16/12/2024
Before the referendum, the BBC received praise for its output. Of course, people recognised the organisation's problems; problems that continue to this day. However, I would argue these problems aren’t unique to the BBC, rather a symptom of bankable stars with too much influence; an issue within many industries – note: analysis isn’t justification. Nevertheless, the world understood the BBC’s influence on culture and journalism was unmatched. So, why then, in Britain, has the tide slowly changed and for what purpose?
Both the left and right criticise the BBC’s news coverage; proof of its impartiality. Though, it’s the impartiality and lack of influence from advertisers that threatens some of the political sphere. The BBC is part owned by the public, hence the need for impartiality. But, in the digital age of alternative media, impartiality disrupts the propaganda these channels seek to push. Channels like GB News, who has Nigel Farage, a sitting MP, broadcast to the masses.
These ‘independent’ channels are typically funded by or people affiliated with certain political ideologies; for example, oil Fracking billionaires the Wilks Brothers fund The Daily Wire. Likewise, Hedge Fund Millionaire Sir Paul Marshall owns GB News. So, are The Daily Wire ‘independent?’ I think, not. Does GB News have an agenda? Most definitely. And what is their agenda? Keep a close eye on American in the coming years or, better yet, look at how bad Argentina’s doing right now – another President Elon Musk supported.
These people want to cripple the BBC because it’s publicly owned. Don’t believe me, then why does Farage, a sitting MP and host on BG News, want to replace the NHS with an insurance-based model? Because to them, you’re just another cheque.