The Middletown Eye

  • Home
  • The Middletown Eye

The Middletown Eye The Middletown Eye is a daily newsblog about Middletown CT. www.middletowneyenews.blogspot.com.

Dueling emails.  It' true, I wrote: We don't want a lousy plan shoved down our throats.  But "lousy" replaced another wo...
18/08/2024

Dueling emails. It' true, I wrote: We don't want a lousy plan shoved down our throats. But "lousy" replaced another word in my original draft.

BTW, I did not spend four terms at the Board of Ed (it may have seemed so), I spent four years - one term.

An ex-official questioned why the Middlesex County Chamber of Commerce meeting on the Route 9 lights removal project was closed after he was removed by police.

Look mom, my picture's in the paper.  My question, as always, what's the DOT trying to keep from the public?
15/08/2024

Look mom, my picture's in the paper.

My question, as always, what's the DOT trying to keep from the public?

Ed McKeon, outspoken critic of the Department of Transportations plan to reconfigure dangerous highway exits, wanted to attend the closed-door chamber meeting.

This morning I arrived at the Chamber of Commerce to attend the Route 9 Light Removal Committee meeting.  I thought it w...
14/08/2024

This morning I arrived at the Chamber of Commerce to attend the Route 9 Light Removal Committee meeting.

I thought it was appropriate, as a former Council member, and as a resident completely involved in city discussions on the topic, to attend.

Surprisingly, I was asked to leave. I was told it was a "private" committee meeting. I was informed that I was not invited. And though I protested that if public elected officials, and state and city staff were in attendance, I can't imagine it would be anything but a public meeting. I added that a topic of significant public interest was being discussed, and as an interested citizen, I was anxious to hear if progress was being made.

I was told the Chamber is a private business, and I was not allowed to attend the meeting. The press, in attendance, was also excluded from the meeting.

I refused to leave, and after a lively back and forth with the Chamber CEO, I was escorted from the building by the Chief of Police who said that if I didn't I would be subject to arrest (he apologized profusely as we climbed the stairs to the street).

A SHORT REFRESHER

- The DOT has proposed changes on RTE. 9, in Middletown.
- They held two public information sessions on the changes.
- They did not hold a public hearing at which residents could share concerns.
- The Middletown Common Council held a public hearing which the DOT refused to attend.
- At the Common Council public hearing it became clear that there were many residents concerned and alarmed by the damages the proposed changes would do to Middletown and its downtown.
- Aside from the specific changes that caused concern, the public, again and again, condemned the decision-making process which excluded important constituencies
- Middletown residents, Common Council members (and other elected officials), members of Middletown boards and commissions who are focused on the environment, and residents concerned with racial issues, health, safety, business and traffic.

THE "NEW" CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ROUTE 9 COMMITTEE

Despite the concerns raised at the hearing, the DOT has decided to continue consulting with a small 36 member committee assembled by the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce which includes Chamber members, elected officials of neighboring towns (Portland, Cromwell), Middletown's mayor and chief of staff, Middletown departmental staff (fire, police, P***c Works, Economic Development), but excluding Common Council members (elected to represent residents), elected State Representatives, downtown residents, all downtown business owners, environmental groups, faith-based groups, university representatives, the Housing Authority and others with deep and legitimate concerns.

As far as the business that occurred at the meeting, the DOT made a presentation which reportedly included their own report that they were addressing 93 concerns that they had received.

Reports from the meeting say that the DOT explained that they would now be doing environmental testing as required. The DOT reported that they don't feel there are any environmental justice concerns they needed to addressed. The DOT also addressed, and dismissed, a few specific concerns (e.g. amount of traffic on Middletown streets) by showing some of their own statistics and maps saying that the concerns had no basis in fact. The DOT has not been straightforward and honest in the past and their statistics have been cherry-picked to favor their conclusions.

