The Veil

The Veil A zine focussed on occultism, mysticism, philosophy, magic, & comparative religion. Content: Levin A. Diatschenko. Design: Nico Liengme.

08/05/2024

Barrel of Wine Thought Experiment

Imagine a person as a barrel holding liquid— but the liquid being held is consciousness. Because the barrel is sealed, the substance is not aware of anything outside the barrel. Since its only quality is awareness, it IS aware of the only thing it can be: the container.

Now consider that there are five hoses that syphon out the consciousness to the world outside the barrel. So, with five senses there are five streams forcing the awareness outwards. This makes it impossible for the awareness to stay inside. In other words it is impossible for the awareness to be aware of itself. As such, we don’t believe in a soul.

Even with the barrel sealed, the awareness would be aware of the container before it would be of itself.

Enter Islamic philosopher Ibn Sina (also known as Avicenna) who gave us the Floating Man thought experiment that essentially shows how to take away awareness of the container, which would then make it impossible for the awareness—whose only descriptive is to be aware—not to be aware of itself.

The other brilliant thing about the floating man is that it essentially describes the objective of pure meditation by way of removing the obstacles or steps. Therefore, it is testable ( through meditation). To go back to my metaphor: the senses are the hoses, and the mind (including memory and identity) is the barrel.

The floating man is basically this:
Imagine a man is created in an instant, falling or floating in a void. He has no senses and his limbs are spread out. Since he was created instantly, he has no memory. Since he has no senses and floats, he does not know anything at all about himself (not size, s*x, form, race, etc. ).
Ibn Sina’s asks, “Will he be aware of his own existence?”

Above, with the barrel metaphor, I’ve tried to show the impossibility of him not being aware of his own existence.

Ibn Sina’s floating man thought experiment is intended to prove the soul. But it is a microcosmic equivalent to his argument for proof of God (by logic alone), where he talks about ‘contingent existence’ vs. ‘necessary existence.’ In the smaller floating man argument you would say that the substance in the barrel is the equivalent of the necessary existent, and everything else of contingent existence.
In the comments I’ll put a link to a video showing that argument. As a footnote I can’t help note that his idea of the Necessary Existent matches perfectly with the Jewish Qabalah’s ‘Ein Soph.’

Illustrations from Henry Olcott's “People From The Other World,” 1875, detailing his 1874 investigations into the famous...
13/10/2023

Illustrations from Henry Olcott's “People From The Other World,” 1875, detailing his 1874 investigations into the famous Eddy brothers of Chittenden, Vermont, and their claimed mediumship abilities. When the Eddy brothers’ abusive father couldn’t flog their mediumship-and-phenomena out of them he sold them to a travelling sideshow. In these performances the organisers selected respectable people from the audience to form a “committee” who would begin the show by tying up the mediums to prevent them from cheating. The illiterate Eddy brothers bore scars from this period, such as from overly tight ropes and handcuffs.
When Olcott went to investigate them in their farmhouse in Vermont, this is when he first met Madam Blavatsky with whom he would go on to found the Theosophical Society with.

From A Little Touch of Drama by Valerian Pidmohylny, 1930
14/09/2023

From A Little Touch of Drama by Valerian Pidmohylny, 1930

23/08/2023

Whatever event or situation happens, the advantaged exploit it to stay advantaged. They’ll reincarnate as the children of their victims and the disadvantaged will reincarnate as the children of the advantaged … and so on, generation to generation, until finally one generation (or person) can handle the slightest bit of power without abusing it.
That’s really the impressive thing about Superman. Who could have that much restraint and fairness with that much power? That’s also the significance of the cross, foreshadowed by His tempting in the desert.

This book began as articles written by Col. Olcott for the New York Daily Graphic (1874) about his experiences at the Ed...
21/08/2023

This book began as articles written by Col. Olcott for the New York Daily Graphic (1874) about his experiences at the Eddy Homestead, since his reputation and objectivity was trusted. Here is where he first meets Helena Blavatsky who had been touring seances and debunking fakes at the time. The two would go on to found the Theosophical Society together.

Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb.

https://youtu.be/3nb4nYqNXyM
21/05/2023

https://youtu.be/3nb4nYqNXyM

The French 17th century philosopher Blaise Pascal is one of the world’s great pessimists- with an unusual power to cheer us up. If you like our films, take a...

“All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” —Pascal
20/05/2023

“All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” —Pascal

02/03/2023
27/12/2022

Two Stories related to the topic of Gender Fluidity
Here is the first:

When working at a high end restaurant in the late 1990s or early 2000s, I met and worked with a gay man of Chinese descent. He was very camp and effeminate in his demeanour and in no way suppressed or hid his nature. One night while having a drink after work, he told me about himself. He was the youngest of 9 children. All were girls except himself. The reason his parents had so many kids is that his father, being very traditional, was adamant that he wanted a male heir. So when girl child after girl child came out, the parents kept going until they finally got a boy child. To the father’s disappointment, his son, as said, was very effeminate from the start and he turned out to be homos*xual.
It occurred to me back then that my workmate may have been meant to be born female— his soul was to incarnate into a female form—but the stubborn desire of his father thwarted nature and finally achieved a male child. This was like a kind of astral/psychological violence and violation. My workmate’s response to this idea was just that it is interesting but fanciful.

The second story comes from the alleged diary of an upperclass English boy of about 8 or 10 years old in the Elizabethan era. The book begins January 1, 1885, and goes until October 1887.

These entries were published in 1953 as a book called The Boy Who Saw True, after the anonymous author had died (in accordance with his stipulations). The boy had second sight, meaning he could see auras and spirits and so on. It claims to be factual but of course that doesn’t mean it is. The introduction, afterword and extensive notes are written by English composer Cyril Scott; the diary was brought to him because of his public reputation and known interest in the occult.

Here are two entries, amended slightly by me to stay on topic:

May 25
A rum old party named Miss Salt—what a funny name—is staying here. She has short hair like what Papa calls a rat’s back, and talks in a manny voice and has an old gentleman inside her. ( viz. inside her aura.) I thought this rather funny [strange] so while we were sitting in the drawing-room before tea with Cousin Agnes, I said, “Why have you got an old gentleman sticking to you?” Then she jumped, and said, “God bless my soul! What does the little boy mean?” And Cousin Agnes went all red as if I’d said something rude, and sort of laughed. (With embarrassment.) And so I thought I’d better tell Miss Salt that the old gentleman had funny clothes a bit like those pictures of Mr Pickwick, but he wasn’t near so jolly-looking and had a nasty red mark (a scar) on his cheek. “Good Gracious!” she cried. “Why that was Mr.——“ and she said a name I can’t remember. Then she looked uncomfy and stared at me like as if she was going to say something but thought after all she wouldn’t, and uttered some’ut about washing her paws for tea, and left the room. When she had gone, Cousin Agnes asked me, “Whatever made you say that to that lady? I think she is very hurt. Besides, it was such a strange thing to say. I don’t know what people will think if you say things like that.” So I said, “Well, it was true, so why shouldn’t I?” “Because I’m afraid you’ll be getting yourself into trouble one of these fine days,” she said. But she wasn’t very cross, so I didn’t mind. […]

