Wilson Ip

Wilson Ip Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Wilson Ip, Video Creator, .

CineRags by CineMilled Introduced – New Diffusion Products for Aputure Domes. CineMilled has released CineRags, a muslin...
05/01/2024

CineRags by CineMilled Introduced – New Diffusion Products for Aputure Domes.
CineMilled has released CineRags, a muslin diffusion alternative for Aputure 150 and 2 and 3 light dome models. With these products, the company gives Aputure users another tool in their arsenal to shape their lighting differently. Let’s take a look at what this new product offers!
CineMilled is a company based in Los Angeles, California, created by camera and SteadiCam operator Pedro Guimaraes, SOC. His products are solutions born from his own needs, including gimbal accessories, power solutions, and vehicle camera rigging, to name a few.
Matching cinematography industry standards
This time, CineMilled partnered with a small, family-owned sewing company based in L.A. to create Cinerags diffusion, a new alternative to Aputure’s diffusion inserts for Aputure Dome 150 and Dome 2 and 3. The idea emerged as a solution to those situations when even the minimal output of Aputure lights (10%) proved too strong for the scene. Replacing Aputure’s original diffusion with a thicker material was the solution and the origin of these CineRags diffusion inserts.

{"":"https://schema.org","":"VideoObject","name":"CineRags by CineMilled Introduced - New Diffusion Products for Aputure Domes","description":"CineRags by CineMilled Introduced - New Diffusion Products for Aputure Domes","contentUrl":"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFUOzrZiUqc","thumbnailUrl":"https://img.youtube.com/vi/JFUOzrZiUqc/mqdefault.jpg","uploadDate":"2024-01-03T12:47:43+01:00"}
CineRags are high-quality hand-sewn muslin inserts for Aputure light domes. CineMilled selected and tested various muslin options until they found a near-perfect match to the industry-standard muslin favored by Los Angeles cinematographers.
The fabric also covers the backside of the velcro, so the edges are not exposed. This design ensures that all light reflects evenly off the muslin, giving a more uniform output. Another advantage of using muslin over plastic diffusion is the additional benefit of reduced noise, particularly in windy conditions.
All the fabrics have been pre-washed and pre-shrunk to ensure a perfect fit. CineRags also features an EZ-Pull tab sewn in to facilitate its removal.
Shaping light’s color and intensity
When using any diffusion or bouncing material, one of the most important aspects to consider is the color temperature. Any diffusion fabric between the light source and the subject will affect light’s characteristics, so it is essential to have correct values for consistency. The company offers two CineRags diffusion versions, bleached and unbleached muslin. As you may know, unbleached muslin has a yellowish tone, which makes it suitable for warmer scenes and more pleasant skin tones.
Color comparison: no diffusion, leading brand’s diffusion, and CineRags diffusion -Source: CineMilled
CineMilled has tested and tried to match the color temperature of industry-standard muslin. In summary, their bleached muslin has a drop in color temperature of around 350 Kelvin compared to direct light, while the original Aputure diffusion decreases by about 150K. The unbleached version decreases to around 1140K, almost identical to the industry standard. For these measurements, they lit the subject from 6 feet, a typical distance when using these light domes. Regarding light loss, the CineRag diffusion is around two light stops, about a half stop more than Aputure’s thickest option.
Price and availability
CineMilled’s goal is to develop CineRags muslin diffusion for all the Aputure light boxes plus more brands in the future. You can now buy the bleached and unbleached versions from their website. The CineRags Muslin 150 Light Dome Insert sells for $69.99, and the CineRags Muslin Light Dome 2&3 Insert is available for $59.99.
What do you think about CineRags by CineMilled? Is it a tool you would like to include in your bag? Let us know in the comments! https://www.cined.com/cinerags-by-cinemilled-introduced-new-diffusion-products-for-aputure-domes/

Tilta Lightweight Shoulder Rig Review – Not Perfect but Surprisingly Comfortable. Tilta’s new Lightweight Shoulder Rig c...
05/01/2024

