The Laughing Cavalier

  • Home
  • The Laughing Cavalier

The Laughing Cavalier A Channel dedicated to reviewing historical films and presenting short history videos.

Bit more news, the channel just hit 9,000 subs, thanks everyone! It was sitting at about 8998 for days! Channel members/...
08/04/2025

Bit more news, the channel just hit 9,000 subs, thanks everyone! It was sitting at about 8998 for days! Channel members/Patreons got access to another unlisted chunk of the Napoleon review so, as a reward, I'll preview it a bit early (it's in the comment section) as always it will be deleted in a few weeks. Notice I got a copyright claim for some music about 10/11 minutes in and had to use YouTubes tool thing to remove it, so the audio in that chunk sounds weird. That will be fixed in the final upload.

Finally, more for myself, I made a spreadsheet detailing my progress with the Napoleon review. I split it into numerous chunks to work on it. Green means completely finished, orange means heavily worked on, red means barely worked on. As you can see, it looks like it will be nearing 3 and a half hours long! I feel I have been making more progress of late though so we will see if I can get it done by the summer maybe!

Just a quick update: If you are a Channel Member and/or a (paid) Patreon Supporter, I should be previewing another chunk...
03/04/2025

Just a quick update: If you are a Channel Member and/or a (paid) Patreon Supporter, I should be previewing another chunk of the Napoleon review at the weekend if all goes well. It will be about 18 minutes ish of the end of the character section. Again, it will be unlisted and deleted in a few weeks since I always do this to check for copyright in preparation for the main review.
Again, I won't be giving an estimated release for the whole review since I still have a lot of work to do. Keep an eye out though if you are a member/patreon since I will sporadically do posts like this in advance of the main review coming out.
Also, I have been considering creating a unique tier for Patreons/Members on the discord. I have no idea if any of you are both discord users and members/patreons though, so do let me or Matthias (who runs the discord) know if that is something you would like. It's just a tier on the discord, no perks of course but you'll get to be above everyone else I guess!

Link to the discord: https://discord.gg/2hzmtwQP
Link to the Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/TheLaughingCavalier
Link if you want to become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdgTg98yxCDSGg3mAVC3nsQ/join

A channel mainly focused on reviewing historical movies (particularly those depicting the Tudor and Stuart eras) and presenting short videos on primarily military matters of those eras. I may occasionally wander off onto other topics such as WW2 and the Napoleonic Wars.

01/04/2025

Stunning and brave news regarding the casting of Majesty on ITV (totally legit):

Upcoming Tudor Dramas for 2025(ish) in a Nutshell:
16/03/2025

Upcoming Tudor Dramas for 2025(ish) in a Nutshell:

Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction01:15 - Channel Admin02:05 - TYTW: 'Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light' (2024)11:22 - TYTW: 'Firebrand' (2024)17:00 - TYTW: '...

This is a bit of a different post than usual since I don't cover crime in my videos (although I do have plans to do a vi...
17/02/2025

This is a bit of a different post than usual since I don't cover crime in my videos (although I do have plans to do a video on a controversial case some day, but I'll have to do it when I feel a bit braver...) However, I can't resist with these “new” Jack the Ripper revelations that have been doing the rounds.

Basically, the press have been putting out loads of headlines lately claiming DNA has proven that Aaron Kosminski was the Ripper, based on DNA taken from a shawl that was meant to have belonged to Catherine Eddowes, the fourth of the “canonical” victims and the second on the night of the “double event”. I hate to be a sourpuss, but it appears to be a load of utter bo****ks:

1. This story is not new. Over ten years ago, Russell Edwards claimed he made this breakthrough, but upon further examination, the DNA match was not as conclusive as it first seemed owing to a mistake by one of the experts which meant it went from being a near certain match to nearly anyone of European descent! Now it is claimed he has since done a peer review of this and DNA from both Eddowes and Kosminski is on the shawl, but from what I can gather, a lot of experts are still sceptical since it is mitochondrial DNA, which is not definitive and some fiddling may or may not have been done to get to the “correct” answer with the DNA (I'll link to a forum discussion where they go over the results). Again, this also not new. In 2019 the Journal of Forensic Sciences published J. Louhelainen, and D. Miller's research (who supported Edwards). However, since then, the Journal has also published an 'Expression of Concern' regarding that original article.

