10/10/2024
Now available! Jason Ānanda Josephson Storm’s commentary - “Nightmen, Troglodytes, and Other Phantoms of the Classificatory Imagination” - on our latest issue’s target article “(Re)defining Esotericism: Fluid Definitions, Property Clusters and the Cross-Cultural Debate” (by Steven Engler and Mark Q. Gardiner):
Aligning with Engler and Gardiner’s advocacy of abandoning rigid definitions to instead formulate “pragmatic scholarly categories,” Storm notes his agreement with the target article, up until it's seventh section. Storm's main critique is Engler and Gardiner’s lack of consideration regarding what “practitioners might intend by ‘esotericism,’” as the authors focus instead on scholarly utilizations of the term. Storm concludes, “to focus only on scholarly definition without attempting to discuss the social kind(s) so defined is like trying to do zoology without discussing actual animals, prone to phantoms.”
Check out Storm’s commentary - with subscription - here: