Broken System Productions

28/09/2023

https://brokensystemproductions.com/dissecting-the-voice-referendum/

Australians head to the polls to vote yes or no regarding the establishment of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice

15/09/2023

I use to love watching Hugh Jackman until he assisted his wife, Deborah Lee Furness, in the reinvention of the Australian "Forced Adoption Program" through her "Forever Families Program" and supporting of our very broken Child Protection INDUSTRY.

Too many children are removed each year based on vexatious and uneducated reports, and are held within CPS unnecessarily by the industry using delay tactics in court and through the publicly available processes, to ensure permanency of children in care.

CPS have criteria to allege who will be successful for reunification and a big part of that is to promote that after 12 months in care reunification is extremely unlikely; this is untrue ( a child at any age can be torn from a parent and apparently successfully bond to a carer, so why not a parent? It's all tactics).

Care and Protection Orders until 18 years are the equivalent of FORCED ADOPTION, especially for children aged between 0-5 years old.

The industry makes substantial income and profits from the Commonwealth and state Governments for each child bought into CPS including providing incentives for employees to retain children in care.

Martin Cockburn, Janet Rees, sold Foster care Associates for £50 million, for divorce settlement and both retain close to £200 million in profiles as a foster carer and social worker couple. Their wealth is built off the industry.

Paul Whyte from the Department of Communities Western Australia was able to steal $27 million to fund his lavish lifestyle over 10 years under Graeme Searle - CEO of the Department of Communities.

Horse racing, gambling, Fostering agencies, Not For Profit (NFP) groups - profiteering, Non Government Organisations (NGO's) primarily paid for by our governments... Kids are being trafficked from biological parents to foster and kinship parents, also transferred from Family Court ordered primary parents to limited parents.

Kids are more frequently sexually abused, emotionally abused and physically harmed in these placements due to a lack of bond and genuine connections with these kids... Crime, mental health, lower education, homelessness, and Welfare dependancy, is also increasing with the rise of Children in and exiting state care.

Quote for reference:
"Furness, 67, is an advocate for orphans and adoption, especially in her native Australia, and one of the founding members of National Adoption Awareness Week."

‘Our journey now is shifting.’

30/06/2023

Child Protection Services across Australia are a collective group of people who primarily study psychology and community and social management.

Education in exploring how the mind and emotions work can be used to manipulate and control as well as to aid healing...in CPS, it is more often than not, used against the already vulnerable parties who are declared to be lacking capacity.

I am posting different materials that many of you will recognise as tactics used to elicit information from you to remove or retain your children or children of loved ones.

Knowing this information and how to adapt to it, can help significantly in Family Law and CPS matters.

Child Protection Services across Australia are a collective group of people who primarily study psychology and community and social management.

Education in exploring how the mind and emotions work can be used to manipulate and control as well as to aid healing...in CPS, it is more often than not, used against the already vulnerable parties who are declared to be lacking capacity.

I am posting different materials that many of you will recognise as tactics used to elicit information from you to remove or retain your children or children of loved ones.

Knowing this information and how to adapt to it, can help significantly in Family Law and CPS matters.

Some CPS Psychological tactics:

The Reid technique - https://reid.com/programs/program-descriptions/the-reid-technique-of-investigative-interviewing-and-advanced-interrogation-techniques

"The technique is known for creating a high pressure environment for the interviewee, followed by sympathy and offers of understanding and help, but only if a confession is forthcoming."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reid_technique

"For example, if an interviewer lies and tells a burglar that his or her fingerprints have been found at the scene of the crime, a burglar who wore gloves now knows that this statement is a lie and will probably realize that the police do not actually have much evidence against him or her."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/reid-technique #:~:text=For%20example%2C%20if%20an%20interviewer,evidence%20against%20him%20or%20her.

Cunningham law - Cunningham's Law states "the best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer." The concept is named after Ward Cunningham, the inventor of wiki software.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Cunningham

The 4 stages of manipulation

While manipulative tendencies are often subtle and sometimes undetectable, there are four stages of manipulation.

