FBT - Football Bizin Tactics (2025)

16/03/2025

𝗟𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗖𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗼 𝗖𝘂𝗽 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝘀 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗗𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲

If Arne Slot had envisioned his Liverpool side delivering a performance befitting the occasion, what unfolded at Wembley on Sunday afternoon was nothing short of a nightmare.

Liverpool were dismal, particularly in a first half where they failed to match Newcastle United’s intensity. Rather than channel the disappointment of their midweek Champions League exit into a determined response, they appeared weighed down by self-pity.

Despite enjoying significant possession, they lacked incisiveness and control. Their midfield was overpowered, forcing them into a series of aimless long balls, relinquishing control and losing crucial duels. Newcastle’s pressing left them second-best in nearly every contest.

The attacking trio of Mohamed Salah, Diogo Jota, and Luis Díaz were left isolated and ineffective, struggling to provide any meaningful territorial advantage. Salah—so often Liverpool’s talisman in decisive moments—was reduced to a peripheral figure, a bystander in a match slipping away from his side.

A rare moment of attacking cohesion saw the front three combine in the dying moments of the half, yet Jota’s miscued strike—Liverpool’s first effort of the game and their only touch inside Newcastle’s box—was emblematic of a striker enduring a ten-game goal drought.
Had they reached the interval level, there might have been an opportunity to regroup.

Instead, they were undone by Newcastle’s well-rehearsed set-piece routine, failing to track Dan Burn at the far post, and conceding on the stroke of half-time.

Liverpool have struggled in opening periods before, but this was arguably their most abject 45 minutes under Slot—and at the worst possible moment. The second half offered little reprieve. Falling two goals behind almost immediately after the restart left only the faintest hope of a comeback, while Slot’s flurry of substitutions further disrupted an already disjointed team. Federico Chiesa’s late goal in stoppage time merely softened the scoreline but did little to mask a dismal afternoon in north-west London.

05/02/2025

In the annals of footballing strategy, the concept of a ‘trio’ is traditionally reserved for a triumvirate operating within the same department of play—a formidable attacking trident, a cohesive midfield unit, or an impenetrable defensive triumvirate. Yet, in Arsenal’s resplendent 5-1 dismantling of Manchester City, tactical intrigue was found not in such conventional delineations but in the elegant synergy of three men operating down a single flank.

Leandro Trossard, stationed nominally as a left-winger, was ably complemented by the authoritative presence of Declan Rice in the left-central midfield berth, while Myles Lewis-Skelly, entrusted with left-back duties, was anything but a conventional full-back. Their interplay was the beating heart of Arsenal’s strategy, a triumvirate functioning with remarkable fluidity, exploiting spaces with guile and precision.

A glance at Arsenal’s passing network from the encounter is most illuminating. On the opposing flank, there was little discernible interplay of note, yet on the left, the triumvirate of Trossard, Rice, and Lewis-Skelly formed a dense, interwoven structure. They inhabited one another’s spaces, interchanging roles with seamless dexterity, and in doing so, carved pathways into the very sinews of City’s defensive line.

It was Trossard who, in theory, was Arsenal’s principal outlet on the left. Though not a conventional winger, he had demonstrated his aptitude for traditional wing play in the 2-2 draw against Aston Villa, twice reaching the byline and delivering precise crosses with his weaker foot to devastating effect. Against City, however, he found himself marked by Matheus Nunes—a makeshift right-back, visibly uncertain in the role. Such vulnerability demanded additional protection, and thus, at the first sign of Trossard’s intent, Bernardo Silva hastened across to assist his beleaguered teammate.

Yet herein lay the conundrum for City. Doubling up on Trossard inevitably left chasms elsewhere. The next time he surged forward, Bernardo found himself initially tracking Rice’s run before being lured wide once more. Rice, ever perceptive, exploited the vacated space, surging unmarked between Nunes and Manuel Akanji. The sequence concluded with Trossard tumbling under a challenge, his appeals for a penalty ignored, yet Rice’s presence in the box, gesticulating for a pass, was indicative of the systemic problem City were contending with.

