04/10/2024
N magazine publisher, Dennis Spear, attended the CPAC meeting concerning the possible development of what is known as “The Upper Westside Project” at the South Natomas Community center. The meeting was held in the smallest public room at the center. This resulted in an overflow crowd into nearly a third of the extensive center lobby. It was very hard for those attending to hear within the room and impossible for those in the overflow crowd. The room, by law, was only allowed a maximum of 25 people, but over 70 were there interested in the presentation. It was not an easy meeting for the CPAC committee and Senior Planner, Emma Patten from the County Office of Environmental Review.
Kudos must be given to Afrika Shields from the county for her work in attempting to deal with the less-than-perfect sound (there was no sound system) and the overflow crowd. To be honest, the crowd should have been planned for. Afrika kept everyone moving along and oversaw the public comments. To be honest, most government presentations allow about 2 minutes each for public comments. Many comments this night extended beyond the limit. Shields gave some leeway but kept it within reason.
The substance of this CPAC (Community Planning Advisory Council) was to hear the county presentation on process and their report of the Upper Westside Project. Planner Emma Patten had her hands full but was able to make her presentation clear to most of those in the room. The Upper Westside Project concerns the development of an area of Natomas that is mostly west of El Centro Road, north of Interstate 80, and includes area south of San Juan Road near El Centro. It extends up to near Arena Boulevard. You can see maps of the area of concern at the county planning site, or the ECOS (Environmental Council of Sacramento) site. There is much more being proposed for our Natomas Region, so look beyond this project to what is going to happen north of this location.
N magazine would like all Natomas residents to visit the Websites at the end of this article, and really take a hard look at this future project. Regardless of anyone’s personal view, this will change the nature of the Natomas community forever in ways that are not always understood or anticipated. This project requires all of those living in Natomas to become educated to make intelligent and meaningful comments to CPAC.
The public comments started, and the views varied from “This is a needed development” to past planning and commitments along with Urban Services Boundaries are not being adhered to. One longtime resident said pointedly that “Stepping on a few endangered bugs and snakes or being concerned about birds doesn’t matter, the development should proceed.” (not an exact quote, but close enough). There were thoughtful comments supporting the project, based on trusting the plan as presented. However, former Mayor, Heather Fargo, pointed out that this project is ignoring many long-standing agreements and commitments. Representatives from ECOS were also concerned for long standing commitments and planning processes that help preserve the Natomas Basin. Not much could be communicated in two minutes. Many of the public comments rambled on before getting to their point, but by then their time was up.
Concerns ranged from the issue of needed housing to the fact that the project may destroy the very reason residents enjoy Natomas. It is N magazine’s understanding that the planned housing is aimed at those moving from the Bay Area (and other large metropolitan areas), not on affordable or needed housing by residents. That will have to be researched more. Traffic and air quality was at issue with many current community members. To be honest, even with the current development, traffic has become a real concern. In fact, pedestrians have died and that is of concern to Councilmember Lisa Kaplan. So much so, that she held a public meeting of that very issue. It included police, city engineers and traffic planners. That meeting was also an overflow crowd. Kaplan’s meeting with pictures is highlighted on the events page at the N magazine Website.
Many of the comments were in favor of the project. The public talked of life, schools and just more that the community needs. A representative of the 49er Truckstop, who supports the project sees it as an advancement and talked of their, soon to open, electric power charger station and commitment to air quality and future technology. The comments questioning the validity of the project, seemed based on quite a bit of knowledge concerning previous planning and commitments. Issues with the long-standing agreements on the Urban Services Boundary must be considered by CPAC. There were valid comments on the issue of infill rather than urban expansion. Those comments were few but were quite important and must be considered by the community.
It came to light that the city is only marginally involved but may have to provide services that include police and fire. One resident commented that in the past, it took 45 minutes for the police to arrive, even without this new project. The city and county must cooperate on the impact of the proposed project. This development could stretch police, fire and other service to a point that residents don’t want to see. The issue of access pointed to very few roads in and out of the area that will be an issue in case of fire or floods. The impact of traffic was of great concern to many attendees. The affect on Garden Highway residents was also pointed out by speakers.
As the meeting ended, it was clear that more work must be completed before this project is either approved for shelved. Many attendees were questioning how little public communications there was on the Upper Westside Project. CPAC must take a hard look at their method of timing and communication with the public. They also must know more about the community their decisions will affect. The meeting also showed that the public needed to be more informed and knowledgable on the actual proposal.
The following Websites will provide you with more data and views on this important proposed development that could change the nature of Natomas forever.
https://planning.saccounty.gov/PlansandProjectsIn-Progress/Pages/UpperWestsideSpecificPlan.aspx
www.ecosacramento.net
www.nmag.net