Wiki World Order

02/06/2022

02/06/2022

23/08/2021

Some very interesting framings from Charles Eisenstein, Aug 1: "... Moving the Masses

For these reasons, I won’t try too hard to substantiate my belief that – and I may as well say it explicitly as a gesture of goodwill to the censors, who will thus have an easier time deciding what to do with this article – the Covid vaccines are much more dangerous, less effective, and less necessary than we are told. They also seem not as dangerous, at least in the short term, as some fear. People are not dropping dead in the streets or turning into zombies; most of my vaccinated friends seem to be just fine. So it is hard to know. The science on the issue is so clouded by financial incentives and systemic bias that it is impossible to rely on it to light a way through the murk...
Nor is the foregoing analysis incompatible with the theory that Covid and the vaccination agenda is a totalitarian conspiracy to surveil, track, inject, and control every human being on earth. There can be little doubt that some kind of totalitarian program is well underway, but I have long believed it an emergent phenomenon agglomerating synchronicities to fulfill the hidden myth and ideology of Separation, and not a premeditated plot among human conspirators. Now I believe both are true; the latter subsidiary to the former, its avatar, its symptom, its expression. While not the deepest explanation for humanity’s current travail, conspiracies and the secret machinations of power do operate, and I’ve come to accept that some things about our current historical moment are best explained in those terms.

Whether the totalitarian program is premeditated or opportunistic, deliberate or emergent, the question remains: How does a small elite move the great mass of humanity? They do it by aggravating and exploiting deep psycho-social patterns such as the Girardian. Fascists have always done that. We normally attribute pogroms and genocide to racist ideology, the classic example being antisemitic fascism. From the Girardian perspective it is more the other way around. The ideology is secondary: a creation and a tool of impending violent unanimity. It creates its necessary conditions. The same might be said of slavery. It was not that Europeans thought Africans were inferior and so thus enslaved them. It was that thinking them inferior was required in order to enslave them...
The us of fascism requires a them. The civic-minded moral majority participates willingly, assured that it is for the greater good. Something must be done. The doubters go along too, for their own safety. No wonder today’s authoritarian institutions know, as if instinctively, to whip up hysteria toward the newly minted class of deplorables, the anti-vaxxers and unvaccinated.

Fascism taps into, exploits, and institutionalizes a deeper instinct. The practice of creating dehumanized classes of people and then murdering them is older than history. It emerges again and again under all political systems. Our own is not exempt. The campaign against the unvaccinated, garbed in the white lab coat of Science, munitioned with biased data, and waving the pennant of altruism, channels a brutal, ancient impulse.

Does that mean that the unvaccinated will be rounded up in concentration camps and their leaders ritually murdered? No. they will be segregated from society in other ways. More importantly, the energies invoked by the scapegoating, dehumanizing, pollution-associating campaign can be applied to gain public acceptance of coercive policies, particularly policies that fit the narrative of removing pollution. Currently, a vaccine passport is required to visit certain countries. Imagine needing one to go shopping, drive a car, or exit your home. It would be easily enforceable anywhere that has implemented the “internet of things,” in which everything from automobiles to door locks is under central control. The flimsiest pretext will suffice once the ancient template of sacrificial victim, the repository of pollution, has been established..."
https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/mob-morality-and-the-unvaxxed

(A standalone Part 3 of a series. Part 1, Part 2) Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.– Joseph Goebbels We would like to think that modern societies like ours have outgrown barbaric customs like human sacrifice. Sure, we still engage in sc...

07/08/2021

A team from MIT put together a fascinating study on online research communities. I loved reading it and wanted to share with others to help them try to understand my world. Some of the research communities they studied sounded adjacent to independent research and media communities that I have participated in since before the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic. The full video includes reactions to this recent MIT study plus a review of the ‘pro-mask’ studies cited by it.

Transcript / essay / show notes:
MIT study finds anti-maskers are “grounded in a more scientific rigor”
https://wikiworldorder.org/2021/05/20/mit-study-anti-maskers-more-scientific-rigor-not-less/

Video Versions:
[Trailer]
4 min: https://tinyurl.com/4n9445vj

[FULL Reactions+Research]
151 min: https://tinyurl.com/ur3s8uuh

[Reactions+Research Conclusions] (Parts 1+2)
48 min: https://tinyurl.com/r8t59ypk

[Research Conclusions] (Part 2)
11 min: https://tinyurl.com/rn6ffsd2

[Research Notes] (Appendix A+B)
61 min: https://tinyurl.com/kvk8d467

[Familiar CDC Meme] (Appendix C)
3 min: https://tinyurl.com/pke3atbk

05/08/2021

Klaus at corona restaurant: "For our entrée, we would love to order the chaos."

;-p

04/08/2021

One of the best memes of last month ;-P

22/05/2021

Quotes from reviewing the ‘pro-mask’ ‘establishment’ literature:

“Ten RCTs were included in meta-analysis, and there was no evidence that face masks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
(WHO systematic review in Oct 2019)
https://www.who.int/influenza/publications/public_health_measures/publication/en/

“There is little information on the efficacy of face masks in filtering respiratory viruses and reducing viral release from an individual with respiratory infections …”
(Apr 2020)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2

“Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. … There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
(CDC systematic review in May 2020)
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

“Previous data from randomised trials are mainly for common respiratory viruses such as seasonal influenza, with a systematic review concluding low certainty of evidence for extrapolating these findings to COVID-19.”
(The Lancet systematic review in Jun 2020)
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31142-9/fulltext

“Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of such studies have provided suggestive, although generally weak, evidence.”
(Jun 2020)
https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/pdf/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818

“… there are insufficient data on cloth-based coverings, which are being used by a vast majority of the general public …”
(Jun 2020)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32624649/

“There is low certainty evidence from nine trials (3507 participants) that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask … There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask …”
(Cochrane systematic review in Nov 2020)
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5/full

“Several systematic reviews found no conclusive evidence to support widespread use of masks in public settings to protect against respiratory infectious diseases …”
(Nov 2020)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588529/pdf/20-3003.pdf

“The impact of face masks worn in public on the spread of COVID-19 has yet to be systematically analyzed.”
(Dec 2020)
https://www.pnas.org/content/117/51/32293

“Prior to the [COVID-19] pandemic, the efficacy of community mask wearing to reduce the spread of respiratory infections was controversial because there were no solid relevant data to support their use.”
(Jan 2021)
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776536

“Although evidence suggests that masks help to curb the spread of the disease, there is little empirical research at the population level. … Segmented regression analysis of reported mask-wearing showed no statistically significant change in the slope after mandates were introduced; …”
(Jan 2021)
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776536

------
To me, far more progress must be made on topics like this before high certainty becomes actionable for public policy including fines, jail, or censorship.

Long-form review of over 100 published references throughout conclusions and appendix:
https://wikiworldorder.org/2021/05/20/mit-study-anti-maskers-more-scientific-rigor-not-less

After reading my appendix, if anyone still believes that I’ve missed some overwhelming pro-mask evidence here, then I would be earnestly curious to understand what it is, and why you find it compelling enough to establish a new public health paradigm. ;)

13/05/2021

If some people are acting like the declared pandemic is over, it might be because most states have probably been below 2018 seasonal levels of all-cause mortality for a month or two. ;)

12/05/2021

Classic : Asch conformity experiments were a series of studies directed by Solomon Asch studying if and how individuals yielded to or defied a majority group and the effect of such influences on beliefs and opinions. Developed in the 1950s, the methodology remains in use by many researchers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments

I am forced to put aomething here! It won't let me upload if I don't. So that is another way of getting conformity, through force!

11/05/2021

"Why are we obsessed with danger, and conversely with safety? The Swedish psychiatrist and author David Eberhard comments on the effects that a lockdown has on a population, and on how we feel less and less secure despite arguably living in the safest period of time in human history. David has worked in psychiatry for most of his adult life, at multiple different centers in Stockholm. Since 2019, David is working as the head of staff at PRIMA Maria Addiction Care Clinic.

In addition, he is a bestselling author and active lecturer, focusing on everything from responsibility and human rights and violations of these, to security thinking and child rearing."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43J7hD9I0jY

Why are we obsessed with danger, and conversely with safety? The Swedish psychiatrist and author David Eberhard comments on the effects that a lockdown has o...

10/05/2021

Anyone seen the strongest claims here addressed well?

09/05/2021

Anyone seen an updated systematic review?

07/05/2021

Has anyone seen any studies which estimate impacts of mass-vaccination campaigns on different types of virus mutations?

06/05/2021

Funky face-mapping for . ;-p Dear society, please start by freeing those convicted of "crimes" without victims, and catch up on justice for the [high-level] criminals with countless victims.

For exclusive content or just to support : http://patreon.com/kyledunniganJOIN this channel to get access, behind the scenes/bonus contenthttps://www.youtube...

05/05/2021

Has anyone collected the studies used to define COVID-19 as a novel disease last spring?

05/05/2021

Indi-media also felt more sane when the New York Times finally reported on the critical false-positive/junk-data issue in August. If you haven't heard this angle before, it's worth checking out as it goes more mainstream now: "Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be."

"In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
...
"Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said.

A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less. Those changes would mean the amount of genetic material in a patient’s sample would have to be 100-fold to 1,000-fold that of the current standard for the test to return a positive result — at least, one worth acting on."
...
In July, the lab identified 872 positive tests, based on a threshold of 40 cycles.