Though Arsenal did not always execute the final pass with the precision demanded at this exalted level, their relentless occupation of City’s right-back zone ensured a constant menace. At times, Akanji hesitated, uncertain as to whether he should track Trossard or Rice, and such indecision was precisely what Arsenal sought to engineer.

The most compelling feature of Arsenal’s left-sided dominance, however, was not merely positional superiority but rotational dynamism. While Trossard was ostensibly the winger, Rice the midfielder, and Lewis-Skelly the full-back, they rarely found themselves bound by those traditional constraints. The interplay was kaleidoscopic, a ceaseless rotation wherein one might occupy the role of the most advanced player at one moment, only to retreat into a supporting position the next.

Ordinarily, one might expect Rice to be positioned deeper than the other two, offering a measure of midfield control. Yet, there were moments when he drifted widest, with Trossard central and Lewis-Skelly further forward. At other times, Lewis-Skelly, notionally the deepest of the three, surged ahead of both his colleagues, his youthful exuberance manifesting in bold, incisive runs.

This chameleonic movement rendered Arsenal unrelentingly unpredictable. Even when their passing was not always commensurate with the fluidity of their movement, the mere threat of constant interchange was sufficient to unsettle City’s defensive structure.

Perhaps the most striking visual representation of Arsenal’s unorthodox approach lay in Rice’s heatmap, which bore the markings of a left-winger rather than a central midfielder. Shortly before half-time, he once again positioned himself wide before attempting a sweeping cross-field ball towards Martinelli—an attempt that, though unsuccessful in ex*****on, foreshadowed a sequence that would bear fruit later.

The second half was a continuation of Arsenal’s calculated dissection of City’s right flank. At times, the structure was completely inverted—Lewis-Skelly abandoning his left-back berth to drift into central midfield, Trossard momentarily assuming a defensive role, and Rice surging forward as an auxiliary attacker, teetering on the precipice of an offside decision. Though the final pass often betrayed their good intentions, the inevitability of a breakthrough loomed ever larger.

And indeed, it arrived. Following an opening goal gifted by a City error and a second courtesy of an unfortunate deflection, Arsenal’s third was a pure distillation of their left-sided ingenuity. Rice, yet again wide, fed Lewis-Skelly, who, with a deft turn, cut inside and finished with aplomb.

A fourth from Kai Havertz was swiftly followed by a fifth—this time the result of Rice’s refined ex*****on of the very pass he had attempted before the interval. His exquisite cross-field delivery found substitute Ethan Nwaneri, who proceeded to execute what is fast becoming his signature move, cutting inside before dispatching a precise finish.

For all Arsenal’s attacking potency, however, their performance was not without its flaws. In possession, there was a hesitancy at times, a conservatism that occasionally inhibited their natural fluency. Moments of indecision punctuated their otherwise coherent strategy, preventing an even greater margin of victory.

Yet, in a campaign that has often seen them disproportionately reliant upon the right-sided combination of Martin Ødegaard and Bukayo Saka, this newfound emphasis upon the left was both a necessary recalibration and an intelligent exploitation of a perceived weakness in City’s defensive armoury. It was, in many ways, the defining factor in what may well prove to be Arsenal’s most consequential victory of the season thus far.

02/02/2025

At the heart of Liverpool’s midfield this season, one man has pulled the strings with an assured grace, his composure under pressure a defining feature of the Reds’ engine room. Ryan Gravenberch, the Dutchman whose arrival on Merseyside was met with measured expectation, has swiftly established himself as the metronome in Arne Slot’s evolving symphony.

From a deeper-lying role, his ability to withstand pressure and weave his way through opposition midfield lines has provided a stable foundation, one that has allowed Alexis Mac Allister to venture forth with greater attacking licence. The balance has been delicate, yet effective—until this past weekend, when Liverpool’s encounter with Bournemouth saw a notable shift in Gravenberch’s duties.