May 26
While i was watching William, the nice gardener who says everything is rum, Miss Salt came by, and said she was just going to take a little walk to the sea, and would I like to come with her. So I had to say yes so as not to be rude. When we got to the seashore we sat down on the lovely hot sand, and she said, “Tell me, how did you know that about the old gentleman?” So I said I could see his face in her lights. Then she asked me, what did I mean by her lights, which surprised me very much, because the old lady is not blind, and doesn’t wear spectacles. So she said “Why, the colours? I’ve never heard of that.” So I reckoned this was very rum, and told her she must be short-sighted. But she said she wasn’t, and I thought that so q***r I said to myself, “Dear me, what is the matter with everybody?” Then I said, “You were very poorly once, weren’t you? And she said “Yes; how do you know that?” So I said, “I don’t know, but I do know (somehow). And I know that once upon a time you had a sweetheart you was going to marry but he had to go somewhere first a very long way off, and he got hurt, and didn’t come back again.” And that seemed to make her jump, and she said, “I’ll tell you what, little boy?” And I said “Yes Miss Salt?” And she said, “Upon my word, I believe you’ve got second sight.” But as I didn’t see what she meant she said that people had second sight what knew things without being told. Then I said, “Excuse me, Miss Salt” — and I’d have liked to call her Miss Pepper for fun—“But I reckon you are wrong, ‘cause there are a fine lot of things I don’t know, and have to ask papa or Miss Griffin. I had to ask her what is a circumcision and what it means to covet your neighbour’s ox or his ass, and a lot of other things out of scripture.” And that seemed to make Miss Salt laugh, and she said, “Oh I don’t mean those sort of things, I mean things that have happened like me being so poorly.” Then she took out of her satchel a funny old photograph, and said, “Do you know who that is?” So I said, “Why that’s the old gentleman.” And she said, “Quite right.” And after that she gave me sixpence to buy some lollipops, and thought we must be getting back now, as cousin Agnes might be wondering what had become of me. And that was the end of that.

(From pages 42 to 45, fifteenth edition 2005, Published by Rider.)

14/10/2022

The Cut and The Stitch

Time is the blood of God, flowing from His open wound. In place of blood cells you would find souls falling into incarnation. How to stop this draining of life and spirit? Stem the wound! Press on it with a hand! Stop the bleeding!
When they pierced the torso of Christ, blood and water poured out; the blood signifying Christ's continuing presence, and the water signifying the Church (baptism). But both fluids spilled onto the centurion, the servant of Caesar. And so too did the church become, over time, scattered and divided like spraying drops, and splattered finally onto the servants of materialism. As the blood spilled outward, so did religion spread, while The Sacred continued to die.
Let the Church baptise itself anew with fire! The fire that seals closed a wound, for religion's duty is surely to turn that flow around and back to the cut. Let the Cross -- when our fingers dip into holy water in order to anoint -- let that sign of the Cross be a cut and a stitch, a vertical cut and a horizontal stitch. For what is inward prayer and meditation, if not turning back to the source of the bleeding of time and space and souls away from divinity, and sealing the breach?

02/09/2022

'The man of genius differs from the dreamer and the fool in this only, that his creations are analogous to truth, while those of the fool and the dreamer are lost reflections and bewrayed images. Hence, for the wise man, to imagine is to see, as, for the magician, to speak is to create.' Eliphas Levi, Transcendental Magic.

BoredomBoredom is the accidental awareness of excess time that you don’t know what to do with. Life is excess time on Ea...
08/08/2022

Boredom
Boredom is the accidental awareness of excess time that you don’t know what to do with. Life is excess time on Earth that you don’t know what to do with. Boredom, then, is existential horror. But as soon as it is registered you apply a diversion.
In this way we put off suffering as long as we can, yet we also put off addressing the issue until it’s too late.

The TowerA traveler arrives at a new city but it has been destroyed. Every structure is blackened and damaged. Every fif...
13/06/2022

The Tower

A traveler arrives at a new city but it has been destroyed. Every structure is blackened and damaged. Every fifty metres there are piles of bricks . Roofs are missing. The people are gone. Mass graves line the sides of roads.
The traveler finally meets another soul who has made camp.
“Who destroyed this place?” the traveler asks.
“This city isn’t destroyed. It is unfinished. They couldn’t finish a single structure before getting distracted and moving on to another. They built a ruin. They built a ruin and then killed themselves.”

A merchant called one of his men and said, “I need you to deliver something to such and such customer in such and such province. “ The cargo was a thought. Let’s say it was a combination of numbers or a very specific image to remember in the absence of a picture. I don’t know, for reasons that will be obvious.
So the merchant’s employee put the thought in his head and took it on the road. He held it carefully in his head so it wouldn’t get damaged. But whenever he got to a town or market, people spoke to him! In other words they tried to put other thoughts in his head, which only had a limited amount of space. As far as he was concerned they were trying to knock the thought out of his head.
He had to avoid everyone.
He finally arrived at his customer’s home and delivered the wrong item. The right thought had been replaced somewhere along the way.

