Ilkeston Today

27/10/2023

Is Erewash Borough Council's Climate Emergency Declaration Backed by Action?

Erewash Borough Council, like many local authorities, has declared a climate emergency, signifying their commitment to environmental concerns. However, recent decisions by the council have raised questions about whether their actions align with this declaration.

Words vs. Actions

Declaring a climate emergency is a crucial step, but its true test lies in the practical measures taken. Erewash Borough Council's recent decisions, like charging residents for green waste collection and closing recycling centres, appear contradictory to their environmental commitment.

Environmental Impact

Charging for green waste collection can discourage recycling and lead to more waste in landfills, increasing greenhouse gas emissions. Closing recycling centres may force residents to travel longer distances, generating more carbon emissions, offsetting any recycling benefits.

Demand for Accountability

Residents should seek transparency and accountability. If the council genuinely wishes to address the climate emergency, they should reconsider these actions and explore more sustainable solutions.

In a world where environmental sustainability is paramount, actions speak louder than words. Erewash Borough Council must be held responsible for shaping a greener, more sustainable Erewash.

25/09/2023

Erewash Borough Council's Recycling Centre Closure Sparks Fly-Tipping Fears

Erewash Borough Council, now under Labour control, has made a startling announcement: the closure of a key recycling centre. This decision has sent shockwaves through the community, with concerns rising that fly-tipping is poised to surge in the area.

The recycling centre, once a symbol of sustainability and community involvement, is set to close this month, leaving residents with limited options for responsible waste disposal. This move could result in an environmental crisis, as the closure of this essential facility may encourage fly-tipping.

Fly-tipping, the illegal dumping of waste, harms communities and the environment. The closure of Erewash's recycling centre may worsen this issue, leading to illegal dumping and further environmental damage.

Erewash Borough Council's decision appears shortsighted. While they cite budget constraints, they fail to acknowledge the long-term costs of this choice. The council overlooks the link between accessible recycling centres and reduced fly-tipping incidents. This decision goes against the fight against climate change and environmental sustainability.

In a time when climate change is a pressing concern, Erewash Borough Council's move sends the wrong message. Instead of promoting recycling and waste reduction, they inadvertently endorse illegal dumping and pollution.

The consequences of fly-tipping are significant, harming wildlife, habitats, and the efforts of those committed to environmental preservation. The recycling centre’s closure undermines community efforts to encourage responsible waste disposal.

Erewash Borough Council must reconsider this decision, invest in the community's future and environment, and expand and enhance recycling centres. Instead of closing centres, they should promote recycling and discourage fly-tipping.

Inaction will worsen the fly-tipping crisis and taint the council's legacy. It's time for the council to act responsibly, prioritise the environment, and reverse this decision before it's too late. Our environment and future generations depend on it.

22/09/2023

The Future of Ilkeston Town Centre: Erewash Borough Council's Plan Amidst Wilko's Closure and Parking Charge Increases

Wilko's departure from our town centre is undeniably a significant blow. It leaves a noticeable void in the retail landscape, affecting both the convenience of local shopping and the overall vibrancy of our community hub. However, it also underscores the broader challenges facing brick-and-mortar retailers in the digital age.

Without Wilko, we may see:

• Reduced Foot Traffic: Wilko attracted a steady stream of customers, benefiting neighboring businesses. Its absence could lead to decreased footfall in the town centre.

• Job Losses: The closure of a large retailer often results in job losses, impacting local employment opportunities.

• Empty Storefronts: An empty retail space can deter other businesses from setting up shop in the area, creating a domino effect of vacancies.

Erewash Borough Council's approach to the future of our town centre has raised concerns among residents, as it appears to be lacking a comprehensive plan. The closure of significant businesses like Wilko has left a void in our community, and many are looking to the council for guidance on how to revitalise the heart of our town. However, there has been limited communication from the council regarding a concrete strategy for attracting new businesses, improving infrastructure, or fostering a vibrant atmosphere in the town centre. This lack of a clear vision has left residents uncertain about the future and eager for more proactive and transparent leadership from their local government.