2. We don't even know if the shawl belonged to Eddowes. The story is, Amos Simpson, a sergeant in the Metropolitan Police, took the shawl after finding her body and for whatever reason did not hand it over (effectively stealing evidence from an active crime scene seems like a MAJOR issue to me!) Then he passed it down to his descendants and, in 1991 (over a century after the murders!), it resurfaced with this story. All we have to link it to the Ripper case is the oral tradition of his relatives. There was no mention of Eddowes owning a shawl, none was found on her body and none of the eyewitnesses who saw her before her death claimed she was wearing one. Apparently, the floral pattern of the shawl does match the floral pattern of her dress (although I have also read it is a different floral pattern), but that is it.
Also, there is no mention in contemporary sources of Simpson finding the body. She was found in Mitre Square, which was in the jurisdiction of the City of London Police, by PC Edward Watkins. Simpson was under the MET, so I find it doubtful he got this from the body of Eddowes, unless he went into another forces jurisdiction, stole evidence and snuck off with it! It could be he found the body but, realising he was not in the area he should be, he went back to the MET's jurisdiction and accidentally took it with him, but that seems very unlikely.

3. I have to be careful how I word this, since I don't want to get sued, but Edwards has an updated version of his book coming out, and I can't help but feel that this is a mixture of promotion for the book and the media doing its usual sensationalist headlines to generate clicks. From what I can see, nothing new has come out other than he now claims he has verified the DNA, but that is still contested as seen above. Also, again I don't want to get sued, but Russell Edwards is not without controversy. From my understanding, a few years ago he claimed he had found skeletal remains that may belong to Keith Bennett, victim of the “Moor murders” from the 1960's. This was proven to be false and the remains were not found. Keith's brother was not happy and has denounced Edwards for his actions.

Overall, I am not convinced. In particular, we cannot verify if this shawl even belonged to Eddowes. The DNA evidence is not as conclusive as is being claimed in the press. Edwards seemingly does not have a good reputation and the press is notorious for publishing over the top headlines to attract attention. Finally, even if this was all true and we have proof that Kosminski murdered Eddowes... that is it. There is nothing else tying him to the murders of the other four canonical victims (and certainly none of the other possible Ripper victims). Even amongst the canonical victims, to this day, there is debate as to whether it was the same killer. I will link to some discussions on a few of the Jack the Ripper forums and so on who go into this in a lot more detail and with more knowledge than me.

- Jack the Ripper Forums (post on the DNA): https://www.jtrforums.com/forum/ripperology-books-and-reviews/616271-new-edition-of-russell-edwards-naming-jack-the-ripper-2024?p=616450
- Casebook article on Amos Simpson: https://www.casebook.org/dissertations/dst-amos.html
- 2014 Casebook article on Kosminski and Edwards, old but still relevant regarding facts of the case: https://www.casebook.org/dissertations/dst-edwards.html

On this day in 1554 Lady Jane Grey was beheaded, which was the worst thing that happened to her. Now, here is me talking...
12/02/2025

On this day in 1554 Lady Jane Grey was beheaded, which was the worst thing that happened to her. Now, here is me talking about the second worst thing that happened to her, the series My Lady Jane. This is a 12 minute preview for my next video (which will be about 45 minutes long). As always, this will be deleted once the main one is done:

Test

10/02/2025

Just a reminder to Channel Members/Patreons. I have now uploaded an unlisted preview of a section from the next video. Next week, or in a few days depending on how things go, I'll let everyone else preview it as well. I am aiming now to get the whole video done by the end of the month.

A bit of Wolf Hall news (shame this came out well after I recorded the next video, but oh well, I'll make a note to talk...
25/01/2025

A bit of Wolf Hall news (shame this came out well after I recorded the next video, but oh well, I'll make a note to talk about it in the proper review). Parliament (specifically the culture, media and sport committee) is currently having an inquiry into British film and high end tv and Peter Kosminsky, who directed both Wolf Hall and the Mirror and the Light, has submitted comments to said committee.

I won't quote him word for word (although I'll link some stuff below in the pinned comment so you can see) but basically he claims that basically none of the major streamers would do a deal to help co-fund the series with the BBC and, in the end, he, Mary Rylance and other major figures took a massive pay cut in order to get the series made. He says one of the problems is that productions like Wolf Hall (to American executives at least) are seen as being culturally significant to the UK, but that the US would not be interested in them so the big American streamers don't sign deals for them. He claims that about 15 UK productions are currently in limbo because of lack of funding.

