Islam vs Anti islamics (2024)

29/11/2018

1- King David, the Begotten Son of GOD and X-***ed Po*******hy:

First King David is GOD's Begotten Son: "I (David) will declare the decree: the LORD had said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. (The King James Version Bible, Psalm 2:7)" In this verse, we clearly see how GOD Almighty loved King David so much, that he chose him to be His begotten Son.

The importance of King David in the Bible and to Christians and Jews:

1- King David was called "God's begotten son" in psalm 2:7 as shown above.

2- Christians call Jesus "Son of David", not meaning a biological son, but rather a son in a respectful way. To respect Jesus, they call him "son of David" i.e. David is good and respectful. See Matthew 1:1, Matthew 9:27, Matthew 12:23, Matthew 15:22, Matthew 20:30-31, Matthew 22:42, and many other verses.

3- David's Star is the Jews' holy symbol just like the Cross is the Christians' holy symbol.

Knowing the above facts, let us examine King David and fornication in the Bible:

X-***ed Po*******hy from the "Begotten Son of GOD":

Please be advised that I am not claiming that GOD Almighty agreed with the po*******hy of King David in the Bible. In fact, I don't even believe that King David did any of this. I proved below that the Books that claim this about King David are corrupted and unreliable and full of man-made doubts and lies.

David watches a women bathe, likes what he sees, and "goes in unto her." Let us look at 2 Samuel 11:2-4 "One evening David got up from his bed and walked around on the roof of the palace. From the roof he saw a woman bathing. The woman was very beautiful, and David sent someone to find out about her. The man said, 'Isn't this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam and the wife of Uriah the Hittite?' Then David sent messengers to get her. She came to him, and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.) Then she went back home." This Holy Figure in the Bible is a pervert!.

So what happened to "If a man commits adultery with another man's wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. (From the NIV Bible, Leviticus 20:10)"????

The woman was not only another man's wife, but also the wife of his neighbor! Double deadly crimes had been committed by the King against GOD Almighty!

How come Leviticus 20:10 was compromised in the Bible and never applied to King David?! Didn't King David know about this law? Yet, the Jews use his star as their holy symbol; the David Star, and the Christians call Jesus his son; "Son of David".

It seems to me quite clearly that the Bible is nothing but a compromised corrupted Book as Jeremiah 8:8, 2 Samuel 11:2-4 and Leviticus 20:10 suggest.

If the strong eats the weak in the Bible, then what moral and wisdom are we to learn from this book?

Further more....

GOD supposedly inspired King David's men to get some heat for King David by having a beautiful virgin minister unto him. Let us look at 1King1:1-4 "When King David was old and well advanced in years, he could not keep warm even when they put covers over him. So his servants said to him, 'Let us look for a young virgin to attend the king and take care of him. She can lie beside him so that our lord the king may keep warm.' Then they searched throughout Israel for a beautiful girl and found Abishag, a Shunammite, and brought her to the king. The girl was very beautiful; she took care of the king and waited on him, but the king had no intimate relations with her." Is the Bible a porn-full man made book? or is it an inspired Divine Book from GOD Almighty? Did GOD Almighty inspire David's men to bring him a young virgin so he can sleep with her without marriage? What kind of morals are we teaching our kids here?

Let us look at Esther 2:2-4 "Then the king's personal attendants proposed, 'Let a search be made for beautiful young virgins for the king. Let the king appoint commissioners in every province of his realm to bring all these beautiful girls into the harem at the citadel of Susa. Let them be placed under the care of Hegai, the king's eu**ch, who is in charge of the women; and let beauty treatments be given to them. Then let the girl who pleases the king be queen instead of Vashti.' This advice appealed to the king, and he followed it." So what we call today illegal prostitution and s*x according to the "laws of the Bible" is actually allowed in the Bible? Here we see that GOD Almighty in His Divine Book, the "Holy Bible", inspired the King and his men to bring young bosomed virgins to sleep with the King, and the best one of them would replace Vashti.

