True chronology of history

07/08/2023

04/08/2023

Hello! I am publishing, as always. Learn more at https://evilempireblog.com/, Have fun with my videos. Tnx for sharing.

28/07/2023

The Jesuits invented Chinese characters in the 16th century!

It is still not known exactly when the Chinese characters originated. But according to the most famous legend, the creation of the first hieroglyphs as a writing system is associated with the name of the legendary ruler of the Celestial Empire, the founding father of the Chinese Empire in the 25th century BC, the great Yellow Emperor - Huang Di. Emperor Huang Di ordered his court official Cang Jie to create the first Chinese writing system, and he, having carefully studied the traces of birds and animals, invented famous Chinese characters.

Simply put, Chinese writing is one of the most ancient in the world. But is it really so? Of course not. Chinese civilization is one of the youngest and remained primitive and backward until the 20th century. Contrary to the modern version of Chinese history, the first European Jesuit missionaries who arrived in China in the 16th century noted the terrible backwardness and complete ignorance of the Middle Kingdom. Today, historians tell us stories about the antiquity of Chinese writing. However, even in the 17th century, many Jesuits noted that Chinese dignitaries, instead of writing, still used knot writing, like the natives of Central and South America.

As proof, this is what the French Jesuit Joachim Bouvet wrote in his reports, In 1685, as part of a group of Jesuits, represented the interests of the French crown in Beijing. He became a confidant of one of the most famous Chinese emperors – Kangxi. Upon arrival, the Jesuit Bouvet was surprised to note in his report the complete backwardness in education, both of the members of the imperial family and of all the pundits of the Celestial Empire: "It seems that they have almost completely lost all knowledge of the past, have completely forgotten the meaning of their own hieroglyphs and have ceased to understand their own books."

In the 17th century, the French Jesuit Bouvet showed many Peking scholars books that seemed to be written in their own hieroglyphic script, but they grimaced and declared that they did not understand a word of them. On the other hand, according to Bouvet, other local Jesuits freely read these books and made explanations. He writes bluntly in his report: "His brothers understand and interpret their ancient documents and hieroglyphic books better than their native scholars." An amazing fact that historians do not tell.

So why did many local Jesuits of the 17th century freely read Chinese books written in hieroglyphs, and local Chinese dignitaries and pundits could not read a word in them? And this is in the 17th century? Why? Is it not because Chinese characters were invented not by the Chinese but by European Jesuit missionaries? And this is not fiction, but a harsh reality, which is carefully hidden by historians so as not to undermine faith in the antiquity of Chinese history.

So who and when came up with the hieroglyphs with which the Chinese still write? The denouement is coming soon, but for now, a bit of history. The first Jesuits arrived in China in the second half of the 16th century. Still, they could only break into actual practical activity at the very beginning of the 17th century.

The most striking figure of that time was the Italian Jesuit missionary, mathematician, astronomer, cartographer, and translator Matteo Ricci. Ricci was the first European to visit the Forbidden City and gained the confidence of the imperial family. He introduced the backward Chinese to advanced Western science and culture for the first time. The Chinese first learned Western cartography, mathematics, and astronomy thanks to Matteo Ricci. And most importantly, Matteo Ricci was the first European who was fluent in Chinese, more precisely, several of its dialects. And this achievement could not be repeated by any Jesuit in subsequent years and even centuries.

Pope Francis was sanctified in May 2022.

15/05/2023

the theory of New Chronology elaborated by Dr. Anatoly T Fomenko et al in the course of 44 years of meticulous research with the toolbox of exact sciences. The initial impulse was given by the major discovery in the telluric system Earth-moon made in 1971 by NASA chief astrophysicist Dr. Robert R Newton. History: Fiction or Science? series of books and e-books is the most explosive tractate on history that was ever written.

The list of 1534 sources, illustrations from ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attest to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays. The dominating historical discourse was essentially crafted in the XVI-XVII century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages, the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late medieval astronomers resting upon the power of ecclesial authorities.

The consensual world history was manufactured in Europe in the XVI-XIX centuries with the political agenda of powers of that period on the basis of erroneous clerical chronology elaborated in the XVI-XIX centuries by Kabbalist-numerologist Joseph Justus Scaliger and Jesuit Dionysius Petavius. The objections to such chronology by Sir Isaac Newton or Jean Hardouin (Curator of Louvre under Louis XVI) were discarded.

Thank you for your interest!

