon dating of organic material buried alongside skeletons pinned them to an era when the Sahara was still green—a fleeting moment in geological terms.

Central Africa: Where the Past Runs Deep
• DR Congo 🇨🇩 - Katanda (90,000 years ago)
Katanda brings the drama with some of the world’s oldest bone harpoons. Yes, 90,000 years ago, humans in the Congo were angling for giant catfish. Scientists used stratigraphic dating to analyze the layers of soil surrounding these tools, which had been preserved as if in a time capsule.
• Zambia 🇿🇲 - Mumbwa Caves (50,000 years ago)
In Zambia’s Mumbwa Caves, layers of ash and stone tools point to Homo sapiens innovating under pressure. By dating the surrounding sediments with optically stimulated luminescence, researchers discovered these artifacts were left behind a cool 50,000 years ago.

East Africa: Humanity’s Birthplace
• Ethiopia 🇪🇹 - Gademotta Formation (195,000 years ago)
Ethiopia takes the crown as one of the oldest homes of Homo sapiens, with tools and fossils dating back 195,000 years. Volcanic ash layers were analyzed using argon-argon dating, giving us a precise snapshot of this early human hub.
• Kenya 🇰🇪 - Olorgesailie (295,000 years ago)
Olorgesailie shows us that early humans weren’t just surviving—they were thriving. Evidence of social networks, long-distance trade, and pigment use—all dated through sediment analysis and paleomagnetic techniques—places this site at 295,000 years ago.

South Africa: Innovation Central
• Border Cave (195,000 years ago)
Border Cave’s fossils suggest modern humans were already spreading out by 195,000 years ago, carrying symbolic artifacts like beads. Carbon dating of organic remnants provided the timeline, reinforcing Africa’s pivotal role in human evolution.
• Diepkloof Rock Shelter (60,000 years ago)
Diepkloof’s engraved ostrich eggshells—decorated water bottles, basically—show off early artistic expression. Using optically stimulated luminescence, scientists dated these layers to 60,000 years ago, when humans were getting creative with survival.

How Dates Were Formulated
• Carbon Dating: Measures the decay of radioactive carbon isotopes in organic material, effective up to 50,000 years. (Perfect for hearths, bones, and charred remains.)
• Thermoluminescence: Dates the last time minerals in tools or pottery were exposed to heat.
• Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL): Determines when soil grains were last exposed to sunlight. Ideal for buried artifacts.
• Argon-Argon Dating: Dates volcanic layers by measuring argon gas isotopes, great for ancient sites like Gademotta.
• Stratigraphy: Examines soil layers to understand the relative age of artifacts. Think of it as history in layers.

The Takeaway

Africa’s archaeological record is a treasure trove that proves humans didn’t just appear overnight—they innovated, adapted, and thrived over millennia. With every tool, fossil, and harpoon we unearth, we’re reminded that Africa isn’t just the beginning of the story—it is the story. And with better excavations in underrepresented areas like West Africa, who knows what surprises await?

07/01/2025

The fire dance 🔥

07/01/2025

Egyptomamia in the 19th century; cosplaying.

07/01/2025

Progress, much like history itself, is never a straight line. Many Africans hold the belief that progress follows a clear, unwavering trajectory—a steady ascent towards betterment. Yet, history teaches us otherwise. Every time progress is achieved, it sparks resistance, often fierce and unrelenting, from those who fear its implications or stand to lose from its advances. The enemies of progress, whether in the form of oppressive systems, entrenched interests, or even the inertia of tradition, rarely sit idle as societies strive to move forward.

History reveals a dance of push and pull, a constant struggle between aspiration and opposition. From the fight against colonial domination to the modern pursuit of self-determination, progress in Africa has always been punctuated by setbacks and challenges. Every movement forward has been met with attempts to reverse the gains, whether through external interference, internal conflict, or systemic sabotage.

Yet, this non-linear journey is what makes progress meaningful. Just as the path of history meanders through triumphs and tragedies, so too does the road to societal transformation. The key lies not in expecting a smooth, unbroken march forward, but in understanding that resistance is a natural part of growth.

Progress, then, is not defined by the absence of obstacles, but by the resilience to overcome them. It is forged in the determination to rise after every setback, to push forward in the face of opposition, and to embrace the complexities of change with unwavering resolve.

07/01/2025

What does it all mean? John Mahama’s outfit

06/01/2025

Guinea, situated in West Africa, is home to a diverse population of nearly 14 million people. The country is divided into multiple regions, with Conakry serving as both its capital and largest city, while N'Zérékoré is another prominent city in the nation.

Guinea has 8 administrative regions and 33 subdivisions called “prefectures”.

Conakry is not only the political capital but also the economic hub of Guinea, housing important institutions and industries. It boasts an international airport, bustling markets, and a vibrant cultural scene.

One of the notable landmarks in Conakry is the Grand Mosque of Conakry, an impressive architectural marvel.

Guinea is a country characterized by its rich ethnic diversity. The major ethnic groups include the Fulani (Peul), Mandinka, Soussou, and the Forest region's various ethnic communities. Each of these groups has its own distinct languages, traditions, and customs.

Along Guinea's coastline lies a range of cities, each with its unique charm and economic significance. These include the capital Conakry, which is also the largest city, as well as cities like Kindia, Labe, and N'Zérékoré.

Guinea's natural beauty is enhanced by its diverse geography, including lush forests, savannahs, and mountainous regions. The country's culture, history, and natural wonders make it a fascinating place to explore and experience.

Picture: Traditional outfit

06/01/2025

Beads in precolonial West African culture held multifaceted roles, encompassing social, spiritual, economic, and artistic dimensions. They were far more than adornments; beads were powerful symbols of identity, status, and connection to the divine.

Socially, beads signified rank and wealth. Royalty and nobles adorned themselves with intricately crafted beads, such as coral or agate, to denote authority and prestige. Among the Yoruba, Benin, and Akan peoples, specific bead types and colors were reserved for kings, queens, or chiefs, visually marking their elevated status. Beads also played roles in rites of passage, such as marriages and initiations, symbolizing maturity or union.

Spiritually, beads were conduits for divine energy and ancestral connection. In religious practices, priests and devotees wore sacred bead strands as part of their regalia, believing them to hold protective or healing powers. Beads also served as offerings to deities or ancestors in rituals, embodying devotion and communication with the spiritual realm.

Economically, beads functioned as currency in trade networks, exchanged for goods and services across vast distances. They also represented artistic innovation, with skilled artisans crafting intricate designs that reflected cultural aesthetics.

Beads in West Africa were thus dynamic artifacts, intertwining personal identity, cultural heritage, spirituality, and economic vitality in precolonial societies.

Thinkafrica.net

13/01/2025

13/01/2025

13/01/2025

13/01/2025

12/01/2025

12/01/2025

12/01/2025

11/01/2025

11/01/2025

11/01/2025

07/01/2025

07/01/2025

07/01/2025

07/01/2025

06/01/2025

06/01/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category