• Flattery. The first stage is when the person who manipulates puts on a facade of being kind, caring, and helpful. “They may act like they want to help you with anything you need, but in reality, they’re just trying to get what they want from you,” Draughn explains.

• Isolation. This is when the person who manipulates may start to isolate you from your friends and family. They might try to convince you that your loved ones don’t understand you or want to control you. The goal is usually to separate you from people who might spot the manipulation, Draughn explains.

• Devaluing and gaslighting. During the third stage, someone who manipulates may try to make you feel guilty or confused. “They might start telling you that you’re ungrateful, or that you’re making them unhappy,” says Draughn. The purpose of this stage is to make you doubt yourself, your instincts, and your decisions. “It can be very difficult to break free from the manipulator’s control at this stage,” Draughn adds.

• Fear or violence. The fourth and final stage is when the person who manipulates may begin to threaten you. According to Draughn, they may threaten to leave you, hurt you, or hurt themselves as a way of keeping you under their control with fear. “It can be very difficult to break free from someone who is using threats as a form of manipulation.”

https://psychcentral.com/lib/tactics-manipulators-use-to-win-and-confuse-you?fbclid=IwAR3GIt5UPXclG1SbHoiNvmCvlPleKnrKcKtbY0BSzPnDvvZeQWa7APSQt48 -of-manipulation

What Are The 11 Psychological Tactics of Manipulation?

• Charm
• Coercion
• Silent Treatment
• Reason
• Regression
• Self-abasement
• Responsibility Invocation
• Hardball
• Pleasure Induction
• Social Comparison Theory

https://practicalpie.com/psychological-tactics-of-manipulation/?fbclid=IwAR1jcWt57jSTgCvCoW8Ri968TP_zSOw2-8dAZn3tX9IxIt8iJhHKfHp_j9l

The 4 stages of manipulation

While manipulative tendencies are often subtle and sometimes undetectable, there are four stages of manipulation.

• Flattery. The first stage is when the person who manipulates puts on a facade of being kind, caring, and helpful. “They may act like they want to help you with anything you need, but in reality, they’re just trying to get what they want from you,” Draughn explains.

• Isolation. This is when the person who manipulates may start to isolate you from your friends and family. They might try to convince you that your loved ones don’t understand you or want to control you. The goal is usually to separate you from people who might spot the manipulation, Draughn explains.

• Devaluing and gaslighting. During the third stage, someone who manipulates may try to make you feel guilty or confused. “They might start telling you that you’re ungrateful, or that you’re making them unhappy,” says Draughn. The purpose of this stage is to make you doubt yourself, your instincts, and your decisions. “It can be very difficult to break free from the manipulator’s control at this stage,” Draughn adds.

• Fear or violence. The fourth and final stage is when the person who manipulates may begin to threaten you. According to Draughn, they may threaten to leave you, hurt you, or hurt themselves as a way of keeping you under their control with fear. “It can be very difficult to break free from someone who is using threats as a form of manipulation.”

https://psychcentral.com/lib/tactics-manipulators-use-to-win-and-confuse-you?fbclid=IwAR3GIt5UPXclG1SbHoiNvmCvlPleKnrKcKtbY0BSzPnDvvZeQWa7APSQt48 -of-manipulation

What Are The 11 Psychological Tactics of Manipulation?

• Charm
• Coercion
• Silent Treatment
• Reason
• Regression
• Self-abasement
• Responsibility Invocation
• Hardball
• Pleasure Induction
• Social Comparison Theory

https://practicalpie.com/psychological-tactics-of-manipulation/?fbclid=IwAR1jcWt57jSTgCvCoW8Ri968TP_zSOw2-8dAZn3tX9IxIt8iJhHKfHp_j9I

This new 4-day format includes the material from our 3-day Interview and Interrogation program as well as our 1-day Advanced program. This is the most complete program available regarding the Reid Technique.

