23/12/2023
From BFB Author Jim DeFilippi:
Dear Indie Book Reader,
This insightful and beautifully written review is by the internationally know poet and essayist Stephanie V. Sears about my book BUSTING STONES, which Amazon named “The Number One New Release in Women’s History Studies.”
Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2023
Review of ‘Busting Stones’ by Jim DeFilippi.
This is the story of a remarkable woman, Martha Gellhorn, war correspondent and literary writer. From the beginning of the twentieth century to about the year 2000, the author, Jim DeFilippi, weaves together her life with that of America’s evolution as a nation. The tone is irreverent and amusing, particularly, when it addresses the country’s handling of the women’s liberation movement. Jim DeFilippi, whose affection for his heroine transpires throughout the book, bemoans her self-defeating disregard for her journalistic writing as she aspires to become a literary writer; something she achieves, though perhaps not with the level of success she had hoped for. The fault, concludes DeFilippi - with what seems like paternal frustration - lies, partly, with her own precarious self-esteem. You feel that the author wants to yell at her : ‘You’re more than good enough, don’t waste your energy on self-doubt…” DeFilippi partially forgives her, however., by expounding on American misogyny at the time, ( one so well embodied by Martha Gellhorn’s first husband , Ernest Hemingway, and referred to, by DeFilippi with acerbity, as the ‘bloated proser’).
The author’s voice is masculine, rugged, often derisive, yet also touchingly indignant that Martha Gellhorn did not get more acclaim for her work. He clearly considers her a much braver and better war reporter than Hemingway who, intentionally or not, kept her in his shadow.
In fact, I, myself, knew nothing about this outstanding woman until I read ‘Busting Stones’. If I had previously come across her name, it was probably, indeed, through her connection with Hemingway.
One sympathizes with the author’s genuine outrage throughout the book, as it unravels mercilessly the history of women’s unequal rights and the pressures put upon them to live by certain rules in America, land of the free, and elsewhere in the world. One can only agree that the female half of humanity has too long received scraps of individuality and self-realization, thrown under the table as to a pet, by male dominated societies.
The United States, another central character in ‘Busting Stones’, gives up its misogyny with reluctance. To a ‘chauvin’ United States, womanhood resembles an exotic and unpredictable country, but inconveniently situated within the nation’s own boundaries. And to the author, Martha Gellhorn represents an essential dynamic towards change in the socio-political landscape of the country, one that goes well beyond gender inequality.
Yet it is at this point, as a woman, that one departs slightly from DeFilippi’s portrayal of Martha Gellhorn as being in contradiction with herself throughout much of her life. He finds inconsistency where , to a woman , there is none. He opposes her feminine foibles to her daring and talent as a professional:” For months, she would pour more interest into the shape of her ass than to the shape of her paragraphs”. One is tempted to accuse him of Manicheism. From the female side where I stand, an accomplished woman can have her feminine ‘frivolities’ and be damn good at what she does professionally. When he notes:” She would dress herself in Schiaparelli suits….”, one wants to categorically reject the criticism. We, liberated women, know very well that our happiness includes wearing ‘mud-caked brogans’ one moment, and wearing ‘ridiculous’ stilettos the next. Which, by the way, are not ridiculous to a woman, a fortiori, one who enjoys fashion, and displaying her own shapely legs. Adopting different styles of dress, or behavior, is second nature to a woman, and not incompatible with her accomplishments, whether she is an astronaut or a civil engineer…. It creates, to the contrary, a kind of glorious synergy.
Martha Gellhorn admits to having used her physical attractiveness to facilitate her work:
” Maybe I care so much about looks because ….I lived on them well and truly, and with easy confidence.” She comes after a long line of exceptional women across the world who managed to accomplish great deeds by way of courage, intelligence but also by way of seduction.
So Martha Gellhorn took cyanide. But no one is uniformly happy throughout one’s life….
One should not feel too sorry for her.After all, she did achieve professional excellence, she had many adventures, a great deal of s*x, apparently, love, motherhood, friendship, and very good clothes…To top it off, here is a book about her that keeps you rivetted from beginning to end, and that clamors to the world her talent, fearlessness , and humanistic values.