2- About the validity of thebooksof 1 and 2 Samuel,1 and 2 Kings, and Esther:

Here is what the NIV Bible Theologians and Historians say about the books:

About the books of 1 and 2 Samuel: "Many questions have arisen pertaining to the literary character, authorship and date of 1,2 Samuel."

"Who the author was cannot be known with certainty since the book itself gives no indication of his identity."

(From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 368).

About the books of 1 and 2 Kings: "There is little conclusive evidence as to the identity of the author of 1,2 Kings."

"Whoever the author was, it is clear that he was familiar with the book of Deuteronomy."

(From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 459).

About the book of Esther: "Although we do not know who wrote the book of Esther, from internal evidence it is possible to make some inferences about the author and the date of composition. (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 707)"

(www.answering-christianity.com/authors_gospels.htm)

So as we clearly see from the above quotes, no one in this world knows who wrote these books. Yet, Christians regard these books as Holy Divine Revelations from GOD Almighty.

What kind of a low and cheap man-made book the Bible really is?

3- Question to Jews and Christians about KingDavid:

Assuming that the above lies in the Bible about King David are true, which I as a Muslim by the way don't believe that a Prophet from GOD Almighty would do these things, and Allah Almighty in the Noble Quran did talk about King David in the best way, but as to Jews and Christians, it is a must for them to believe in what's written in their corrupted and porn-full Bible. So my questions to them are:

For the Jews, after reading the above verses about King David, why do you use "King David's Star" as your holy symbol that represents Judaism?

For the Christians, why do you call Jesus "Son of David"?

27/11/2018

Bad things about Jesus in the New Testament! Also exposing the Old Testament:

Introduction: We must first of all know that the entire Bible is corrupted and unreliable and is mostly filled with man-made laws and corruption! GOD Almighty Said: "`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

The Revised Standard Version makes even clearer: "How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie. (From the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

In either translation, we clearly see that the Jews had so much corrupted the Bible with their man-made cultural laws, that they had turned the Bible into a lie!

See Also Deuteronomy 31:25-29 where Moses peace be upon him predicted the corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his death.

The Book of Moses predicted that the Law (Bible) will get corrupted. The Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after did indeed confirm this corruption.

Bad things about Jesus in the New Testament! Also exposing the Old Testament:

First, let's start with the Old Testament:

There are several Verses in the Bible that seem to be very cruel. Let us look at few of them:

1 Samuel 15:2-4 2 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt. 3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass. 4 And Saul gathered the people together, and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred thousand footmen, and ten thousand men of Judah.

Let us look at Numbers 31:17 "Now kill all the boys [innocent kids]. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man."

Also, let us look at Numbers 31:35-40 "[From the captives of war] 32,000 women who had never slept with a man.......of which the tribute for the LORD was 32 [virgin women]."

Why kill the innocent children? Why kill all of the non-virgin women? Back then, it was only men who fought men in wars. Women rarely fought in battle fields. So what crime did the innocent children and the non-virgin women do?

This verse was sent to me by Yusif 65; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him: "But after they had moved it, the LORD's hand was against that city, throwing it into a great panic. He afflicted the people of the city, both young and old, with an outbreak of tumors. (From the NIV Bible, 1 Samuel 5:9)"

"tumors" was defined as "with tumors in the groin." This is verified at this link.

Why torture the enemies by destroying their groins?

In the New Testament:

Below are some verses from the Bible that prove Jesus was irrational and self-contradicting. As a Muslim, I believe that Jesus peace be upon him didn't contradict himself in anything, nor was he irrational. The Bible is full of man-made alterations and corruptions,and it can not be fully trusted.

Let us look at what the Bible says about Jesus:

In the NT, we read about Jesus commanding his followers to buy swords: "He said to them, 'But now if you have a purse, take it and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. (Luke 22:36)"

Ok, maybe Jesus ordered his followers to buy swords to keep them for self-defense situations only, which I am certain that this was the case. But buying the swords by itself is a very bad idea from the "Prince of Peace" as the Bible calls him. Imagine if every Christian in the world today owns a gun in his/her home. Imagine how dangerous the society will be. You can't expect every Christian to be as good as Jesus if you know what I mean! Owning guns would certainly make the job of the government's law enforcement a lot harder!