THE PROBLEM

The DOT made their presentation in front of a small, private group. By making this limited presentation they hope to absolve themselves from further criticism of their plans. There was no one to voice a counter argument to the DOT's claims. This small, private group plans to meet on a regular basis.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE

- The mayor needs to declare that he, and city staff, will not be involved in any DOT meeting that doesn't include representation by Common Council members, or concerned members of the public.
- The Common Council has to hold the mayor responsible, and demand representation at the meetings.
- The Common Council has to insist that the DOT address all concerns in public, at a meeting in which the Council and the public have the opportunity to respond.
- The DOT has to formulate plans for Route 9 that will not harm Middletown's residents, Main Street, environment, water resources, safety and traffic flow.
- No more private meetings.
- State Representatives need to demand that the DOT be responsive to the needs of Middletown residents.

Any decision that will get made will affect Middletown, its residents and its businesses for decades. The plans have to be carefully and creatively wrought, and vetted thoroughly.

The world is a little less wondrous and beautiful without David Schulz.  He was an amazing artist, and an equally amazin...
05/08/2024

The world is a little less wondrous and beautiful without David Schulz. He was an amazing artist, and an equally amazing man. He and Carol were also earnest, quiet and dedicated progressives. They loved Middletown, and they alway wanted what was best for the city. I met them both early on when I was recruited to oppose the construction of a big box store on Main Street (which would have led to the demolition of a block of our historic store fronts). Over the years, David and Carol could be counted on to show up to oppose any development project that would lead to the uglification of Middletown. David knew we had enough ugly to go around. As a veteran, David was acutely aware of the costs of war, so he was an advocate for peace, and he worked diligently, quietly and strongly for social and environmental justice and progressive causes. Of course, David was an accomplished and very talented artist. One of my favorite pieces of art is a landscape of the Portland quarries that David painted, and which hangs as a centerpiece on a wall in my library at home. But I think one of my favorite ongoing works was David's front yard editorials, where he took on the politics and the politicians he opposed. These black and white signs echoed an old-time advertising campaign by Burma Shave. Those of us old enough to remember know that the Burma Shave company advertised their products using progressive highway signs that one would read traveling past them on the road. The product was always the payoff, but the signs always had a whimsical but profound message: Past School Houses - Take It Slow - Let the Little - Shavers Grow - Burma Shave. David and I talked about these signs and he admitted that they were his inspiration. David posted these "progressive" black and white editorials on the front lawn of his Ridge Road home. I often reposted them as Curbside Editorials on the Middletown Eye. David made Middletown, and the world, a better place, and the way he lived his life was the best example of now to be committed to one's community. We will miss him.

Looks like the fascist snowflakes don't like to see convicted felon Donald Trump, and they somehow think it's obscene.  ...
07/06/2024

Looks like the fascist snowflakes don't like to see convicted felon Donald Trump, and they somehow think it's obscene. Facebook is now restricting me, and with this, I may be banned, alas, just the excuse I need to get off social media.

06/06/2024

At 44:40 in this video the mayor begins his report on Rte. 9. What I think I hear him saying is that he has taken the concerns expressed at the Common Council public hearing to heart, and will be seeking answers from CT DOT.

Strangely, he seems to say that we have to move the plan forward in order to do the environmental testing needed to decide if plan is viable.

However, he also seems to remain convinced that the plan is the best one we're going to get from the CT DOT. At 56:00 the mayor says he has not signed off on the plan, though it's a direction he's been supportive of.

01/06/2024

One more thing on the CT DOT. In a statement to the press, the DOT spokesperson says, again, that a crash takes place every other day on the stretch of Rte 9 that the DOT would like to alter.

1. It's an average. A crash does not occur every other day. An injury doesn't occur once a week. Using that logic and the UCONN Crash Data statistics, one could say a crash occurs nearly every day on the Middletown streets adjacent to the highway. That does not seem to concern the DOT. It's a scare tactic. And thought I'm not a mathematician or statistician, it's not a true reflection of the data.

2. The DOT claims their public meetings are "equitable, inclusive and meet the needs of all residents." Baloney. The public hearing the Common Council held proved that the DOT has studiously avoided gathering feedback and is just trying to check a box. And in terms of their meetings being "equitable and inclusive," I wonder what their outreach was to the struggling neighborhoods their project will affect the most.

