The News Baaz

  • Home
  • The News Baaz

The News Baaz This is the page to discuss and interact with my Facebook friends about my YouTube show The NewsBaaz
(5)

Hindutva’s Labour of Love or Religious Apartheid The banner on his fruit ‘thela’ ( handcart ) along the Muzaffarnagar hi...
18/07/2024

Hindutva’s Labour of Love or Religious Apartheid

The banner on his fruit ‘thela’ ( handcart ) along the Muzaffarnagar highway bore two very simple words in hindi – Nasir. Phal. Similarly, another thela had this banner pasted on it – Arif. Phal. The UP Police issued the diktat to ‘clear the confusion’ among Kanwar Yatris who they are buying fruits from. Understanding Hindi was simple. The message the UP administration wanted to send out to all the Muslim eatery owners and fruit sellers wasn’t lost on anyone either - You shall be a marked man.

A tea stall owner in Western UP told a media person that he changed the name of his tea stall from Chai Lovers Point to Wakil Sahab Tea Stall but the officials still told him this was ‘not clear enough’, so he again changed the name to Wakil Ahmed Tea Stall. You may find a dollop of comedy there but frankly it is the most nightmarish thing a citizen can imagine at the hand of his own government. A religious apartheid now being gradually normalized and institutionalized to impose majoritarianism.

Consider this – Goons climbed atop a mosque in Maharashtra, rained hammer on its minarets, damaging the place of worship after planting a saffron flag. Did you ever delineate violence from Hindutva?

A Muslim police constable was shot dead in Aligarh in a bizarre incident. Police claimed he died after a jammed pistol of a colleague accidently fired hitting him in the abdomen and ricocheting to hit Yaqoob on his head. Who would believe this bunkum? Apparently the two constables were out to nab a suspected smuggler of cow meat. Yaqoob’s father is certainly not the one to buy the theory. But would he press hard for the truth to come out considering his minority status and the consequences that might befall challenging the administration helmed by Yogi.

In UP’s Siddharth Nagar, a temple priest broke the idols of Lord Ganesha and pinned the blame on two local Muslim youths. Incidentally, the Police found out the truth. But what would have been the fate of the two youths had the temple priest mobilized Hindutva local lumpens in his defense more aggressively or the Police had chosen to blatantly take side?

In Chhattisgarh, two Muslim youths were lynched over suspicion of cow smuggling. Déjà vu?

Well, these are but five incidents of Hindutva violence past fortnight that has found a new momentum in Modi’s 3.0, eerily playing out the disturbing intent that so defined the PM’s brazen election speeches centering around the Muslim community.

If all of these is a throwback to Modi’s first term as PM pock-marked with cow vigilantism and reckless lynching and the second term that he rode at the back of seeking military revenge across the border and on the ricocheted glory of Yogi’s bulldozer drive, then the third term promises to give you more of the first time and more of the second term, making his illogical 2ab algebraic definition appear as close to the mathematical formula as possible. This is the extra 2ab he has been repeating ad nauseam past ten years. And yet the third term is not just squared for all its New India nasty Hindutva elements thrown in but multiplied to the power of 3.

A new narrative is being sought to circulate and take firm roots of marking the ‘other’ physically. They marked the houses of Jews in N**i Germany. Now, minorities have been marked as the ‘other’ who are identifiable with ‘certain kinds of dresses.’ It took them ten years to actually do this physical marking on the pretext of safeguarding the religious sentiments of the majority community. The dividing line becoming crystal clear – a majority
community who shall be armed with all the constitutional rights on the one hand and a section of citizenry subservient to those majoritarian impulses, reduced to playing second fiddle.

Therefore, the Arifs and the Nasirs and the Wakils – the bonafide citizens of this country just the same as those Kanwar Yatris who shall storm the highway, as if entitled, creating ruckus and noise and blocking the busy highway for almost a week, bringing the economy and usual life to a standstill, will have to display their name on their handcarts so that it doesn’t ‘cause confusion’ in the minds of Kanwars.

