03/10/2025
Michael raised an important point on persistent surpluses. Germany, Japan, China, and others entrenched the global imbalance by recycling excess savings into US assets instead of adjusting their domestic economies. That insulated them at home but concentrated risk globally.
What I added in response is that this only held because the system made the dollar the adjustment anchor. Every imbalance flowed back into US assets. Surplus countries sterilised internally. Deficit countries carried IMF discipline. Washington alone escaped the symmetry Keynes intended. This is why Bretton Woods II was always fragile, and why the Triffin dilemma has now returned in full force.
The arithmetic is unavoidable. In 2024, US net interest costs reached $ 949 billion, surpassing the $ 816 billion defence budget. Debt service is no longer marginal; it is central. Central banks purchased over 1,000 tonnes of gold in 2024, bringing official reserves to roughly 35,000 tonnes worldwide. That accumulation is one of the clearest markers of the monetary reset already underway.
This is why I argued in From Insurance to Extraction that the US order delivered liquidity and safety, but it also imposed extraction. It lasted for decades, but at the cost of debt crises in Latin America, Asia and Africa, and rising inequality within the United States.
This is why I believe it is not simply debasement, but the slower move toward a monetary reset. The outcome could resemble a collapse if unmanaged, but properly framed, it is a correction that restores sovereignty and shares costs more symmetrically.
Link to article: https://canarycompass.substack.com/p/from-insurance-to-extraction-rethinking