05/09/2024
Some actions people take sometimes, I start wondering if they are considering future for action.
I just came across a 70 years old woman on Facebook that did IVF at 70 years and got 6 kids at a time. And people that suppose to advise her well are shouting congratulations.
Like seriously, how possible can a 70 years old take care of 6 kids of the same age? What happened with requesting for 2 baby of different gender. What happened in starting the ivf at early stage since she waited for 36 years. I know some people will say she might not have fund then. So at 70 she can now take care of the 6 kids with pension or what. If she couldn't do it with her salary during young age.
Here are some of the reasons to back up my concern
1. **Physical and Emotional Capacity**: Raising six children at 70 years old is a monumental challenge, not only due to the physical demands but also the energy, emotional support, and long-term stability that children need. It's important to consider not just the ability to carry a pregnancy, but the capacity to parent effectively as the children grow.
2. **Health Risks**: IVF at such an advanced age can put both the mother and the babies at serious health risks. Even with medical advances, pregnancy in older women comes with a higher risk of complications like preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and other life-threatening conditions. Additionally, the chances of having premature babies or children with health complications increases with multiple births at once.
3. **Financial and Practical Challenges**: The financial burden of raising six children is significant at any age, but it is especially concerning when the parents are elderly and may not have a steady income stream. Depending on government assistance for such a large family can place undue pressure on the system and leave the children vulnerable if the parents are unable to provide.
4. **Late-Stage Parenthood**: Becoming a parent at 70 also raises questions about the long-term well-being of the children. In 15 to 20 years, these children will still be in their developmental years, and their parents may be in their late 80s or 90s, if still alive. What happens then? Who will be responsible for their care and upbringing?
5. **Ethical Responsibility of Doctors**: There's a significant ethical question regarding the role of medical professionals in facilitating such procedures. While IVF is an incredible technology that offers hope to many families, its use must be carefully considered in light of age, health, and the long-term consequences for both the parents and the children. Doctors should weigh these factors carefully before proceeding, ensuring the patient's overall well-being and future capacity to care for the children.
6. **IVF Planning and Responsibility**: As you mentioned, planning for IVF earlier in life, if possible, might have been a better route, especially in terms of balancing health, finances, and caregiving ability. IVF should be a choice based on a person's ability to provide for the children emotionally, physically, and financially.
7. **Faith vs. Practicality**: While faith is important to many, there's a difference between faith and realistic planning. Medical issues should be addressed early, and simply relying on faith without medical assistance or rational planning could have adverse consequences. Having faith is powerful, but it's important to combine it with practical action and informed decisions.
Ultimately, while every individual has the right to make their own reproductive choices, it's important that those decisions are made with a realistic understanding of the responsibilities involved. The societal response to these choices should include both compassion and critical thinking to ensure the long-term well-being of the children.
I rest my case for now