Where previously he had been Liverpool’s pivot, orchestrating from the central channels, here he found himself pushed towards a wider berth, while Mac Allister assumed the deeper role. A tactical tweak, no doubt, but one that raised eyebrows among the Anfield faithful.

One need only consider Bournemouth’s recent form to understand the rationale behind this adjustment. The Cherries’ attacking threat, spearheaded by the lively Justin Kluivert—a player who delights in drifting into space from a nominally central berth—necessitated a more disciplined approach. Thus, Gravenberch, typically so involved in the Reds’ forward surges, was tasked instead with a more watchful brief, curbing Kluivert’s influence in what was an altogether more muted display from the Dutchman.

Gone were the driving runs that have so often split opposition midfields. Absent were the sharp, incisive turns that allow him to glide effortlessly past pressing challenges. Even his booking in the second half, a rather needless transgression, suggested a player adjusting to an unfamiliar brief.

Yet, if this was not a performance that drew gasps of admiration, it was nevertheless a disciplined and intelligent display—one that will no doubt have pleased Slot as much as it left spectators yearning for more of the usual Gravenberch elegance.

Bournemouth’s high-intensity pressing and aggressive midfield structure posed a considerable challenge, but in navigating this new role with quiet efficiency, Gravenberch demonstrated the adaptability that has earned him such glowing praise under his new manager.

He may not have set the pitch alight with his usual bursts of brilliance, but in adhering to his revised remit, he reinforced an often-overlooked truth: football is as much about sacrifice as it is about spectacle. And in that, Ryan Gravenberch continues to prove himself invaluable to this resurgent Liverpool side.

02/02/2025

It was a debut brimming with verve and conviction, as Omar Marmoush graced the hallowed turf in Manchester City’s colours for the first time. His inaugural performance, against none other than Chelsea, bore all the hallmarks of a player eager to seize his moment. Indeed, even the fastidious Pep Guardiola, ever the perfectionist, found himself remarking upon the Egyptian’s boundless industry when not in possession.
“He made incredible movements that the players in the middle could not see,” the Catalan maestro mused in the aftermath of City’s 3-1 triumph. “But it’s a question of time—knowing each other. We don’t yet understand his movements, the runs he favours. That will come with time.”
There was little ambiguity about what Marmoush brought to the table. A frontline that had, at times, appeared ponderous and circumspect this season was suddenly injected with urgency, vitality, and a restless desire to probe the opposition’s backline. According to SkillCorner, the Egyptian embarked upon no fewer than a dozen runs in behind Chelsea’s defensive structure—an effort unmatched by any City player not named Erling Haaland in the past eight months of league football.

𝐀 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐟𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐢𝐭𝐲’𝐬 𝐓𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬

If the Blues have been labouring under the weight of defensive frailties, they have sought solace in an old adage: attack is the best form of defence. With a Champions League clash against Club Brugge looming, Guardiola’s men remained prone to counter-attacks—whether adhering to their usual meticulous passing regimen or adopting a more direct approach with driving overlaps and audacious forays into enemy territory.
As the squad prepares for a crucial meeting with Arsenal, Marmoush’s natural inclination to stretch defences offers Guardiola an enticing proposition: should he resist, or should he fully embrace this new element of danger?
City’s latest triumph was notable not only for the introductions of Marmoush and Abdukodir Khusanov but also for a tactical recalibration. For much of the season, Guardiola has stood firm in his preference for a 3-2-5 build-up, with Rico Lewis or Josko Gvardiol stepping into midfield. Yet, against Chelsea, both full-backs were deployed higher and wider—an uncharacteristic move that signalled a shift in City’s attacking philosophy.
The midfield triumvirate of Bernardo Silva, Mateo Kovačić, and Ilkay Gündoğan sought to orchestrate affairs from deeper positions, occasionally tucking in between the centre-halves. Meanwhile, Phil Foden and Marmoush were entrusted with roles just behind Haaland, forming an offensive trident brimming with guile and fluidity.
It was a notable departure from Guardiola’s customary caution—a recalibration that afforded City the width and interplay they have sorely lacked. On previous occasions, most glaringly at Villa Park, City’s wingers had found themselves isolated, yearning for full-backs to support their endeavours.
Against Chelsea, however, Marmoush’s relentless running carved open avenues for City’s adventurous Croatian full-back, Gvardiol, who revelled in the newly afforded space.