Jesus killing his enemies:

"So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways. I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds. (From the NIV Bible, Revelation 2:22-23)"

Brother Karim proved from the Greek text that "children" here is actually literal and means actual children: Innocent children punished with death in the New Testament!

We also read about Jesus bringing corruption and destruction to earth rather than peace: "Do not suppose that I [Jesus] have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. (Matthew 10:34)"

Jesus ordering the killing of apostates (those who desert him): "I am the vine; you are the branches. If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing. If anyone does not remain in me, he is like a branch that is thrown away an withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned. (John 15:5-6)"

Even though this statement doesn't directly order for the killing of apostates, but it does encourage it, because the Bible does order the killing of apostates in both the Old and New Testaments.

Jesus hitting others with a whip, not that it makes him bad, but certainly takes his "perfection" away: "So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. To those who sold doves he said, 'Get these out of here! How dare you turn my Father's house into a market!.' (John 2:15)"

Jesus not respecting the life of the innocent animals, which again takes away his "perfection" from him: "He [Jesus] said to them, 'Go!' so they came out and went into the pigs, and the whole herd rushed down the steep bank into the lake and died in the water. (Matthew 8:32)"

26/11/2018

Exposing the Bible's books' and gospels' corruptions.

The gospel of john:

No one knows regarding the "Gospel of John":

1. Who wrote it.
2. How many people wrote it.
3. When it was written.
4. Where it was written.

We find alarming troubles with the Gospel of John itself. Since Christians believe that the writer of the gospel of John is the same one as the one who wrote 1 John, then it is important to point out the following absurdity in the authenticity of this gospel from its last and concluding chapter:

John 21:24-25 24 This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true. 25 Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written. "We know that his testimony is true"?! Wasn't the disciple John the one who supposedly wrote the gospel of John? How can he say about himself that "we know that his (the author) testimony is true"?! Isn't this a clear and indisputable proof that the book was written by an unknown person? Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:

"Many scholars of the past two centuries have denied that John wrote this book, partly because of their belief that the author fabricated many details such as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus. (The Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN: 978-1-58640-275-4, Gospel of John, Page1540)"

"Critical Analysis makes it difficult to accept the idea that the gospel as it now stands was written by one person. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"Within the gospel itself there are also some inconsistencies. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"To solve these problems, scholars have proposed various rearrangements that would produce a smoother order. However, most have come to the conclusion that the inconsistencies were probably produced by subsequent editing in which homogeneous materials were added to a shorter original. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"Other difficulties for any theory of eyewitness authorship of the gospel in its present form are presented by its highly developed theology and by certain elements of its literary style. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)" "The gospel contains many details about Jesus not found in the synoptic gospels. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"

"The final editing of the gospel and arrangement in its present form probably dates from between A.D. 90 and 100. Traditionally, Ephesus has been favored as the place of composition,though many support a location in Syria, perhaps the city of Antioch, while some have suggested other places, including Alexandria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)" So again, no one knows regarding the "Gospel of John":

1. Who wrote it.
2. How many people wrote it.
3. When it was written.
4. Where it was written.

Also, when one reads this gospel, he would immediately notice that it was not written by John himself.

Christians say that it was John the Apostle writting about John the Baptist.
The evidence in the quotes above clearly proves that this is a desperate lie!
I submit to you that neither John wrote anything!
Let us look at the following verses from the gospel:

"And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:19)"

"John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:26)"

"For John was not yet cast into prison. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:24)"
etc...
Whoever wrote the gospel, was he appointed or inspired by GOD Almighty? If yes, then who is that man? It can't be John for it is quite obvious from the above verses and many more throughout the gospel that John wasn't the original author.
One has to be ridiculously biased and blind in faith to deny that.
So now, what about these most popular verses:

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was was God. (From the King James Version Bible, John 1:1)"

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (From the King James Version Bible, John 3:16)"

These verses were obviously written by mysterious men and not by any of Jesus' original disciples. Therefore, it is blasphemy to consider such verses as Divine and to try to prove Jesus is the Creator of the Universe through them.

