iMarket

iMarket iMarket is a Facebook-based online publishing and marketing platform promoting Papua New Guinea to the world.

If you have a story to tell please feel free to contact us. We are based in Brisbane, Australia with office in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea

02/03/2023

PNG, yu tink wanem long las 2022 Eleksen blong yu? Planti tok Feil Eleksen na sampla tok saksesful, yu tink wanem? Mipela raunim survey long dispela as tinktink, plis givim opinon blong yu. Downloading “Wabiria Electoral System” Votas App long app/play store or downlodim long website: www.wabiriaelectoralsystem.com . Sapos yu download from website, go long menu long website, select Android or iOS versions of app, daunlod na klik long “go to opinion polling” selekt survey long PNG Elecksen, “submit” na patisipeit. Klik too long dispela link na vot Sapos yu les long downloadim app. Klik long hia: https://poll.wabiriaelectoralsystem.com/view/polls/2022-png-national-election-survey-and-peoples-opinion-polling

2022 PNG National Election Survey and People's Opinion PollingYour opinion matters, please click on the link below and p...
24/02/2023

2022 PNG National Election Survey and People's Opinion Polling

Your opinion matters, please click on the link below and participate in this survey we are running on WES Election platform. Share the link so that many people's opinion are collected to get the government to prioritize and introduce much needed Electoral Reform for a fair future PNG Elections! We need this, click the link below or download the Wabiria Elelctoral System voting app- go to the opinion polling option on the app if you are using the app and participate. thanks

http://polling.wabiriaelectoralsystem.com/view/polls/2022-png-national-election-survey-and-peoples-opinion-polling

team here on iMarket did our part to run few ads about this great innovative election platform this young bloke has buil...
29/07/2022

team here on iMarket did our part to run few ads about this great innovative election platform this young bloke has built! I think it’s time we look back and think about this as one of the option. We need consideration given to initiative taken by PNGans to bring about solutions to some tough and inevitable problems we face in the country and Election is certainly one of them as we are facing at this moment! Time for you PNG leaders and people. This system has to be given consideration that is for sure..

Tech Pacific : Home of technology news and Tips, Software updates, domain and subdomain reviews, website designs, phones gadgets and Cyber Security

BIOMETRIC APPLICATION VOTING MACHINES WILL NOT SOLVE ELECTION PROBLEMS IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA BUT WILL MAKE THEM WORSEThe B...
15/07/2020

BIOMETRIC APPLICATION VOTING MACHINES WILL NOT SOLVE ELECTION PROBLEMS IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA BUT WILL MAKE THEM WORSE