Which proves to me that the DOT is not interested in solving all safety issues in Middletown. The DOT is not interested in hearing all opinions. The DOT has gone out of its way to move this project forward without considering the expressed concerns of "all residents."

The two most telling paragraphs in this story.  The DOT says it collected all necessary testimony.  It didn't.  And, no ...
01/06/2024

The two most telling paragraphs in this story. The DOT says it collected all necessary testimony. It didn't. And, no comment from the mayor.

“We have held numerous public meetings over the last three months and appreciate the significant public input and comment that we’ve received, using meeting formats that are equitable, inclusive, and meet the needs of all residents. We remain committed to this important safety improvement project,” (DOT spokesperson) Morgan said.

Mayor Ben Florsheim did not respond to a request for comment.

(Story text in comment.)

MIDDLETOWN — The Common Council unanimously passed a resolution Thursday asking that any plans to modify Route 9 be suspended until residents’ concerns are addressed and the state Department of […]

And in another state, they've just decided that building and widening highways isn't such a good idea.
31/05/2024

And in another state, they've just decided that building and widening highways isn't such a good idea.

The state has made it harder to widen highways, and transportation officials are turning their eyes to transit.

Thanks to Jen Alexander for all her work examining the inconsistencies in the DOT's plans for Rte 9.  Here's something e...
31/05/2024

Thanks to Jen Alexander for all her work examining the inconsistencies in the DOT's plans for Rte 9. Here's something else she uncovered.

When you wonder why it's so important for the DOT to get vehicles moving down Rte 9, it's important to examine not only what's happening in Middletown, but what's already happened downstate.

(text of article in comments)

ESSEX – The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-1 on Tuesday to approve an overlay district meant to spur new development on the west side of Route 9 around Exit […]

Just so you know.  Middletown's Common Council voted unanimously last night to send a letter to the DOT and the Mayor as...
31/05/2024

Just so you know. Middletown's Common Council voted unanimously last night to send a letter to the DOT and the Mayor asking that they suspend all work on DOT changes to Rte 9 until all concerns raised at the community meeting last week are addressed, and the DOT returns with a plan that won't harm Middletown.

Thanks to the Common Council for working diligently to get the meeting in before the DOT deadline, which is today, May 31 - so you still have time to send an email to [email protected].

Special thanks to Common Council clerk Linda Reed for working with Councilman Vinnie Loffredo to make sure the meeting's posting and warrant were completed correctly. Without their work the special meeting would not have occurred.

One final note. I've been asked many times why the project seems to be moving forward even with the opposition, and in the past few days I've heard the same response, so I'd suggest sending your complaints to Governor Ned Lamont's office too.

29/05/2024
This needs to be elevated to its own post.  From cartoonist extraordinare, Bob Englehart - who testified at the hearing ...
24/05/2024

This needs to be elevated to its own post. From cartoonist extraordinare, Bob Englehart - who testified at the hearing last night.

24/05/2024

The video from last night's Common Council hearing on DOT proposed changes to Rte 9 is available.

The DOT and Route 9.  Ten Questions.  Question  #10.QUESTION 10: What next?I know several of you were at the Common Coun...
24/05/2024

The DOT and Route 9. Ten Questions. Question #10.

QUESTION 10: What next?

I know several of you were at the Common Council public hearing last night, and many more watched on the web.

What you saw, or what you might have seen if you watched, was a series of concerned residents - some of them scientists, architects and business owners, who testified, unanimously, against the changes the CT DOT proposes to Route 9.

The video of the meeting, usually posted on the city website, was not available at the time of this post.

Residents cited general concerns about safety, threats to walkability, the damaging effects of ozone and particulate, traffic congestion on Middletown streets, threats to our return to the riverfront, threats to our water supply, safety, accidents on Middletown Streets, lack of accurate information from the DOT, threats to neighborhoods, lack of independent formal environmental, commercial and traffic studies, threats to the character of the city, environmental justice concerns and design flaws in the DOT plan.

It was heartening to see Common Council members pay intent attention throughout the long testimony where dozens of residents spoke out. About sixty people attended the hearing.

Not a single resident spoke in favor of the DOT plan.

Several residents decried the absence of the DOT at the meeting.

Next steps?

The Common Council indicated they may be willing to hold a special meeting to pass a resolution asking the DOT to pause any immediate progress on the plan until more, and more accurate information can be assembled.

Unfortunately, because of state law, the Common Council has no official power to put the brakes on. However, a resolution would send a strong message to the DOT, and the mayor, that further study is necessary before any additional action on the plan takes place.

Calls and emails to they mayor’s office would be completely appropriate. ([email protected], 860-638-4801).

Finally, there are several more questions (don’t worry I don’t have the energy to author any more posts).
Has the mayor signed off on the plan?
Has the city traffic officer signed off on the plan?
Has the city conducted an independent traffic assessment?
Has a comprehensive business impact study occurred?
Will the city surrender streets to the state making them state roads?
Will deKoven Drive become an access road to Rte 9?
Has the city considered hiring an independent traffic engineer to offer alternative plans?
Has a formal Environmental Impact Assessment occured?
Has the state explained traffic flow during construction?
What is the expected cost to the city (public works, fire, police)?

Thanks to all the people who came out to the meeting to provide solid testimony, and all who came to support those who shared their thoughts and concerns.

Thanks again to the Common Council, and to Senator Matt Lesser and Lieutenant Governor Susan Bysiewicz for their advocacy and thanks to Matt for attending the meeting and listening to the entire public testimony.

A report from the Common Council meeting last night on the DOT and Rte 9.  The DOT didn't show up.
24/05/2024

A report from the Common Council meeting last night on the DOT and Rte 9. The DOT didn't show up.

An increase in serious crashes and congestion is pushing the state to get rid of traffic lights, but it’s a tough sell for some downtown businesses.

Fox 61 called early this morning and asked for an interview about the Common Council meeting tonight on the proposed cha...
23/05/2024

Fox 61 called early this morning and asked for an interview about the Common Council meeting tonight on the proposed changes on Rte 9. Here's what they broadcast:

The Middletown City Council is holding a public hearing on the traffic lights on Route 9.

I'm interviewing Wes Marshall, author of Killed By a Traffic Engineer on my radio show on WESU this afternoon between 4-...
23/05/2024

I'm interviewing Wes Marshall, author of Killed By a Traffic Engineer on my radio show on WESU this afternoon between 4-5pm (WESU FM - 88.1). Here's a short clip of Wes talking about the proposal to remove traffic lights on Rte 9. Tune in for the entire 30 minute interiew at wesufm.org
https://youtu.be/ME9bV8OFreA

Wes Marshall, Civil Engineering Professor at the University of Colorado, Denver, talks about Rte 9 in Middletown CT. Wes is the author of Killed By a Traffi...

Today on Hoot and Holler (5/23, 4-5 PM, WESU 88.1 FM) I speak with Wes Marshall about his book Killed By A Traffic Engin...
23/05/2024

Today on Hoot and Holler (5/23, 4-5 PM, WESU 88.1 FM) I speak with Wes Marshall about his book Killed By A Traffic Engineer (it's not a mystery novel), and to Susan Stewart Taylor about her novel, set in Vermont, called Agony Hill (it is a mystery novel).

wesufm.org

The DOT and Route 9.  Ten Questions.  Question  #8.I have several questions/concerns about the current plan to remove tr...
23/05/2024

The DOT and Route 9. Ten Questions. Question #8.
I have several questions/concerns about the current plan to remove traffic signals from Rte 9 being offered up by the DOT. In the next several days, I'll post ten of them here.

There's a community meeting with the Common Council tonight, Thursday May 23, 6:00 PM, in Council Chambers to discuss the plans. Despite requests from the Common Council, Senator Matt Lesser, State Representative Brandon and Lieutenant Governor Susan Bysiewicz. The DOT has refused to attend the meeting.