I think I get his point and, obviously, a lot of these Tudor related shows are popular in the States but I think he means more the executives don't understand that. This has been a problem for a while though, remember Henry VIII in 2003 (from ITV of course, but point still stands) could only raise something like £1.5 million for its £5 million budget from UK funds and had to get the begging bowl out and go to the Americans, Canadians and Australians if my memory serves me right. Things have only gotten worst since then although I don't think Kosminsky's proposal to make 5% of streamers subscriptions go to a UK cultural fund will have much impact. I fear that will just make them increase subscription prices still further, and of course lets be honest, Netflix, Amazon and maybe Apple and Paramount are about the only major streamers in town.

One point to take away though, in spite of its success (something like 4 million views for episode one of the Mirror and the Light) this might be a sign that the BBC will be cutting back if something like Wolf Hall struggled to get made, which in a way is a shame since it basically only leaves Netflix, Amazon etc. with the capital to do stuff.

Links:
- Variety Article: https://variety.com/2025/tv/global/wolf-hall-mirror-and-the-light-turned-down-every-streamer-1236284468/
- Parliament Website: https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/378/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/204864/british-film-and-highend-tv-2-cms-committee-publishes-written-evidence-on-tv-production-challenges-ahead-of-evidence-session-with-minister-and-bfi/

The widespread challenges being faced by the domestic production sector in getting high-end drama and other television programmes made are highlighted in the publication today of written evidence submitted to the CMS Committee’s inquiry into British film and high-end TV. 

Zuckerberg, no matter how hard you try, I am not giving you £35! I have to save up to help Brad Pitt get his kidneys fix...
17/01/2025

Zuckerberg, no matter how hard you try, I am not giving you £35! I have to save up to help Brad Pitt get his kidneys fixed or something!

Very quick Christmas stream here:
23/12/2024

Very quick Christmas stream here:

I have no idea what I am doing... again. This will be brief.

Good news: The Upcoming Tudor Dramas video is recorded.Bad News (for me): It is nearly an hour long...
21/12/2024

Good news: The Upcoming Tudor Dramas video is recorded.
Bad News (for me): It is nearly an hour long...

Wolf Hall, the Mirror and the Light written reviews, Episode 6: Light (finale):  Well, we are at the end. I'll do the us...
15/12/2024

Wolf Hall, the Mirror and the Light written reviews, Episode 6: Light (finale):

Well, we are at the end. I'll do the usual breakdown of the episode and then a brief final thoughts on the series as a whole.

Brief Plot Overview: The entire episode is Cromwell in the Tower awaiting his fate with him being interrogated, his few remaining allies trying to help him but, ultimately, the episode ends with his ex*****on.

Positives:
- This was probably the best episode of the season in my view. In theory, it should have been quite slow since I would say about half the episode is just Cromwell on the one side being interrogates by Norfolk, Gardiner, Wriothesley and Rich. However, it was very well acted and brought together a lot of the plot points we saw in earlier episodes all being used against Cromwell, which he himself knows since he has done this to others before.
- One of the few recasting's I do approve of is Gardiner's and I did like his final conversation with Cromwell where they act quite respectful to one another.
- We only got one scene with Henry getting Sadler to read Cromwell's letter to him and, again, was very well acted.

Negatives:
- Whilst we did Cromwell's confession letter to the King and the 'mercy, mercy, mercy' line, Cromwell (and again this is a common criticism from season 1 as well) felt a bit too noble and even though he sort of justified his actions, everyone looked very sad when he finally went, even his enemies. In reality, I am sure there were a lot of people that would have been almost joyful when he was executed. Of course, that is rather the point of Wolf Hall, to make him more sympathetic, but at the end it was like he was becoming a saint or something.
- They sort of but didn't really do what I thought they would with intercutting Henry and Katherine Howard's wedding with Cromwell's ex*****on. We got a shot of Henry looking sad whilst Gardiner and Norfolk look at him, then Katherine and her maids sorting her dress out whilst Mary looks on and then walks out, but that was it. I am surprised since that seemed to be the natural thing to do if they were going to portray Henry marrying Jane intercut with Anne Boleyn's ex*****on at the start of the series, but they didn't fully do that.
- Also, I know what they were going for with Cromwell having a flashback to Anne Boleyn staying in those apartments in the Tower, but I am pretty sure Cromwell was not staying in the Queen's apartments when he was there!
- Some of Cromwell's lines in his second interrogation where he basically predicts the rest of Henry's reign (the wars with Scotland and France, the country going bankrupt etc.) felt a bit on the nose. I doubt the real life Cromwell was that much of a fortune teller. Granted, you could judge Henry's patterns (likes war and spending money) but something about it felt like someone who knows the outcome later on making out they predicted it.

