24/04/2025
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH: The Knox County Sheriff's Office plays a critical role in securing the lives and property of county residents, but messaging on its official page suggests that it has ambitions to shape the religious faith of the local population as well.
Earlier this month, the Easter greeting posted on the official page went far beyond bunnies or well-wishes, but instead offered guidance on "the true meaning of Easter," including a tribute to "our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ" and a quotation from the gospels.
Such a message on Sheriff Jack Harlan's personal page would have been uncontroversial. He and all other office-holders have First Amendment rights to hold their own religious beliefs and express them.
Some experts, however, argue that when it comes to the official social media accounts of a taxpayer-funded law enforcement organization, there is another part of the First Amendment that comes into play—the so-called "Establishment Clause," which reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
In other words, institutions of the state, including local institutions, are constitutionally mandated to remain neutral in matters of religion, except insofar as they should protect the public's right to exercise their religious practices freely.
To be sure, public commentary on the Sheriff's Office Easter message was uniformly positive and appreciative. The response included messages such as "The Lord is risen indeed!" and "Thank you for being bold enough to make this statement." Many members of the community are deeply sympathetic to the religious beliefs that were expressed.
However, in the context of an official page of a law enforcement agency, Robert Tuttle, Research Professor of Law and Religion at George Washington University, confirmed to The Tracker that "it’s an improper use of official means for transmitting messages."
On the other hand, Tuttle added that it is not clear who would have legal standing to bring a claim about this "apparent violation" of the First Amendment. He added, "Unless public officials themselves decide to enforce by exercising some form of discipline, there’s no legal remedy for ordinary residents."
Ed Yohnka, Director of Communications and Public Policy of the American Civil Liberties Union Illinois, also described the Sheriff's Office's use of its page as "problematic." He noted that it "blends governmental messages and political beliefs" in a manner which seems to "elevate one religious belief" above others.
This blurring of the lines, he contends, might "exclude parts of the community" and lead to doubts that the Sheriff's Office will enforce the law in an impartial and non-discriminatory fashion.
The Tracker invited members of the County Board to share their opinions, either in approval of this use of the official page of the Sheriff's Office or critical of it.
The only response came from Board Member Pamela Davidson, who noted, "What about the people who are Muslims? What about the people who are Jewish?" Her conclusion is that "religion should be out of it."