QUESTION 9: Will the proposed change for Rte 9 in Middletown solve the traffic congestion problem?

Simple answer, no.

Building a highway without a traffic light will not, and has never, solved the congestion problems. At peak hours on freeways across the state, and across the country, there are always traffic jams.

At peak hours travel through Hartford, New Haven, Waterbury, New Britain, Danbury and you will experience significant slowdowns when the roads are filled with commuters.

So much for the idea that removing the lights in Middletown will get rid of congestion.

Data also shows that if a highway is improved, it actually invites more traffic.

To be clear, the DOT has never claimed that congestion would be eliminated. Only that it would be improved.

In fact, in the most recent presentation on April 30, the DOT demonstrated that on most of the daily routes that experience congestion now, the average trip through Middletown would be less than a minute or two faster, sometimes only saving seconds.

Worse, the highway congestion will move to the streets of Middletown. Imagine how 4,500 cars and trucks a day exiting Rte 9 North, and being dumped onto Middletown’s streets will increase the congestion on our city streets.

Essentially, the DOT’s solution is this - move traffic congestion from the freeway to the streets of Middletown.

WTAF?  Just learned that one of our State of CT legislative delegates convinced a staff member of the DOT to attend the ...
22/05/2024

WTAF? Just learned that one of our State of CT legislative delegates convinced a staff member of the DOT to attend the Common Council hearing on Rte 9 changes (5/23, 6PM), and the DOT Commissioner blocked it.

What do you suppose they're afraid of hearing?

The DOT and Route 9.  Ten Questions.  Question  #8.(photo: Main Street Middletown, Amato’s Middletown, Amatos - New Brit...
22/05/2024

The DOT and Route 9. Ten Questions. Question #8.
(photo: Main Street Middletown, Amato’s Middletown, Amatos - New Britain and aftermath of Amato’s fire, New Britain)

I have several questions/concerns about the current plan to remove traffic signals from Rte 9 being offered up by the DOT. In the next several days, I'll post ten of them here.

There's a community meeting with the Common Council on Thursday May 23, 6:00 PM in Council Chambers to discuss the plans. Despite requests from the Common Council, Senator Matt Lesser State Representative Brandon Chafee, the DOT has refused to attend the meeting.

QUESTION 7: Will the proposed change for Rte 9 hurt Middletown’s Main Street?

According to DOT engineer Stephan Hall in his DOT presentation of April 30, the proposed changes can only move forward if they don’t violate these stated constraints: “The proposed design changes cannot cause regular backups onto Rte 9 or cause adverse affects (sic) to Main Street and the downtown roadway network.”

As I see it, the DOT should pack their charts and head back to the Berlin Turnpike drawing boards just based on that statement alone.

Will Rte 9 changes, as proposed, hurt Main Street and the downtown road network?

In their own plans the DOT intends to send thousands more cars and trucks daily down deKoven Drive and the South end of Main Street. That, in and of itself, will increase congestion, pollution, noise and danger to pedestrians and bikers.

What they don’t readily admit, and what is likely to happen, is that hundreds of vehicles (and their GPS systems) will also search for shorter, quicker routes on Church Street, William St, High Street, South Main Street, Broad Street, Pearl Street, Grand Street, Court Street, Liberty Street, Green Street - you know, our “downtown roadway network.”

What’s more, the four years of construction, and the eventual flood of vehicles on Main, attempting to make lefts on Washington, College and Court Streets will likely cause congestion on a regular basis.

To be fair, the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce has spoken to and gotten support from some downtown Middletown merchants and businesspeople who feel the sheer increase in traffic will be good for business. Or they have accepted the DOT explanation that with the redesign, traffic flow on Main Street will actually move more smoothly, despite the incredible incredible increase in number of cars and trucks trying to get through town as quickly as possible. Somehow, miraculously, the DOT says, congestion will decrease.

But others have their doubts and worry that the congestion will discourage shoppers and diners, and that parking, which is already an issue, will become even more difficult with a steady stream of traffic congestion
AMATO’S - A CAUTIONARY TALE

Diane Gervais, owner of Middletown’s Toy and Hobby in Middletown has seen it all.

