22/03/2024
"The first section of “Judging by its Cover” consists of pieces that are interested in the cover as a form of compensation, a covering over, as a piece of gorgeous textile can mask or stand in for what one doesn’t want to confront, or what can’t be confronted for whatever nefarious, oblivious, or self-deceptive reason. The pieces are interested, too, in how covers spur questions about what others are thinking and what one’s own book is doing—and what it is about the cover image that links these two epistemic problems to each other. The pieces shore up, finally, the irreverence of asking an image to do for us what we want it to do, to represent for us. Because, as we know, it would be difficult to imagine any image that doesn’t exert its own power regardless of what we ask of it.
This last problem is approached more pointedly in Part 2, in which our authors consider the disjunctions as much as the continuities between the images on their books’ covers and the arguments of those books—and hence, in some cases, understanding the recontextualization of the image as a kind of brutality. The series concludes with a postscript by Rebecca Colesworthy—not only an editor at SUNY Press but also an author of an important book in modernist studies with its own arresting cover—who offers a personal and industrial perspective on the making and meanings of scholarly book covers."
Read the second part of "Judging by its Cover," curated by Visualities editors Alix Beeston and Pardis Dabashi, featuring short essays by scholars reflecting on their book covers, here: https://modernismmodernity.org/forums/posts/judging-its-cover-part-2