𝐀 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐌𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞

One particular passage of play typified Marmoush’s keen spatial awareness. As Foden drifted inside, the Egyptian sensed the moment to dart forward, dragging Reece James away from his flank. His selfless movement paved the way for Gvardiol to charge forward unmarked, receiving a through ball with acres of room to exploit.
Even when City’s full-backs refrained from advancing, Marmoush remained undeterred, persistently seeking the chinks in Chelsea’s armour.
There was an unrelenting quality to his efforts, even when team-mates hesitated to play the riskier pass. One could observe Haaland himself gesturing in appreciation as Marmoush continued his relentless pursuit of the ball over the top. It was the hallmark of a forward unwilling to be discouraged—a player who understood that persistence, in time, breeds reward.

𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐚’𝐬 𝐃𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐦𝐚: 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐨𝐬?

Yet therein lies a quandary. Guardiola has long championed control as the bedrock of his philosophy, a doctrine that has propelled City to dizzying heights. However, the evidence is mounting that this iteration of his team thrives on the opposite—a degree of calculated chaos, an embrace of verticality, and a willingness to exploit space at pace.
The breathless opening against Everton, the electric second half against Club Brugge, and the new-found dynamism against Chelsea all point to a side that is perhaps at its most menacing when playing with a touch of abandon.
It remains to be seen whether Guardiola will yield to this emerging reality. He has spoken of his players needing time to comprehend Marmoush’s instincts, but perhaps the adjustment must come from the touchline as well. The Egyptian’s maiden march in Manchester was a signal of intent—whether his manager chooses to follow suit is now the question at hand.

31/01/2025

The grand old continent has known Barcelona as a club of majesty, a bastion of footballing artistry. Once more, they stand amongst the leading contenders for the greatest prize in European football—the Champions League. Yet, while Hansi Flick’s men dazzle the purists with their attacking verve, a fundamental weakness lurks in the shadows, threatening their ambitions.

This latest exhibition, a 2-2 draw against a well-drilled Atalanta side, captured in vivid clarity the enigma that is this young Barcelona team. Goals from the prodigious Lamine Yamal and the resolute Ronald Araújo propelled their tournament tally to 28—six more than any other side. And yet, for all their offensive éclat, the Catalans have been breached 13 times, a defensive frailty surpassed by no fewer than 20 teams in the competition.

Herein lies the crux of their predicament: the attacking triumvirate of Raphinha, Robert Lewandowski, and Yamal strike fear into opposition defences, but their own rearguard remains alarmingly susceptible. Against Atalanta, that deficiency was exposed with ruthless efficiency.

Atalanta, an exemplar of defensive discipline, executed their stratagem with characteristic resolve. Others—Bayern Munich among them—had attempted to shackle Barcelona’s creators with man-marking schemes, only to be undone by the nimble ingenuity of Pedri, Gavi, and their enterprising forwards. But Gian Piero Gasperini’s men were unmoved, resolute in their purpose.

Tactical Manoeuvres and Early Exchanges
Pedri and Gavi interchanged positions in a bid to unsettle Atalanta’s meticulous structure, yet found themselves constrained. The early moments of the contest illustrated Barcelona’s offensive conundrum. In the 11th minute, a Frenkie de Jong interception was pounced upon by Gavi, who swiftly supplied Yamal. The young winger, with characteristic audacity, cut inside and curled his effort narrowly wide.

