22/09/2021
MADAM Edith Gongloe-Weh WRITES
I shared Honorable Younquoi's post because I sense a political motivation to criticize him without understanding the relevance of Honorable Younquoi's concerns as raised therein. Let me remind readers here of the historical trend of road construction and rehabilitation throughout Liberia.
Firstly, I hope that readers are aware that the government of Liberia has the sole obligation for the construction of roads and bridges throughout the country. This includes primary and secondary (farm to market) roads. Prior to the war, the Ministry of Public Works, as the implementer of such responsibility of government, procured tons of road building equipment to carry out its national function, somewhat. The Ministry then established sub-offices in the counties to enable it execute its duties in every county. And it did so to some extent.
For example, some may recall the "public works yard in Ganta and Sanniquillie." Those communities derived their names from being the locations of the Works Ministry's storage for road equipment intended for work in Nimba County. I believe similar warehouses or workshops were in other counties prior to the war.
Fast forward to the 2000s, since the restoration of peace and the ushering in of a constitutional government after the war, the Ministry of Public Works reverted to a contract approach in the ex*****on of its duties- building/rehabilitating roads, with assistance from the donor community. This approach was inadequate to tackle the huge demand for the building and rehabilitation of roads throughout the country, and it remains that way today. Nimba County, with its size and dire need for roads, especially farm to market roads for our largely resilient agricultural population, was hard pressed for road rehabilitation, to put it lightly.
Meanwhile, the ArcerlorMittal Mineral Agreement which was signed in 2005 and amended in 2006, provided the County with an annual benefit of 1.5 million United States Dollars, which we all know about.
Hence, citizens and stakeholders of Nimba County convened a county consultative meeting, in Saclepea in 2006, to discuss ways to utilize the County's portion of the ArcelorMittal annual contribution. It was at this meeting that the decision to purchase road building equipment for the county was unanimously reached.
Following this meeting, there were some attempts to purchase used equipment for the County through the involvement of the Caucus and the Ministry of Internal Affairs in 2008. The deal to purchase used equipment, costing over 3 million United States Dollars, ended in confusion amongst members of the Caucus, the Minister of Internal Affairs and the commercial entity that won the controversial bid to purchase the equipment.
While the case was in court, we became Superintendent of the County in August, 2009. Under our administration, we devised a different approach, learning from the controversy over the bid process. That approach was to avoid the purchase of used and unworthy equipment, which would have definitely been a waste of money, and to purchase brand new fleets of yellow machines with the help of the President. Our intention was to decisively tackle the rehabilitation of our roads, especially our farm to market roads. This was a County decision implemented by us.
Yes, it was our primary goal to ensure that all of our roads are rehabilitated, including primary roads that are impeding the efforts of our farmers within the county. Here is the issue being discussed. When the government wants to do road works in its name, it should use the Ministry of Public Works' equipment. If the Ministry does not have the capacity to carry out its obligation and intends to use the county's equipment, it must be negotiated with the entire caucus, in collaboration with stakeholders in the county.
Here is my argument in support of the concerns raised by Honorable Younquoi. First, please disabuse your minds of politics, if any. Let's consider the fact that Public works does have a set budget for annual road construction and rehabilitation. In fact, the Ministry has one of the highest percentage of our annual national budget. That means that the Ministry already costed all the roads it has to complete within the budget year.
If the Saclepea to Diala road or any other road within the county was, by any chance, captured in the Ministry's annual work plan, then of course it was budgeted for. Yes, it is Nimba and we purchased our equipment to relief our people of the horrible road conditions during this time of the year. I am particularly aware of the condition of the road from Saclepea to Tappita and beyond. It demands urgent attention. However, the Ministry's approach should be a sort of public-private partnership engagement and not the coercive use of power. The Ministry cannot use our machines for the government to take the glory. Who repairs the Machines in case of damage when the government wants to bag the work as one of its accomplishments? And of course some agents and collaborators of the government will soon catalog the work as one of their accomplishments. They want to use what belongs to the County and shamelessly take the credit.
Lastly, the Caucus is a unit comprising nine equal members representing the constituencies of Nimba County. Decisions emanating from that body must meet at least two-thirds of its members. I think the Ministry in collaboration of the Superintendent engaged the situation with gross disregard to stakeholders of the County. If nothing is said, the next time we shall hear that the Ministry has borrowed the machines to work in other counties. I can imagine that some will then argue that the machines are meant for development in the country.
The action of the Ministry in collaboration with the county administration is not in good faith. And did I hear Senator Johnson signed the agreement with the Minister without the participation of his colleagues? To our people in Sacleoea, Tappita, Dialla and all the mega towns along the route, you need relief with the road condition. And no one in their right mind can dispute that. I have shed tears in the past years, just seeing people trapped in the mud for weeks on that road. I am glad that the machines are finally up and functional again to complete critical interventions along the road. The issue is the approach used by this government and its collaborators. The government still owes our money. I mean huge amount! Sadly, instead of paying what they owe, they want to appease us with the use of our own machines.
As I close, let me remind all readers that many detractors, some who are today beating their chest over Nimba's ownership of those machines are the ones who have consistently maligned my character for the purchase of those very same machines! Wow!! The highest level of political hypocracy and deception is at play here. I have been hypocritically accused of taking money when those monies in question were the payments for the very equipment that they are bragging about today! And they know the facts! Shameless!!! Honorable Younquoi is right to question their motives and approach.