Furthermore, amidst the uncertainty surrounding the future of our town centre, rumours have been circulating that the council is contemplating further increases in car parking charges. This potential move has added to the apprehension within the community. While it's understandable that the council may need additional revenue to support town centre improvements, many residents are worried that such increases could deter visitors, exacerbating the challenges faced by local businesses and making it even harder to breathe new life into our town centre. The lack of clarity and transparency regarding these rumoured changes only deepens the concerns of residents, who are seeking a clear and constructive plan that takes into account the needs and aspirations of the local community.

15/09/2023

Erewash Borough Council's Bin Tax: A Shocking Burden on Residents

Erewash Borough Council's recent introduction of a bin tax has sent shockwaves through the community, leaving many residents baffled and frustrated. This new tax, essentially a 30% council tax hike for Band A payers, is a glaring example of financial mismanagement and a disregard for the well-being of the very people the council is meant to serve.

The rationale behind this controversial move? To fund a so-called "cost of living action plan." However, a closer examination of this plan reveals a disconcerting trend. Instead of addressing the genuine concerns of Erewash residents grappling with the soaring cost of living, it seems that the council's primary agenda is to create more bureaucratic jobs at the town hall.

The fundamental question remains: Why should hardworking taxpayers shoulder the burden of a scheme that appears to serve the interests of the council rather than the local community? The imposition of a bin tax, which was previously considered a basic service, raises serious doubts about the council's priorities and its commitment to responsible governance.

Local authorities must demonstrate fiscal responsibility and prioritise the welfare of their residents over their own interests. Erewash Borough Council's decision to burden its taxpayers with exorbitant bin tax charges while seemingly using the proceeds to expand bureaucracy, rather than providing tangible relief to residents, is a troubling example of public servants losing sight of their true purpose.

In these challenging times, residents deserve transparent, accountable, and responsible leadership that genuinely addresses their concerns. Erewash Borough Council's actions have fallen far short of this standard, and it is high time they reconsider their approach and put the needs of their community first.

Welcome to Erewash Borough Council

11/09/2023

Despite strong objections from the community, the Labour-controlled Erewash Borough Council's insistence on proceeding with the sale of 1.43 acres of land off Wardlow Road (DE7 8TE) is concerning. This decision disregards the valid concerns of residents and raises doubts about the council's commitment to democratic principles and community well-being. The council should reevaluate this decision and engage in meaningful dialogue with the community to ensure responsible and accountable governance.

11/09/2023

Erewash Borough Council's Dubious Choices: Brown Bin Charges and the Cost of Living Action Plan

Erewash Borough Council's recent decision to charge residents for emptying their brown bins has stirred up controversy and cast doubts on the council's priorities. While they argue that these charges will finance a "Cost of Living Action Plan," one cannot help but question how long it will be before Erewash finds itself in a situation akin to that of Birmingham.

At first glance, the concept of a Cost of Living Action Plan may seem commendable and beneficial for the community. After all, the rising cost of living is a legitimate concern for many people. Nevertheless, it is imperative to scrutinize the means by which this plan is being funded and whether it aligns with the council's responsibilities.

Charging residents for the disposal of garden waste and food scraps through their brown bins is an ill-conceived approach to generating revenue. These bins serve an essential environmental purpose, encouraging recycling and reducing landfill waste. By imposing fees on their use, the council appears to be penalizing residents for their efforts to adopt eco-friendly practices.

Moreover, it raises questions about the council's fiscal management. If the council is grappling with financial constraints, it should explore alternative revenue sources or allocate its existing resources more judiciously. The introduction of charges for brown bin collections seems to be a hasty solution that targets residents who are already striving to minimize their environmental footprint.

The comparisons with Birmingham are not unfounded in this context. Birmingham City Council faced severe financial difficulties in recent years, resulting in cuts to essential services and a deterioration of overall city infrastructure. The imposition of exorbitant charges and the mismanagement of funds were contributing factors to this dire situation. Erewash Borough Council must heed these lessons rather than replicate them.

The decision to allocate the revenue generated from brown bin charges to the Cost of Living Action Plan may be viewed as a tactical move. However, it is imperative to ensure transparency and accountability in how these funds are expended. Residents have a right to know how their money is being employed to address the cost of living concerns within the community.