Tilta Lightweight Shoulder Rig Review – Not Perfect but Surprisingly Comfortable.
Tilta’s new Lightweight Shoulder Rig comes in at $339 for the base kit, and true to form, Tilta has included a bunch of bells and whistles in the package that might be considered a la carte additional purchases from other camera accessory brands. Shoulder rigs, like tripods, are purchases that stick with you for years and years. So, does the Lightweight Shoulder Rig have what it takes to keep your shoulder happy and your camera safe? Let’s check it out.
I love camera operating and try to do it wherever possible – even on larger sets where I wear different hats. There is something about the connection you get with your subject while operating that is unique and that doesn’t quite carry over to a monitor at Video Village. Towards that end, I am laser-focused on operating gear that works with me and doesn’t add pain or discomfort over long hours. Lately, I’ve been a fan of the Ergorig from Cinema Devices for support. Still, monitor placement is equally important (to avoid neck injury), and a quality shoulder rig is right at the top of the priority list. Your shoulder rig choice shouldn’t be an afterthought, and there are a bunch of affordable options out there, but keep in mind quality may vary.
Some shoulder rigs are specifically designed for a single camera system, but there are a few that could be considered “universal.” Here are just a few of the lower-mid-cost competitors:

SmallRig Shoulder Rig Pro Kit – $335.00
CAMVATE Pro Shoulder Mount Rig – $286.00
SHAPE ARRI Dovetail Shoulder Mount with Handles – $666.75
Zacuto ACT Baseplate – $295.00 (Handles sold separately)
ikan Stratus Shoulder Rig System for Cinema Cameras – $299.99
Kondor Blue Shoulder Pad Air Rig – $699.99
8Sinn Shoulder Rig Kiti with 15mm LWS Baseplate – $699.99

Everything sits comfortably on flat surfaces (not true with all shoulder rigs). Image Credit: Graham E Sheldon / CineD
My history with Tilta as a brand began in the RED DSMC 1 era with a RED Epic Dragon rig. The price was competitive at the time, but it wasn’t my favorite rig overall. Since then, the brand has progressed significantly while sticking to affordable price points. I’m seeing Tilta products on larger and larger sets these days, and their Nucleus Nano II Follow Focus / Zoom Rocker is especially impressive. (Nano II review coming soon).

One side-mounted 15mm rod is included and is being used here for Nano II motors. Image Credit: Graham E Sheldon / CineD
Tilta markets the Lightweight Shoulder Rig as geared towards “compact camera rigs.” I might be pushing the definition of “compact” a bit with my Canon C300MKIII and SIGMA Cine Zooms, but at about 5 lbs. (2.268 kg) for the body itself, this isn’t a particularly heavy camera. I just think Tilta intends this rig more for the likes of the RED Komodo, Sony FX3, Canon EOS C70, or even a Canon EOS R5 C with DSLR glass.
Either way, it works fine with my Canon EOS C300 Mark III, and I feel like other more mid-sized cine cameras like a Sony FX6 would do well, too. Moving on.
First impressions

Everything ships in this case. Image Credit: Graham E Sheldon / CineD
It is hard to overstate how much I enjoy self-contained kits, and this shoulder rig comes in a semi-rigid hard case with plenty of interior room that suggests it could take a hit or two without damaging the overall rig. Having everything in a kit means I don’t need to dedicate the time to figuring out another solution. It’s also easy to throw in my vehicle for a shoot at the last minute while having the confidence it’s all good to go when I land at the location.

Padding back pad mounted on a nato rail. Very comfortable! Image Credit: Graham E Sheldon / CineD
The main components of the Lightweight Shoulder Rig are the following:

15mm Rod Mounts (dual at the rear, and one near the front)
Baseplate (Arca and Manfrotto compatibility)
Quick Adjustable Rosette Arms (additional cost from the core kit)
Shoulder Rig
Back Shoulder Pad

Out of the case, everything assembles quickly. The first thing I noticed is an adjustable horizontal bar that allows the rig to be quickly set on a flat surface or for added flexibility with the two front handles. I do wish the locking screw for this bar had a safety catch element because loosening this screw while the camera is on your shoulder will tip the weight of the camera forward (something to be mindful of).

Adjustable horizontal bar — which I wish had a locking mechanism. Image Credit: Graham E Sheldon / CineD
The handles are comfortable and feature a fully adjustable arm on either side, allowing for different operator body types and heights. Everyone wants their handles in different places depending on the gig, and this system lets you do just that. Add the quick-adjust rosettes (available as part of a more expensive kit), and this brings another layer of flexibility if you change your hand position often while filming. Some may prefer the locking k**b over the quick-adjust rosettes. It just comes down to preference.
For power, you could install a battery plate like this one from Tilta on the back part of the rig itself, but my battery on the C300MK III affixes directly to the camera.
Unfortunately, the included camera plate only has 1/4-20 screws and not 3/8″-16 options, and it is designed in such a way that you couldn’t add 3/8″-16 screws even if you wanted to. Not a big deal for smaller cameras, but I appreciate combining both screw types for larger camera builds.
Everything is a stylish matte black made from aluminum alloy with rounded edges and no sharp points to catch on an operator or AC. A 1/4-20 mounting point on each handle gives you another spot to mount a small monitor or other accessories.
Tilta Lightweight Shoulder Rig – operation
Given the fact that “lightweight” is literally in the product name, you’ll be happy to hear that the overall rig is one of the lightest I’ve ever used. With the low weight, I was worried that corners might be cut in the strength of the overall material, but I didn’t see any sketchy bending or flexing despite having a camera rig at the top end of the overall system weight limits.
A useful design innovation here is the use of a back pad (see image below), an idea I would love to see find additional use in this accessory segment as a whole, and on future Tilta shoulder rig products – it’s that good. The back pad helps when you tilt down because it transfers weight to your back and not your biceps. If you have ever worked on a cooking show where you are often required to tilt from the chef’s face to the plate on the counter, you will immediately appreciate this design innovation.
There are also multiple mounting points on the back pad where you could add a counterweight like this one (designed specifically for this shoulder rig by Tilta).

