29/09/2023
Interesting stuff about AI generated images.
Iâll probably talk about Ai images and programs until theyâre properly regulated most likely.
For anyone who isnât familiar, AI programs have been a source of contention for artists for quite some time now. And, unlike some would have you think, itâs not because our egos are too big. Itâs because theyâre stealing the existing work of artists without permission, credit, or compensation. AI programs allow the user to type in various word prompts and will come up with an image based on those prompts. Which sounds kind of fun - especially if youâre not an artist but want to see what cool things you can mash together. However, when the Ai programs are stealing the existing works of artist to âlearnâ from, thatâs a problem.
The second layer to this issue is that not only are the Ai programs doing this, the prompters are then taking credit for these new images. Theyâre going as far as to call themselves Ai artists. Now, I do a lot of digital art. I take my Apple Pencil and create works using Procreate which is a digital drawing program. It still requires me to come up with my own original ideas, my own creative works, and execute it with my own hands using the skills Iâve accumulated over the last couple of decades. It makes some things easier than traditional works - I LOVE the undo button! - but digital art is just another tool with its own skillset, much like learning to paint with watercolor or draw with pencils. Ai programs do not require skill nor any level of real creativity. Anyone can be the ideas guyâŚ.but the ex*****on is where it becomes a work of art. If you have no part in the ex*****on other than the pressing of a âcreateâ buttonâŚ.then you have no part in calling yourself an artist.
The third layer to this problem is that these Ai prompters are capable of generating these images at record speeds. Hundreds of them in a matter of days. Theyâre now flooding markets where traditional artists once were with soulless stolen images. Theyâre stealing jobs that belong to skilled creators and theyâre doing it with terrible images because the Ai is incapable of recognizing itâs own flaws or recreating anything with any real consistency. There is also an idea currently being presented by a few of the Ai prompters that theyâre not stealing these works because theyâre able to enter images and use those images as a âdatasetâ to train the Ai programs to create images âin their styleââŚ..except the dataset images theyâre using are previously generated worksâŚ.they never belonged to them in the first place and were made using the existing work of actual artistsâŚ.. sometimes it even includes remnants of the original artists signature or watermark.
The thing is, the people making these images are so unskilled where the creation of actual art is concerned that a grand majority of them donât even have the skill to properly âfixâ the flaws the Ai has presented in a given image with digital editing or drawing programs. Nor do they possess the skills to recreate, by hand (either digitally in a digital drawing program or with traditional mediums), these images theyâre presenting as their own. They behave as though theyâve made something amazingâŚwhen they donât actually possess the real skills to do so.
I went and found the first image that came up when I searched AI art on Pinterest. Now, my algorithms are likely different than yours so this mermaid-esque looking creature may not be the first one on yours but itâs not hard to find if you want to check it out - I will say, though, that the source that clicking this image brings you to has a lot of not-safe-for-work stuff and is a P8tre on account. I donât personally recommend it but fill your boots if you feel itâs necessary. Iâm also not posting a credit because a machine made this and stole it from skilled artists.
Iâve picked out a few things in this image that are definite giveaways that itâs an ai generated image. I am not the best artist in the world but with 20 years under my belt Iâve learned a thing or two and, while Iâm still always learning, my eye is trained well enough to âspot the differenceâ in most cases. Some of the âtellsâ Iâve picked out are fairly consistent flaws among Ai generated images though. And thatâs not to say that traditional artists donât sometimes use âhintsâ of things or a ârepresentationâ of something in their work instead of all the detailâŚ.but in Ai generated images thereâs always something about it that doesnât quite make sense. For example, at first glance, the blobs in the background give the idea of fish. But at that range you should be able to see some detail still instead of just blue blobs. Youâll also likely notice parts that blend into something else in a most unnatural wayâŚ.like a fish fin would never become hair unless it was done intentionally and repeatedly. It would have a purpose instead of trying to oddly blend in without a reason. Youâll also notice things like hair or other âwispy bitsâ that show up either without purpose or with no natural beginning or end. Hair grows from the top of the head and goes down. Even when itâs underwater, it still starts from the headâŚ..
The eyes in a lot of Ai generated images are alsoâŚ.creepy. Theyâre creepy. Thereâs no way around it. Ai seems to have a really hard time with circles and symmetry so one eye usually looks way off from the other and the iris usually juts off unnaturally in at least one of the eyes. The creepy part is in how soulless the Ai has made them seemâŚitâs really odd.
With buildings and backgrounds the perception or line of sight is usually off or the placement of things like windows and doors isâŚ.odd.
Images with âwordsâ usually include letters but donât actually create words that make any sense.
Images that include jewelry are also a big tell. At first glance it looks nice but upon further inspection you realize that things that should be symmetrical or more centered just arenâtâŚ.and metal suddenly âwispsâ around the edges sometimesâŚ.itâs just not right but you;d have to really be looking at it.
It is the Uncanny Valley of the art world. These images are a representations of what a robot thinks art looks like based on existing works created by real artists.
One of the arguments that pops up is that creating images this way isnât any different than artists creating pieces based on references or things theyâve studied or have seen. The biggest difference here is that the programs arenât observing, internalizing, processing through a filter of emotions, experiences, and ideas, and creating an entirely new piece that adds something new to the world from a variety of perspectives. It is relying SOLELY on existing works made by traditional artists and if those images didnât exist, the Ai would have nothing to steal from.
Itâs a huge slap in the face to have idolized artists all of these years but instead of compensating them appropriately for things these Ai prompters were incapable of doing or unwilling to learn, they found an easy way to exploit our work and took the credit themselves.
This is why I will not entertain Ai prompters or support any business that chooses to use these images and this is not a stance I will ever budge on.