What the police did not say and what the UP administration wanted to tell all and sundry is this – You are the other and we shall mark you for that. What the police and the administration did not tell you in as many words is this – if Kanwar Yatris do not buy stuff from those vendors named Arif and Nasir then they certainly have only religious sentiments uppermost in their mind not to buy any consumable item from non-Hindus during such a piligrimage. No offence intended.

But, offence certainly taken Mr Yogi Adityanath for wearing your religious bias on your sleeves and displaying crude religious discrimination. Think of putting Hindus in that place and your nostrils shall get flared up. Seems you haven’t learnt any lesson from massive defeat in the recent Lok Sabha polls in which the voters squarely rejected your bulldozer justice. Bulldozers that rampantly mowed down houses and shops of minorities for offence that that were not even cognizable. For holding a kangaroo ( bulldozer ) court even before the matter reached the court of law.

But a constitutionally untenable diktat like the one by Muzaffarnagar administration could only mean two things - either Yogi wants to seek his revenge on the community that voted against his party handing him the worst election humiliation of his career and making him the prime suspect in the eyes of the non-biological supremo and his corpulent lieutenant, setting the grapevine abuzz with his impending replacement. Or this was a deliberate act of defiance against Modi that BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari gave words to in neighbouring West Bengal.

In a convention packed with party members, Suvendu Adhikari gave a roaring speech, thunderously rejecting Modi’s pet Sabka Sath Sabka Vikas slogan and replaced it with his own coinage – jo hamare sath, hum unke sath. In a way, Adhikari was clearly rejecting whatever pretense Modi has to perforce act out in order to keep the last vestiges of his sabka sath sabka vikas image intact. Adhikari then went on to suggest BJP convention members to close down party’s minority morcha before ending his speech with aggressive chants of Jai Shree Ram.

Consider also that Nagpur isn’t quite happy with its Delhi protégé and now the RSS Sarsanghchalak himself has taken the lead to show mirror to Modi ever since BJP’s lukewarm showing at the hustings. The election results punctured Modi’s hubris. He had to hold on to the crutches of two most unreliable partners to make him limp back to power. Mr Mohan Bhagwat is doing all he can to pick small, little holes into his still puffed up ego. He has been actively trolling the ‘non-biological’ PM precisely for pretending to be what he is not – superhuman claiming to have the divine qualities. In a sense, Mr Bhagwat is chiding Modi to stop playing God and focus on governance which is certainly Mr Modi’s proven Achilles heel.

The fact that Modi has to water down on blowing his own trumpet in what certainly is NDA regime is already hampering his working style. Now, he will have to work overtime to keep the murmurs of a possible dissent within the party under check. Thirdly, for keeping his allies in good humour he will have to continue pretending to live up to his old slogan of sabka sath, sabka vikas because despite all the give and take of power balance both big allies are visibly inclined well disposed toward safeguarding minority interests in their respective states. It is as much a test of this far and no further attitude of allies to check Modi’s zealotry urges.

This only adds to the burden of Modi still having to shoulder the responsibility of pulling his party out of the abyss of marked pessimism. The forthcoming elections to the Maharashtra and Haryana Vidhan Sabha might as well give him the chance to get back a sliver of his confidence. Because the nasty bit about the 2024 Lok Sabha elections was that Modi fell short of even managing his own electoral vikas, not just losing UP badly, miserably failing to keep up his own victory margin from Varanasi but also falling short of driving his party past the majority mark. As for now, UP mangoes to Nagpur oranges the fruits of his Hindutva labour of love have left a bad taste in the mouth.

On Jai Hind and Jai PalestineA section of people on social media justify Owaisi’s ‘Jai Palestine’ remark during his oath...
02/07/2024

On Jai Hind and Jai Palestine

A section of people on social media justify Owaisi’s ‘Jai Palestine’ remark during his oath-taking by pointing out statement of India’s Minister of External Affairs S Jaishankar that India was helping Palestine’s refugees in a big way. Do the two remarks complement each other. The answer is NO. One is an official statement given by country's external affairs minister in the country’s Parliament underlining his government's official stance on Palestine, that it unflinchingly stands for a two-state solution and that his government is sympathetic towards financially supporting agencies working for Palestinian refugees. That's what the government of India's current diplomatic efforts on Israel-Palestine issue is, take it or leave it. One can always crucify the government for still not doing enough to contain Israel from its unilateral strikes against Palestine resulting in human tragedies of unprecedented proportions.

On the other hand, a seasoned Member of Parliament is invited by the protem speaker of the newly convened Parliament to take oath as a member of the Lok Sabha. And soon after taking his oath, he hails the state of Palestine in the same breath he hails the Constitution, his party, MIM, that largely represents the minority Muslim community Owaisi himself comes from and hails his home state of Telangana.

Mr Owaisi's sympathy with the people of Palestine and the hundreds of lives lost because of relentless bombardments of Palestinian territories is understandable. But, is it any different from MPs and party leaders across India's political spectrum who share Mr Owaisi's concern on fresh wave of violence unleashed on Gaza which carries the virulent imprint of a pogrom by the State of Israeli against hapless Palestinians.

But what struck a jarring note was the occasion Mr Owaisi chose to register his voice on the current state of the Palestinian people. Was it the right forum for Mr Owaisi to be even mentioning a foreign country least of all hailing it when it was a solemn occasion for MPs to affirm their true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India and to upholding the sovereignty and integrity of India. Could he not make a distinction between a Parliament and a public rally. A similar sentiment on Palestine in Hyderabad, his home turf, could have drawn an uproarious reaction from the crowd.

Again, though he gave salutation to his home state Telangana – Jai Telangana - he couldn’t work up his emotions to add Jai Hind - a salutation to his own country - though he was under no constitutional or moral obligation to do so. But he was under no moral obligation to give salutations to Palestine either. But he did. And there hangs the twist in the tale. Telangana to Palestine via India could still have gone a long way into understanding his mindset. Skipping India only reinforces feeling of misplaced priority and indiscretion. If he was being idealistic in hailing Palestine during his oath-taking, he was being too clever by half for not adding a set of two more words - Jai Hind.

If Jai Philistine was his desire to see things change for the better, Jai Hind could have been his resolve to make things better in his capacity as a parliamentarian and as a mass leader both. A country reeling under unprecedented inflation and growing unemployment, where political opponents are jailed without evidence and proof and minorities harassed no end, where crony capitalism is playing havoc with farmers and country folks, where government is throwing rule book to get even with dissent, where the party bigwig declares himself the unopposed leader despite the mandate against him, despite his party falling short of majority in parliament, his megalomaniac craving for power, his government’s celebratory tone of utter mismanagement of issues at hand, Mr Owaisi still had Palestine and not India that is Bharat uppermost on his mind while taking oath. And this, on the very occasion that marks the celebration of Indian democracy, the reinforcement of the Republic – the convening of a new parliament after general elections held every five years. If Owaisi considers Parliament as the appropriate forum to reach his voice to the world, he should know that it was the Indian Republic that allowed him to enter those hallowed portals in the first place.

It would have made no difference even if Owaisi had walked down the pulpit after simply reading out the very specific text laid down for oath-taking, as did so many other MPs some in their own mother-tongues. Here, let me briefly draw a distinction between oaths taken by two other members of Parliament from the one taken by Mr Owaisi. First is the case of Congress MP and now Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, who took oath in English. He hailed the Constitution ( Jai Samvidhan ) preceded by Jai Hind after taking the oath as an MP. All along he held and waved a copy of the pocket edition of the Constitution, which has become a quite rage since his election campaign days when he flashed the Red book in rally after rally to drive him his election plank that Modi government secretly intended to change the Constitution of India if voted to power the third time.

The second case is that of Mahua Moitra, who took oath in Bengali. After she read out the oath, she gave salutations to India, the Constitution of India and to her home state, West Bengal by uttering these words - Jai Hind, Jai Samvidhan, Jai Bangla.

Where was the hurry for Mr Owaisi to pronounce his sympathy for Palestine and tag it along the same template he was reading out the oath-taking speech from? Did he really hail Palestine in order to draw attention of the government against the Israeli atrocities in Gaza? Was this his way of teasing the Modi government of evading a tough stand against Israel?

Again, where was the hurry for Owaisi to register his sympathy for Palestine when he knew that Parliament, in due course of time, shall always provide an opportunity or two for him to speak at length on his favourite subject of Palestine. Isn’t that the raging global issue of the day? If yes, Owaisi, like all members of Parliament, has all the rights to ask questions and get the government to commit even on issues it dilly-dallies on. That is what a Parliament of a vibrant democracy promises.

But, the question still remains – Why would Owaisi weave-in his concern for Palestine into his oath-taking speech? Why mix the two? And towards what objective? Was Mr Owaisi trying to exploit the occasion for his wider appeal in the Islamic world knowing well that the oath-taking ceremony inside Parliament was beamed LIVE not only on government media network but on different news channels that have a worldwide viewership? Does he really court an image of himself as a truly global Muslim leader? Does he share this illusion with his bete noire of becoming the Vishvaguru? A khalifah, of sorts, of the Muslim ummah.

For someone who will have a tough time winning an election from any Lok Sabha constituency other than Hyderabad, his home constituency, that even resembles the same demographics this was a truly a gamble of ridiculous proportion. If it were not for any of the reasons above, he certainly has set off a bad precedent that will not go down well with Parliamentary conventions.

Since BJP leader Chatrapal Singh Gangwar’s turn came after Owaisi, MIM leader could not recoil on his statement on the pretext that he mentioned Palestine only as a tit for tat for Gangwar’s Hindu Rashtra utterance which he found obnoxious.

This is not to suggest that Gangwar’s salutation to ‘Hindu Rashtra’ ( Jai Hindu Rashtra ) after his oath-taking from the same pulpit inside the Lok Sabha was a natural corollary to or a bad imitation of sentiments displayed by his fellow Parliamentarian Mr Owaisi. I would not hazard a guess that Owaisi in any way influenced Mr Gangwar. Quite frankly, he did not. Mr Gangwar would have done it his way, and this way alone, anyways. Owaisi or no Owaisi. Owaisi for Palestine or Owaisi without Palestine. Some things are ingrained. The clot has spread blocking faculties of reason. The arrogance has mutated. No medicinal concoctions shall work. Not even a strong dose of medicine administered by the people in the recent elections to Gangwar’s party and its supremo, denying majority to the former and checking the latter’s hubris.

02/07/2024

नेता प्रतिपक्ष राहुल गांधी के आज के संसदीय भाषण के बाद अभिनेता, स्क्रिप्ट और डॉयलॉग राइटर का़दर खान के कुछ मशहूर डॉयलॉग्स याद आ गये। ख़ासतौर पर ये वाले डॉयलॉग्स -

आदमखोर भेड़ियों, लाखों इंसानों का खून बहा कर झूठी हमदर्दी के आंसू बहाने वालों, तुम्हारी शतरंज का खेल ख़त्म हो गया। तुम लोग ख़ुद अपनी चाल में फँस कर रह गये हो।

हराम की दौलत इंसान को शुरू शुरू में सुख ज़रूर दिलाती है मगर बाद में ले जाकर एक ऐसे दुख के सागर में धकेल देती है जहां मरते दम तक सुख का किनारा नज़र नहीं आता है।

जिंदा हैं वो लोग जो मौत से टकराते हैं, मुर्दों से बदतर हैं वो लोग जो मौत से घबराते हैं।