The back pad mounted on a secure nato rail system. Image Credit: Graham E Sheldon / CineD
Strangely, there isn’t a way to make this rig work with a VCT system, and that’s a bit of a bummer if you need to transition from tripod to shoulder and back. If you plan to live on your shoulder for the entire shoot day, then this lack of VCT compatibility won’t be an issue for you. Tilta, as a company, seems invested in the dovetail platform over VCT in most of their products.
And speaking of living on your shoulder – I love the cushion on both the back pad and the shoulder pad. It is incredibly comfortable and feels like you have a piece of memory foam between you and the camera: A+.

The telescoping handle gives you a bit extra length if needed on the arms. Image Credit: Graham E Sheldon / CineD
Quick moves and heavy use over a long shoot day didn’t loosen any of the k**bs to the point where I felt like they were fighting my camera moves. At one point, I actually removed the left handle so I could just leave my hand on the lens barrel. Everyone is different, and having a shoulder rig that can keep up with different op styles is important.
I found the padded handle grips to be comfy, but you could upgrade one of these (depending on if you are right or left-handed) to a $157 Tilta Wooden Handle with Control Trigger – just double-check that your camera has the correct available trigger cable or the record button won’t work. The use of ARRI standard rosettes on this rig also opens up options from a few other brands as well if you want to mix and match components.


Tilta Lightweight Shoulder Rig and Canon C300MK III. Image Credit: Graham E Sheldon / CineD
Tilta Lightweight Shoulder Rig – conclusion and price
The $339 / €344 Tilta Lightweight Shoulder Rig is priced competitively, takes lighter to mid-sized cameras, and, maybe most importantly, is very, very comfortable. The back pad is something I didn’t know I needed on a shoulder rig (can’t live without it now!), and the whole rig breaks down into a small kit for transport.
I find the adjustable horizontal bar to be a good idea, but in practice, the lack of a safety catch means it feels like a potential future failure point with extensive use – only time will tell there. The lack of a VCT mounting solution makes the overall rig a bit less flexible than it could be from job to job. The single 15mm rod mount is nice, but two would be better for lens support or additional accessories.
There are cheaper shoulder rigs on the market, but you’d be hard-pressed to find one that is this comfortable to film with. The Tilta Lightweight Shoulder Rig strikes the right balance between cost and quality.
What kind of shoulder rig do you use? Is there another one you could recommend? Let us know in the comments below! https://www.cined.com/tilta-lightweight-shoulder-rig-review-not-perfect-but-surprisingly-comfortable/

Stalman Clamp Introduced – A Vertical Smartphone Clamp for iPhone 15 Pro/Max. The new Stalman Clamp results from an inte...
05/01/2024

Stalman Clamp Introduced – A Vertical Smartphone Clamp for iPhone 15 Pro/Max.
The new Stalman Clamp results from an interesting cooperation between Filmmaker and YouTuber Tyler Stalman and accessory-maker Kondor Blue. Unlike most smartphone clamps, this new product grips the device’s vertical side. This method should provide additional stability while maintaining relative compactness, and more.
As smartphones acquire more and more professional features, smartphone clamps have become a common sight, not to say a necessity among content creators. These devices adapt the mobile, slate-shaped devices to industry-standard mounting solutions such as tripods, gimbals, cold shoes, or magic arms. This adaptation is crucial to the creation of advanced, professional-level content. It may even render cameras obsolete for certain shooting scenarios and projects.

{"":"https://schema.org","":"VideoObject","name":"Stalman Clamp Introduced - A Vertical Smartphone Clamp for iPhone 15 Pro/Max","description":"Stalman Clamp Introduced - A Vertical Smartphone Clamp for iPhone 15 Pro/Max","contentUrl":"https://youtu.be/q8UtkTc2kn0?si=Hry9hUrBtdVYPO73","thumbnailUrl":"https://img.youtube.com/vi/q8UtkTc2kn0/mqdefault.jpg","uploadDate":"2024-01-04T12:34:41+01:00"}
Enter the Stalman Clamp
The vertical design in the new clamp is very dominant. It looks both sturdy, compact, and quite stylish if you like the minimalistic approach. The asymmetric design fits the iPhone 15 camera array, and will probably fit many others.
Build and ergonomics
The Stalman Clamp is made out of stainless steel and aerospace-grade aluminum (have you ever heard of non-aerospace-grade aluminum?). There are two 1/4″ mounting points, on top and in the middle, both with the nice touch of locating pin holes. At the bottom, we’ll find an intricate contraption that surrounds and protects the smartphone’s port. A 90-degree “L-shape” USB-C adapter is included. This specific one is quite impressive, boasting 40Gbps transfer speed and 240W power throughput. Neatly nestled in its little gap, the adapter looks safe and stable. Continuing at the bottom of the device, we’ll also find an ARCA mount and a magnetic piece with another 1/4″ port.
Bottom of the Stalman Clamp, USB-C elbow adapter, and magnetic piece. Image credit: Tyler Stalman
The clamp is designed to be compact enough to remain on your smartphone between shots, without being too cumbersome. The compact size is one feature, but Kondor Blue added some additional design features such as rounded corners and a flush design with no hard edges poking out.
Kondor Blue Stalman Clamp. Image credit: Kondor Blue
Additional accessories
The Stalman Clamp has no dedicated accessories, and that’s a good thing. Working with industry-standard connections makes the device extremely modular and flexible. Of course, you can work with Kondor Blue attachments, such as the Kondor Blue Mini Lock Quick Release System, or a PRO-BLADE SSD Recording Handle, but any bit of gear with a 1/4″ screw will attach and work the same way. The same goes for the Arca plate, which will readily attach to many tripods, monopods, rigs, and gimbals.
Kondor Blue Stalman Clamp with a Sandisk PRO BLADE grip. Image credit: Kondor Blue / Tyler Stalman
Alternatives
While I couldn’t find a direct vertical competitor, some smartphone cages will offer a viable alternative. The SmallRig Mobile Video Cage is a bit more robust, but will probably fit most pockets. It includes multiple 1/4″ points and two cold shoes. also available as a kit with single or double handles, and an add-on lens mount. As mentioned – it’s not as compact, and will only work with a specific smartphone model due to its outer frame design. It will provide better protection for your precious iPhone though. If the influencer halo is what you’re looking for, there’s also a Brandon Li Special edition available. Another kind of smartphone rig is one that aims to provide a more “camera-like” workflow. While they might not hold the phone as tightly as the Stalman Clamp, and may not be as modular, such grips will up your filming game. A good example is the SANDMARC Creator Grip, and there are many others.
Image credit: Kondor Blue
Price and availability
The Stalman Clamp is available for pre-order on the Kondor Blue website. It will set you back $75 and is due to ship on January 31st.
Do you see yourself using the Kondor Blue Stalman Clamp for your content creation? Will it help you incorporate your iPhone (to Android) into a more professional workflow? Will it help you leave the big camera back home for some projects? Let us know in the comments. https://www.cined.com/stalman-clamp-introduced-a-vertical-smartphone-clamp-for-iphone-15-pro-max/

Creative Techniques to Enhance Your Documentary – Ideas and Showcases. We talk a lot about visual storytelling and narra...
05/01/2024

Creative Techniques to Enhance Your Documentary – Ideas and Showcases.
We talk a lot about visual storytelling and narrative tools in fictional films. Leading lines, creating depth, playing with aspect ratio, specific types of editing… Some of them apply to documentaries as well. Yet, of course, when we capture the events unfolding before our eyes, it’s not always possible to think about framing, let alone stylistic choices. Still, there are plenty of creative techniques that can help to enhance your documentary and add something special to the story you want to tell. Let’s take a look at several examples below!
Over the last decades, documentaries have become much more than plain reportages that document reality with interviews and B-roll footage on top. This one word includes so many parts of the motion picture: educational, observational, portraits and personal stories, wildlife cinema, historical documents – the list can go on and on.
There are no strict conventions on how to make a documentary, except for being truthful to your vision of the world. So, filmmakers choose their own form and style, adding creative elements that help to underline the story or visualize the message. As with every art form, you will find endless possibilities on how to make a documentary narrative stylized. We won’t be able to cover all the creative techniques in one article, but I want to show you some recent examples that I found inspiring. Maybe they will inspire you as well. And if you have other tools to share, please do so in the comments below!
Unusual approach to interviews to enhance your documentary
We all know that conventional documentaries include interviews – be it with experts, with portrayed protagonists, or with people involved in depicted events. However, an interview itself doesn’t have to be filmed conventionally. On the contrary, this is a part of your film that is typically pre-planned, providing you with ample opportunities for stylization. Let’s take as an example the Austrian film “Feminism WTF”, which premiered last year. Here are some of the interview setups from it:

Film stills from “Feminism WTF” by Katharina Mückstein, 2023

Looks impressive, right? Filmmakers chose an abandoned building for their interviews and dressed each room for each interviewee, using specific colors and objects. Yet, this meticulous set design is not only about flashy style. The documentary researches the topics of feminism in the 2020s, social stereotypes, modern challenges, gender equality, and different attitudes toward it. Choosing vivid and unusual setups for interviews provides viewers with some context on an unconscious level, and reflects the messages from testimonies. Isn’t this what thinking outside the box means?
What about framing?
Another idea to stylize a documentary interview could be by playing with frame composition. Here you can use all the possible visual storytelling tools we talked about. Remember though, that when you pick a specific shot size or decide on a particular depth of field, it affects the viewer’s perception in some way. For instance, in the Oscar-winning documentary “Navalny”, cinematographer Niki Waltl, AAC went for four different angles in the interview with the protagonist. Each of them created a different feeling.
Film stills from the “Navalny” documentary by Daniel Roher, 2022
The main camera depicted Navalny talking directly into the lens. Breaking the fourth wall is not the most obvious choice for documentaries, but here it puts the viewer in the position of a listening bartender, which feels more intimate. One of the other angles is shot through a mirror – rather contradictory, isn’t it? At the same time, we also get a “regular” close-up, and a curious perspective from slightly above the interviewee, as if someone is always observing him. All these choices are not random, of course, as you can read in our interview with Niki Waltl here.
Recreating events for better visualization
You might have watched the Netflix comedy series “How to Sell Drugs Online (Fast)“. This story is inspired by true events that took place in Leipzig in 2015. A 19-year-old Maximilian Schmidt, under the pseudonym Shiny Flakes, managed to sell hundreds of kilograms of drugs, worth millions of euros, directly from his bedroom before he was caught. The German documentary “Shiny Flakes: The Teenage Drug Lord“, which also appeared on Netflix, follows his story.
What I found particularly interesting in the stylistic choices of this film is how they decided to recreate the events. Filmmakers shot the documentary partly when the protagonist was in jail serving his seven-year sentence. There was neither archive material, nor a possibility to locate him at the location where it all began. Still, they wanted to go beyond just listening to his story. That’s why they built his room at a 1:1 scale in an empty hall at the jail, recreating each and every detail.

Film stills from “Shiny Flakes: The Teenage Drug Lord” by Eva Müller, 2021

This way, filmmakers were able to take Maximilian Schmidt directly to the crime scene and re-enact his story, giving viewers a strong visualization of the events. This technique not only adds to the overall immersion but also helps the audience to get a better grip on the reality of the protagonist’s deeds and life.
Enhancing documentary with fictional parts, or docudrama
At times, documentary filmmakers go a step further by incorporating sequences filmed in a fictional style, complete with actors and staged scenes. This genre is called docudrama and normally it includes both documentary shots and dramatized re-enactments of actual events. Or you can film scenes that were written in addition to those shots as they do in “The Social Dilemma”, an American movie from 2020. In this docudrama about the negative effects of social media, director Jeff Orlowski used the cast to portray the issues covered in the film. Such sequences, like the one below, follow the story of a fictional family that suffers under the influence of social media in their daily life.