Overall Thoughts of the season:
- Obviously, in these reviews I have listed more negative points but don't take that as me saying that the series is bad or anything, it's simply the good points are often a lot more simpler to state (costumes good, acting good) as opposed to errors. Overall, this was pretty good and is probably the best Tudor related drama we have had in years. I'd argue since season 1 back in 2015!
- In terms of the recasting, overall, most of the choices were a step down but were still good in heir own right, Lady Rochford for example was well played by Jessica Raine was better in the role. One of the two exceptions to this is Gardiner; Alex Jennings was much better in the role compared to Mark Gatiss. Technically, Mary was recast (she had one scene in season 1) and Lilit Lesser was pretty good, I kind of don't count it as a recast though since her role was minimal in season 1 and was set several years earlier when the character was younger, so a recast was probably inevitable anyway.
On the flip side, the only recasting I think was much worst was Timothy Spall as Norfolk. He is a good actor but for whatever reason he just did not fit in this role, particularly compared to Bernard Hill who was far more lively and animated. Sadly, Bernard Hill has passed away and was presumably ill when filming, which is why he could not reprise the role, but it is a shame we did not get to see him again.
- The returning cast were all fine. Damian Lewis has gone up in my Henry rankings a bit I think, although it is a shame he didn't really bulk out in the last few episodes. He should have basically looked like the later Holbein portraits by that point yet, whilst his clothes were bulky, he had the same problem Jude Law did in Firebrand where his face is quite thin compared to the rest. Still, he gave a good performance. Of course, Mark Rylance needs little more words written about his performance. If he does not win a BAFTA or Emmy or something, then the awards will have been rigged.
- Costumes and sets were very well done. Of course, there were errors (I think highlighted the boots in a previous breakdown etc.) but overall it looked great and more magnificent than season 1, helped by the fact they actually got to film at Hampton Court for this season.
- Pacing wise, it had the strange problem (episodes 1 to 4 at least) of going quite slow with the pacing yet somehow not covering enough and missing huge chunks. Again, aside from a few extracts I have not read the Mirror and the Light (I think I read the first book years ago but can barely remember it) but it feels like they skimmed over a lot of points. For example, the whole thing with Cromwell's daughter went nowhere, we had a flashback in this last episode when I was expecting her to try and visit him one last time or something, that whole arc appeared in the last five minutes of one, and then was done in about the first ten to fifteen of the next. In terms of the history, we basically missed the Exeter conspiracy (or got bits of it I suppose), I would have liked to have seen a bit more of Anne of Cleves but we got one scene with her. Jane Seymour got a fair bit of screentime, but even she was underused. The Pilgrimage of Grace effectively happens largely off screen etc.
- Again, I brought this up in a few reviews in the past. The diverse casting was unnecessary and, despite what Kosminsky (I think?) said, about how “things have changed since season 1” (because apparently the nobles in the 16th century between 1 and 2 suddenly got more progressive!), I think this decision was taken more to meet industry and award standards so it would qualify for the BAFTA's and the Emmys. It was not the same as Anne Boleyn though, the only notable-ish figure changed was Elizabeth Seymour, the rest is all a few random background soldiers and nobles, but again, that does further reiterate my point when doing this, and something I have been saying since at least the 2018/19 Mary Queen of Scots film. Make it look how it did, the world was different in the 16th Century and should be reflect as such.
- A personal peeve, but the constant use of flashbacks was annoying. There were scenes were they were doing flashbacks to scenes that had practically just happened! It felt like I was watching an anime or something to the point I am surprised they didn't have a random episode where they went to the beach!

So that is it. I will do a Quick Review at some point next year depending how the (massive) Napoleon review goes. I fear I have fallen behind a bit of late with the Tudor stuff. To compensate, I will be doing an unscripted upcoming Tudor Dramas video sometime before/after the New Year since we have had a few announcements.

Anyway, to conclude, here is the final picture meme, that being a contemporary image of Gardiner and Norfolk at the end, and then a collage of all six to reflect the season:

Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light,Episode 5: MirrorWell a bit of a dramatic episode this week. Brief Plot Overview: Th...
08/12/2024

Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light,
Episode 5: Mirror

Well a bit of a dramatic episode this week.

