30/04/2024
Nnamdi Kanu:
Nigeria Keeps Deteriorating, Degenerating, Decaying, And Decomposing
Any keen and objective observer of events and developments in Nigeria since 2017, WHEN MOHAMMADU BUHARI DIED, and mask-wearing impostors were used to run Nigeria by , will not find it difficult to conclude that Nigeria has been travelling on the road to abyss since then.
Because of the desperation to invent non existing crimes against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, Britain and Nigeria have been systematically sniffing life out of themselves, in their ill advised efforts to vitiate the restoration of Biafra.
The judiciary of any nation should be a major indication of the existence of sanity in that nation or not, and perhaps, that's why people say that the JUDICIARY is the last hope of common man, since the state of health of the judiciary is a reflection or a determinant of the extent of the rule of law obtainable or prevalent in that country.
Since the (which many people call agitation) gained frightening momentum and unprecedented followership, under the leadership of the indefatigable and charismatic IPOB Leader, , Nigeria, under the instruction of Britain, has been muddling itself in very pathetic disrepute.
Take the case of the international crime of illegal abduction, which , , , and teamed up to commit against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and Biafrans, for instance.
Because of the fact that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu survived the assassination bid of British and Nigerian governments, through the army's Operation Python Dance, and escaped for his life, having earlier been granted bail, Nigeria exposed her emptiness and her terroristic nature by claiming that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu JUMPED BAIL.
Instead of the judiciary using this opportunity to redeem itself, and see the extent to which it can contribute in recovering Nigeria's battered and shattered image, by straightening out the matter of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, and stating emphatically that he did not jump bail, but instinctively escaped for his life, the judiciary aligned with the British and Nigerian governments, who stand to be the greatest losers WHEN Biafra regains sovereignty, to agree that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu jumped bail.
The worst damage Nigeria's judiciary did to itself, and by extension, the whole of Nigeria, is in the matter of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's international abduction, extraordinary rendition, and continuous tortuous incarceration.
Despite the going back and forth of British and Nigerian governments in the matter of spurious, puerile, untenable, infantile, and ridiculous charges brought against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu through Nigeria's DSS, nothing was firmly established, with many of the charges quashed and thrown out, even by Nigeria's federal high court, where the matter was being heard.
Not satisfied with the decision of the High Court, the formidable legal defense team of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, led by Prof Mike Ozhekome and Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor, approached Nigeria's APPEAL COURT, ABUJA, where a landmark judgement against the Federal governments of Nigeria and UK was obtained, declaring Mazi Nnamdi Kanu discharged (as there were no serious charges against him), with a proclamation that compensation should be paid to him, and at the same time, prohibiting any other court in Nigeria from trying him.
Despite the fact that the appeal court stated these unequivocally, the British and Nigerian governments failed to act according to this judgement, and went for what they called stay of ex*****on, which not only took eternity to obtain from the backdoor, but was in totality, an aberration.
This stay of ex*****on was the premise upon which and approached the Supreme Court, with regards to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's case.
Now, the final and irreversible damage that Nigeria, through the judiciary, has done to herself is the pronouncement of the Supreme Court, as dictated by the Presidency, in which the Supreme Court referred Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's case to the High court for his trial to begin afresh.
The APPEAL COURT OF NIGERIA had clearly, thoroughly, and holistically considered the persecution of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, and concluded that SELF-DETERMINATION, which Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is pursuing, is a fundamental and inalienable right, the pursuit of which is not only legitimate and constitutional, but equally democratic and expedient, for which the UN has mandated any host nation to give maximum support to any self-determination seeking people.
Because of the fear that the materialization of the sovereignty of Biafra is a deadly economic blow to both Britain and Nigeria as parasitic nations, the British and Nigerian governments have, in this process of attempting to truncate or vitiate the restoration of Biafra, made Nigeria a mockery, ridicule, and of no value before the world, resulting in the fact that Nigeria has become a mere laughing stock among the comity of nations. (Evidences abound)
For the avoidance of doubt, the DEMAND of BIAFRANS has been the same, and it is very simple.
That demand is a , as enshrined in ARTICLE 3 of the UN CHARTER, with regards to SELF DETERMINATION.
SELF-DETERMINATION is a fundamental human right, and is a democratic process.
The call for REFERENDUM is not a call for war, and mustn't be treated as such.
The earlier both British and Nigerian governments assimilate this reality, and act in line with that, the better, as nothing on earth can stop the restoration of Biafra.
Written by
Mmadụ Awụchukwu
Link is in comments section.