The Biometric Machines used for elections will not make any difference or solve problems if they were to be used in national elections in Papua New Guinea as far as many challenges technology can’t circumvent or address according to our research, founder and CEO of Wabiria Electoral Solution (WES), Nicholas Wabiria says. The Biometric (Fingerprint) system has its huge advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost and Fingerprint template generation which can be used to impersonate or double voting. The world is becoming smart and everything to be done in a non-location-based manner. The biometric Voting system is not a solution for election-related crises we face during every election in PNG but has the potential to extremely worsen what we have already seen and cost us more.
Unlike customized WES system, Biometric system is a standard built technology wasn’t designed customarily for PNG and doesn’t address or go around many problems and challenges. It is not an innovation as it does not solve the problems we face during the elections but has potential to drive us into the brick wall given limitations it has in PNG context when used to conduct election. It is a standard technology built by people from other country who absolutely has no idea about PNG election challenges and for us to try to force it to work in PNG is no different to driving luxury cars up in the highlands- rugged country roads only meant for four wheel, and we will certainly not drive over those challenges we face during elections in PNG, Mr Wabiria added. It could solve perhaps “ghost names” issues while updating common rolls and I see it could work for common roll updating but not when it comes to actual running of elections, Mr Wabiria said. No one worries or cares about common roll updating and people can be collaborative to scan and update their data but energy and focus shift when it comes to actual election which biometric system runs us into brick wall. The death toll will increase and the number of casualties and property destruction will be worst recorded as this incapable technology plunge us into mess. Given our people’s uncivilized attitude towards elections- coupled with lack of education and weak law and order situations have always enabled our people to chop and damage ballot boxes and tendency to do so is strongly rooted in them. We don’t see any reason why our people not doing same on those very fragile expensive electronic devises. Biometric voting machine advocates have to be warned of that certain impediment ahead, Mr Wabiria said.
The Biometric devices are easily malfunctioning due to different chemical creams applied by different voters, damaged/tempers and the biometric device interface becomes less sensitive in reading the bio-data. Every after 10 to 15 votes the bio-data reader/scanner has to be changed to be effective which further blows the costs. The weather also plays out factor that affects the accuracy of bio-data reading and our people lifestyle back in the village where we don’t expect nice, clean smooth hands that works better for biometric reading poise further difficulty reading the bio-data.
Furthermore, the set-ups of biometric system at polling stations will be either standalone or internet applications. Either way, none of them solves or circumvent problems we have now to do with infrastructure, people’s attitudes etc. If you have seen the set-up of devices at the polling stations, you will definitely know that it doesn’t work for country like PNG where supporters don’t easily accept defeat and everyone doing bit to disturb proper election processes and also remoteness of majority polling areas that poise transportation challenges. If the set-up is internet application, that means both ends (Voters and admin ends) need internet application which is not workable as far as country’s limitation of wifi/internet coverage nationwide is concerned. The direct Satellite system to provide internet will cost an exorbitant amount given numerous polling stations around the country. If the set-up is stand alone, it poises votes/data security risks when they are not sent but still stored in the standalone computers at the overcrowded, chaotic and troublesome polling areas as we’ve always seen. We have seen during past elections many polling stations were unsafe and lack securities.
Hence the risk of destroying votes in standalone- fragile computers and devices will be very high making no difference or improvement from the current ballot paper- box system. We have seen voters’ privacy; secrecy and security envisaged according to the UN policy for democratic elections have been compromised and denied for many which biometric system does not make improvements. During every election, overcrowded polling stations predispose bloody and deadly circumstances where many have even lost lives. These are factual and eminent to happen again in 2022 National Election which the biometric system does not address or solve with its centralized physical system that will require more attention, care and security than current ballot boxes given their high vulnerability and fragility. Current ballot boxes withstands minor forces or tempering which will not be the same case for very fragile biometric devises and computers and many voters will certainly be left out adding more problems. Peace during elections is what we want to achieve and the biometric system does not help us achieve that given those limitations.
Through the use of WES, these problems will be solved through the adoption of the simple and yet effective voters code system. As the voters cards are emailed/text/posted/hand-delivered to voters, and voting conducted using SMS through any mobile phone, eliminating the malfunction of bio device, inconvenience of going to a selected (centralized) voting location where people fight each other, lawless and rigging of election happens.
Moreover, most of the organizations are doing away with the biometric systems in many countries as it compromises health of people. Coronavirus have changed the world we live and it is a very big problem to finger print scanning/facial recognition biometric system. Most of the organizations in many industries don’t want to accept biometric scanning system now days as they poise great health risk. According to the world health organization, we expect second and third and more repetitive wave of Coronavirus and any other health risks in that matter poise a risk for us to have hope and dependency on biometric voting system.
Finally, the cost to use Biometric system for election is another big concern. It does not save PNG from being the most expensive country in the world to run elections as the cost will go beyond the roof and tripled or more which is not a good idea especially at this time when our country needs money, Mr Wabiria said. This is how biometric scanning system will inflate the election costs. The costs to build/buy the biometric voting machines for all polling stations in the country will be too much. Not only that but the Bio- data reader will be needed to change every after 10 to 15 voters in order for the reader/scanner to be effective. Biometric voting system needs/constitutes many applications on different devise that needs to set up and that is very costly and inconvenient for PNG where lawlessness and uncivilized people’s behavior to do right things are absent. The biometric application whether facial or finger no matter what it is it is quiet expensive because you need to get many application and not in one devise. In one polling centre they will need more than one devise for set-up like 20 computers, scanning machines, few truck/car batteries or generator etc. which effects the costs. Transporting to and fro polling stations, will be absolutely inconvenient and disastrous given lawlessness and road links/remoteness of the polling stations. During past elections we have seen no security presence at polling stations and the marked ballot boxes would be transported to counting room by villagers themselves through very risky passage encountering many problems and even losing lives through sponsored gangs and supporters in a bid to control ballot boxes. Hence, replacing current- hard ballot boxes with numerous fragile and vulnerable device sets for a biometric voting machines will be a worst decision anyone can make.
According to PNG Electoral Commission (PNGEC) official website, PNG budgeted 800 million Kina for 2012 National Election. In addition to that, the hidden costs, aid from the Australia, NZ and EU and other aid donors, PNGEC legal costs, by- elections, etc. have costs PNG almost 2 billion Kina. For 2017 National Election, Mr Isaac Lupari handed 600 Million Kina as a government budget, plus foreign aids, hidden costs, legal expenses for PNGEC (few legal cases are still pending), By- Elections (We still have few to go), have costs PNG roughly 1.5 billion Kina. This is excluding the costs for the destructions of private and public properties and the losses of lives.
Biometric Voting system does not reduce but will potentially triple the costs. Security and logistic/transportation of ballot paper/boxes costs PNGEC more than a half of the overall election budget which will be tripled with biometric system on transporting its devise sets. Instead of transporting only one ballot box for a polling station which we do with our current ballot paper/box system, transporting biometric devise sets which constitutes few computers, hundreds of scanners/readers to be changed after every 10 to 15 votes to maintain accuracy, few high voltage batteries or a generator to and fro polling stations will cost PNG an exorbitant amount than usual. Hence, Biometric system is not a cost effective but very expensive way to run election in PNG at a moment. Through the use of WES system, PNG Government will spend around K50 to K60 million or less to run elections according to our study. Almost couple of billion Kina down all the way to just K50 or K60 million and yet much secured and transparent election process is a good win and savings for a country. It will cost peanut to make and transport voters’ cards than ballot boxes and papers and biometric voting devise sets.
Wabiria Electoral Solution would like to requests the PNG Government and the Minister for National Planning Hon. Sam Basil to allow us to have harmonious and positive debate/discussion if needed with biometric or other voting machine advocates and presentation of our product and system and see which one is cost effective, convenient, innovative and workable in PNG context. We have already submitted our proposal inviting the PNG Electoral Commission to test and trial our system but unfortunately we have being referred to the office of National Executive Council and the Ministry of National Planning. We hope for fair response from the Government for our opportunity to showcase our innovative blockchain technology-based voting platform and trial it out for the whole PNG to see if it is a better product we all want moving forward.
Together we can truly make PNG the richest black Christian Nation on planet earth where no child is left behind as our government aspires. It all starts with right leaders and we want to contribute to it with our innovative platform that operates beyond human corruption and manipulation of election processes and present unbiased election result and we wait for a fair response says Mr. Wabiria.
ABOUT
Wabiria Electoral Solution (WES) is an Australian incorporated independent company (ABN: 22173639505) based in Melbourne, Australia. WES innovation is a blockchain-powered technology built to run high-security online elections for government and non-government such as corporate directors, associations, churches, schools, university student elections, community elections and many more. The technology supports different electoral methods such as Limited Preferential Voting (LPV), Singular-Non Transferable Voting (SNTV) and First-Past-the-Post (FPTP) systems. WES innovation excels in complex, high-security elections that operates above election corruption and helps voters achieve full democracy. WES was founded by Nicholas Wabiria, a Papua New Guinean Aerospace Engineer and a graduate of Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT). The directors and all key personnel of the company have no political affiliations or interests that could compromise the independence or integrity of elections run, involve, or paid for using our system.