Brief Plot Overview: The episode is mainly focused on the Anne of Cleves marriage and the beginning of the end of Cromwell. He is arrested in the Council during the final minutes.

Positives:
- Quite a lot of historical/historical based lines I noticed this time round. Off the top of my head; Henry's various comments about how “I liker her [Anne of Cleves] not” and how he didn't think she was a virgin. Norfolk's line about his niece “he [the King] did cast a fantasy to Katherine to first time he laid eyes on her” (based on a comment by her grandmother I think), and Fitzwilliam even makes a duckies reference! There are various others as well, these are just a few examples.
- I have not read the book save for a few passages I think were free online a year or two back or something, but I do remember Jane Rochford's comments about Katherine Howard being from there, so it sounds like they have been pretty faithful. I think I might actually go and read the book before I do my quick review in the future.
- The episode stuck with the Cleves stuff and I think was better for it. Previous episodes felt like they were trying to cram in two or three different plotlines.

Negatives
- Pacing wise, this one felt a lot quicker since we were speed running the whole Anne of Cleves marriage. Hell, I think she had one conversation with Cromwell the whole time, and Katherine Howard just kind of stands there in a few scenes fixing her dress (although with the latter, I'm obviously not expecting many lines anyway). Anne of Cleves at least should have got a bit more time, although there is still next episode I suppose. I thought they might take it a bit slower and have him get arrested in the first third or so of the last episode, but that has just happened.
- Speaking of, I do feel the arrest scene was rushed as well. Compare it to the 1972 version, which was much more dramatic (and accurate). I seem to remember Cromwell's hat blew off just before he went into the meeting, and no-one doffed their hat, which surprised him. I thought they were going to do that with all the wind as he was walking to the meeting but they didn't. A shame, since that is a scene we have a couple of sources on and it is quite dramatic. It felt quite rushed and dumbed down, although we did get them taking his chains of office from him and so on.
- I also thought we would get the King meeting Anne at Rochester but instead it is related to Cromwell by his son afterwards. It reminds me of the old dramas from back in the day where they didn't have the budget to show things like battles, so some other characters would just relay all the facts. Example: By the Sword Divided had that a lot, with them talking about the King marching into Parliament, the Battle of Naseby etc. all off screen.
- Again, I haven't read the book but I am surprised we basically skipped the Exeter Conspiracy. We got a bit of it last episode, but that should have been given a bit more focus in a series about Cromwell. I remember Sir Nicholas Carew was a character in season 1, yet to my knowledge he has not been in this season so we missed his death. And of (moving an to another topic) course there has been no more mention of John Lambert and his ex*****on. Last we saw was him before the King, I can't even remember if they mentioned that.

Other points:
- Someone (forgot off the top of my head) said they felt like the pacing was quite rushed and I am beginning to see that more with this episode in particular. Funny since it has felt quite slow and plodding in other parts, it seems to be something that happens in a lot of modern productions. Somehow it goes fast and slow at the same time!
- Overall though, I do think this was a good episode. There are criticisms but, broadly, it was pretty decently done. It was mainly pacing and some plot points that have been exercised.

And with that, an artists interpretation of Thomas Cromwell at the end of this episode:

As some of you may recall, I have for some time now been saying “whelp, looks like the Tudor train has finally run out. ...
03/12/2024

As some of you may recall, I have for some time now been saying “whelp, looks like the Tudor train has finally run out. Looks like we are entering a period where they stop making them for a while.” This has aged like milk courtesy of ITV, who after over twenty years have finally decided to have another go at doing a Tudor drama.

This was announced yesterday, but I only came across this by chance when looking at an article about Wolf Hall and this was mentioned. I will summarise what we know thus far:

