07/06/2023
Impronta welcomes a new composer in our catalogue!
Clemens Gadenstätter
Clemens Gadenstätter, born 1966 in Zell am See (Austria), studied composition with Erich Urbanner and Helmut Lachenmann. He is a composer who goes to the substance of music like hardly any other of his generation. Not the material itself or a "critical examination", as one so often reads, is the core of his interest, but a philosophy of listening, understanding and feeling, based on semantic analysis and an in-depth study of perceptual phenomena. A philosophy that has two sides, on the one hand one that describes the sound and its perception, as well as its structuring, on the other hand the sounding piece itself. In his essays Gadenstätter designs models of our own sensory apparatus, which inspire and can be applied also apart from his pieces. In the course of his research he felt his way further and further and refined his approaches, but the two sides are never separated. The pieces are not simply the application of what was previously formulated textually, they are part of his thinking and reflect it artistically. They make his philosophy audibly comprehensible and experienceable. The starting point is often the simplest material, sounding or not sounding, from banal everyday noises to sensations or semantic complexes. Categorized and analyzed, this material experiences the most diverse forms of transformation and musicalization and is then brought into new contexts. As we listen to this process, new meanings and new perspectives emerge on what seems so familiar. On the way to understanding, listening becomes a conscious process that involves semantic grasping as well as the sensual and physical.
In Semantical Investigations he explores banal everyday sounds and their universe of meaning. The series of works E.P.O.S.: les premiers cris, les cris des lumieres, les derniers cris for different ensembles deals with the transformation of acoustically triggered, preformed sensations. Likewise SAD SONGS deals with human sensations. In ICONOSONICS, Gadenstätter compositionally analyzes iconographic contexts. However, work on meaning and perception also runs through countless other works in the composer's broad oeuvre, as does his critical view of our increasingly isolating society. Currently, an increased dialogue with other media is also evident, as in les cris des lumières for ensemble and light or daily transformations for voices, instruments, electronics, video, space and light.
The essays mentioned (HÖREN VERSTEHEN KOMPONIEREN and Was heißt hier banal?) as well as a detailed biography and list of works by the composer have been published and can also be read on the composer's website.
Impronta interview
A few words by Clemens himself
Dear Clemens, we are very happy to welcome you among us. We started our collaboration with a huge project - your flute concerto making of - intimacy from which we see a small excerpt from your manuscript above. Can you tell us something about this project and about the meaning of this wonderfully evocative title?
Clemens Gadenstätter (G): "making of – intimacy" has a double meaning: on one hand side it evokes that all the sounds and structures of this music are building something intimate. in my eyes our perception is on one hand side intimate, a very intimate communication with our surrounding. but as we know, neither our perception nor our intimacy are naturally given – they are constructions made by the culture we grow up and life in. These constructions are settings that are implemented into us by normative structures in our societies, over and over repeated powerful standardisations. We are brought to perceive and feel in a specific way, a kind of well-behaviour that we are trained to fulfil.
and the 2nd meaning thus means: to shows this making of our intimacy: how are we made to feel all the same and to show all the same reactions (more or less inside a spectrum of possibilities). How does it come, that we all express our intimate experiences in a standardised way – and also in arts we can see this standardisation. The piece works on the paradox that we have very intimate sensations (and we think that they are absolutely individually) that are totally culturally pre-fixed. And it works on the possibility to gain something as a „real“ intimacy – freed from the normative restrictions and from all the labels that are implied – constructed out of the normations of perception and intimacy. So the two aspects are to be perceived at the same time: a realistic and sceptical aspect that researches the subject of intimacy and it’s making thru normative processes; and a „utopian“ aspect that searches for the a perception of sensations in the concrete here and now far from standardisations and with a meaning for us, that we have no words, no labels for – maybe a form of intimacy that allows us to get closer to what this way of inseparable contact of us and something other. This is then a different way of seeing us as individuals or subjects as well: seeing us as preformed also in the way of perceiving with the necessity of the effort to find a way of non-standardised perception within our setting given: our possibilities and our imprisonments.
The focus of your work is "understanding in listening" - you also said in an interview about your flute concerto that our perception is a product of what we learn. What has influenced you most in your compositional development and how would you describe what composing is for you?
(G): The biggest influence is my research in my own perception, so listening myself while listening, questioning the obvious and staying in the mode of a „cheerful skepticism“. Certainly i am not alone in this world, and there are many books, films, music, humans that influenced me in this thinking and acting in the artistic world of composing music. Seeing the perception as a product of normative structures of the society that we live in means a radically different view on myself as a human: i am not simply me, but i am made and i mirror willingly or unwillingly these powerful standardisations. And this awakes my opposition: unwillingly supporting something that i might not be conform with is not what i imagine that should have a big part in my life. So i do what i can – and this will always be too little to really make the difference (or not, depends on the point of view) – to get an access to all these setting that i am made of. Some i can change, some not, and some i do not want to change because they give me strong possibilities in this world to act.The „understanding in the listening“ is part of these efforts and are part of my compositional strategies to overcome the preformed setting we all live in.
How was it for you to work with the flutist Karl-Heinz Schütz and the orchestra of the Zagreb Music Biennale? What was it like for you to hear your work live for the first time - outside your idea of it in your head? Is the result always planned and predictable for you, or are there also elements of surprise?
(G): Karl-Heinz Schütz represents for me (as an trained flutist myself) the ideal of flute-playing: he has a sound, incredibly rich and changeable, he has a musicality that is stunning – everything he did in this rather hard concerto felt totally natural, as if in the moment invented. As i knew him and his playing before the result was at the same time planned and stunning. And i was always surprised how a third sense, in addition to what i wrote and the internal sense of the music that is a second layer, could arise by his playing: the way he understand the music and what he does – also then in combination with the orchestra – was always something more then written, his understanding was a surplus that filled me with great-fullness. This is as well a wonderful ideal of musical interpretation, this is why composed music always leaves space for this gift donated by it’s true interpreters.
https://edition-impronta.com
🧡Impronta - your fingerprint for music🧡
, , , , , , , , , ,