06/04/2023
At the time of the TPO the father filed for a divorce in Dekalb County Superior Court.In the days after the TPO hearing the Father filed an emergency petition for custody of the minor child. Attached in the filing, perhaps mistakenly by a paralegal, were emails between the GAL Alice Limehouse, and between the Father's legal team having ex parte communications to place this case to a Judge. The statements and communications show that the claim was that incoming cases could not be heard until a new Judge, not even sworn on to the bench yet by the governer, came on the bench. The statement is that the filing would be with held from assignment from a judge until Shondeena Morris could take the bench. Review of cases assigned to Shondeena Morris that were filed before she took the bench reveal that this is not true that cases were "waiting". Only two other cases to Judge Sondeena Morris and they both were divorces by publication and had not been withheld from assignment to a Judge as the Father's counsel claimed. This meant that Terrell v. Terrell was the first case before Judge Shondeena Morris came by way of Judge shopping. Curious, I reviewed all of the attorneys over a two year period who were assigned to Judge Shondeena Morris. Cases in Dekalb County are assigned at random to 5-7 judges on the circuit. Court rules also dictate that there can be no communications with clerks regarding assignment to a Judge until a judge is assigned a case. I mathematically formulated that of the same attorney's to Judge Morris's court over two years spread out over other cases they had to other Judges it was an average of 23 percent of an attorney to be have cases assigned to the same Judge. The were only two deviations, one was 27 percent. In that same two year period there was only one other deviation from the average of 23 percent- The attorney for the Father, Charla Strawser had 80 percent of her cases in Dekalb County assigned to Judge Shondeena Morris. The email from the GAL attached in the filings instructing the Father to take the child from the daycare and keep the child from his Mother. The Mother had not been served in her divorce and the GAL was without assignment by court order to the case in keeping with Superior Court Rules and as such could not operate under Judical Immunity or even if she had been assigned had no authority to with hold the child without a court order. On to the next part....