The series is to be titled 'Majesty', and will be set in the court of that little known monarch who has barely had any dramas done about him... Henry VIII. The main character will be another character that we barely see in film... Elizabeth I. It will have six episodes (I assume 1 hour each although this isn't stated in the press release). It is due to be filmed in 2025 and casting will be announced nearer the time.
From what I can gather, this sounds like a mixture of 'Becoming Elizabeth' and 'My Lady Jane' (because both of those worked out so well). The basic premise will be young Elizabeth I before she is Queen but with “a bold, intriguing reimagining of her life based upon conspiracy theories which surrounded her as a youth.”
I am going out on a limb here: I bet they are going to do the whole crackpot theory that young Elizabeth got swapped with a boy. The press release talks about Elizabeth hiding a “profound secret” This is the other major part of the press release relating to the plot: “Majesty is an emotional, funny, and contemporary-feeling alternate history about how three outsiders try to stay alive while hiding a secret that, if discovered, would rock England to its foundations. Majesty allows us to have fun with history while illuminating who we are now. This show is pure wish-fulfilment of how people devoted to the public good suddenly find themselves in a position to make a difference.” I think you can see why I said this sounds like Becoming Elizabeth crossed with My Lady Jane!
Obviously, I am already dreading it since, yet again, it seems to have several of the tropes I hate in modern Tudor dramas, and the showrunners don't inspire me with too much confidence. William Harper, Tony Phelan and Joan Rater have previously been showrunners on things like 'Grey's Anatomy' (not related to Lady Jane Grey of course!) I can't really see the makers of a medical series doing a period piece. Ironic this is ITV since it sounds exactly like what happened back in 2003 with the makers of their Henry VIII series.
The director will be James Strong, who did direct the 'Mr Bates vs The Post Office' drama recently. Now he does have a long career but again, I can't see many period pieces on his resume (by not many I mean none unless you want to count Mr Bates and maybe some of the Doctor Who episodes I guess!) He made these comments: “I could not be more thrilled to be bringing this audacious and original show to the screen. The brilliant scripts are a directors’ dream as we get to re-imagine and recreate an iconic piece of English history and tell a period story that looks stunning but also feels modern and relevant to todays’ viewer.” Just to re-iterate: when I become some sort of dictator, I am having anyone caught using the words “contemporary” or “modern” punished severely.
Strong has founded a new production company that will be making the series, which will then air on ITV and STV. I have no idea about internationally, but Studiocanal is backing Strong's company, so that might be a clue.

Anyway, that is the main points. I am not exactly feeling confident, and given the recent trend (My Lady Jane, that Mary I comedy series with Karen Gillian which... I have not heard anything about since the announcement come to think about it!) I think it is a given they will age up Elizabeth, so it will be someone in their twenties. The casting will be very modern from the sounds of it. Anyway, here's an old meme that pretty much sums up my YouTube career at this point:

Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light Written Reviews,Episode 4: Jenneke  Onto episode 4:Brief Plot Overview: Jane gives b...
01/12/2024

Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light Written Reviews,
Episode 4: Jenneke

Onto episode 4:

Brief Plot Overview: Jane gives birth to Edward, but dies not long after, throwing the King into grief, although he soon makes plans to try and find a new wife. The rest of the episode is mainly split between a plot line with Cromwell's illegitimate daughter from Antwerp, the plans to find the King a new wife, and Cromwell starting to close in on the Poles. Towards the end, there is a bit with John Lambert and the dispute between Gardiner and Cromwell.

Positives:
- I do feel like I am repeating myself a lot in these reviews, but yeah, the acting is all round pretty good. We finally get to meet Gardiner, who is back from France. I haven't rewatched season 1, but so far I am much more impressed with Alex Jennings as Gardiner compared to Mark Gatiss.
- Now, obviously, Cromwell did not have an illegitimate daughter from the Low Countries (he did have an illegitimate daughter in England, who we don't know much about) but I don't think part was done too bad. In fact, it felt like it was all over quite quickly since she has gone back home by about a third into the episode.
- Again, repeating myself, but Mark Rylance is doing great this season. He is a little more devious now regarding the Poles, although still a lot more gentle than the real Cromwell.

Negatives:
- How many God damn nightmares is Cromwell going to have?! I swear, every episode he wakes up from about two or more. I was about to give praise for the episode not using flashbacks but then, towards the end, a bunch more re-used clips of Anne Boleyn from season 1. I hope the BBC is paying Claire Foy for all these flashbacks!
- There are a few parts, like Cromwell loudly proclaiming to several courtiers just after she has died, that he should have married Jane Seymour etc. that would land most people in trouble and feel a bit out of place.
- I do feel like the series is focusing on so much stuff, yet dragging and not really committing to it. One minute we are starting to get a bit more depth into the King's next marriage, then suddenly it is onto the stuff with Lambert, Gardiner etc.

Other Points:
- Yeah not much more to add, this was a bit of a quick review all things considered. I would just be repeating myself constantly if I kept brining up costumes etc. I will say, I am surprised that Jane died right in the first 15 minutes or so, I would have thought they would have dragged that out till near the end and finish the episode with Henry depressed over her loss, instead we got that early on.

Anyway, I think this meme sums up Henry's plans regarding marriage now:

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Laughing Cavalier posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share