Authors and Personalities
Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko (Ukrainian, b. 1945 in Stalino). Full Member (Academician) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Full Member of the International Higher Education Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Head of the Moscow State University Section of Mathematics of the Department of Mathematics and Mechanics. Solved Plateau’s Problem from the theory of minimal spectral surfaces. Author of the theory of invariants and topological classification of integrable Hamiltonian dynamic systems. Laureate of the 1996 National Premium of the Russian Federation (in Mathematics) for a cycle of works on the Hamiltonian dynamical systems and manifolds’ invariants theory. Author of 200 scientific publications, 28 monographs, and textbooks on mathematics, a specialist in geometry and topology, calculus of variations, symplectic topology, Hamiltonian geometry and mechanics, and computational geometry. Author of a number of books on the development of new empirical-statistical methods and their application to the analysis of historical chronicles as well as the chronology of antiquity and the Middle Ages.

Gleb Vladimirovich Nosovskiy (b. 1958). Candidate of Physics and Mathematics (MSU, Moscow, 1988), a specialist in the theory of probability, mathematical statistics, the theory of probabilistic processes, theory of optimization, stochastic differential equations, computer modeling of stochastic processes, and computer simulation. Worked as a researcher of computer geometry at Moscow Space Research Institute, in Moscow Machine Tools and Instruments Institute, in Aizu University in Japan. A faculty member of the Department of Mathematics and Mechanics at MSU.

Robert Russell Newton (1918-1991) was an American physicist, astronomer, and historian of science, best known for his book The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy (1977). In Newton’s view, Ptolemy was “the most successful fraud in the history of science”. Newton showed that Ptolemy had predominantly obtained the astronomical results described in his work The Almagest by computation, and not by the direct observations that Ptolemy described. According to R. Newton, that was a conscious falsification.

Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) was a French and Dutch philologist and historian best known for his works on chronology. Born in Agen, he in 1559 went to Paris to study Greek and Latin and then began to teach himself Hebrew, Arabic, Syrian, Persian, and the principal modern languages. He converted to Protestantism in 1562 and set out on travels to French and German universities and to Italy to study its antiquities.

After the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day (August 1572) and the persecution of French Protestants, he went to Geneva, where he taught at an academy, returning to France in 1574. He was called to the University of Leiden (1593), where he became known as the most erudite scholar of his time. He remained there until his death.

Scaliger’s greatest work is the Opus de emendatione tempore (1583; “Study on the Improvement of Time”), a study of previous calendars. In it he compared the computations of time made by the various civilizations of antiquity, corrected what he considered their errors, and for the first time placed chronology on a scientific basis. His other major work is Thesaurus temporum, complectens Eusebi Pamphili Chronicon (1609; “The Thesaurus of Time, Including the Chronicle of Eusebius Pamphilus”), a reconstruction of the Chronicle of the early Christian historian Eusebius Pamphilus and a collection of Greek and Latin remnants placed in chronological order. Two other treatises (published in 1604 and 1616) established numismatics, the study of coins, as a new and reliable tool in historical research. His other works were collected and published posthumously in 1610, and two collections of his correspondence appeared in 1624 and 1627.

Dionysius Petavius (Denis Pétau, 1583-1652), was a French Jesuit theologian. Born at Orléans, attended the University of Paris, then he followed the theological lectures at the Sorbonne. In 1603 was appointed to a lectureship at the University of Bourges, but resigned two years later to become a Jesuit. Taught rhetoric at Reims, La Flèche, and at the Collège de Clermont. Later taught positive theology for twenty-two years. In 1629, at the invitation of Philip IV, taught ecclesiastical history at Madrid; in 1639, at the invitation of Pope Urban VIII, became a cardinal in Rome. A crater on the Moon is named Petavius in his honor.

13/05/2023

https://t.me/+dt5giTyY15tkMzRk
Reasons to doubt history:
1. Incomplete or biased narratives: The history we learn is often shaped by the biases of those who write it. It is inevitable that individuals, groups, and nations will interpret history in their favor, emphasizing their achievements and downplaying their failures. This leads to incomplete and biased narratives that can overlook or delegitimize the experiences of other groups.
2. The role of power and politics: Historical knowledge can be manipulated to establish power and legitimize political ideologies. This means that the history we are taught can be shaped to reinforce the status quo and political agendas, excluding alternative perspectives or dissenting voices.
3. Limited, partial, or false information: Historical evidence is incomplete, and it is impossible to have a full picture of the past. Furthermore, historical documents could be falsified, destroyed, or purposely ignored, resulting in a limited or false representation of the past.
4. Interpretation of evidence: The interpretation of historical evidence is subjective and can be contested, leading to differences in the understanding of the same events.
In conclusion, there are valid reasons for doubting world history as taught in schools and universities, as presented in the History Channel. Critics can argue that history is incomplete, biased, manipulated, and subject to interpretation, leading to limitations in our understanding of the past.