The lie of trinity was born between the years of 150 to 300. It is quite possible and highly probable that some church wrote the so-called "Gospel of John" from excerpts that they found. Notice that there are 24,000 "letters" or papers found that were not included in today's New Testament,which means that the excerpts that were used for writing the "Gospel of John" and all of the other books and gospels of the NT are highly doubtful and contain no proof what so ever that they were written by any of Jesus' original disciples.
The Gospel of John was written about John but not by the original "Saint John". Big difference and big corruption!
You can't consider such rubbish as GOD Almighty's Divine Holy Words.

24/11/2018

Cursing the Holy Spirit
can't be forgiven proves
the trinity is a lie:

Matthew 12:31-32 (CEV)
31-32 I tell you that any sinful
thing you do or say can be
forgiven. Even if you speak
against the Son of Man, you can
be forgiven. But if you speak
against the Holy Spirit, you can
never be forgiven, either in this
life or in the life to come.

Notice the contradiction between
the ABSOLUTE statement "any
sinful thing you do or say can be
forgiven" and the next statement
about cursing the Holy Spirit can
not be forgiven. This is not a
trivial point, because it
demonstrates that the
statements that Christians use to
prove their false trinity, from the
Bible, are exaggerations like this
one.
The Holy Spirit disproves the
trinity lie:

Notice here how Jesus said that
cursing him can be forgiven,
while cursing the Holy Spirit can
never be forgiven. The following
will make this quite clear or you:

1- Jesus in the Old Testament
was always referred to as ABD
(SLAVE). This is the same
exact word that is used for the
Gentile slaves of the Jews.
2- Jesus a few verses earlier in
Matthew 12, was said that he
was the CHOSEN SLAVE (ABD)
that GOD Almighty chose:
Matthew 12
17 So God’s promise came true,
just as Isaiah the prophet had
said,
18 “Here is my chosen servant
(SLAVE, ABD)! I love him, and
he pleases me. I will give him my
Spirit, and he will bring justice to
the nations.
Both the OT and NT called him
SLAVE OF GOD.
Note: GOD's Spirit came upon
many in the Bible.
Jesus, the Slave of GOD, also
had the Spirit of fearing GOD in
him:
Isaiah 11:1-3 "1. A shoot will
come up from the stump of
Jesse; from his roots a Branch
will bear fruit.

2. The Spirit of the LORD will rest
on him (Jesus)-- the Spirit of
wisdom and of understanding,
the Spirit of
counsel and of power, the Spirit
of knowledge and of the fear of
the LORD (Jesus fearing his
GOD)--

3. and he will delight in the fear
of the LORD. He will not judge by
what he sees with his eyes, or
decide by what he hears with his
ears;"

3- So when Jesus, the SLAVE OF
GOD, said the following about
the Holy Spirit:
"....But if you speak against the
Holy Spirit, you can never be
forgiven, either in this life or in
the life to come." (Matthew
12:31-32)
Then there is no doubt that:

(a)- The Holy Spirit is Higher and
Holier than Jesus.

(b)- The Holy Spirit is much
closer to GOD Almighty than
Jesus.

(c)- Jesus was only a creation of
GOD Almighty and His Abd (Slave)

(d)- We know in the OT,
blaspheming GOD Almighty's Holy
Name is punishable by death:

Leviticus 24:16 Whoever
blasphemes the name of the Lord
shall surely be put to death. All
the congregation shall stone him.
The sojourner as well as the
native, when he blasphemes the
Name, shall be put to death.
And Jesus said that he did not
abolish or invalidate or nullify the
Law of Moses. He only came to
fulfill its Prophecies regarding
him:

Matthew 5:17 “Do not think that
I have come to abolish the Law
or the Prophets; I have not come
to abolish them but to fulfill
them.
So regarding GOD Almighty's Holy
Name, we know that's a given!
And Jesus extended this Law by
telling his followers that if you do
also blaspheme the Holy Spirit,
then your sin will never be
forgiven!
Even in Islam, the Holy Spirit
belongs to the World of
Command of Allah Almighty, and
little was given to us regarding
It:

"They ask thee concerning the
Spirit (of inspiration). Say: " The
Spirit (cometh) by command of
my Lord: of knowledge it is only
a little that is communicated to
you, (O men!)" (The Noble Quran,
17:85)"

Jesus said he would be a
liar!