BIOMETRIC APPLICATION VOTING MACHINES WILL NOT SOLVE ELECTION PROBLEMS IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA BUT WILL MAKE THEM WORSE The ...
23/06/2020

BIOMETRIC APPLICATION VOTING MACHINES WILL NOT SOLVE ELECTION PROBLEMS IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA BUT WILL MAKE THEM WORSE

The Biometric Machines used for elections will not make any difference or solve problems if they were to be used in national elections in Papua New Guinea as far as many challenges technology can’t circumvent or address according to our research is concerned, founder and CEO of Wabiria Electoral Solution (WES), Nicholas Wabiria says. The Biometric (Fingerprint) system has its huge advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost and Fingerprint template generation which can be used to impersonate or double voting. The world is becoming smart and everything to be done in a non-location-based manner. The biometric Voting system is not a solution for election-related crises we face during every election in PNG but has the potential to extremely worsen what we have already seen.

“If the biometric voting system advocates from the Think Tank Group and ICT think the biometric voting system is a way forward then that simply means they have not well researched and lack understanding of all elements that play out towards why PNG perpetually hold deadly, troublesome, and most expensive elections in the world. We rather keep the traditional ballot paper/box system, as the biometric systems does not address or reduce costs and will certainly take us into a brick wall and very expensive. Past elections have thought us lesson and we have seen it becoming a normal occurrence that our villagers tend to damage ballot boxes. They chop and tendency to do so with no single hesitation is strongly rooted in them. Hence, if the biometric voting system advocates from the Think Tank Group and ICT people think the biometric voting system is the way forward, they need to tell PNG people what makes them think the villagers will not do the same to their expensive biometric voting machines, Mr Wabiria further added.

Negligible or least application of force on ballot boxes never shatter them given their hardness but it won’t be same for very fragile biometric devise sets and computers. A biometric machine is an electronic device that can easily blackout even with the smallest application of force. Consequently, thousands will be left out to vote and it will be a great disaster ahead leaving many out which could potentially lead to more chaos. We have seen that many polling stations never get even single police/security compromising democratic processes. Most of the time, supporters or sponsored gangs would destroy ballot boxes they believe to have block votes for their opposing candidates. That trend of abuse has always gone worst and it is eminent come 2022. Hence, it is not a good idea to believe biometric system will avoid or address challenges we face during elections. “We have seen so many blood sheds and loss of lives over ballot boxes in a bid to control votes to influence the outcome and how does Biometric system circumvents that? I don’t think biometric system advocates from the Think Tank Group and ICT have done their research well if they think biometric system addresses problems faced during elections in PNG”, Mr Wabiria says.

