
22/02/2025
Both Canada and the United States have recently designated several Mexican drug cartels as terrorists orgnanizations. However, it is worth questioning how these countries have contributed in the development of such organizations, only to later use the generic label "terrorist" to advance their own political and economic interests. Drug Cartels do not operate by themselves; they are deeply embed within the nation-states where they operate. The United States, through its Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), must have as much contact with the Drug Criminal Gangs as the Mexican state itself. Media speaks about Mexico being a de facto narco state, but this logic mus also hold true for the United States. Though both nations can be classified as "narcostates", the historical and social implications differ significantly . For Latin America, the so-called War on Drugs has weakened the ties between indigenous populations and their territories, making them more vulnerable to exploitation by transnational corporations and foreign interests—many of which are tied to the U.S. Rather than confronting the forces of extractivism, capitalism, and neoliberalism, local populations are forced to contend with the violence of the cartels. This extractivist machinery has operated seamlessly under different US administrations since the 1970s. So, is Trump’s designation of these cartels as terrorist organizations a self-inflicted wound? Why disrupt a system that has worked so effectively in advancing neoliberal interests? This opens an opportunity to held accountable not only the Drug Cartels, but also the organizations (banks, governments, administrations) that keep them working.
Author: Marco Lopez. Czech version in the comment section.