Jesus further said that if he were
to bear witness of himself, then
his witness would be a lie, i.e.,
Jesus would be a liar: John 5:31

"If I bear witness of myself, my
witness is not true." (KJV) This is
despite the fact that Jesus, the
SLAVE OF GOD as the OT and
NT both call him, performed
many Miracles. But still, he would
be false if he dared to disobey
GOD Almighty and bear witness
of himself. He simply was not
given this authority by GOD
Almighty.

Moses and GOD:

When GOD Almighty appeared to
Moses, did He, the Almighty,
require witnesses to prove
Himself to Moses? Was His
Witness True? Were His Words
True? Or were they false and
lies?

10/10/2018

Absurdity of christianity

10/10/2018

Is "TAQIYA" really a doctrine of deception as claimed by the anti-islamics?

The sections of these article contains:

1-The Justifications for Taqiya

2- What does the Bible say about Taqiya?

3- Did Jesus practice Taqiya in the bible?

4- Paul is a liar and a hypocrite!!

1- The Justifications for Taqiya:
Taqiyya is derived from Taqi, which one of its meanings is "to guard yourself" . For example:
1. You taqi yourself from the rain by covering yourself under your umbrella.
2. You taqi yourself from danger by not being careless.
3. You taqi yourself from tongue-slips by being more careful of the words that exit your mouth.
4. You taqi yourself from aggressors by taking self-defense classes.
Taqiyya was allowed for the Muslims to guard themselves from the harm and killings of the disbelievers. It's not a license to lie and be wicked and deceptive and evil as I thoroughly demonstrated throughout this entire article. Taqiya was given to the Muslims by Allah Almighty due to the overwhelming persecutions and slaughters that they went through. Bani Yasir (Tribe of Yasir) suffered the most, because they were the smallest and most vulnerable. Many of them were tortured to death because
they refused to renounced Islam .
Allah Almighty allowed for the Muslims to renounce Islam verbally if they were in such situation, because it is "what's in the heart that matters"
(3:29) :

Taqiya's Special Circumstances:
Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, permitted for Muslims to lie under special circumstances. Let us examine those circumstances:
1. Lying to the enemy during war (war is deceit).
2. Not telling the complete Truth if you're trying to reconcile between two people (strangers, friends, relatives, or between a husband and a wife) when asked what one said about another during hostile times. In other words, you don't have to narrate the foul words that one said; just narrate the main point.
3. When one is under a threat or danger.
The Prophet, peace be upon him, said:
"Humaid b. 'Abd al-Rahman b. 'Auf reported that his mother Umm Kulthum daughter of 'Uqba b. Abu Mu'ait, and she was one amongst the first emigrants who pledged allegiance to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), as saying that she heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).
(Sahih Muslim Book 032, Number 6303) " ( Source )

2- What does the Bible say about Taqiya?

There are two categories in the Bible:

(i)- GOD Almighty made people lie in the Bible, beyond their wills:

Bible defines "LYING SPIRITS BY GOD" to mean "God makes you lie": you have no will (2 samuel 12:7-12)
Go to: http://www.answering-christianity.com/made_to_lie_by_god.htm

(ii)- The Bible permitted lying for the sake of spreading the Faith:
"Balanced Lies" Rebuttal.
Goto: http://www.answering-christianity.com/balanced_lies_rebuttal.htm

3- Did Jesus practice Taqiya in the bible?