The family’s business, founded by her father, Vinnie Amato, has survived fires, floods, redevelopment, the growth of malls, an international pandemic and the rise of web-based retail.

Amato’s, on Main Street Middletown, is an anchor retailer on Main Street, is proud of what she, her staff and her store have accomplished.

But she’s worried that the Middletown store might be at risk at the hands of a foe that dealt a fatal blow to another of the family’s anchor stores - Amato’s in New Britain.

That foe - the CT DOT.

The New Britain store, owned by Gervais’ brother, finally closed in 2022 after years of declining business when downtown New Britain was not able to bounce back after decades of redevelopment, the above-mentioned fires and floods in the store, and what Gervais, her brother and her father felt was a fatal decision to believe the promises of the CT DOT.

The DOT came to New Britain and promised increased business and plentiful downtown access when they met with city leaders. They succeeded in selling their vision and built five and six lanes of freeway, and a sprawling highway exchange (ironically, Rte 9, and Rte 72) in a concrete canyon that ran directly through the heart of downtown New Britain.

What everyone knows, and can still see, is that the highway divided and decimated downtown New Britain, which is still suffering, and attempting to bring back what was once a thriving downtown (I know, because I grew up there).

One friend told me recently: "I've driven through New Britain on the highway hundreds of time, and I don't even know what the city looks like."

Of course there were many factors that caused a struggling city to falter, but chief among them is a highway that didn’t live up to promises.

And New Britain is not the only city torn apart by DOT. All you need do is visit Meriden, Waterbury, Norwich, Bristol and Bridgeport and other CT cities where freeways have literally wiped-out neighborhoods, and have had devastating long-lasting half-life of economic turmoil.

So, Gervais is justified in her worry. And with her retail and life experience, we ought to seek out her opinions.

While the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce has gotten important input from Middletown and Middlesex County businesses, it’s important that we take the further step of an in-depth survey and analysis of Main Street, and of businesses that exist on our downtown network of streets.

We need to understand, honestly assess, what four years of adjacent highway construction, and a monumental increase in traffic will do to the commerce, character, safety and aesthetics of our Main Street. Downtown Middletown is our showcase, our economic engine and our tax base.

Matthew LesserKai Nikki BeltonState Senator Jan Hochadel

22/05/2024

PUBLIC COMMENT ON RTE 9 CEPA SCOPING EXTENDED UNTIL MAY 31.

He screams.

Send your emails to [email protected]

Thanks to Jane Brawerman for tracking down the update.

The DOT and Route 9.  Ten Questions.  Question  #7.(photo: conceptual rendering of the proposed pedestrian bridge over R...
21/05/2024

The DOT and Route 9. Ten Questions. Question #7.
(photo: conceptual rendering of the proposed pedestrian bridge over Rte 9)

I have several questions/concerns about the current plan to remove traffic signals from Rte 9 being offered up by the DOT. In the next several days, I'll post ten of them here.

There's a community meeting with the Common Council on Thursday May 23, 6:00 PM in Council Chambers to discuss the plans. Despite requests from the Common Council, Senator Matt Lesser and State Representative Brandon Chafee. The DOT has refused to attend the meeting.

QUESTION 7: What about that pedestrian bridge?

Most of us agree about the importance of reconnecting Middletown as a city, to the Connecticut River riverfront.

Through the Bend in the River, riverfront redevelopment project, the city of Middletown has proposed a pedestrian bridge to be built from a proposed residential/commercial development on the site of the former parking arcade on Dingwall drive, over Rte 9, and to Harbor Park.

The pedestrian bridge, which is still in a conceptual phase, is planned as a construction partnership between the city of Middletown and the State of Connecticut using federal, state and municipal funds.

The project has an official DOT project number (CTDOT Project # 0082-0327), but in its presentation materials, the DOT describes the project as being “in its infancy.”

In March, RiverCog, the Lower Connecticut River Valley Council of Governments, voted to add the project to a list of many projects scheduled to receive federal TIP/STPA (Transportation Improvement Program, Surface Transportation program) funds. The vote was for $4.3 million in design and nearly $35 million for construction of the bridge. (The RiverCog vote can be viewed here at the 56 minute mark:) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EW-QrQVBQgI

That seems like good news, with a substantial price tag.

With all that in mind, there are still several questions.

Will the pedestrian bridge only be built if Rte 9 is constructed under the current plan offered by the CT DOT? Stated another way, is the DOT holding the pedestrian bridge project hostage so that the city of Middletown will accept the DOT plans for Rte 9 without alteration?

Where in the construction schedule does construction take place?

What’s the proposed projected construction start and finish date?

What’s the status of the development of the old arcade site, and how does the construction of the pedestrian bridge fit into plans for development there?

What is the projected total cost of the project?

Where does the money come from? How much will the city of Middletown be obliged to spend on the project?

The importance of Middletown reconnecting with the river can’t be overstated. Understanding where, when and how the proposed connection to the river will be built and what has to be sacrificed to get it done is essential.

State Representative Brandon Chafee State Representative Kai Belton Matthew Lesser

The DOT and Route 9.  Ten Questions.  Question  #6.(photo: the intersection of Union and DeKoven)I have several question...
20/05/2024

The DOT and Route 9. Ten Questions. Question #6.
(photo: the intersection of Union and DeKoven)

I have several questions/concerns about the current plan to remove traffic signals from Rte 9 being offered up by the DOT. In the next several days, I'll post ten of them here.

There's a community meeting with the Common Council on Thursday May 23, 6:00 PM in Council Chambers to discuss the plans. Despite requests from the Common Council, Senator Matt Lesser and State Representative Brandon Chafee, the DOT has refused to attend the meeting.

QUESTION 6: What about the pedestrians?

In a thirty-eight minute presentation about the proposed changes on Rte. 9, DOT presenter Stephen Hall talked about a lot of things.

One thing he seems to have forgotten is pedestrians.

A short, slick and expensively-produced animated video that he showed mentioned pedestrians in passing, but the people walking, running and riding bikes along Middletown’s streets were noticeably absent. Hall’s presentation was pedestrian-free.

It leaves one thinking that the top priority for the DOT is moving vehicles as quickly as possible along roadways. Pedestrians be damned.

Looking at the proposed changes to Rte 9 and adjacent Middletown streets, some explicit alterations make walking considerably more dangerous.

We all recognize that right turn on red laws have given drivers permission to sail through red lights, sometimes slowing, sometimes barely putting on the brakes and rarely stopping completely before turning.

It’s dangerous for those crossing, even at legitimate walk lights because drivers are looking at the light, looking at oncoming traffic to the left, looking towards where they’ll be turning to the right. The pedestrian or bicyclist is the last consideration of the driver. When there’s a dedicated right turn lane, it makes matters worse.

The new plans from DOT calls for two dedicated right turn lanes where they don’t exist now. One at Union Street and DeKoven Drive. And one at Rapallo and Main.

What’s more, a design that shunts traffic onto DeKoven will make crossing along that roadway as a pedestrian at any intersection considerably more dangerous as drivers search for the quickest route to their destination.

The crossing at DeKoven and Washington is already impossibly dangerous. It’ll get worse.

But crossing will also become more dangerous on any street that will see increased traffic and increased left-turns, including Main Street, Washington Street, Pearl St, High Street, Church Street, throughout the North End and along other streets.

And once streets are surrendered to the state, becoming state roads (River Rd, DeKoven, Union, Rapallo, South end of Main), and not city streets, if changes are needed, the city will have to appeal to the DOT to make safety changes instead of expeditiously making them ourselves.

While other cities are moving towards encouraging walking and bike riding, creating pedestrian-only zones and making city streets walkable, the proposed DOT plans demonstrate the priority that moving vehicles quickly has over pedestrian safety for the DOT.

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Middletown Eye posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Middletown Eye:

Videos

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Contact The Business
  • Videos
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share