28/03/2025
Trump Administration Reaches $100 Million Settlement with Skadden Law Firm Amid Legal Crackdown
WASHINGTON, D.C. — President Donald Trump announced Friday a landmark settlement with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, securing $100 million in pro bono legal services for his administration’s initiatives.
The deal, finalized on March 28, 2025, allows the prestigious law firm to sidestep punitive executive orders that have targeted other legal giants, marking a pivotal moment in Trump’s escalating campaign against the legal establishment he accuses of opposing his agenda.
The settlement stems from a firestorm ignited by billionaire Elon Musk, a key Trump adviser, who took to X last week to criticize Skadden’s pro bono work.
The firm had deployed 17 lawyers to defend a Georgia man falsely accused of voter fraud in the 2022 documentary “2,000 Mules,” produced by conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza.
Musk’s post on X, “Skadden this needs to stop now,” (elonmusk on X) amplified D’Souza’s grievance: “Skadden Arps is the firm engaged in systematic lawfare against ‘2000 Mules.’ They have an army of 17 attorneys working pro-bono against me. I have 2 lawyers,” (DineshDSouza on X).
Within days, the White House negotiated with Skadden, averting an executive order that could have barred its lawyers from federal facilities and contracts.
Under the agreement, Skadden will provide at least $100 million in free legal work over Trump’s term, focusing on administration priorities such as veteran support and law enforcement initiatives.
The firm also committed to “merit-based” hiring, aligning with Trump’s push against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies.
Trump praised the deal on Truth Social, quoting Skadden Executive Partner Jeremy London: “We engaged proactively with the President and his team in working together constructively to reach this agreement.” Trump added, “It’s a shame what’s gone on, but we very much appreciate their coming to the table,” a sentiment echoed in an X post by dnlbrns (Daniel Burns): “Trump: ‘We appreciate Skadden’s coming to the table. As you know other law firms have likewise settled the case. It’s a shame, you know, what’s gone on is a shame but we very much appreciate their coming to the table.’”
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom is a powerhouse in the legal world, employing over 1,700 attorneys across 21 offices globally, from New York to Shanghai. With revenues topping $3 billion in 2023, according to American Lawyer Magazine, it ranks among the highest-grossing firms in the U.S.
Its clients include Fortune 500 giants like JPMorgan and Johnson & Johnson, and it famously advised Musk on his $44 billion Twitter acquisition in 2022.
Yet, its pro bono efforts, like the “2,000 Mules” case, have now drawn Trump’s scrutiny, highlighting the firm’s vulnerability given that over 40% of its revenue reportedly ties to government-related work.
The settlement follows a pattern of Trump targeting law firms he links to his political foes. Since early March, executive orders have stripped security clearances and imposed restrictions on Covington & Burling, Perkins Coie, Paul Weiss, WilmerHale, and Jenner & Block.
Covington faced penalties for attorneys who advised former Special Counsel Jack Smith, while Perkins Coie was hit for its Clinton campaign ties.
Paul Weiss secured a $40 million pro bono deal to avoid further action, but WilmerHale and Jenner & Block have sued to block Trump’s orders. These moves have revoked clearances for dozens of lawyers and threatened billions in government contracts.
Trump’s legal offensive traces back to his grievances over probes like the Russia investigation and January 6 inquiries. Firms employing figures like Robert Mueller (WilmerHale) or Mark Pomerantz (Paul Weiss) have been singled out, with aides like Will Scharf framing the orders as a response to “unlawful DEI practices” and bias.
Critics, however, see retribution. “This is the autocratic legal idea of using law to erode checks on executive power,” said UCLA law professor Scott Cummings.
Skadden’s choice to negotiate rather than resist has split the legal community.
While Perkins Coie won a temporary injunction against Trump’s order on March 12, Paul Weiss Chairman Brad Karp justified his firm’s deal as averting an “existential crisis.”
On X, marceelias (Marc Elias), a former Perkins Coie partner, blasted the trend: “Paul Weiss didn’t just bend a knee, it set a new standard for shameful capitulation.”
Meanwhile, RichardHanania on X (Richard Hanania), president of the Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology, offered a contrarian take: “Skadden’s $100M deal with Trump is smart business. Fighting him costs more than folding—law firms aren’t martyrs, they’re profit machines.”
The deal has also sparked internal unrest at Skadden. Rachel Cohen, a third-year associate, resigned Thursday in a viral firm-wide email, slamming the industry’s “capitalistic cowardice.”
She told NBC News, “Silence is not going to protect them—it’s going to kill people,” a view she amplified on X as RachelCohen: “Big Law’s refusal to fight Trump’s attacks is a betrayal of the rule of law we swore to uphold.”
Cohen’s exit followed her organizing an open letter signed by over 300 associates urging resistance, underscoring the moral stakes for younger lawyers.
Legal scholars warn Trump’s tactics threaten the right to representation.
“This is retribution dressed up as policy,” said University of Pennsylvania’s Claire Finkelstein.
As firms like Skadden and Paul Weiss opt for settlements—$100 million and $40 million, respectively—others brace for more orders.
Trump vowed Friday to continue his “review” of the legal industry, leaving its future uncertain.
For now, Skadden’s deal stands as a stark example of Trump’s leverage over even the most formidable players in law.