When it comes to the use of biometric voting, PNGEC will spend a lot to purchase the biometric devices (not only one but thousands for each polling stations) apart from the amount already spent to build one and at the same time, it faces a lot of challenges as the devices are easily malfunction due to different chemical creams applied by different voters, damaged/tempers and the biometric device interface becomes less sensitive in reading the bio-data. Every after 10 to 15 votes the bio-data reader/scanner has to be changed to be effective which costs more. The weather also plays out factor that affects the accuracy of bio-data reading and our people lifestyle back in the village where you don’t expect nice, clean smooth hands that works better for biometric reading poise difficulty reading the bio-data. It is a system that is very expensive and not working for PNG and many other countries that should have thought of it didn’t seem it workable too. I don’t see it is working for us as far as our research show, Mr Wabiria says.

Moreover, the biometric system set-up at polling station will be either Standalone or Internet applications. Either way, none of them solves or circumvent problems we have now to do with infrastructure, people’s attitudes towards elections coupled with lawlessness and lack of education etc. If the set-up at polling booths are internet application then that means it will be both ends (Voters and admin ends) need internet application which won’t be workable as country is not fully covered with wifi/internet coverage. The direct Satellite system to provide internet will be okay but then how costly it will be when you are talking about setting up for all the polling stations.

If it is standalone set-up, then how safe are they especially when the votes/data are not sent but still stored in standalone computers at the chaotic and troublesome polling areas. We have seen many polling stations were unsafe and lack securities during our past elections. Hence the risk of destroying votes in standalone- fragile computers and device will be very high. We have seen supporters trying to destroy and temper ballot boxes and there won’t be any difference for them to do same on those electronic devises. It does not improve at all from the existing Ballot paper- box system. We have seen voters’ privacy, secrecy and security envisaged according to the UN policy for democratic elections have been compromised and denied for many and how does biometric system improves that at overcrowded and very volatile polling stations. Biometric voting systems will definitely drive us to brick wall and cause a lot of mess. During every election, overcrowded polling stations predispose bloody and deadly circumstances where many have lost lives. These are factual and eminent to happen again in 2022 National Election which the biometric system does not address or solve with its centralized physical system that will require more attention and security than current ballot boxes as far as their fragility are concerned. Peace during elections is what we want to achieve and the biometric system does not help us achieve that given those limitations.

Through the use of WES, these problems will be solved through the adoption of the simple and yet effective voters code system. As the voters cards are emailed/text/posted/hand-delivered to voters, and voting conducted using SMS through any mobile phone, eliminating the malfunction of bio device, inconvenience of going to a selected (centralized) voting location where people fight each other with no order and lawlessness. Through the use of WES system platform, we will restore voters’ safety, privacy, security and secrecy envisaged according to the UN Policy for democratic elections as voters can vote from anywhere, anytime in their private/safe place without intimidation or being pressured.

Also, most of the organizations are doing away with the biometric systems in many countries as it compromises health of people. Coronavirus have changed the world we live and it is a very big problem to finger print scanning/facial recognition biometric system. Most of the organizations in many industries don’t want to accept biometric scanning system now days as they poise great health risk. According to the world health organization, we expect second and third and more repetitive wave of Coronavirus and any other health risks in that matter poise a risk for us to have hope and depend on biometric voting system.

Furthermore, the cost to use Biometric system for election is another big concern. It does not save PNG from being the most expensive country in the world to run elections as the cost will go beyond the roof which is not a good idea especially at this time when our country needs money. Biometric voting system will not minimize costs but further maintain our position as very expensive country in the world to run election. This is how biometric scanning system will inflate the election costs. The costs to build the biometric voting machines for all polling stations in the country will be too much. Not only will that but the Bio- data reader will be needed to change every after 10 to 15 voters in order for the reader/scanner to be effective. Biometric voting system needs/constitutes many applications on different devise that needs to set up and that is very costly and inconvenient for PNG where lawlessness and uncivilized people’s behavior to do right things are absent. The biometric application whether facial or finger no matter what it is it is quiet expensive because you need to get many application and not in one devise. In one polling centre they will need more than one devise for set-up like 20 computers, scanning machines, few truck/high volt batteries or generator etc. which effects the costs.

According to PNG Electoral Commission (PNGEC) official website, PNG budgeted 800 million Kina for 2012 National Election. In addition to that, the hidden costs, aid from the Australia, NZ and EU and other aid donors, PNGEC legal costs, by- elections, etc. have cost PNG almost 2 billion Kina. For 2017 National Election, Mr Isaac Lupari handed 600 Million Kina as a government budget, plus foreign aids, hidden costs, legal expenses for PNGEC (few legal cases are still pending), By- Elections (We still have few to go), have costs PNG roughly 1.5 billion Kina. This is excluding the costs for the destructions of private and public properties and the life loss. Biometric Voting system does not make improvement but will potentially costs PNG double or more.

Security and logistic/transportation of ballot paper/boxes costs PNGEC more than a half of the overall election expenditure which biometric system will not improve but worsen. Instead of transporting only one ballot box for a polling station which we do with our curent ballot paper/box system, you are talking about transporting biometric devise sets which constitutes few computers, biometric devise with scanners/readers which will be needed to change after every 10 to 15 votes to maintain accuracy, few high voltage batteries or a generator to power them to and fro polling stations which will cost PNG double or more. Hence, Biometric system is not a cost effective but very expensive way to run election in PNG at a moment. Through the use of WES system, PNG Government will spend K50 million kina or less to run elections according to our study. Almost couple of billion Kina down all the way to just K50 million and yet much secured and transparent election is a good win and savings for a country. It will cost peanut to make and transport voters cards than biometric voting devise sets.

It will be very interesting for us the WES team and the Biometric Voting Machine advocates from the Think Tank group and ICT to have proper debate and presentation of our product and system and see which one is cost effective, convenient and workable in PNG context. We have already submitted our proposal inviting the PNG Electoral Commission to test and trial our system. We hope for fair response from the PNGEC and the Government for our opportunity to showcase our innovative blockchain technology-based voting platform and trial it out for the whole PNG to see if it is a better product we all want, Mr Wabiria concluded.

ABOUT
Wabiria Electoral Solution (WES) is an Australian incorporated independent company (ABN: 22173639505) based in Melbourne, Australia. WES innovation is a blockchain-powered technology built to run high-security online elections for government and non-government such as corporate directors, associations, churches, schools, university student elections, community elections and many more. The technology supports different electoral methods such as Limited Preferential Voting (LPV), Singular-Non Transferable Voting (SNTV) and First-Past-the-Post (FPTP) systems. WES innovation excels in complex, high-security elections that operates above election corruption and helps voters achieve full democracy. WES was founded by Nicholas Wabiria, a Papua New Guinean Aerospace Engineer and a graduate of Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT). The directors and all key personnel of the company have no political affiliations or interests that could compromise the independence or integrity of elections run, involve, or paid for using our system.

MAIN PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES OF ELECTIONS IN PNG WHERE WABIRIA ELECTORAL SOLUTION (WES) WILL ADDRESSThe spread of democr...
15/05/2020

MAIN PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES OF ELECTIONS IN PNG WHERE WABIRIA ELECTORAL SOLUTION (WES) WILL ADDRESS
The spread of democracy around the world is one of the most significant achievements of our times and election sits at the centre of it. However, many problems mitigate the successful conduct of elections, and the democratic election process is often abused in Papua New Guinea (PNG).
Available data shows an increase in the crisis level encountered in PNG during elections. The death rates rose significantly during every elections and was worst in the 2017 national elections. Likewise, the value of properties damaged increases at every election period. The outlook shows nothing will be different but worse in 2022 National Election if nothing new is done to the way we run elections.
Hence in anticipation of worst 2022 Election brings, the Papua New Guinean aerospace engineer Nicholas Wabiria has developed a blockchain technology based E-Voting platform designed to help PNG and democratic countries run cheap and yet successful elections beyond human manipulation, fraud and violence.
The new cutting-edge election system delivers real time election result, solves and circumvents both manmade and natural problems encountered during elections, and significantly lowers the cost of running elections.
Mr Wabiria, who is now based in Melbourne, Australia, grew up in a politician’s home and hails from Hela Province where electoral corruption and election related problems are usually high.
The following problems are major concerns during national elections in PNG which Wabiria Electoral Solution (WES) is designed to address, go around and ensure real democratic election results are achieved without human interference and influences. WES will cut-down human involvement to the barest minimal in running election that compromises the integrity of elections resulting dissatisfaction amongst supporters. Though there are many problems WES will address during elections, below are only some of them.

PRINTING OF EXTRA BALLOT PAPERS
One of the big problems seen in developing countries is printing of extra ballot papers and illegally brought into the counting stations. Corrupt candidates tend to print and circulate extra ballot papers to abuse and rig elections. In PNG, the people live in tribes, clans and families in villages. A village or several villages have council wards which make up polling areas.
The running candidates who come from a particular tribe or nearby tribe tend to have more power or authority over all the votes from that ward than their opponents who come from other tribes/villages and he can easily have them marked or awarded in his favour.
Although this is an abuse of democracy, it has become a recurring trend in PNG, and the situation may worsen in coming elections. By using WES, this problem will be solved through the adoption of our voters code system. Only legitimate voters in the common roll/WES system will vote, stopping illegal ballot papers/voters double voting etc. from outside.

VOTING ON LEFT OVER BALLOT PAPERS
It has also become common occurrence that left over ballot papers get marked anyway instead of bringing them back to the officials to destroy them. We have seen that the powerless officials allows villagers to continue use- up access or extra ballot papers though it is seen as double voting and an abuse of democratic process. By introducing WES system, this trend of abuse will be solved as WES system will not accept double voting or extra voting.