Sensing a need to alter their approach, Barcelona’s attacking line began to withdraw deeper, drawing Atalanta’s defenders out of their compact shape. In the 27th minute, Yamal, displaying astute movement, lured Davide Zappacosta out of position, linking play with Jules Koundé, whose pass found Pedri and, in turn, Lewandowski. Atalanta’s centre-halves hesitated, uncertain whether to engage or hold their line. This momentary lapse allowed Lewandowski to tee up Yamal, though the youngster’s strike was comfortably gathered by Marco Carnesecchi.

The rhythm was set. Barcelona had deciphered the code to unlock their adversaries. Moments before the interval, Raphinha, dropping into a central pocket, unleashed a shot that demanded the best of Carnesecchi.

A Glorious Goal Amid Defensive Uncertainty
The second half began with Barcelona in full flow. In the 47th minute, their forward line combined in fluid synchrony. Lewandowski and Raphinha retreated, dislodging their markers. With a deft flick, Lewandowski released Raphinha, who, in turn, found Yamal in the six-yard box. A graceful shift of balance took him past Carnesecchi and Sead Kolašinac before he slotted home.

A second seemed inevitable. Raphinha, the architect once more, presented Lewandowski with a golden opportunity, only for the Pole’s usually clinical instincts to falter. Another Yamal effort was repelled by Carnesecchi, but Barcelona’s hold on the game was loosening.
Atalanta, unwavering in belief, struck back in the 67th minute. Ederson’s powerful drive restored parity, a moment symptomatic of the defensive vulnerability that has plagued Barcelona’s campaign.

The match ebbed and flowed with a breathless intensity. Araújo’s thumping header from a Raphinha corner restored Barcelona’s advantage, but Gasperini’s men remained undeterred. Seven minutes later, Mario Pašalić, ghosting into the box unmarked, levelled proceedings once more.

Barcelona’s Defensive Quandary
As exhilarating as their attacking play has been, Barcelona’s propensity for defensive lapses remains their Achilles’ heel. Their system demands a commitment of numbers in forward areas, leaving them prone to counter-attacks should possession be squandered. Against Atalanta, this flaw was repeatedly exploited.

A glaring instance occurred in the 11th minute, when a forward pass by Zappacosta was not properly dealt with, allowing the wing-back to storm into open space. Later, in the 35th minute, a mistimed adjustment by De Jong left a channel for Mateo Retegui to exploit, forcing an alert save from Wojciech Szczęsny. Time and again, Barcelona’s inclination to press aggressively left gaps that Atalanta duly punished.

Even with a lead, the Catalans failed to fortify their lines. As Charles De Ketelaere orchestrated Atalanta’s final attack, Barcelona’s defensive structure unravelled. Juan Cuadrado, an ever-wily presence, waited patiently before threading the decisive pass to De Roon. The Dutchman, reading the space ahead of him, delivered a curling cross that Pašalić converted with aplomb.

A Team Still in the Making
Barcelona’s Champions League odyssey, thus far, is a tale of exhilarating highs and exasperating frailties. Their attacking prowess is reminiscent of Luis Enrique’s treble-winning side of 2015, yet defensively they remain a work in progress. That great Barcelona outfit conceded just 11 goals en route to European glory; Flick’s men have already surpassed that tally.

For all their brilliance, this team is yet to master the fine margins that separate contenders from champions. The knockout rounds will not be as forgiving. Barcelona must heed the lessons of nights like these, lest their campaign be undone by their own shortcomings.
The road to Wembley is paved with peril, and for Barcelona, defensive diligence must become as much a hallmark as their famed attacking ingenuity.

29/01/2025

Manchester City’s triumph over Chelsea on Saturday evening bore the hallmarks of a side adept at finding solutions to its own deficiencies, yet it also raised compelling questions about the club’s evolving tactical blueprint. Having conceded within three minutes and fielded a struggling debutant in Abdukodir Khusanov, Enzo Maresca’s Chelsea ought to have pressed home their advantage. Instead, City, undeterred by their early deficit, wrested control of proceedings and emerged comfortable victors by a 3-1 margin.