John 7:1-13
Jesus Goes to the Festival of Tabernacles
1 After this, Jesus went around in Galilee. He did not want [a] to go about in Judea because the Jewish leaders there were looking for a way to kill him.
2 But when the Jewish Festival of Tabernacles was near,
3 Jesus’ brothers said to him, “Leave Galilee and go to Judea, so that your disciples there may see the works you do.
4 No one who wants to become a public figure acts in secret. Since you are doing these things, show yourself to the world.”
5 For even his own brothers did not believe in him.
6 Therefore Jesus told them, “My time is not yet here; for you any time will do.
7 The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify that its works are evil.
8 You go to the festival. I am not [b] going up to this festival, because my time has not yet fully come.”
9 After he had said this, he stayed in Galilee.
10 However, after his brothers had left for the festival, he went also, not publicly, but in secret .
11 Now at the festival the Jewish leaders were watching for Jesus and asking, “Where is he?”
12 Among the crowds there was widespread whispering about him. Some said, “He is a good man.” Others replied, “No, he deceives the people.”
13 But no one would say anything
publicly about him for fear of the leaders.

Footnotes:

There are few points to notice here:
1- Here we see Jesus said that he wasn't going to the festival, but then went after his brothers went.
2- Did Jesus practice a form of Taqiya when he told his brothers that he wasn't going to the festival but his intention was to go?
3- Jesus didn't want to go to the festival publically. So he told his brothers in John 7:8 "I am not going up to this festival" .

4- But Jesus did go to the festival in secret (John 7:10 ); not in public.

5- So the bottom line here is this: Jesus Christ did say that he wasn't going to the festival, but he then shortly after went up there anyway.

Question: Did Prophet Jesus Christ, peace be upon him, practice Taqiya so that the Jews who wanted to kill him wouldn't see him? Otherwise, why would he then be concerned about showing up in public?

4- Paul is a liar and a hypocrite!!

Paul's hypocrisy:
To all the muslims, when we see the christians lying to propagate their religion, this is because they are following their master, paul, in order to win large numbers as paul himself claims!:

“Although I am free from everyone,I have enslaved myself to all of them in order to win a larger number. To the Jews I behave as a Jew; to those under the Law as one who is under the Law, although I am not under the Law, to gain those who are under the Law. To those who are without law I am without law, although not lawless toward God but committed to Christ’s Law, in order to win those who are without law” (1 Corinthians 9:19)

Paul is a liar, he claims to follow the Law of Christ when the Law of Christ was the observance of the Torah (Matthew 5:17-20) the very Law that he strongly rejected! Paul's hypocrisy is further exposed in the following verse:

"For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?" (Romans 3:7, King James Version)

"But if through my lie God's truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?" (English Standard Version)

"But if the truth of God through my lie abounded unto his glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner?"
(American Standard Version)

Muhammad Ataur-Raheem comments on the verse above:

“It would seem from this statement that, although he knew he was lying, Paul felt that the means justified the ends, but it is not understood how truth would abound through a lie… Paul produced a religion which encompassed different contradictory elements. He took the Unitarianism of the Jews and added to it the philosophy of the pagans”.

Paul is the anti-Christ, the supreme liar, the pathological liar, and the corrupter of Jesus’ Gospel. The Jewish Christians (Nazarenes and Ebionites) considered him an ‘apostate’ from Judaism, yet historical accounts say that he was born Gentile.

The author Roshen Enam says:

“Paul abolished the Law, which was followed and preached by Jesus (pbuh), and corrupted the whole religion, giving it a new form. The main ambition behind all this was, in his own words, “to win a larger number” of followers; the followers of a new religion “the Pauline Christianity”.

09/10/2018

Jesus was defeated by the woman's wisdom:

I'd like to start this section by presenting this Noble Verse from the Noble Quran:

"Do they not ponder on the Qur'an? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy. (The Noble Quran, 4:82)"

Below we will see the overwhelming amount of corruption that exists in the New Testament.