THE HIJACKING OF BALLOT BOXES AND BALLOT PAPERS
The hijacking of ballot boxes and papers by a group of sponsored gangs have become a common occurrence during elections in PNG. Candidates have their supporters, who hijack ballot boxes and papers, and then they mark all in that particular candidate’s favour and send them back to the counting room.
Often these supporters resort to destroying marked ballot papers and boxes while being transported back to the counting room if they know that the ballot box transported has block votes for other candidates.
These incidents quickly aggravate to a disruption of social law and order as opposing gangs often clash and fight in a bid to hijack ballot boxes and control for the benefit of their chosen candidate.
An objective of the WES would be to solve or bypass the challenges associated with transporting ballot boxes and papers by the electoral commission to and fro polling units without having them hijacked by gangs.
Ballot papers and ballot boxes may not be necessary. WES will do away with ballot papers and ballot boxes, instead replace them with voters’ cards and election detail that contains candidates and election ID and can be issued on the day of voting at the center or brought by the voters, as they receive it through sms/email before the election date. In PNG manual distribution will be viable, not sms/email distribution.
Using WES introduces a voucher and card system and text message voting systems. Stack of cards (typical business card or flex card- size cards) is controllable and transported in one car or helicopter, so it is safe and easy to control and manage, whereas thousands of ballot boxes and ballot papers transported on a few long trucks are vulnerable, too much to manage.
In country like PNG, each Local Level Government (LLG) land mass is very big and consists hundreds of council wards which make up number of polling areas to manage. We have seen that with our current Ballot paper/box manual system most of those polling areas have no control and too much to manage. Most of the wards/polling areas often have couple or no security presence at all. To manage that, our approach will be to appoint 2 to at most 4 designated areas depending on LLG Land Mass or size where voters of all wards can go to collect their voter's cards. Hundreds of wards will be grouped into two to four at most designated areas each LLG constituencies. In this way it is highly secured, manageable and controllable given concentrated few designated areas to focus with heavy security presence rather than scattered to hundreds of wards/polling areas with current manual systems where some polling stations get not even a single security personal and control at all. Other Pacific Countries will have no problems with the distribution/transportation of the voter's cards. Voter's cards will be brought into those appointed areas via helicopter or cars with heavy es**rts directed to those designated areas. WES system has provision to nullify voter’s card and code number for a particular area/ward if necessary at any given time.

UNSAFE TRANSPORTATION OF MARKED BALLOT BOXES TO COUNTING ROOMS AND ILLEGALLY PRE- MARKED BOXES
One of the risky scenarios seen during the election is while transporting the marked ballot papers and ballot boxes back to the counting stations from various polling stations. We have seen during the recent past elections many of the marked ballot papers and boxes never officially get picked up and transported back to the counting room by the elections officials. Pressures from the villagers are often too much and they engage to transport the marked ballot boxes back to the counting rooms themselves as they sometimes don’t trust the election officials and also to make sure safe transportation of their block votes boxes.
It has become normal during the past elections that the villagers from each ward take charge of marked ballot boxes (and they are possibly rigged boxes) from their wards and risk their life transporting them, sometimes without the es**rt of security personnel through highly intense passage. This is where sponsored gangs and supporters from neighboring wards hurt and kill each other.
Most of the time, the sponsored gangs and opposing villagers of other candidates fight each other over marked ballot boxes being transported back in a bid to destroy the ballot papers or have them replace with illegally pre-marked ballot papers. This scene has warranted many problems and election interruptions.
With WES platform, transportation of marked ballot papers is done electronically in the form of text messages. Hence by doing so WES bypasses the problems associated with transportation of marked ballot boxes and papers to the counting room and also eliminates the possibility of adding illegally pre- marked ballot papers and boxes as often happens.

CHOPPING AND TEMPERING OF BALLOT BOXES
We have seen that it was a common occurrence that the supporters or angry villagers resort to chopping ballot boxes at will. Sometimes when boxes are chopped and damaged interrupts polling but get patched and continue otherwise if the forces applied are not enough to severely damage. The chopped/tempered ballot boxes can reach the counting station but then it becomes problem again whether or not to count from them and becomes overwhelming situations for the counting officials as they (the tempered boxes) predispose escalation of problems if decision to count or not conflicts supporters interests. Most of the killing and shooting occurs as a result of this. Unlike biometric/Indian voting machines where they can also be tempered and shut when very insignificant force if applied, posing same or worst problem with their fragility and complexity, WES will solve this problem by doing away with ballot boxes/papers and decentralize the polling areas and allow people to vote from anywhere anytime.