The first story is a poetic allusion to the Tower of Babel and what it shows us. The second story alludes to the Tower card in the tarot and what it refers to.

Painting by Pieter Bruegel 1563.

19/05/2022

The Shared Space Technique

Imagine someone asks if you’ve ever been to such and such restaurant. And since you have you say yes. Then the guy says, “You know that oil painting on the wall to the left of the entrance?” Or he refers to some other specific about the place you’ve been to—and you can picture it with greater or lesser detail.
When you are recalling something, especially a space, the mind is recreating it in ‘thought matter.’ You are ‘back there’ mentally. If it couldn’t you would not be able to recall it. This shows us that if we were to turn on ourselves and look inwards at our own minds, we’d see something like a chameleon or mimic that has no form of its own. It automatically takes on the form of whatever is around it. If you are walking down a street, your mind looks like the street (sounds like, smells like). The form is recorded so that you will remember the street. “Remember that street? Remember the way to that place?” Those questions are the trigger words that make the mind transform into it later. Like how people say, don’t think of a banana. (This phenomenon contains a secret of repetitious prayer or Hesychasm.)
Anyway, so if we try to look inside ourselves, what we see is the same as what is outside ourselves. The world inside us looks (sounds, feels, etc.) just like the world outside us. The exception is when you are standing in a restaurant but thinking of the street. In that case you won’t recall, for example, the oil painting to the left of the entrance very well.

Let’s say we are now walking down a street and we ask ourselves how could we possibly be aware of both the outside world and the inside world at the same time. Usually we need to sit down in a quiet room to meditate, and we need to stop meditation when crossing the road. But now that we know the mind is just like the road we are crossing, we have the basis of a way forward.
Step one is to look at your environment and remind yourself that that is exactly what your insides look like. You are in your mind; you’ve rarely been outside your mind. So now you can look at both worlds simultaneously. The next step is awareness of attachment and aversion, which is to say desire and emotions.
You don’t just recall a painting to the left of the entrance, you also feel something about it. The mere mention of it, let’s say, angers you because the restauranteur stole it off you, or because it depicts a political sentiment you disagree with. Or let’s say the thought of the painting fills you with happiness and melancholy because you knew the artist and you wonder where they are now. In the place you are in there are often people around who make you feel a certain way.
Imagine you are nervous because you are about to go out and give a speech to a hall full of people. You walk out onto the stage and see a huge crowd and feel terrified. If you pause and look inside yourself, you will see see this emotion of terror personified as a crowd of people. They don’t cause the fear; they are the fear. Emotions now have forms. The good thing about the fear inside you is this: if you can stand apart and see it, it is not you. The fear is now exorcised. It’s like a kind of Aikido. The effect is almost like siphoning the fear out.

The fear was inside you when you were looking outside at people. When you looked inside at the fear, you were suddenly free from it because seeing it (as a crowd) revealed it to be at a distance. An eye cannot see itself. The realisation is that you are not your thoughts, nor your feelings.
It is not a philosophical concept, it is a perception in real time. The place you are in is your mind. The things and people in the place are your feelings. The trigger words (or mantra) to remember (recreate) or maintain this perception is, “I, the mind, am a shared space. I, the soul, am the witness of the shared space.”

18/05/2022

Oh Lord Creator
Thank you for making the teeth of wolves not like the horns of my dear buffalo
For now I can make several excellent combs for my dear wife. Amen.

[Prayer from Beelzebub’s Tales to His Grandson by G.I. Gurdjieff.]