25/08/2023

Erewash Borough Council's Moves to Charge for Brown Bins and Remove Recycling Banks: A Short-Sighted Approach

The recent decisions by the council to institute charges for brown bins and eliminate household waste recycling bring banks have ignited widespread concern and criticism. These choices not only exhibit a lack of forward-thinking but also hold the potential to disproportionately impact the most financially vulnerable members of our community, all while posing a threat to our environment.

The council's choice to impose fees for brown bin collection is a move that seems to disproportionately affect individuals already grappling with economic challenges. This decision places an undue financial burden on low-income households, which can result in difficult choices between essential needs and waste disposal. This practice is inherently unfair and disregards the principle of social equality that our community should strive to uphold.

Equally worrying is the council's proposal to remove the household waste recycling bring banks. These recycling points serve as important incentives for responsible waste management and recycling practices. The removal of these banks deprives residents of a convenient and accessible means to appropriately dispose of recyclable items. This alteration could potentially lead to an increase in instances of improper waste disposal, harming both the environment and our ongoing sustainability objectives.

Beyond the immediate implications for residents, these decisions hold grave environmental consequences. The implementation of charges for brown bins might discourage proper disposal of garden and organic waste, potentially resulting in increased instances of burning or incorrect disposal methods. These practices release detrimental pollutants into the atmosphere and soil, posing a serious risk to the environment. Additionally, the removal of recycling banks could result in more recyclable materials finding their way into landfills, directly undermining our efforts to reduce waste and promote ecologically responsible practices.

It is imperative for the council to reconsider these decisions promptly. The introduction of charges for essential waste disposal services and the elimination of recycling options disproportionately target the most economically fragile within our community, while also holding the potential to cause lasting harm to our environment. Instead of perpetuating social and environmental inequalities, the council should explore alternative avenues that place paramount importance on equitable access to vital services and the cultivation of sustainable waste management practices. This would undoubtedly benefit all members of our community and help safeguard the wellbeing of our shared environment.

18/08/2023

Ilkeston Council's Inaction Fuels Alarming Rise in Anti-Social Behavior: A Demand for Immediate Remedies

The once serene streets of Ilkeston have fallen victim to an unsettling upsurge in anti-social behavior, casting a somber shadow over the town's once-tranquil ambiance. As the community grapples with distressing incidents of drug dealing, disorderly drinking, and even public urination, the local council's response to these issues leaves much to be desired. The recent closure of a flat that had become a haven for criminal activities, coupled with the alarming incidents of attacks on Trentbarton buses, underscores the pressing need for the council to take assertive action in curbing anti-social behavior, safeguarding the welfare of its residents, and restoring the town's peace and security.

The once-vibrant market square, which used to be the heartbeat of community interaction, now bears the brunt of frequent incidents of anti-social behavior. The council must do more to maintain a semblance of order in this pivotal public space is indicative of its failure to ensure a safe environment for both residents and visitors. The atmosphere of unease that hangs over the market square not only taints the town's reputation but also creates an inhospitable climate that hampers economic activities and communal engagement.

The incidents involving attacks on Trentbarton buses in Ilkeston and Kirk Hallam are equally distressing. These incidents reflect a deterioration of civility and respect within the community. The council's lack of proactive intervention to prevent such attacks raises concerns about its dedication to preserving public safety and nurturing a harmonious coexistence. These occurrences should serve as a stark reminder that if left unchecked, anti-social behavior can escalate into more serious criminal activity, jeopardizing the overall welfare of the community.

The council is now faced with the imperative task of taking swift, comprehensive action to address the mounting tide of anti-social behavior in Ilkeston. This necessitates heightened police presence, increased community engagement initiatives.