POLLING BOOTH/AREA CHAOS AND DISORDER AND RIGGING OF ELECTIONS
In PNG, a large number of polling booths lack adequate security. There have been situations where there are no police, or they are stationed far in remote areas or way in the town areas.
The past elections have witnessed police officers dying on duty while providing security because the villagers and gangs overpower them with their more sophisticated weapons. This level of chaos has caused most voters, mostly women and young ones, to stay away from the polling booths.
Their rights are denied and they consider it hard and dangerous to come out and vote. Some elections have had situations where entire eligible voters in a council ward or several wards miss out and do not get opportunity to cast their votes because of the chaotic turn of events. Consequently, many are denied the right to decide and select their leader.
The objective of WES, therefore, is to solve and address the enormous issues of chaos and rigging associated with crowding at election polling booths. Through the use of the WES voucher/ballot cards system, we decentralize the polling areas in respective wards, and instead allow people to vote from anywhere, anytime.
Hence, their privacy, security, safety, equal participation, and all established United Nation policies for democratic elections processes are maintained and adhered to. An officer or two will be stationed with mobile phone at designated areas to assists voters without phone or difficulty writing Vote SMS.

POLICING INEFFICIENCIES AND BRIBERIES
The law and lack of efficient law enforcement and policing in country as a whole is one of the significant factors that directly affects elections in the country. Unlike what is obtainable in developed countries like Australia, policing is not efficiently carried out in PNG, and this becomes underlying general security problems for the community not only during the election periods but during a typical day to day life.
Lack of policing/law enforcement in the country becomes the main security issue. In addition to this, policing is difficult sometimes because of the lack of government services and infrastructures like road links, and many more, combined with the police lacking local knowledge, and this makes it very hard for law enforcement agents to exercise their policing duties freely and effectively.
During election festive, it becomes undeniable that police are not willing to provide needed security. The province or electorates in PNG are vast and remote; hence police are divided and scattered (not intact); and they cannot adequately provide peace and security.
Sometimes they can accept bribes and take no action when the hijack of ballot papers, boxes, or when the disorder in the polling booths are reported and ongoing. What frequently happens is they (police and army and other security personnel) watch and let the people act as they wish. The lack of policing efficiency directly affects elections and most of the time police and election securities accept briberies to allow rigging of the elections.
The core objective of WES is to go around the problems associated with policing inefficiencies and bring human involvement in the election process to the barest minimum and reduce the tendency of selfish desires to determine the turnout of elections in the nation. After the elections, enemies are created between supporters and the problems are often brought back to the societies and add on to the law and order crisis we already have in the country. By using WES, elections will be very peaceful as WES system automates most areas of elections, leaving no reason for supporters to fight each other. By doing so, it will be the biggest contribution by WES towards the country easing law and order crisis.

BUYING OF VOTES AND LACK OF VOTERS’ PRIVACY, SECRECY AND SECURITY
Election campaign period leading up to the polling period is usually a time when village people expect a visit and a handout from candidates.
Polling booth is much focused area where every candidate’s campaign committees and general supporters make sure you vote for the candidate who had induce you some form of bribes, and also supporters compete against each other to rig polling, forcing electoral officers to validate their illegal double voting etc.
Polling booth/area is very important strategic spot where millions of Kina are poured and angry supporters and sponsored gangs clash and kill each other over ballot boxes.
Decentralizing polling area and allowing people to vote from anywhere anytime would mean solving one of the biggest causes of problems during elections and WES will do that. People receive their ballot cards and can vote peacefully from their homes, work places or even from any other province or country with no one bothering them. Hence this will discourage vote buying as voters will have full privacy, security and secrecy to vote anywhere anytime without being pressured, forced or fear of intimidations.

CORRUPTION IN COUNTING ROOM
Counting room is the final stage of election and the agenda of manipulation of election is high. It is where tempered, hijacked and illegal ballot boxes finally end up for counting.
The key officials inside counting room are predisposed and susceptible to bribery and that is one of the areas many candidates see as an opportunity to play money and manipulate the counting process. The security problem is another factor there.
We have had unsuccessful counting for some constituencies due to the security risks. Southern Highlands Province counting office in Mendi was one notable example during the 2017 National Elections.
It was too dangerous to complete counting in Mendi so was moved to Mt Hagen and Electoral Commissioner discretionally declared the winner at early stage that aggravated feud amongst supporters resulting death toll and millions of Kina worth properties destroyed.
Same turn of events was recorded in other parts of the country and police officers were powerless and killed.
2022 National election outlook shows noting will be different if no new measures are put in place. WES system is designed to take care of those sort of events with “voters’ end” mobile phone-voting, and automated vote counting system on real time.
The score board can be projected to bigger screen for public benefit outside electoral commission office in Port Moresby were only one counting room will be for all elections nationwide. The counting can also be telecasted live. The counting will be automated without human influences and the winner will be declared same day as election ends.