Jacob the WrestlerGenesis 32:22–32Jacob had been surrounded by people and busy for decades. He’d been living with and wo...
16/05/2022

Jacob the Wrestler
Genesis 32:22–32

Jacob had been surrounded by people and busy for decades. He’d been living with and working on the land for his father-in-law Laban, married to the man’s two daughters. The wives were rivals and so they tried to outdo each other in having the most children. Jacob fathered 13 all up, which included children with the handmaidens of each wife (which the wives chalked up as successes for themselves).
Finally Jacob decided to escape the control of Laban and he set out to make his own clan in his own place. This caused a lot of drama and required a lot of diplomacy and sneakiness, but he finally took his family and entourage and broke away. As soon as he did, news reached Jacob that his distant brother-and-enemy Esau (whom Jacob had wronged) was on his way to ambush Jacob. This required some more diplomacy and sneakiness.
So, on the road, Jacob had his father-in-law behind him and the prospect of getting caught by his brother’s men in front of him. At some point Jacob sent his wives and their parties ahead of him across a river—and for the first time (likely) in his life he was left completely alone.
A man came along and wrestled Jacob until dawn. Jacob was winning, and so the man touched Jacob’s hip and wounded him for life. Nevertheless, Jacob was out-grappling the stranger.
So the stranger said, “Let me go, the sun us coming up.”
At this point Jacob understood that this man was an angel, a stand-in for God. So he said, “Not unless you bless me first.”
The angel asked what Jacob’s name was, and when told he said to Jacob that from now on his new name will be Israel (‘he who struggles or wrestles with God’).
Jacob asked what the angel’s name was but the angel refused to answer. He just tapped-out by blessing Jacob … and then left.
After this, Jacob limped off to his new, blessed life where he made peace with his brother.

Most lives are full of family and work-related drama (even if not as wealthy or dangerous as Jacob’s). We don’t avoid family, work and politics; we consider them normal.
Only that one incident by the river stands out as unusual. We spend our lives avoiding being alone, and avoiding the silence that comes with being alone. We also avoid the idleness that comes with being alone and silent. It is in this place and state that we are confronted with something that we struggle to accept. Boredom is an existential crisis. Loneliness is an existential crisis. Silence eventually forces us to hear how chaotic our thoughts are as the mind freaks out in the face of this crisis. If we try to stop it we end up in a wrestling match.
Jacob was winning though, he was still young and strong. Then, since we are considering the angel as a representation of the fear of the void (of fear of death, in other words), the angel touches Jacob’s hip and makes him old. A bad hip says, Memento Mori.
How do we deal with not knowing what to do with lives we didn’t ask for as we speed towards oblivion? Keeping busy and surrounded are not answers; they’re ways of avoiding the question.
Jacob showed us. He confronted it head on. He kept up with facing it until the darkness lifted and the problem changed into a blessing. The blessing changed the whole identity and nature of Jacob, that name meaning supplanter or usurper by underhanded means. Now he was Israel.
God often represents purpose and meaning in our dialogues, and the absence of a god is silence and loneliness etc. To the occultist and mystic though, God is “He Whom Naught But Silence Can Express* .” He IS the void. A deafening silence when we avoid it in fear, but a consuming, elating peace when we face it.
Being able to be alone, being able to dwell in silence, turning boredom into prayer or acceptance (in other words meditation): these are the first spiritual achievements or signs of mental health. The second is responsibility.

*an expression from the Hermetic Order of The Golden Dawn.

Picture by Leon Bonnat.

27/04/2022
22/03/2022

The basic triangle

1. The person/house/temple/village
2. The fire/embers/faith/spirit
3. The community/elves/angels/enthusiasm

I was shown something in a dream.
A house was needed in order to make and protect a lasting fire, and a fire was needed to bring warmth. When a house is built or acquired, you have to blow on the embers to bring about the fire. This attracts elves (or little people, or djinn etc) whose presence ensures an absence of darker things. The embers must never go completely out but remain like a pilot light in a restaurant oven.

In a parish, the equivalent three points of the triangle are the church building, the fire of faith, and angels. If there is no church or temple, there is no official spot to gather. If no ‘flame’ of faith, there’s no reason or enthusiasm to gather and angels will not come.