29/06/2023

I have always said that CPS used military style interrogation tactics and recently started looking into it further...

Here is just a taste of what I have found; with thanks to others who made discoveries too, that may be helpful to parents....

If you at least know what you are dealing with, you will have an idea what is going on and have a chance to work out how to combat the problem.

By Jules Zanetti

CPS Psychological tactics:

The Reid technique - https://reid.com/programs/program-descriptions/the-reid-technique-of-investigative-interviewing-and-advanced-interrogation-techniques

"The technique is known for creating a high pressure environment for the interviewee, followed by sympathy and offers of understanding and help, but only if a confession is forthcoming."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reid_technique

"For example, if an interviewer lies and tells a burglar that his or her fingerprints have been found at the scene of the crime, a burglar who wore gloves now knows that this statement is a lie and will probably realize that the police do not actually have much evidence against him or her."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/reid-technique #:~:text=For%20example%2C%20if%20an%20interviewer,evidence%20against%20him%20or%20her.

Cunningham law - Cunningham's Law states "the best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer." The concept is named after Ward Cunningham, the inventor of wiki software.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Cunningham

This new 4-day format includes the material from our 3-day Interview and Interrogation program as well as our 1-day Advanced program. This is the most complete program available regarding the Reid Technique.

22/06/2023

Thought's on - Jurisdiction issues
By Jules Zanetti

Think about this:

Child abuse and child neglect are crimes in accordance to each states Criminal Code's and Acts. So, why are Child Protection services across the nation using Children's and Youth Courts?

Because, the Children's and Youth Courts of Australia are Courts of Record only - most child youth crimes cannot be dealt with with in Criminal Court's due to age limits and laws that decide when a child has the capacity to understand right from wrong rather than use the full force of the law.
So in essence, it's a tribunal designed to be a gap filler between childhood and adulthood legal accountability.

So why do Child Protection Services across Australia use this system?

It's essentially a tribunal, no evidence required and was not designed for Child Protection matters...it's used simply to support and record Child Protections position and garnish parents compliance.

Parents are losing their children; not because they HAVE COMMITTED A CRIME, but because the system has decided they are AT RISK of committing a crime.

Let that sink in.

More often than not, the allegations are hearsay, vexatious and by someone close who is disgruntled.

This does not mean ALL notifiers are being untruthful, it just means they may not agree with YOUR parenting style and because you didn't do things their way, they may decide to use the system to encourage you to change.

Many don't realise the consequences to this notification that they are effectively destroying a family for something that was pretty ordinary.

Back to the Courts.

If parents were actually guilty of the crimes Child Services accused them of and not just a possibility, then they would use the Criminal justice system wouldn't they? Not necessarily...Criminal Court's require evidence and more often than nor, Child Protection have none.

This indicates that the system being used is not lawful, where more children are removed based on allegations.

Those allegations remain unfounded and not substantiated until a parent AGREES.

Child Protection Services across Australia are master manipulators and bully's...they need parents to AGREE their children are at risk of or have been harmed. They garnish your compliance more often, UNDER DURESS.

In many Child Protection Services cases nationally, children are actively harmed and abused in care ( NOT all carers are abusive neglectful), yet NO Court in Australia claims jurisdiction to aid a parent in the retrieval of their children, the system relies upon Child Protection to restore the family unit.

We need to look at legislation to establish who has authority when Child Protection take children under duress.

Criminal Court's seem the most obvious with the majority of the events meeting Criminal elements:

• The use of deceit for financial and other gains.
• Child abuse and neglect.
• Fraud
• Bullying and intimidation
• Coercive control

Family Law also has legislation to support parents rights...yet this is not used.

TORT law for defamation, misfeasance, nonfeseance, and malfeasance.

So why do Australian courts ignore and allow Child Protection Australia to take children from their parents under duress and provide no genuine assistance once done?