𝗔 𝗣𝘂𝘇𝘇𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻

Of all the intrigues in City’s approach, none was more striking than the continued deployment of Joško Gvardiol in an advanced role. Given John Stones’ unavailability, it would have been entirely logical for Pep Guardiola to restore Gvardiol to the heart of defence, the position for which he was originally acquired. Indeed, when the Croatian was signed some 18 months prior, City’s Director of Football, Txiki Begiristain, had described him as the archetype of the modern centre-half.
Yet, Guardiola persisted with his preference for Gvardiol as an auxiliary attacker, rather than redeploying him at centre-back and entrusting Rico Lewis with duties at left-back. The rationale for this decision becomes evident upon closer examination of the Croatian’s influence in possession.

𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻

Gvardiol’s attacking contributions are no mere accident of circumstance. He leads the Premier League in both progressive carries and carries into the final third, a testament to his remarkable ability to drive forward from deep. Opta statistics further illustrate his importance in City’s build-up play—only Liverpool’s Virgil van Dijk has completed more passes, only Newcastle United’s Bruno Guimarães has registered more progressive passes, and only Mohamed Salah and Bernardo Silva have recorded more touches in the final third.
Beyond mere ball progression, Gvardiol’s goal threat has been significant. No defender has found the net more times in the Premier League this season. He proved City’s most potent attacking outlet once again on Saturday, even before notching the crucial equaliser.

𝗚𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗮’𝘀 𝗧𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗲-𝗕𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁

Gvardiol’s influence stems not merely from his technical prowess but from his positional intelligence. Unlike the traditional full-back tasked with defensive solidity and overlapping runs, the Croatian frequently operates behind a true winger, such as Jeremy Doku or Savinho. The objective is clear—while the wide man stretches play, Gvardiol exploits the vacant inside channel, a role once reserved for Guardiola’s famed ‘free eights’ in midfield.
A prime illustration of this came earlier in the campaign against Ipswich Town, where Doku’s width created space for Gvardiol to dart into the penalty area and square the ball for Erling Haaland—a move that very nearly resulted in a goal.
On other occasions, opponents have been so preoccupied with City’s wingers that they have entirely failed to track Gvardiol’s late runs. The away victory at Wolverhampton Wanderers provided an exemplary case study. With Doku drawing four defenders towards him in the box, Gvardiol ghosted into space, unleashing a 25-yard effort into the top corner—a strike few full-backs would dare attempt, let alone execute so impeccably.

𝗣𝗵𝘆𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗥𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴: 𝗔𝗻 𝗨𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝗼𝘅 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵

City’s reliance on Gvardiol’s directness is a telling shift in Guardiola’s methodology. Whereas his previous sides excelled through intricate midfield interplay, City’s current iteration derives much of its attacking impetus from Gvardiol’s powerful surges forward.
This was evident in a sequence against Aston Villa, where he received possession deep inside his own half, carried the ball the length of the pitch, played a simple lay-off to Jack Grealish, and then continued his run into the penalty area. The move deserved a finishing touch; that it did not culminate in a goal was down to poor ex*****on rather than faulty design.
City’s recent defeat to Manchester United further underscored Gvardiol’s attacking importance. Ruben Amorim, acutely aware of the Croatian’s influence, instructed Amad Diallo to effectively mark him, even when he played as a centre-back—an acknowledgement of where City’s greatest attacking threat now resides.

𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲𝗮’𝘀 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗚𝘃𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗼𝗹’𝘀 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗲𝘀𝘀

Against Chelsea, Gvardiol operated in a slightly altered role, positioned behind Omar Marmoush rather than a natural winger. The consequences were immediate. Reece James was drawn centrally to cover Marmoush’s inward runs, leaving Gvardiol with space on the outside. A moment early in the match illustrated Chelsea’s defensive confusion: Noni Madueke, inattentive to Gvardiol’s movement, allowed him to drift into an advanced position, nearly resulting in a goal.
Chelsea sought to remedy this by retreating Madueke deeper into a makeshift back five. However, this adjustment proved self-defeating. At times, Madueke was positioned too deep, playing Gvardiol onside when the rest of Chelsea’s defence had stepped up. It was precisely in such a moment that the equaliser was born—Mateo Kovačić’s chip found the Croatian in space, and though his initial effort was parried, he reacted quickest to convert from close range.