{"":"https://schema.org","":"VideoObject","name":"Creative Techniques to Enhance Your Documentary u2013 Ideas and Showcases","description":"Creative Techniques to Enhance Your Documentary u2013 Ideas and Showcases","contentUrl":"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6ZTUf5NUiA&ab_channel=StillWatchingNetflix","thumbnailUrl":"https://img.youtube.com/vi/k6ZTUf5NUiA/mqdefault.jpg","uploadDate":"2024-01-04T14:36:56+01:00"}
By watching Ben, a teenager who falls deeper into social media addiction, or Isla – the youngest daughter in the family – who becomes depressed because of the unrealistic ideals she follows on Instagram, viewers can more easily connect to the topic and understand it. Of course, relating to these fictional figures is not pleasant. However, that’s exactly what the director strives for. His message is quite clear: he wants us to wake up and see all the drawbacks of social media.
Capturing emotional response enhances your documentary
Naturally, we don’t always have huge budgets to dress elaborate sets or re-enact events with actors for a documentary. Nor should we. In creative approaches, it’s also the details that matter. For example, have you watched the recent but already celebrated docuseries “Beckham”? Even if you haven’t had football fever for the last thirty years, you definitely should. This portrait documentary about one of the most famous talents in sports will take you on a very emotional, nostalgic trip.
There is one small but powerful technique that I want to talk about. When the director speaks to Beckham (his family or teammates) about some remarkable game, they show it to the interviewee and capture their reaction, but not in an ordinary way. Filmmakers placed a replay screen just beside the camera and filmed the emotional response with a very tight lens. That results in shots like these:

Film stills from “Beckham” by Fisher Stevens, 2023

This approach creates a strong intimate feeling, as if these famous players hold eye contact with us while we watch and relive these historic games together. I’ve never seen this technique used before, and it indeed had an emotional impact on me.
Every picture tells a story
The thing about techniques and stylized elements in any movie is that they have to serve the story and/or the message. This also holds true in nature documentaries. In our free and exclusive MZed course on wildlife cinematography, held by the ASC cinematographers Paul Atkins and Stephen Lighthill, storytelling becomes an important topic.
As they explain to the participants of the workshop, whenever you find yourself with ample time before hitting the record button, remember to think about your image composition. Even a slight change in the angle can make a big difference. For instance, take a look at a macro shot of water bugs below.
Image source: The ASC/MZed
At the moment, it’s just a close-up of insects, used as an insert shot. However, if filmmakers chose another angle and pulled the focus from the mosquitoes to dry ground near the half-drained lake, it could have conveyed a poignant message: there used to be water, but not anymore. So, always keeping your story in mind is important in any situation, even if you’re “just” filming a B-roll shot of the surrounding nature.
If you’re generally interested in wildlife cinematography, head over here and attend our “The ASC Wildlife Filmmaking Course” on MZed.com for free.
Conclusion
These were just a couple of instances demonstrating how to enrich your documentary by incorporating stylized elements or introducing original approaches to conventional segments. We hope you can use it as a spark of inspiration for your own work. All in all, every creative technique that comes to mind is relevant here, as long as it supports the narrative.
Do you have other recent showcases from the documentary world that caught your attention? Or any stylization tools that you’ve never seen in this art of motion picture before? Let’s gather some ideas in the comment section below!
Full disclosure: MZed is owned by CineD
Feature image source: combined film stills from “Beckham” by Fisher Stevens (2023) and from “Feminism WTF” by Katharina Mückstein (2023) https://www.cined.com/creative-techniques-to-enhance-your-documentary-ideas-and-showcases/

Camera Manufacturers: Don’t Release Unfinished Products (and Ask Us to Review Them) – a Story about GoPro and DJI. Fair ...
05/01/2024

Camera Manufacturers: Don’t Release Unfinished Products (and Ask Us to Review Them) – a Story about GoPro and DJI.
Fair warning – this article is a personal opinion piece pointing my finger at the dubious practice of throwing unfinished cameras onto the market. Are you curious to hear what happened to me when I was supposed to test the new GoPro Hero 12 alongside the DJI Action 4? Then read on...
It’s the end of September. As every year around this time, new versions of the popular action cameras from DJI and GoPro have already been announced, more or less ready to hit the shelves. In my particular case, both the GoPro Hero 12 and the DJI Osmo Action 4 were sent to CineD to be reviewed. As we typically try to use new cameras on “real” jobs, we discussed what we could do with the two new action cams.
GoPro Hero 12 Black and DJI Osmo Action 4 – the specs
Please have a look, as we covered the specs of both cameras in articles here and here.
Just the mere numbers/specs on both cameras didn’t do much to excite me as they were too similar to their predecessors – but there were a few things to take a closer look at, among them GoPro’s new 10bit GP-Log encoding mode that caught my interest in the official press release kit:

Official press release, the section from the reviewers’ guide. Credit: GoPro
It is advertised (also on the GoPro website) as the thing to choose for “professional creators” for “the most lifelike colors and to max out dynamic range” along with dedicated LUTs before post-production. Wow. Finally, “pro” features are trickling down to action cameras. They have truly come a long way.
The DJI Osmo Action 4 offers a similar feature, namely 10bit D-Log M with a dedicated LUT plus a new 1 / 1.3″ sensor which should provide more headroom for lowlight shots. Great!
Planning the review of both cameras for my upcoming travels
Hence, as I was venturing on a long business trip to India, China, and Egypt, starting in early October and ending beginning of November I offered to take both cameras along and do an in-depth side-by-side video review over the four weeks.
Along the trip, I was planning to shoot a wildlife documentary about wild wolves in India and then finish everything off with a diving vacation at the Red Sea in Egypt.
I picked up both cameras from the CineD headquarters, installed the latest app & firmware versions, and headed to the airport two days later. Obviously, I had no time to run any tests with either camera but as I already owned GoPro cameras since the Hero 2 and had shot a lot with the recent DJI Action 3, I was confident in reviewing these new cameras – I mean, what could possibly go wrong?
The Indian Wildlife Documentary
To capture driving scenes in India, I decided to use only the GoPro Hero 12 with the new 10-bit LOG mode and the recent firmware 1.12, as I didn’t want to mix and later match footage from both DJI and GoPro.

GoPro Hero 12 black GP-Log encoded frame – somewhere in India. Image credit: Gunther/CineD
The documentary turned out to be quite a difficult task as the monsoon rain had not finished yet and we got stuck multiple times off roads while searching for traces of wild wolves and other grassland animals. No risk, no fun, right?

Flamingos shot with the LUMIX G9 II and Leica 100-400mm with 2x extender. Image credit: Gunther/CineD
But finally, after four days our efforts paid off and we managed to shoot wild wolves in the very early morning. It was an amazing experience. A pack of five wolves was dancing and playing right in front of us. We also interviewed local village people on their relationship with the wild animals and I am excited to finish working on this, but this is another story.

Wild wolves. LUMIX G9 II at ISO3200 with Leica 100-400mm and 2x extender. Image credit: Gunther/CineD
I had no time to review the GoPro-Log footage as we had to get up at 4 am every morning and usually finished our days after midnight as we also captured fantastic night creatures like chameleons.
But why worry? After all the GoPro footage looked good on the small rear display. Admittedly, if this was a paid job, I’d probably had found the time to check footage on a bigger screen right after shooting, but there was simply no time in this case.
Finishing the trip with diving at the Red Sea in Egypt
During my time in India and China, I was busy fulfilling some work duties and had a rather good feeling that I had canned everything for my wildlife documentary. Out of curiosity, I downloaded files on my business laptop while traveling but the H.265 files stuttered heavily during playback so I just saved it for later.
Then, after nearly four weeks of traveling, I was glad to end the trip with my family in Egypt. Finally, I wanted to do an in-depth comparison between the Hero 12 and Action 4. I captured a lot of footage simultaneously on both cameras and while diving, I only used the DJI Action 4 as it’s waterproof until 18 meters (Hero 12 only 10 meters).

At the Red Sea in Egypt with both cameras. Image credit: Gunther/CineD

My son and me. DJI Action 4. Image credit: Gunther/CineD

A highly poisonous stone fish at 15m depth. Image credit: Gunther/CineD

Hero 12 GP-Log footage. Image credit: Gunther/CineD
In hindsight, I was lucky to capture a lot simultaneously. Here is why.
The unbelievable case of the GoPro HERO 12 LOG encoding mode – the unfinished camera
Now, in Egypt, I started downloading some of the HERO 12 GP-Log footage via the Quick App and exported video frames to be sent to my friends via WhatsApp. They looked rather soft, but I attributed it to the reduced resolution download, and delivery was via WhatsApp – so what?
Near the end of my holidays, the weather turned bad, underwater visibility was gone and I finally opened my son’s M1 Macbook Air to review footage (it cuts through the H.265 footage like a hot knife through butter). I fired up DaVinci Resolve and started to make some first comparisons.
Looking at the GP-Log footage I couldn’t believe my eyes. I proceeded to review all settings, started to google, and looked up videos on YouTube… and got confirmation.
The GoPro HERO 12 LOG encoding mode looked like 1280×720 footage from the early days, especially the 4K 60p mode. Have a look below:

Comparison of GoPro vs. DJI LOG footage. Image credit: Gunther/CineD
Just look at the details in the fore- and background. For example, the divers: the one on the left is barely visible in the GoPro footage. This fact is even more obvious when comparing it to the DJI Action 4 footage, which is very nice and detailed without being oversharpened – what is going on here?
I then thought that the footage underwater in low light may be more noisy, hence the smaller GoPro sensor has a disadvantage.
I then looked at additional side-by-side shots in bright sunlight. Here is a 200% zoomed-in comparison, using the respective LUTs from both companies:

GoPro LOG vs DJI LOG. Image credit: Gunther/CineD
Just look at the dark side of my face – my skin tone is brownish-greenish, and there is a sudden transition from brown to green/yellow in the shadows. GP-Log footage is lacking any sort of detail, skin tones are muddy and plasticky and the whole image is completely washed out. Color banding is all over the place – this is supposed to be 10bit? Hard to believe.
Whereas DJI looks natural, detailed, and overall very good.
So. Here I was, luckily having filmed my family vacation on both cams but having used GoPro and the new GP-Log mode exclusively on my wildlife documentary – “Houston, we have a problem”. It’s the 28th of October, more than six weeks after the release of this camera, still promoting the GP-Log mode for pro-creators on their website with firmware version 1.12.
Version 1.xx usually hints at a final product firmware and not an experimental, beta-tester feedback version.
I have been a GoPro customer since the Hero 2 (10 generations ago) and have put a lot of trust in this company – up until now, they have always delivered a superior image. How is it possible they released such a product? I am seriously asking myself if anyone over at GoPro has even tested the GP-Log mode before the release!? Is this supposed to be the pro-creator mode?
End of story. Or is it?
Having swallowed my initial disappointment I used the remaining time of my holidays to finish the video review by recording myself speaking into the camera while on the beach, highlighting all the deficiencies and issues. I will publish this rather soon. Or at least, that’s what I thought.
On the last day of my holidays – the 31st of October – I hooked up the GoPro to the Quick App again, and voilà – a new firmware version 1.2 just came out. “Fixing image issues with GP-Log encoding”.
Also releasing new LUTs. And yes, definitely fixing a lot of the issues described above.
Finally – good news for the product, but it killed my review
But not so good for me. My review was 99% ready with the main message being to avoid GP-Log encoding mode at all costs. Now all I can do is dump it – hence, there will be no video review this time. I guess that’s part of the life of a camera tester.
However, reflecting on this story neither of my conclusions makes me happy. You either do a very quick test and publish your findings immediately out of fear that a new firmware comes out which makes your findings obsolete. Or you don’t do tests at all and just copy & paste news headlines and specs. A long, and in-depth review seems to have no place in such a scenario.
Last but not least a word or two on the DJI Osmo Action 4
Nevertheless, there is an apparent message from my comparisons, even with the latest fixes for the GoPro HERO 12. We finally have a new king of action cameras, the DJI Osmo Action 4. The image is very detailed without being oversharpened, in all modes. 10bit D-Log M along with the official LUT works very well, the sound quality from the microphones is surprisingly good and from day one it performed flawlessly without any issues.
Very good job on the Osmo Action 4, DJI! Congratulations to the new king of action cameras!
My appeal to camera manufacturers – don’t release unfinished cameras
Dear camera manufacturers, if you want us camera testers to be serious and pour a considerable amount of work into video reviews, we kindly ask you to focus all your efforts on finishing a product before releasing it. If you can’t finish a feature in time, then please let us know about your firmware roadmap and resist the urge to market features that are not working properly.
I am not against firmware updates. Firmware updates show the commitment of manufacturers to support their products. But this is a camera intended for serious use, not a banana that ripes at the customer’s premises – there is no reason to release a product when its software isn’t ready, because that just frustrates customers and professional reviewers like us. There’s no shame in pushing a release date in favor of releasing a more final product that actually delivers on what is advertised.
The case of the DJI Mini 3 Pro – different manufacturer, same story
My colleague Nino Leitner had a very similar experience with the DJI Mini 3 Pro when it was released in May 2022. We received the camera early for review as it often happens (under embargo before the release date), and Nino worked on an extensive video review of the drone, which was finished and ready to be published on the day of the release. Then, on that same day, DJI released a significant firmware update that we were not informed about beforehand – adding 10-bit video recording. Great news for the customer, not great news for the reviewer – the finished video review was canned and never published, just like the review article. Nino was frustrated and wanted to update the review eventually, but seeing that many other reviewers apparently did have access to a beta firmware with the 10-bit color space, he skipped it altogether, which I totally understand.
Manufacturers rely on us, the press, to make reliable camera reviews to review their products and also get the word out about them. We invest lots of sweat and time (and money for editing, running a company …) in these reviews, and deserve the respect to be sent cameras that deliver what is promised, especially when it’s cameras that already start shipping at the time of the embargo release (it’s a whole different story if we touch a pre-production camera, knowing that features are still missing that will be added later).
Dear readers, what are your experiences? Have you been let down before? Let us know in the comments below … https://www.cined.com/camera-manufacturers-dont-release-unfinished-products-and-ask-us-to-review-them-a-story-about-gopro-and-dji/

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Wilson Ip posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share