OFFICIAL BRIBERIES AND WANTOK SYSTEM
Bribery is very common and as long as you give money, you can be served in PNG. The weak law and order system makes it resilient for the bribery giver.
Wantok System culture creates a conducive environment in effecting bribery. Though “wan tok system” is accepted as part of our cultural interaction as it helps out in an extended way, we have abused it when applying it to situations such as national elections.
Together with money, it is possible for bribery and manipulations of election and many international observers described 2017 National Election as one of the worst and corrupt election.
Consequently, there were a total of 71 cases of election petition before the National Court of Disputed Returns. Some of those cases, such as Hela regional seat, are still ongoing and before the courts.
Practice of bribery will still exist but WES will corner and go around predisposed areas of bribery and Wantok System’s influence on election. If we take away human control or interference in the main areas of election very fair result will come out. WES automates most part of the elections making it hard for bribery and Wantok System to take effect.

BY-ELECTIONS AND COURT CASES
The level of election irregularities in PNG has made By-Election become a natural occurrence every election year. This indicates that the electoral system in the country is highly flawed.
Candidates who lose at the polls appeal to Court of Disputed Returns and come up with tangible reasons why they ought to have won in the elections. They often state legal breaches and other factors while disputing the winner's declaration.
If the petitioner is successful and wins the Court of Disputed Returns, by-election is one of the reliefs the petitioner usually seeks and the ruling grants that.
This series of events cause the Government through PNG Electoral Commission to spend more than is budgeted on the conduct of by-elections and court cases.
At every election period, PNG experiences situations where hundreds of court cases against declared winners and PNGEC has to fund its extra legal bills. Furthermore, few electorates/seats go back for by-elections costing millions of kina at the expense of taxpayers.
The objective of WES is to fix this significant problem of huge legal expenses and repeated by-elections in PNG, which the current electoral system cannot solve.
The current system has no measure in corruption within the electoral commission elections officials that is placed to minimize or stop the conduct of by-elections in PNG.
However, WES is designed to take care of this problem. WES, when engaged to run elections in the country, will ensure there will never be by-elections. WES platform is designed to generate report of every activities performed and elections conducted. On that report the codes of every voters who voted will be recorded without names to protect their privacy; where and when they voted; how many candidates took part and their respective votes scored, and how winners were declared. If someone were to carry out manual calculation based on the report by applying limited preferential voting (LPV) method (for PNG) the result will be same. This will discourage the courts of dispute of returns as the election report by the WES system itself will be provided to the court to justify integrity of election ran.

EXPENSIVE ELECTION
Elections in PNG have been the most expensive elections in the world and it is one of the problem WES is designed to address. The PNG Government has budgeted K800 million for the 2012 National Election. However, extra unbudgeted costs, foreign aid from Australia and other countries, few by- elections again, Electoral Commission legal costs and many more have significantly increased the overall election related costs to almost 2 billion Kina or more approximately.
In 2017, PNG Government budgeted K600 million plus for the National Election, which later increased even more including extra unbudgeted costs, foreign aid, legal costs for PNGEC , by- elections and many more have so far cost PNG 1.5 Billion Kina approximately. We still have few more by- elections to go back as well as few court cases pending that will further costs us.
One of the main reasons of WES is to cut costs. WES platform will significantly help minimize the cost of running elections. PNGEC when using WES will spend K50 million or significantly less to conduct nation elections in 2022. There won’t be by- elections and court petition after which will further save state even more. Cost is one of the major problems WES is designed to fix. Running of elections through WES will be very cheap even compared to Biometric, Indian or American voting machines etc.

LAW AND ORDER CRISIS
Supporters often fight each other during elections. When the election is over, the conflicts are often brought back to the societies and become law and order issues even after election is over. Most of the fights and social problems in PNG communities are often election related.
WES will solve all those election related law and order and social problems by providing situation that will cause voters to participate in a peaceful elections. Peace and violent- free election events are what country will achieve through the use of WES platform. As WES automates all aspects of conducting elections, it will leave no reason for voters to fight each other before and after elections..

ABOUT
Wabiria Electoral Solution (WES) is an Australian incorporated independent company (ABN: 22173639505) based in Melbourne, Australia. WES innovation is a blockchain-powered technology built to run high-security online elections for government and non-government such as corporate directors, associations, churches, schools, university student elections, community elections and many more. The technology supports different electoral methods such as Limited Preferential Voting (LPV), Singular-Non Transferable Voting (SNTV) and First-Past-the-Post (FPTP) systems. WES innovation excels in complex, high-security elections that operates above election corruption and helps voters achieve full democracy. WES was founded by Nicholas Wabiria, a Papua New Guinean Aerospace Engineer and a graduate of Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT). The directors and all key personnel of the company have no political affiliations or interests that could compromise the independence or integrity of elections run, involve, or paid for using our system.

WES system is patented and covered by “Copyright 2019, Wabiria Electoral Solution”. Reproduction of these expressive technical feathers or similar idea will be deemed infringement under the copyright act 2000

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when iMarket posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to iMarket:

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Contact The Business
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share