𝗔 𝗧𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗼𝘅 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗚𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗮

City’s growing reliance on Gvardiol as an attacking weapon presents something of a paradox. Once heralded as the benchmark for fluid attacking football, they now find themselves dependent on a converted centre-back for offensive breakthroughs. That in itself is an indictment of their current form.
Yet, none of this should diminish Gvardiol’s immense contributions. In truth, he would likely have performed more assuredly than Khusanov in central defence, but Guardiola’s gamble was ultimately vindicated. For the second time in a matter of weeks, it was Gvardiol’s forward surges that proved decisive.
In the grander scheme of Guardiola’s tactical evolution, City’s reliance on a centre-half to provide their most consistent attacking outlet is an unexpected, yet effective, reality. Whether this approach is sustainable against Europe’s elite remains to be seen, but for now, Gvardiol is flourishing in his unorthodox role, and City are reaping the rewards.

26/01/2025

In a match that will be long remembered for its dramatic twists of fortune, Arsenal snatched a most improbable victory from the jaws of misfortune at Molineux, transforming what appeared to be a calamitous moment into a testament of sporting resilience.

The pivotal incident emerged when young Myles Lewis-Skelly, an Arsenal full-back barely old enough to shave, committed what would become the most contentious tackle of the afternoon. As Matt Doherty swept past with the grace of a seasoned winger, Lewis-Skelly's intervention was swift—perhaps too swift—bringing down his opponent in a challenge that would ignite a firestorm of controversy.

Referee Michael Oliver, that most decisive of arbiters, produced a red card that sent shockwaves through the Arsenal contingent. The young Lewis-Skelly, wearing an expression of pure bewilderment, found himself cast as the villain of the piece—a tragic protagonist in a drama that would unfold with increasing intensity.

The decision defied conventional footballing wisdom. Pundits and players alike were united in their disbelief. The legendary Ian Wright thundered his disapproval, declaring the dismissal a mockery of the noble art of football—a sentiment that resonated from the terraces to the commentary boxes.

What followed was nothing short of a magnificent display of sporting defiance. With ten men, Arsenal refused to submit to the cruel winds of misfortune. Declan Rice, that indomitable spirit, drove his team forward with a determination that would have stirred the hearts of the most stoic supporter.

It was Riccardo Calafiori who would deliver the decisive blow—a half-volley of such sublime technique that it would have drawn applause from the most discerning of football aesthetes. His goal, struck with four minutes remaining, was more than mere athletic achievement; it was a robust riposte to the afternoon's injustices.

The scenes that followed were nothing short of Shakespearean. Manager Mikel Arteta, typically the model of continental composure, erupted in a celebration that spoke volumes of the emotional crucible through which his team had just passed. The Arsenal faithful, packed into the away section, erupted in a cacophony of joy that would have been heard echoing through the industrial landscape of Wolverhampton.

One cannot help but reflect on the curious narrative of fate. What seemed a potential catastrophe transformed into a moment of profound triumph—a victory that might well be remembered as the turning point of Arsenal's tumultuous campaign.

In the annals of footballing folklore, there are matches that transcend mere sporting contest. This was such an occasion—a testament to resilience, a celebration of sporting spirit, and a reminder that in football, as in life, true character is revealed not in moments of ease, but in times of profound adversity.

The sporting gods, it seems, have a delicious sense of dramatic irony.

FBT - Football Bizin Tactics

16/03/2025

05/02/2025

02/02/2025

02/02/2025

31/01/2025

29/01/2025

26/01/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share