With a cutoff of 35, about 43 percent of those tests would no longer qualify as positive. About 63 percent would no longer be judged positive if the cycles were limited to 30.

In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90 percent of people who tested positive in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed negative if the threshold were 30 cycles, Dr. Mina said. “I would say that none of those people should be contact-traced, not one,” he said."

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

The usual diagnostic tests may simply be too sensitive and too slow to contain the spread of the virus.

04/05/2021

"Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t," New York Times, 2007: A whole hospital went through a whole whooping cough epidemic that turned out to be fake, misguided by PCR tests inappropriately being used for diagnosis:

"The second [problem] was with P.C.R., the quick test to diagnose the disease, Dr. Kretsinger said.

With pertussis, she said, “there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,” and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. “We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,” Dr. Kretsinger added...
“If we had stopped there, I think we all would have agreed that we had had an outbreak of pertussis and that we had controlled it,” Dr. Kirkland said.

But epidemiologists at the hospital and working for the States of New Hampshire and Vermont decided to take extra steps to confirm that what they were seeing really was pertussis.

The Dartmouth doctors sent samples from 27 patients they thought had pertussis to the state health departments and the Centers for Disease Control. There, scientists tried to grow the bacteria, a process that can take weeks. Finally, they had their answer: There was no pertussis in any of the samples...
They could only get suitable blood samples from 39 patients — the others had gotten the vaccine which itself elicits pertussis antibodies. But when the Centers for Disease Control tested those 39 samples, its scientists reported that only one showed increases in antibody levels indicative of pertussis...
“It was going on for months,” Dr. Kirkland said. But in the end, the conclusion was clear: There was no pertussis epidemic...
“The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,” Dr. Petti said. “No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R.” "

https://web.archive.org/web/20111226022430/https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20150605073535/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html?pagewanted=2

This case study has been common knowledge in curious independent media since at least August, and I meant to dive into this food for thought more deeply in an essay... but haven't found time yet!-p

Experts say tests that led to a false alarm at a New Hampshire hospital are coming into increasing use.

01/05/2021

Follow The Science: To every totalitarian action there is always opposed an equal reaction.
https://giphy.com/gifs/4ZOfMaEHwn7DaQksUr

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion 's_third_law considered in terms of political [and ] ;-P

30/04/2021

Shared this HuffPo article 11 years ago, "Swine Flu Didn’t Fly." "... On Tuesday, the Council of Europe launched an investigation into whether the World Health Organization “faked” the swine flu pandemic to boost profits for vaccine manufacturers...
The hearing is just latest in a series of investigations into WHO’s propriety, which also include a 2009 Danish Parliamentary review of links between WHO expert - Albert Osterhaus - and makers of the swine flu drugs. Russian lawmaker Igor Barinov has also started an inquiry into WHO’s ties to H1N1 drug makers. In France, Health Minister Roselyne Bachelot was forced to a Paris court on January 4th over swine flu campaign irregularities - including ordering millions unnecessary vaccine doses. Demonstrations over statistical improprieties have taken place in Scotland and Canada.

Inquiries into WHO misdoing are likely to plunge deep into the statistical methods for data collection, however, it takes no expertise to see that health agencies’ data about H1N1 was wildly misleading.

In addition to bad guesses about how many would die, a study released December 7 by the Harvard School of Public Health found that the WHO also estimated the deadliness of H1N1 to be 40 to 250 times higher than it was.

Proving the drug industry squeezed WHO into selling swine flu is very difficult to establish, but the string of clues which points to this corruption is not hard to follow...
One month after swine flu appeared in April, WHO rewrote the definition of “pandemic”. Under the new meaning, a pandemic does not need to cause high numbers of death or illness. A month after changing the definition, with just 144 people dead from H1N1, the flu was given the WHO’s highest threat classification: a “stage-six pandemic alert”. By comparison, the mildest 20th Century pandemic killed a million people.

Before the change, WHO had classified a pandemic as a disease that has “simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.” After the alteration, the organization’s website stated that, “Pandemics can be either mild or severe in the illness and death they cause.” In May, WHO spokesperson Natalie Boudou told CNN that the original definition was an error..."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/niko-kyriakou/swine-flu-didnt-fly_b_438783.html

----
I've come some way since my old blog post, but I still deeply oppose the bio-security state:
"Revolving Door Reversal! Brief Case Study with Swine Flu"
https://wikiworldorder.org/2010/02/04/revolving-door-reversal-brief-case-study-with-swine-flu/

Related to the CDC's 2007-2017 pandemic categories:
https://wikiworldorder.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/cdc-categories-1-1.jpg