दुनिया की कोई जगह इतनी दूर नहीं, जहां जुर्म के पांव में कानून अपनी फौलादी जंजीरें पहना न सके।

वक़्त की क़द्र करना सीखो। जो इंसान वक़्त की कद्र नहीं करता, वक़्त उसकी कद्र नहीं करता। नाकद्रे इंसान के पास जब भी वक़्त आता है, बुरा वक़्त आता है।

तुम भी एक बाद याद रखना। अगर बदले की आद बुझाने में खूनखराबे का इस्तेमाल किया, तो इतना याद रखना कि खून खराबा करने वालों के पूरे ख़ानदान को खान तहसनहस कर दिया करता है।

अपन फेमस आदमी। बड़ा-बड़ा पेपर में अपनका छोटा-छोटा फोटो छपता है। लकी मैन।

इस थप्पड़ की गूंज सुनी तुमने?

हम जहां खड़े होते हैं लाइन वहीं से शुरू होती है।

विजय दीनानाथ चौहान, पूरा नाम, बाप का नाम, दीनानाथ चौहान, मां का नाम, सुहासिनी चौहान, गांव मांडवा, उम्र 36 साल। नौ महीना, आठ दिन। ये पहला घंटा चालू है।

08/06/2024

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं।
जनता के मारे हैं। ।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
हम अहंकारी थे, हम अहंकारी हैं।
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं।
जनता के मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
राम को लाये थे, राम से ही हारे हैं।
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं।
जनता के मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
हम झूठे थे, हम झूठे हैं।
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं।
जनता के मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
सीटें कम हुई तो क्या
पब्लिक रूठी भी तो क्या
आयोग का दिल तो जीता है।
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं।
जनता के मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
पार्टियों को तोड़ते थे, आगे भी तोड़ेंगे।
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं।
जनता के मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
अकेले समाज में गाँठ डालते थे
अब ख़ुद बंधन में हैं।
क़िस्मत की गाँठ निराली है।
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं
जनता के मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
छप्पन की छाती थी
छत्तीस पर आये हैं
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं।
जनता के मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
खाने, पहनावे से प्रॉब्लम थी
अब सहयोगी के और इशारे हैं
हम न्यारे थे, हम न्यारे हैं।
जनता के मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

हम न हारे थे, न हारे हैं।
हिंदू राष्ट्र चाहते थे,
अब संविधान हमारी पहचान है।
जनता से मारे हैं।
बैसाखी के सहारे हैं।

07/06/2024

Nitish Kumar – Maverick or Modi Apologist

Did Nitish bent to touch Modi’s feet? It looked like he did. The manner may have appeared casual but the intent could not be missed. Nitish walked up to the PM’s chair. The PM stood up to greet him. Nitish brought his hands together in a namaste and almost on cue bent forward towards Modi, constantly looking at Modi’s feet, lowered his left frame, his left hand stretching forward, reaching the PM’s knees, when Modi held it midway, apparently embarrassed at the JD(U) supremo’s unexpected gesture.

And as if the exercise had remained incomplete, Nitish then, brought his forehead to lean on Modi’s hand that still held his, in a gesture that only suggested thankfulness and gratitude. The frame was frozen in time..

In Indian culture, prevalent more in northern and central India, touching the feet of elders is seeking their blessings. This is considered a mark of respect. Nitish’s act must have caught Modi unawares. There was no pretence in the act. It looked in the moment thing when emotions get the better of you. Or was it all worked out, a calculated step that hit the bull’s eye.

Was it deliberate? But why would Nitish try and seek Modi’s blessings? And, literally so, by touching his feet. That too, in full public view? They are almost the same age, born six months apart. Worked together as comrades since over four decades, their destiny intertwined in so many ways. Why would Nitish show off his emotions ? And for Modi, with whom his love hate relationship is no secret. What triggered it?

It all happened in a flash. In front of hundreds of NDA elected representatives, chief ministers of NDA states and other BJP bigwigs. It was Live on TV, beamed straight from the coveted Central Hall of the Parliament House.

What could have been the reason for Nitish’s almost fawning gesture. Was it old camaraderie between the two? Could be. But they have had fall outs even more celebrated than their bonhomie, especially after Modi became PM in 2014.

Was it Nitish’s way of acknowledging that despite having bagged 12 Lok Sabha seats for his party, he was never more weaker in the party than he is now. The image of Nitish campaigning jointly with Modi on the truck in Patna rushes back in our memory. The world saw a different Nitish on the truck with Modi. Meek and lost in his own world, he cut a sorry figure, holding the BJP illuminated lotus symbol in his hands, almost as if a irritable child has been mollycoddled with his favourite toy.

Why was Nitish holding the BJP’s illuminated Lotus symbol. The other question that rankled was – what has come over Nitish Kumar. Is he alright? Unverified reports about his mental health had been doing the rounds for some time. The image of an indifferent Nitish Kumar holding BJP’s symbol and not his own party symbol - the Arrow – only set the rumours abuzz. He had earlier set off a series of faux pax, once even referring to Modi’s clarion call for 400 seats as 4000 seats in his speech during a joint election rally with Modi.

On the campaign truck that passed through Patna streets, it seemed Nitish was given a pedestial lower in height than Modi’s, who appeared towering over his regional partner. Was it all designed towards that? Was it a deliberate move to make Nitish appear less significant partner to Modi and compromise his stature.

I can understand Modi’s PR machinery going some length to pull off such a marketing stunt even at the cost of upsetting the alliance partner. But the bigger question is - Did it sit well with Nitish’s persona? Did he not take objection to that treatment? After all, he was the king of Bihar still and BJP’s main trump card through many elections they fought together and won, Nitish always hogging credit for the coalition victories.

He has not only been a long-standing coalition partner of the BJP but also its main face because despite almost 30 years of togetherness BJP couldn’t nurture a grassroot leader who could command a following or a stature quite like Nitish in Bihar.

And yet BJP has had its share of peaks and troughs with Nitish as alliance partner, especially after Modi took over as PM for the first time in 2014. Nitish has had quite a few run-ins with the BJP and has crossed swords with Modi. Like Modi, he keeps his cards close to his chest. And has switched sides like seasons change. His moves timed well and catches friends by surprise.

It has never pricked his conscience that switching loyalty to his one-time bete noire, Lalu Prasad Yadav could dent his stature or impact his electoral base. Once he even jumped ship midway through his term. Never has it ever pricked his conscience that there was a world of difference in aligning with BJP or Lalu’s RJD, both ideologically apart and sitting at different ends of the political spectrum. But only Nitish had the knack of managing the two worlds and be at ease in each one of them as if he belonged. He knew how to stay relevant.

Despite his strong relationship with the BJP, he has never been untouchable for even Lalu Yadav who started his political career alongside Nitish. Both enrolled in the same socialist school of thought passed down by Lohia and JP. Moreover, Nitish’s strong ties with BJP never could lent a communal shade to his personality or make him administratively partial against the minorities. Whichever camp loyalty he affiliated himself with from time to time, depending on who ruled Delhi, he still carries the image of a secular leader who has no beef with the minorities.

But, he has only emerged stronger every time he has broken one alliance to enter another or dumped the new partner for the older partner again. Except that this has earned him the moniker of ‘Paltu Ram.’ From the same voters who elected 12 of his party men for the Lok Sabha in the just concluded elections. Such has been his magnetic pull among voters who largely remained loyal through his several despite him not belonging to a dominant caste groups of Bihar.

The reason for him being what he is, a quintessential Paltu Ram, has its roots in the game all politicians are adept at – the game of thrones. Only that some, like Nitish, are smarter than the others in plotting their political longevity while staying at the top of their game.

