Raw & Unfiltered Political Podcast On Section 370 With Cabinet Minister | Must Watch | Mukesh Daksh. #fbshorts #fbreels #BJPLeader #viralreelsfb #politicsnews #rammandirinaugration #rammandir
Most Raw & Unfiltered Political Podcast
With Nitin Gadkari | Get Work Done
Attitude | TRS ft 203
Maldives India Conflict Explained | Narendra Modi | Lakshadweep |
Ayodhya Ram Mandir History | Ram Mandir
Inauguration | RJ Raunac |
EXPLAINED: Article 370 Revoked From
Kashmir | THIS IS HOW Modi Did It
In our latest YouTube video, we delve into the
complex dynamics surrounding the recent Supreme court order on 370
A screengrab of a five-judge Bench delivering the verdict on validity of abrogration of Article 370, in Supreme Court on December 11, 2023.
A screengrab of a five-judge Bench delivering the verdict on validity of abrogration of Article 370, in Supreme Court on December 11, 2023.
A Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud on Monday unanimously upheld the Central government’s 2019 decision to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution which conferred special status on the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K).
Pointing out that Article 370 is a ‘temporary provision’, the Bench said that it was enacted due to wartime conditions in the State and was meant to serve a transitional purpose.
The Bench pronounced three verdicts – one by CJI DY Chandrachud for himself and Justices Gavai and Surya Kant. Whereas, Justices SK Kaul and Sanjiv Khanna have authored two separate concurring judgments.
The court held that J&K did not retain any internal sovereignty after its integration and that the concurrence of the State Government was not required to apply the Indian Constitution to the State.
In light of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s submission that the government plans to restore J&K’s statehood as soon as possible, the court did not adjudicate upon the validity of the reorganisation of the State into the Union T
Raw & Unfiltered Political Podcast On Section 370 With Cabinet Minister | Must Watch | Mukesh Daksh
EXPLAINED: Article 370 Revoked From
Kashmir | THIS IS HOW Modi Did It
In our latest YouTube video, we delve into the
complex dynamics surrounding the recent Supreme court order on 370
A screengrab of a five-judge Bench delivering the verdict on validity of abrogration of Article 370, in Supreme Court on December 11, 2023.
A screengrab of a five-judge Bench delivering the verdict on validity of abrogration of Article 370, in Supreme Court on December 11, 2023.
A Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud on Monday unanimously upheld the Central government’s 2019 decision to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution which conferred special status on the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K).
Pointing out that Article 370 is a ‘temporary provision’, the Bench said that it was enacted due to wartime conditions in the State and was meant to serve a transitional purpose.
The Bench pronounced three verdicts – one by CJI DY Chandrachud for himself and Justices Gavai and Surya Kant. Whereas, Justices SK Kaul and Sanjiv Khanna have authored two separate concurring judgments.
The court held that J&K did not retain any internal sovereignty after its integration and that the concurrence of the State Government was not required to apply the Indian Constitution to the State.
In light of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s submission that the government plans to restore J&K’s statehood as soon as possible, the court did not adjudicate upon the validity of the reorganisation of the State into the Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh . However, it upheld the carving out of Ladakh as a Union Territory.
The court also directed the Election Commission of India to take steps to conduct elections to the J&K Legislative Assembly by September 30, 2024.
What is the debate around Article 370?
Justice S.K. Kaul in his concurring judg
