08/24/2021
Bar disciplinary proceedings have rules for the safety and rights of the accused attorney much like safety rules at an amusement park. There are also other rules that govern the proceedings themselves. One of these rules is Bar Disciplinary Rule 4-212(a), a copy of which is in the link below, which states that upon service (of waiver of) of a bar complaint filed against you by the State Bar Office of General Counsel ("OGC"), if a response or answer is not filed within thirty (30) days after service, the allegation(s) by the Bar are deemed admitted and the respondent attorney is considered to be default (which of course under the Civil Practice Act, which applies to bar cases, a default can be opened by demonstrating excusable neglect). However, I never failed to file timely answers to the bar complaints against me and thus the allegations in the bar's complaints against me are NOT deemed admitted and I am not in default.
State Bar Disciplinary Rule 4-212(a):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rQrQUzDg_4OmFurxSLxtj8kYW4-M6Pdg/view?usp=sharing
Yet despite the clear wording of Bar Disciplinary Rule 4-212(a), William Jacob Cobb, the bar counsel who prosecuted the bar cases against me fraudulently stated in his objection to discovery (that I served on him) which he signed and filed on September 19, 2017 with the Bar clerk's office and the clerk of the Georgia Supreme Court and which is in the link below that (paraphrasing) I was default not because I did not file an answer, but because I did not timely respond to his discovery against me, which I later did file a response.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZbmCD2Wx9bxQM4tOlaG-YYCgRCIO7Qeh/view?usp=sharing
Incidentally, the State Bar goes on to later contradict themselves by stating that I defaulted not by failing to file an answer, but because I did not file a timely response to the Bar's discovery against me, which not only is it not possible to default on the pleadings (such as not filing a timely answer to discovery), but the Georgia Civil Practice Act and Uniform Superior Court Rules do not permit it.
The State Bar and Georgia Supreme maintain that they had the right to strike the answers to my bar complaints under O.C.G.A. 9-11-37 as a sanction, but that can only occur if a respondent attorney fails to obey a discovery order, which I NEVER did and following a hearing on willfulness, which never took place.
This is just one example of fraud "on" the court by the State Bar of Georgia and Fraud "by" the Georgia Supreme Court. The net net is that the disbarment order is void on its' face, yet it continues to be wrongfully and illegally enforced.
Georgia and most states for that matter have policies and rules referred to as "self correction", which means if the court determines that an error or wrong has occurred in a case or an error or wrong is brought to their attention, both of which apply here, they will correct it.
Despite the Georgia Supreme Court being aware that the disbarment order, which was drafted by Georgia Attorney C. Lynn Johnson (former Staff Attorney for Georgia Supreme Court and now a Staff Attorney with the Georgia Court of Appeal to "throw off the scent") is fraudulent and contains numerous false statements and material omission, they have refused reverse or set aside the disbarment order and do the legal and right thing by formally reinstating my law license.
This is an example of a huge cover-up. The lawyers and judges of the State Bar and Georgia Supreme Court have committed both state and federal crimes and none should be in public office currently or eligible to ever serve in public office again. All, including sitting 11th Circuit Appeals Court judge Britt Grant, committed serious felonies and should be incarcerated.
Google Drive is a free way to keep your files backed up and easy to reach from any phone, tablet, or computer. Start with 15GB of Google storage – free.