Nitish has been the longest surviving leader helming not just his party but also his state as chief minister for the last almost two decades. With all the astuteness and political chicanery at his command, Nitish gives a run for money to PM Modi. Who has been in power since 2001, first in Gujarat as the CM, and now for the past decade at the Centre as Prime Minister as also the de facto party chief, without a break.

And yet, even Modi or his BJP could never think of Bihar minus Nitish. His indispensability comes not because he has excellent rapport with PM Modi - which is certainly not the case despite the dominant optics, despite what the world saw today in the Parliament’s Central Hall.

But Modi, humbled at the hustings and his wings clipped, desperately needed to dig in to bid for the third term as PM. His strongman imaged dented, he needed partners like Nitish to throw his entire weight behind him. Nitish gave a reassuring speech in the NDA meet triggering a l***y applause from the newly elected members of parliament. During his short speech, Nitish not only expressed his faith in Modi’s leadership but read out encomiums to him, as if he were returning a favour.

Modi knows that Nitish’s loyalty can never be taken at face value, but Modi will be pushing his luck not to heed to those words from Nitish’s mouth as gospel truth at this juncture of his crucial journey. Modi knows that Nitish was with the Maha-gathbandhan, running a seemingly smooth government, but broke ties with Lalu’s RJD, only to walk back into the arms of eagerly waiting BJP as recently as January this year. That was also the time he put paid to his chances of being counted among PM probables of INDIA alliance, if it came to power at the Centre.

But in the heat and dust of June’s election results, Modi is aware of the searing reality that confronts him. Nitish could not be anything but his saviour. Their newly found fresh bout of friendship might have yet another expiry date, sooner than later, but it is not time to speculate but to invest in positivity and hope. There ain’t any options. Outside Modi’s playing arena, there are a pack of dog whistlers working overtime. And they have their targets identified already.

Therefore, Modi could only read divine intervention in having Nitish back in NDA fold. ( Who else would better understand this than the non-biological representative of God in India, that is Bharat)

In that august meeting of NDA’s elected representatives, Nitish did not forget to underline that Modi shall be his leader and he shall always stand by him. But he repeatedly reminded the PM that he has to complete some unfinished tasks in Bihar. Of course, special status for Bihar remains one of the dominant templates of Nitish’s governance, a promise he has yet to fulfil.

And now his new demand for one nation, one tariff for the power sector. And we haven’t yet speculated on the likely consequences of portfolio allocations and bad vibes it can set in motion among the alliance partners. In politics, some speculations turn into reality overnight and and set panic in motion.

Will Modi 3.0 deliver these promises on Nitish’s behalf, more as a quid pro quo now, we shall come to know only later. Nitish’s speech had the PM and the gathering in splits. Nitish couched his unwritten short speech in good-mannered rustic humour. But the import was not lost on anyone. Without sounding out any pre-condition for support to Modi, Nitish’s tone, nevertheless gave away the brain behind what makes him the maverick.

Is Nitish Kumar, bogged down by the unhealthy weight of visceral politics on the ground, showing signs of political fatigue. Is ill-health also exacting its own price? In more invisible ways one can imagine. Has the realisation suddenly dawned on him he is playing his superannuated innings and wants to walk into his sunset as a man who delivered what he promised and wishes to be remembered in history like his mentor, Bharat Ratna Karpuri Thakur.

It was only after his short speech that he walked up to the PM’s chair, did a namaste and bent forward to touch his feet and seek his blessings. Was he trying to tell the PM and those present, he shall follow his leader in good and bad times. Was it his way of exhibiting his unflinching commitment to ‘his’ leader standing at the cusp of another innings as the Prime Minister.

Was he finally letting the world know NDA shall be his final political halt. Was there a cryptic clue in those statements? Or was it Nitish at his tricky best, opening doors of speculation more than he closed.

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The News Baaz posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The News Baaz:

Videos

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Contact The Business
  • Videos
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share