Furthermore, active community involvement is of utmost importance. Empowering residents, business proprietors, and other stakeholders to voice their concerns and contribute to crafting solutions is crucial. By cultivating a sense of shared responsibility, the council can foster a unified stance against anti-social behavior and work diligently to restore Ilkeston's reputation as a peaceful, flourishing community.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-66401531

18/08/2023

Erewash Borough Council's Inaction Fuels Alarming Rise in Anti-Social Behavior: A Demand for Immediate Remedies

The once serene streets of Ilkeston have fallen victim to an unsettling upsurge in anti-social behavior, casting a somber shadow over the town's once-tranquil ambiance. As the community grapples with distressing incidents of drug dealing, disorderly drinking, and even public urination, the local council's response to these issues leaves much to be desired. The recent closure of a flat that had become a haven for criminal activities, coupled with the alarming incidents of attacks on Trentbarton buses, underscores the pressing need for the council to take assertive action in curbing anti-social behavior, safeguarding the welfare of its residents, and restoring the town's peace and security.

The once-vibrant market square, which used to be the heartbeat of community interaction, now bears the brunt of frequent incidents of anti-social behavior. The council must do more to maintain a semblance of order in this pivotal public space is indicative of its failure to ensure a safe environment for both residents and visitors. The atmosphere of unease that hangs over the market square not only taints the town's reputation but also creates an inhospitable climate that hampers economic activities and communal engagement.

The incidents involving attacks on Trentbarton buses in Ilkeston and Kirk Hallam are equally distressing. These incidents reflect a deterioration of civility and respect within the community. The council's lack of proactive intervention to prevent such attacks raises concerns about its dedication to preserving public safety and nurturing a harmonious coexistence. These occurrences should serve as a stark reminder that if left unchecked, anti-social behavior can escalate into more serious criminal activity, jeopardizing the overall welfare of the community.

The council is now faced with the imperative task of taking swift, comprehensive action to address the mounting tide of anti-social behavior in Ilkeston. This necessitates heightened police presence, increased community engagement initiatives.

Furthermore, active community involvement is of utmost importance. Empowering residents, business proprietors, and other stakeholders to voice their concerns and contribute to crafting solutions is crucial. By cultivating a sense of shared responsibility, the council can foster a unified stance against anti-social behavior and work diligently to restore Ilkeston's reputation as a peaceful, flourishing community.

Officers secure a closure order for the property after neighbours say they were "living in fear".

29/07/2023

Controversial Planning Application for 263-Home Development at Spondon woods in Erewash to be submitted within weeks.

A highly contentious planning application to be submitted within weeks for a 263-home development on Erewash's greenbelt land, igniting debates about sacrificing precious natural spaces for urban expansion. With the application due in weeks, proponents argue it will urgently address housing needs, while critics express concerns about environmental impact and loss of biodiversity. The promise of only 10% affordable housing onsite has been met with disappointment, as the council seeks funding for an additional 20% elsewhere. As tensions rise, community engagement remains crucial in shaping a development that balances housing demands with preserving Erewash's unique identity and green spaces.

25/07/2023

Erewash Partnership Ilkeston Classic Car Show: A Roaring Success!

The Erewash Partnership Ilkeston Classic Car Show was a dazzling celebration of automotive history. Classic car enthusiasts from all over flocked to witness the meticulously restored vintage beauties on display. The event brought the community together for a day of fun and philanthropy, raising funds for local projects. It was a memorable day of nostalgia and camaraderie that left attendees in awe.

24/07/2023

Following Keir Starmer vows to back 'builders not blockers' Labour-Controlled Erewash Borough Council's have made a Greenbelt Gamble: Leaving Our Greenbelt Without Any Protection from Speculative Development.

In a shocking display of short-sightedness and irresponsibility, the Labour-controlled Erewash Borough Council has made a disastrous decision that puts the cherished greenbelt areas at risk. Withdrawing the local plan, the very blueprint designed to protect our beautiful green spaces from developers, has set a dangerous precedent that could spell doom for our community's future.

Without the local plan, our greenbelt areas are left vulnerable to speculative development. These are no longer protected havens for wildlife, nature enthusiasts, and families seeking a breath of fresh air amidst the urban landscape. Instead, they will become unprotected with no regard for the ecological and aesthetic value these green spaces bring to our region.

One of the first victims of this reckless gamble is likely to be the 196-house plans proposed between Stanton, Ilkeston, and Kirk Hallam. With no local plan to support their case, the council's appeal is hanging by a thread, leaving us on the brink of losing a battle that should have been easily won. Not only has the council failed to safeguard our greenbelt, but their incompetence could also cost taxpayers a staggering £100,000 in legal costs - money that could have been better spent on essential community projects.

One must question the reasoning behind such a decision. Was it due to a lack of foresight or a blatant disregard for the wishes of the residents they were elected to represent? Whatever the case, the consequences are clear: our greenbelt is now exposed to a potential onslaught of uncontrolled development, forever altering the character of our beloved borough.

It is evident that the Labour-controlled Erewash Borough Council is more interested in playing political games than in ensuring the well-being of its constituents. This withdrawal of the local plan showcases their failure to prioritise the protection of the environment and the interests of the local community.

While some may argue that development is essential for progress, it should not come at the expense of destroying our natural heritage. Sustainable development can coexist with responsible environmental practices, but without a well-thought-out local plan, we are left with a free-for-all where developers can run rampant, putting profit before people.

The Council must be held accountable for this grievous mistake. Residents need to demand transparency and answers about the reasoning behind this fateful decision. Let us remind our elected officials that they are here to serve us and our interests, not to sacrifice our greenbelt for political convenience.

21/07/2023

Erewash Borough Council New Administration Claims to Be Broke, but Sits on a Hidden Fortune

A Surprising Revelation: £1.2m Underspend and £4.5m Reserves Discovered

In a shocking turn of events, the recently inaugurated administration, which has been harping on about its lack of funds, has been caught red-handed with a hefty surplus and an overflowing piggy bank. It seems the new regime's "broke" status was nothing more than a smokescreen to gain public sympathy. The truth has finally emerged: they have a surplus of £1.2 million, which accounts for a staggering 10% of their budget. Not only that, but they also possess an astronomical £4.5 million in reserves, a whopping 40% of their budget!

With such a significant surplus and an enviable reserve, one might wonder why the new administration has been painting a picture of financial doom and gloom. Are they attempting to elicit sympathy from the public to justify unpopular decisions or impose austerity measures? It's a disheartening revelation for citizens who believed they were being handed a sinking ship. Instead, it seems they have been handed the keys to a hidden treasure chest.

What makes this revelation even more outrageous is that the new administration's reserves are far beyond the minimum required. Reserves are typically established to serve as a safety net during challenging times or emergencies. However, with reserves amounting to a whopping 40% of their budget.

One can't help but question the motives behind this financial charade. Was it an attempt to instill a sense of urgency and push for unpopular measures, all while hiding a handsome surplus and substantial reserves? It's a grave disservice to the public who elected this administration, expecting transparency and fiscal responsibility.

As taxpayers, it's essential for us to hold our elected officials accountable for their actions. We must demand clarity and explanations from the administration regarding their true financial standing. Why have they chosen to withhold this critical information? What are their plans for utilising this surplus and reserves?

It's time for the new administration to come clean and provide a plausible explanation for their misrepresentation. Erewash residents deserve the truth and transparency they were promised. If we allow such deceptive practices to continue unchecked, it sets a dangerous precedent for the governance of our city/nation.

The surplus and reserves that have come to light shed a revealing light on the true financial status of the new administration. It's high time they face the music and answer for their misleading claims. The public deserves better than a smoke and mirrors act when it comes to their hard-earned money.

19/07/2023

Erewash Borough Council's Fire Sales: Sacrificing Land, Squandering Potential

Subtitle: The Questionable Fate of £3.258 Million - Will It Truly Benefit Our Town?

Erewash Borough Council has made a controversial decision to embark on a series of fire sales, targeting valuable lands within our community. Among the areas marked for sale are the land adjacent to Bramcote Crematorium, Wardlow Road in Ilkeston, East of 2B Kenilworth Drive, and 20 Ladywood Road in Kirk Hallam, as well as Harrington Avenue in Borrowash. Promising a windfall of £3.258 million, we must ask ourselves: will residents see any real benefits from this move?

The estimated revenue of £1.258 million from the sale of land adjacent to Bramcote Crematorium may sound enticing. The other proposed sale locations, including Wardlow Road, Ilkeston, East of 2B Kenilworth Drive, 20 Ladywood Road, Kirk Hallam, and Harrington Avenue, Borrowash, are touted to raise an additional £2 million. Yet, we must question the logic of sacrificing these valuable assets without a clear plan for how this money will be wisely used. There is a significant risk that these funds will be mismanaged, wasted on pet projects or unproductive endeavours, leaving our town no better off than before.

Instead of embarking on this reckless fire sale frenzy, Erewash Borough Council should focus on genuine strategies for improving our town. Allocating resources towards critical areas that would yield far-reaching benefits for our community. Unfortunately, it seems that the council is more interested in short-term gains and appeasing their own financial pressures than in creating a sustainable and thriving future for our residents.

Transparency and accountability are crucial during these proceedings, yet the council's intentions remain shrouded in secrecy. It is imperative that residents demand transparency and actively participate in decisions regarding the allocation of these funds. Without meaningful involvement from the community, there is a high likelihood that the money will be squandered on ill-conceived projects that offer little value to those who call this town their home.

As these land sales unfold, we, as concerned residents, must hold Erewash Borough Council accountable for their actions. We cannot stand idly by as valuable assets are sold off and the potential for meaningful improvements dissipates into thin air. Our town deserves better than short-sighted financial maneuvers that offer little hope for long-term growth and prosperity.

Let us unite and challenge this ill-advised course of action. Together, we can demand a comprehensive plan that ensures the proceeds from these sales are directed towards initiatives that genuinely enhance our town's well-being. It's time to put an end to this wasteful charade and demand a brighter future for our community—one that is built on sustainable development and prudent use of resources.

17/07/2023

https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/local-news/train-company-says-theyve-been-8587484

Is it correct and pronounced il-kes-ton

or ilks-tonne and we have all been wrong

Northern say they've been saying it wrong, but we're not sure they've made things much better

14/07/2023

More plans have been submitted for a 64-home development at the former Cossall Colliery spoil heap, between the village of Cossall and Ilkeston

More plans have been submitted for a 64-home development at the former Cossall Colliery spoil heap, between the village of Cossall and Ilkeston

12/07/2023

Conservative Councillors Question the Decision to Scrap the Planning Bus: A Step Backward for Accountability

In a recent full council meeting, Conservative Councillors expressed their reservations about the decision made by the new Labour administration to cancel the planning bus. This move has prompted concerns over the potential lack of scrutiny in planning decisions, as councillors on the planning committee will no longer have the opportunity to visit sites and assess the impact of developments on the local environment and surrounding areas.

Councillor Bethan Eddy, representing the Conservative group, voiced these concerns by questioning the Labour member responsible for the decision. She highlighted the importance of on-site visits in ensuring that planning decisions receive the necessary scrutiny and attention they deserve. In response, the lead member justified the cancellation, citing the unavailability of committee members during the day and suggesting that Google Maps could serve as a suitable alternative.

Councillor Eddy expressed her disappointment with the decision, characterising it as a backward step. She argued that certain aspects of the planning process cannot be fully understood through a computer screen alone and emphasised the value of physically visiting sites. While acknowledging the challenges of scheduling, she suggested that the bus service could have been rearranged to accommodate the planning committee members, thus ensuring continuity and comprehensive examination of applications.

Councillor Wayne Major emphasised the significance of residents' trust in the planning system. He expressed concern that this decision could result in applications being approved or refused without the thorough evaluation they require. The removal of the planning bus potentially undermines the robustness of decision-making by allowing insufficient time for councillors to fully engage with the process.

The decision to scrap the planning bus, as criticised by Conservative Councillors, has raised valid concerns about the scrutiny and accountability of planning decisions. The use of Google Maps as an alternative is seen as inadequate, failing to provide the same level of understanding that on-site visits offer. It is particularly disappointing that the bus was cancelled simply because some councillors were unwilling to commit the necessary time to the process. By addressing scheduling conflicts and finding a suitable alternative, it is crucial to ensure that planning decisions receive the thorough examination they require to maintain public trust in the planning system.