Jesus was defeated by the woman's wisdom:

"A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, 'Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession. Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, 'Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.' He [Jesus] answered, 'I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.' The woman came and knelt before him. 'Lord, help me!' she said. He [Jesus] replied 'It is not right to take the children's [Jews] bread [blessings and miracles reserved for them] and toss it to their dogs [the Gentiles].' 'Yes, Lord' she said, 'but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table.' Then Jesus answered, 'Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.' And her daughter was healed from that very hour. (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 15:22-28)"

It's funny how Jesus supposedly in the book of man-made alterations and corruption,the New Testament, instantaneously ABROGATED his views and decision about the non-Jewish woman and people in general being equivalent to dogs when compared to the Jews. It is important to note that the woman, in this corrupted book, from the very start showed that she is a "believer" (what ever that meant back then). So it wasn't a matter of a "disbeliever" or pagan seeking Jesus' help.

The woman's wisdom defeated Jesus, the so-called "Creator of the Universe"! Jesus, within a second, changed his racist and trash-mouthed views against her from being a "dog" to a human being who deserves to be helped.

"I was sent ONLY to..." clearly and irrefutably means that Jesus initially claimed that he wasn't sent to other than the Jews!

So what if the woman failed with Jesus??

It seems that Jesus in the corrupted book of the new testament changed his racist and filthy views only because the woman begged him. I wonder if the woman never did this and instead answered him inappropriately after he called her and all gentiles as "dogs", would the gentiles today still be considered as the Jews' dogs? Most probably yes. It doesn't take much for a racist to go back to his old habits and generalizing evil beliefs.

Again, don't forget that the woman initially showed that she was a believer! Jesus rejected her only because she was a Gentile!

The contradiction and man-made corruption in the text are clear!

The "Jesus" of the corrupted book of new testament is clearly not the Creator of the Universe as the lie of trinity claims. Allow me to quote Jesus himself, or what's put on his mouth, regarding those so-called masters:

"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing. (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 23:37)"

No Prophets killers can ever be better than any human being that GOD Almighty Created! Those so-called masters can not be better than anyone or any race that exists on earth. In fact, the dung that I personally or anyone for this matter flush in the toilet is better than them and those worthless words that were uttered on the tongue of Jesus in the book of racism and lies, the New Testament. Let alone, them being the masters. So much for them being better than me, a non-Jew, and me being their "dog".

Because the bible is not Divine and is filled with man's lies, it is easy to find unanswerable contradictions in it. Jesus' views were clearly absurd and allow me to say, stupid. At one point, the Jews were the masters, and because he was satisfied with them, he ignored the fact that they were theProphets' killers. But after they disappointed him, the balance changed and they became bad, and it was now ok to go and preach to the Gentiles (the non-Jews).

So in other words: 1- Have the Jews been ok with Jesus, the Gentiles would not have received any preaching.

2- The face of christianity today would be totally different. "Christianity" today would be limited to "only the lost sheep of Israel," i.e., the Jews. 3- Like I mentioned above, have the woman failed with Jesus, the Gentiles today would still be considered as the "Jews' dogs".

Of course me as a Muslim, I don't believe that the foul dirt that was put on Jesus' mouth or anything that exists in the NT is Divine. Again, as Allah Almighty Said:

"Do they not ponder on the Qur'an? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy. (The Noble Quran, 4:
only the verses in the Bible and Hadiths (collection of Prophet Muhammad's, peace be upon him, words) that directly agree with the Noble Quran are considered close to the Truth, but not quite the Truth. The Jesus of Islam is not the Jesus of the bible. The book of lies, the New Testament, is filled with man's alteration and corruption. I haveh provided ample quotes from bible theologians and a long list of contradictions that clearly and irrefutably prove this!

So now the question to you is:

Do you honestly call this absurdity about Jesus being a trash-mouthed racist and then changing instantaneously in the book of lies as Divine Revelations from GOD Almighty?

Where is the Divine Wisdom and Perfection in that?

I only see double-standard hypocrisy and CLEAR-CUT stupidity!

Let's just briefly compare the above lies with the Divine Justice and Revelations in the Noble Quran:

"O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other. Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well-acquainted. (The Noble Quran, 49:13)"

Islam vs Anti islamics

29/11/2018

27/11/2018

26/11/2018

24/11/2018

10/10/2018

10/10/2018

09/10/2018

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share