23/01/2023

10/12/2021

(NOTE: the information and depiction below is not a reflection of all situations. It is a hypothetical situation based on eye witness reports and victim statements.)

By Jules Zanetti.

The Child Protection system needs society to trust them otherwise their intakes drop and so does funding.

Reports to CPS from the public such as family and friends against a struggling parent are essential to incite investigations.

Reporting will not occur if every person who encounters Child Protection is mistreated through malfeasance, nonfeasance and misfeasance.

To keep people trusting, CPS must have good outcomes, to maintain trust.

Like any business, there are good and bad people; people who will skim off the top, so-to-speak.

Paul Whyte Director General of Department of Communities (Child Protection and Family Support and Subsidised State Housing) in Perth WA, is just 1 very recent example of such corruption.

Paul Ronald Whyte was charged with 564 counts of fraud with a 27 million dollar gain from the public purse in WA over a period of approximately 11 years. He is now facing 12 years incarceration.

Some cases are designed to remain supported, positive and functional. They become recipients of the engaging and friendly staff who offer and uphold submissions of support.
These case's are relied upon to continue to promote the good aspects of Child Protection.
While the sad reality many others face, is extreme hardship, mental and emotional torture, gaslighting, intimidation and coercion.
The loses of the investigated parent, significantly outweigh the very little gain of maybe 1 hour contact per quarter holiday periods with their children.

In many of these cases, the child is also subjected to significant abuses and trauma, often advised their parent doesn't want them love them or even care for them.
The child often retaliates out of hurt and frustration and the department has the validation to cut out the parent further.
These are common tactics.

Not many people are willing to research the facts, however, when we do the results are often shocking. What may appear kosher and good faith in writing, can be the smoking weapon you recognise in another matter.

Most information is available in government websites. You just need to be willing to look and when you do, have the time to follow it through. My experience spans some 40+ years with recent online research now reaching 10 years.

Here is just some of the most recognised CRITERIA for REMOVAL:
(Note: you can find this on most CPS websites if you look hard enough)

-Family violence.
-Sexual abuse.
-Emotional harm.
-Mental health.
-Homelessness and low income housing.
-Low or no income.
-Substance misuse.
-lack of support.

Now consider this:

A mother subject to years of physical assaults and beratements, finally chooses to leave with the couples children after police attendance. (police have an automatic flagging system where children are involved to report to CPS)

The mother has no money and had been the stay at home parent while her husband earned the family income. Her lack of income made it difficult for her to leave previously, despite the history of abuse.

Her mental health is poor, she is suffering long term anxiety and depression with likely PTSD. She starts drinking alcohol to cope.

Her and her children are placed into emergency housing with the state and placed onto centrelink.

CPS is notified by police of the family situation (mandatory reporting) and the mother is now under investigation.

During investigations, CPS discover a child has alleged to be sexually abused by the father and the department makes substations that the children have be subjected to emotional abuse and neglect (neglect for the victim parent not removing the children sooner).
The children are removed and investigations step up to another level.

The mother then has to,

1. Go to Criminal Court against her perpetrator,
2. if married, apply for divorce and property settlement in Family Court,
3. now attend Children's Court for trying to get her kids back...all the while dealing with mental health created by the ongoing situation.
4. CPS will then expect the mother to attend multiple courses, psychiatric services, contacts and meetings, which effectively prevents her working.

She will lose all friends (naturally people see the stigma before the person they knew, trusting the system had a real reason to remove the kids), her family will turn on her and she ultimately meets another criteria...lack of support.

Her centrelink gets cut from Single Parent Payment - $870pf, to Job Seekers - $470pf.
Running to every expected court case, meeting, Betterment course, hiring lawyers when legal aid rejection occurs, purchasing computer, printer and still trying to furnish her home...all adds up and food becomes a second thought.

She will lose her state housing for not meeting the criteria of filling the rooms available with her children, and because of her income, cannot secure private rentals.

She has been set up to fail. Yet many on the outside don't ever see or recognise this side of CPS.