10/01/2023
TO GRAHAM HANCOCK IN RESPONSE TO MAGICIANS OF THE GODS AND ANCIENT APOCALYPSE DOCUMENTARY (NETFLIX)
I know you have read my book, just like Gary Osborn, Robert Bauval, and John Anthony West, who mocked me when I claimed the GP to be MUCH older than the prevailing narrative. In Alpha to Omega, only one solution for the Great Pyramid's function answers all the questions. It is one of two axioms needed to solve all these mysteries while exposing human potential beyond our current imaginations. Axioms are representative of a theory.
In 2012, which is when Alpha to Omega was released, you were admittedly stuck trying to figure out the connections between the megalithic anomalies of ancient history and the relation between an ancient civilization - even though you had been studying it for nearly 20 years. You were writing fiction novels and a war-gods trilogy, which came to a screeching halt within weeks after receiving my email (see photo below) asking for your support of Alpha to Omega - just prior to its launch date. It is NOT a coincidence that you did a complete turnaround and immediately began working on Magicians of the Gods, while bringing your other projects to a standstill.
It is obvious to me - especially after seeing you at Contact in the Desert in 2016 - that you were not only inspired but furious that you hadn't figured out how to connect the dots once you read my email of July 1 2012. After all, a valid theory is an evaluation of evidence designed to answer many questions and leave as few on the table as anyone else can and I had beat you to it. You obviously felt as though you had the right to present this as yours - and without acknowledgment to boot. Your ego is getting in the way.
Please explain how the advanced civilization lifted huge megalithic structures weighing tons and carried them up steep mountains? No tools have been found nor written documents. I gave my solutions to that and much more, in my book, Alpha to Omega - Journey to the End of Time. I wasn't afraid to be mocked by those who disagree or find it nearly impossible to believe. And now you're introducing the possibility of new realities, when that was thoroughly discussed in Alpha to Omega.
You claim that the Great Pyramid is approximately 4500 years old. How can you, in your right mind, assess that the GP post-dates the mesmerizing sites you've investigated in Fingerprints and Magicians? The GP is much more elaborate and sophisticated than any of them and incorporates each of the 12 mathematical constants into its construction. The last constant was only recently discovered by our current academia about 30 years ago. As you well-know, there are hundreds of amazing facts about the GP, which ranks it above every structure on earth today! These questions are also answered in Alpha to Omega.
The importance here is not just my theory, but proof that you have usurped the first part of MY theory and are now alluding to things I've already explained - without a single mention of my work.
My theory is sacred and extremely important. It is timeless, because it creates an entirely new paradigm that solves the mysteries of history and religion while cleverly evaluating evidence of quantum experiments as the visual effect of the total possible combination of conscious choice at any fraction of a second - rather than the cause of a multiverse with different outcomes.
It really bothers me that you are diluting the entire meaning of an important and timely story. In fact, my first book published in 2001 - Heretical Wisdom - embraced the same theory. Where were you then?
There are other questions I have answered, but all of them need to be answered in order to quantify - what you claim to be - your theory, which uncannily parallels the model used in Alpha to Omega - insofar as a previous advanced society served as a source-culture to primitive mankind.
My contention remains that these teachers were not of the same seed as ours; much further removed from us IN TIME and they were NOT aliens! If you really want a theory that answers more questions, you will have to change your narrative and I see you are slowly trying to incorporate new ideas into your version of my theory - but they are not new ideas, they are mine.
You are claiming that an advanced society was destroyed about 12,000 years ago and that the majority of survivors around the world were not advanced? I know you currently equate that with today's situation where primitive tribes live in remote jungles while the rest of the world is more sophisticated, but it is the extreme minority - not the majority. Your watered-down version of my theory will not work with 12,000 BC as the period when all mankind was eradicated from earth.
Malta is a perfect example. Although Malta may have gone through quite a bit, Italy itself was not destroyed. If those on Malta were extremely advanced, how could a (then) connected territory become suddenly primitive? You speak of Giants, but who were they? I've answered that in my theory.
The flooding of the last ice-age did not destroy the entire planet - far from it. Water levels have been rising steadily since the last ice-age. In fact, I was raised on a small island in NJ and the water levels at the ocean have moved 300-400 yards inwards in the last 50 years!
The ancient tales you refer to, which are the earliest writings from nearly every location on earth - long before outside influence of any kind - talk about a COMPLETELY destroyed civilization and only a handful of survivors who survived in a vessel of sorts. Your scenario does not fit that persistent narrative.
You paint a picture that seems very appealing to those who may not know many of the things required to challenge or question your version of MY theory. To me, you are the epitome of the experts you loathe - grab what you can and maintain your narrative and position without question. I'm wondering whether or not you are really looking for the Truth or just another best-seller. I'd love to have a discussion with you, Graham!