10/07/2024
07.03.2024 | 10:49 PM | SANTA ANA - Complaints About Santa Ana Police Spark Concerns Over New Oversight Commission's Role.
In the aftermath of protests at UC Irvine in mid-May, the Santa Ana Police Department received over a dozen complaints from the public. Although the department has reviewed these complaints and a member has decided not to disclose them publicly, they have yet to be presented to Santa Ana’s newly established Police Oversight Commission.
This situation has led some city officials to scrutinize the relationship between the commission and the police department it is meant to oversee. Santa Ana City Councilmember Jessie Lopez expressed concern, stating, "The purpose of the civilian oversight is so that no one can undermine it. If the police department receives complaints and decides to withhold information, it undermines the commission's function and the transparency it is supposed to provide."
The commission, which began meetings earlier this year, was created by the City Council to enhance transparency, accountability, and public confidence in the Santa Ana Police Department, as outlined in a city ordinance. To support this mission, the commission recently launched a portal on the city’s website for residents to file complaints about interactions with police officers.
According to city documents, these complaints should be reviewed by the commissioners, who would then make recommendations to police and city leadership. However, at the June 13 Oversight Commission meeting, Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Martinez informed commissioners that the city had received at least 16 complaints related to the police department’s presence at UC Irvine. Martinez mentioned that technical issues had prevented sharing these complaints with the commission.
Days later, the Santa Ana Police Department denied a public records request from The Orange County Register to access the complaints, providing only a redacted record of a non-misconduct-related report about a stolen bike. Santa Ana Police Department Commander Jorge Lopez was identified as the person responsible for withholding and redacting the records. The police department directed further questions to the city’s communications department.