Prayer was the equivalent of blowing on embers to bring the flames and make the fire big. A significant part of the dream was that where there are no embers, blowing on them is futile. There are many organisations— religious, political and so on—who continue to do their equivalents of blowing on the blackened and cold remnants of a fireplace. The blowing becomes tradition and/or superstition.

We’ve seen how angels get replaced by something dark and evil. But we’ve also seen where they don’t get replaced and there is no longer any life. The organisation (or house) eventually becomes a ruin.

Smaller again there is the human, who builds his “Etheric temple” by surrounding herself with the protective walls of logic, critical thinking, love and learning. He cultivates a fire of faith and enthusiasm in his heart.

24/02/2022

Meditation is similar to fact-checking the self, but not from research—more like testing and experimenting. So, it becomes more like trouble-shooting to find it or its borders.
The story of Jesus and similar characters are just stories, we’re told. Narratives, not reality. But so are we. Who will remember you, and for how long? Before long those who knew you will die and you’ll be anecdotes many times removed. And then there’ll be a stage where nobody knows how much is true in the stories about you. Soon you and I are in the same boat as King Arthur, history becoming muddied up into myth.
More people will remember King Arthur than they do us. We’ll be forgotten. There’ll be historical evidence, maybe a bloodline, maybe lasting influence, as there was with Jesus. Did he actually die in Kashmir, married to Madeleine? Is that shrine real or just a story?
Effective meditation is like heading back to the round table to see who is actually sitting there. Is there an emperor inside the emperor’s new clothes?
Forgive all these metaphors and analogies to what are just stories.

18/02/2022

Roughly 777 lives.
700 in the Halls of Ignorance
70 in the Halls of Learning
7 in the Halls of Initiation
[paraphrased from the writings of Alice A. Bailey.]

14/01/2022

Say there’s only an hour until your alarm goes off in the morning. To get more sleep you have to build a compartment that is farther out of earth’s atmosphere where time moves slower, and sleep in that. The second compartment is called a dream.

If you want even more sleep you can, from the second compartment (your bedroom is the first) build a third compartment farther into space, climb in there and time will move even slower. In each compartment there is a body made from the same material as the compartment: the first physical atoms, solid; the second astral or emotional, liquid; the third imaginary, gaseous like clouds.
It becomes unsteady. If you can awake gently and climb carefully back to earth the compartments won’t collapse and your dreams will remain intact. If you cannot, the bodies in each compartment will be crushed too.

You’ll awake in the first compartment and body with no recollection of any dreams.

Incidentally, an alarm that forces you awake will inevitably cause these buildings to come crashing down, seemingly defeating the purpose of all that spacetime travel .

Strong attachment to some problem in your daily life can cause insomnia. The mind keeps racing and you cannot relax enou...
21/04/2021

Strong attachment to some problem in your daily life can cause insomnia. The mind keeps racing and you cannot relax enough to fall asleep. If you take that to the extreme – and on your deathbed your last thoughts are of violent obsession over some worldly thing or person left behind, this can create what we call the vampire. We call them ‘undead’, and death is the Big Sleep; so the vampire (tied to Earth by his obsession) is the ultimate form of insomnia.

Blavatsky called this state ‘half-death’ and explained that the cord connecting the body with its spectral counterpart fails to sever properly. The astral spectre – propelled by the obsession – then needs to sustain the body, and so does this by draining the life force (sometimes through the blood) of the living, while its own body lies idle in a coffin somewhere. This explains the depictions of vampires as having no reflection: they are not physically there.

Their victims, who are often the object of the Big Insomniac’s obsession, become drained and weak. Consequently, they often go on to suck the life-force of others still, in order to save themselves. This is the origin of the contagiousness of vampires depicted in fiction. It becomes like a pyramid scheme of desperation.

For your interest, here is a true account of vampirism in old Russia: http://issuu.com/pinkus/docs/the_veil

A zine devoted to philosophy, occultism, ethics, religious, cultural, and political thought. Published in Darwin, Australia. It features contemporary articles along side bygone papers from around the world. All content: Levin A. Diatschenko. Layout & design: Nico Liengme.

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Veil posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Veil:

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Contact The Business
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share